Native and European Concept of Warfare

Native and European Concept of Warfare I need at least one primary source for the following paper. My textbook for the class can also be used: American Military HIstory: A survey from Colonial
Times to the Present by William Allison, Jeffrey Grey, and Janet Valentine.

Native and European Concept of Warfare
Native and European Concept of Warfare

I have done the outline and have a working thesis. This is a paper to cover North American colonization and expansion time period.
Working Thesis: From the earliest Native and colonial American encounters, a clash of ideologies, practices, religious beliefs, and modes of warfare
regarding land and sovereignty left the indigenous people in a weakened position in their struggle for survival.
I. European Worldview
A. Pre-Colonization Ideology –
B. Colonization
C. American Colonial Leaders
II. Native Worldview
A. Pre-Colonization History
B. Colonization from Native Perspective
C. Native Leaders
III. Evolution of Native Policies and Tactics and Responses
A. New England Colonies
B. Southern Colonies
C. Middle Colonies
D. United Colonies and Native Responses
IV. Conclusion

The Battle Of Midway World War Two

The Battle Of Midway World War Two Paper will include Strategic, Operational, and Tactical settings for the battle; Commanders Intent/Scheme of Maneuver for both sides; all aspects of METT-TC

The Battle Of Midway World War Two
The Battle Of Midway World War Two

– Mission, Enemy, Terrain, Troops available, Time, and Civilian considerations (describe terrain by using OAKOC-observation and fields of fire, avenues of
the approach, key terrain, obstacles, and cover and concealment.); technology advancements or TTPs utilized that might have allowed one side to have the
advantage over the other and lessons learned that are relevant to future battles. Six months after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States defeated Japan in one of the most decisive naval battles of World War II.

The Revolutionary War for British and Americans

The Revolutionary War for British and Americans Complete a 2- to 3-page paper in which you address the following:
Only the Wars in Afghanistan and Vietnam lasted longer than the Revolutionary War.

The Revolutionary War for British and Americans
The Revolutionary War for British and Americans

Why was the war so long and what were the costs involved in the British and for the Americans? You might consider not only loss of life and munitions but also political, social and actual economic costs. Great Britain is one of many countries who fought in the Revolutionary War in the late 18th century.
Great Britain is the largest island in the British Isles and Europe and lies northwest of Continental Europe.

Inevitable War between Athens and Sparta

Inevitable War between Athens and Sparta To write this paper you have to only be focused on Thucydides History of the

Inevitable War between Athens and Sparta
Inevitable War between Athens and Sparta

Peloponnesian War, Book 1 .the origin of Peloponnesian war remains a point of
controversy in Greek history. this paper will the opportunity to analyze the evidence for yourself. The prof cares mostly about critical thinking and this us
the grading schedule and writer has to follow it,
Focus argument 35%
Structure 25%
Citations 25%
Writing mechanics and style 15%
The writer should use Thucydides text to back up the arguments you make in the body of your paper when citing Thucydides use the book and chapter number, not the page number in referring to the text, e.g, Thuc. 1.20.
You may use either in-text citations or footnotes.limit actual quotations to a bare minimum. . have a well articulated and interesting argument, a clear structure that is easy for the reader to follow, use evidence to back up its arguments.remember that this is Thucydides book using only, if you use
something out cite it! Right a good paper so I can keep ordering from your writer

Civil Rights Movement or the Cold War

Civil Rights Movement or the Cold War Order Instructions: Common Assignment Instructions
For your assignment this section, you will actually be able to research and select your own source to analyze instead of having to work with what I provide!

Civil Rights Movement or the Cold War
Civil Rights Movement or the Cold War

Below you will find a file uploaded with an overview of the assignment, but the basic plan is that you need to use the library database (http://www.sanjac.edu/student-services/helpful-resources-facilities/libraries/article-databases) to find an article about a topic of your choosing from the Civil Rights Movement or the Cold War (1950-1989) and you need to critically analyze the chosen article. Please be thoughtful in your selection, do not just choose the first one that you find! Consider the page length of the article (I would recommend between 8-15 pages to ensure there is enough material to write about but not too much to read), topic (try to use something that you actually find interesting!), and availability (Make sure you search for articles available online in full text, so you don’t find an abstract but no article to go with it). Be sure you do not select a Book Review – you cannot review someone else’s review!

If you have problems accessing the library databases, please use the library contact information because they can ensure that you have access from off-campus. Also, the librarians can often help you find good articles as well so feel free to take advantage of their assistance if you have trouble!

I have posted the overview below so read on for the details of the assignment! Please let me know if you have any questions!

Common Assignment Instructions

I. Reading Selection:

Select an article/monograph pertaining to the historical period covered in this course from a scholarly historical periodical from the San Jacinto College Library System (either in print or through a database.)

II. Preparation of Article Analysis:

A. Content

1. Thesis – Explain the topic of the article as well as the author’s main argument or focus.

2. Evidence – Analyze the evidence that the author uses to support his/her thesis. Does the evidence support his/her thesis? (Please identify any primary sources used.) What qualifications does the author have that make him/her qualified to write on the subject?

3. Conclusion – Provide comments and/or criticisms of the work. Read and comment on one or two contrary perspectives on the topic (one must be primary.) How does this issue affect your world today and does is change your outlook in any way or push you toward any action?

B. Style

1. Typewritten, Double-Spaced on Letter-size (8 1/2″ x 11″) Plain White Paper. Font Size must be Times New Roman 12 point

2. Length -300 words minimum (1-2 pages)

3. Format – Put your name in the upper right-hand corner. Centered at the top of the paper, place the correct Chicago Manual of Style citation for the work. (Parenthetical citation)

San Jacinto Library Article Databases
Use this link to access the library databases. A few tips:

1. Use databases from the “History” tab to ensure good options

2. While you can select any of the databases, the History Reference Center is a great place to start

3. When you search, try to limit your searches to “full text” to make sure you get the whole article

4. Remember, you cannot use a review so make sure you find a full article, not a Book Review

5. Make sure you provide a citation for your article at the end of your article analysis!

http://www.sanjac.edu/student-services/helpful-resources-facilities/libraries/article-databases

Civil Rights Movement or the Cold War Sample Answer

The article Is There a New Cold War? by Stefan, Kiesbye tries to shed light on the likelihood of re-emergence of another cold war. First, logic would dictate that since the USSR and the USA fought as allies during World War II, they would have a strong and friendly relationship. However, this never happened and any imagination that these two superpowers were friendly during WW II is illusory. After WW II, these superpowers had a clash of different ideologies and beliefs especially on communism and capitalism. Both sides vied for international dominance by exploiting every available opportunity for expansion anywhere in the world. However, in 1991 USSR was dissolved to its constituent republics, the Iron curtain got lifted and the cold war was brought to an end. However, recently concerns have been raised on whether in deed the cold war came to an end or if a new one is brewing up.

STEFAN (2010) advances his argument that cold war still exists by giving a number of examples. For instance, he quotes the repercussions of the Georgia-Russia conflict of August 2008 where Georgia was accused by Russia of aggression against South Ossetia. Russia then introduced large-scale air, land, and sea attack on Georgia. The president of the United States intervened and accused Russia of attacking a sovereign state an act that endangers the democratic government that is elected by the people. Consequently, US sent humanitarian aid to Georgia on military aircraft, this was not received well by the Russians. STEFAN, (2010) also points out that the two states have also had disagreements especially on the installation of an American missile shield in Europe, NATO membership as well as the war in Syria where President Putin supports the Syrian president, Assad while the United States does not support how he runs the country. This has also created a conflict between the superpowers. The evidence provided in the article supports the thesis.

The article comprehensively examines the conflicts and rivalries between the United States and other countries. It also focuses specifically on how current events in the world affect Russia and the United States and the potential to spark the war. I find the issue of re-emergence of cold war quite scary. This is because it has the potential of resulting in World War III, an event that I will not like to experience on earth. I feel that the two superpowers should not come up with an amicable solution to their differences so that they can foster and prevent people from living with fthe ear of another world war.

Civil Rights Movement or the Cold War Reference

STEFAN, K. (Ed.). (2010). Is There a New Cold War?. Greenhaven press, ББК: Т3 (7США) 64-64 (2Р) я43 Т3 (2Р) 64-643 (7США) я43.

Revolutionary History Essay Assignment

Revolutionary History
                 Revolutionary History

Please write 1 page essay for each question.
1. Compare the social and political climate in England in the 1760 s with the colonies. How did immigrants from outside England affect the sociopolitical
conditions of the colonies? Were there significant differences in the colonies between the coastal cities and the backcountry? .
2. Summarize and explain the decisions made in the British House of Commons regarding their debts following the French and Indian War and why these decisions were challenged by the colonists. How could Britain have avoided these economic problems? How could Britain have better managed the political fallout in North America? Why was the response so different in Canada? .
3. Explain the actions of the colonists in the 1760s and 1770s and the responses by the British government that led to the political break and the Declaration of Independence. How did the colonists protest these actions? Were the grievances of the colonists legitimate? .
4. Analyze the Declaration of Independence. What were the main arguments for independence? How did the United States live up to these ideals in 1776 and how did it fall short? Did the Declaration of Independence mark a completely new philosophy in government in North America, or was it more of a fulfillment of ideas of the English constitution? .
5. How did American troops fight the Revolutionary War? How did the tactics differ from the British? How was the American army ultimately able to fend off the
more numerous, better-trained British army and its adjuncts? .
When responding to the essay questions, keep in mind that they are essays and not short-answer questions. Essays should be detailed and have resources to support factually based comments. Your answer must state your hypothesis and be supported with detailed information, including dates, specific examples, and material from the readings. The conclusion should follow logically from the information you have presented.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

World War II and Onset of the Cold War P

World War II and Onset of the Cold War
World War II and Onset of the Cold War

World War II and Onset of the Cold War

World War II and Onset of the Cold War

Order Instructions:

You will be providing a bibliography and citations on this two part approximately 4 page essay.

You are free to find quality sources from any appropriate educational website, library or journal.

I prefer footnotes for your citations and please remember to provide the bibliography page at the end. (NOTICE: THE FORMAT FOR BIBLIOGRAPHY AND FOOTNOTES ARE DIFFERENT! USE THE CORRECT FORMAT FOR EACH!)

Using proper format, in a +/-4 page essay, please completely answer the following questions:

1. In your opinion, did the Marshall Plan force the Soviet Union to create the buffer zone?

2. Should the Western Allies have acted to oppose Soviet domination of Eastern Europe?

3. Explain how the situation in Europe immediately following the fall of Germany led directly to the Cold War.

150 pts. RUBRIC: 40 Content 30 Supported Opinion 20 Bibliography 20 Format 20 Citations

SAMPLE ANSWER

World War II and Onset of the Cold War

  1. In your opinion, did the Marshall Plan force the Soviet Union to create the buffer zone? 

In my opinion the Marshall plan did not force the Soviet Union create buffer zone but it made them strengthen their buffer zones. The buffer zones were created earlier before the Marshall plan came into effect. George Marshall, an architect of, World War II was appointed Secretary of state by the then US President Harry Truman. The state department under Marshall with the expertise provided by George Kennan, William Clayton among others crafted the Marshall plan. The plans primary aim was to aid rebuild the European economy. George Marshall earlier speech to the world on June 5, 1947 at Harvard widely known as European Recovery Program (ERP) was one of the pillars that led to the Marshall plan for he was convinced that the restoration of political stability in Europe would be realized on economic recovery. The Americans provided financial aid to the affected countries allied to their capitalistic ideologies (LaFeber, 2013).

The buffer zones created by the Soviet Union came after they successfully defeated the Germans. Berlin was split into two with the Americans and the Soviets in opposing ends. The Soviets overran a number of states setting up communist governments hence creating buffer zones known as Iron curtains in some quarters. The buffer zone’s purpose was a physical entity which signified the territorial barriers gains of the Soviet Union. They allowed the Soviets feel comfortable. The buffer zones helped guard people from escape and the western intrusion.

  1. Should the Western Allies have acted to oppose Soviet domination of Eastern Europe? 

In my opinion the Western allies should not have acted to oppose the USSR’s domination of Eastern Europe for it would have been economically derailing. The major cities and Europe at large was in a terrible state.

That act would have caused counter attack at such a time that the western allies were not ready for another war. The USA had just dropped atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan while the USSR was in a process of developing them. Such attacks would have taken unprecedented long time to repair the already torn world.

Major treaties and agreements that were negotiated after the World War II Would not have come in place without the support on the Soviet Union. If the western allies would have united against the USSR they would have been cooperative at this point. The United Nations would not have been formed neither would the Germany’s surrender have been well. The Soviet Union’s support in the aftermath of the war to repair Europe would not have come if the western allies would have opposed its domination.

Finally, since the Western Allies were in economic depression it’s evident that that would not be a goal after the World War II. Money was needed to repair the damages and helping the displaced people rather than opposing the Soviets. The long cold war that was unavoidable would have caused havoc to the Western Allies who had bad economy. They really needed money to repair their economy but not for war. Opposing the Soviet Union would not have really been an option for they needed them (Hook and Spanier, 2015).

  1. Explain how the situation in Europe immediately following the fall of Germany led directly to the Cold War.

The aftermath of the war was terrible with nearly ¼ of the housing in Germany destroyed and infrastructure was depleted. Inflation was at center stage with millions of homeless people experiencing food shortage. Germany was divided into four zones of American, French, British and Soviet. The American, French and British later merged to form federal republic of Germany. With the USSR occupying East Germany with its Headquarters in Berlin (Todd, 2012).

Russia had lost over 20M of its citizens hence Stalin created a buffer zone for friendly states to make sure than Russia would never be invaded again. The growing in statue of the USSR beyond its boundaries made the USA scared. Tension grew for the fear that USSR would expand towards America. In my view, the USA’s serious thinking on countering the massive expansion of USSR and its own defenses against communism caused the cold war. There was immense secrecy between the two super powers, whereby America did not know the place that Russia was planning to go while Russia didn’t know if USA was going to stop them.

The Marshall plan was another big cause of the cold war. The economic support program by the US secretary of state George Marshall gave money to democratic-torn friendly countries in order to build their economy. The American intention was to alienate the USSR who they did not give financial aid with their partners in the east. All this angered USSR; it made them hate the USA and its allies. Compared to the expansion of Russia, the Marshall plan widely led to the cold war. COMECON was the USSR’s response initiative to the Marshall plan where the Communist states were given financial aid that encountered threats from capitalism. This in turn angered the Americans resulting to cold war (Maddox, 2015).

 References

Hook, Steven W., and John Spanier. American foreign policy since World War II. Cq Press, 2015.

LaFeber, Walter, Richard Polenberg, and Nancy Woloch. THE AMERICAN CENTURY: Volume 2: A History of the United States Since 1941. Vol. 2. ME Sharpe, 2013.

Maddox, Robert James. The new left and the origins of the cold war. Princeton University Press, 2015.

Todd, Allan. History for the IB Diploma: The Soviet Union and Eastern Europe 1924-2000. Cambridge University Press, 2012.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

 

Declaration and War for Independence from Britain

Declaration and War for Independence from Britain INSTRUCTIONS: Assume you have just learned of the Declaration and War for Independence from Britain.

Declaration and War for Independence from Britain
Declaration and War for Independence from Britain

As an African American do you join the revolutionary
army, join the British army? Explain the circumstances around your choice (what factors would influence your decision?).
? KEY TERMS: indentured servitude, Bacon’s Rebellion, task system, Great Awakening, George Whitefield, Moor, Pueblo de Gracia Real de Santa Teresae de Mose,
or "Mose," maroons/cimarron, Stono Revolt (South Carolina), Crispus Attucks, French and Indian War/Seven Years War, John Locke, Thomas Paine/Common
Sense, Lord Dunmore, Loyalists, Esteban/Estebanico, James Beckwourt

Declaration and War for Independence from Britain Essay Paper Writing Instructions

Write a 500-700 word paper in response to the given prompt. To adequately address each question, I would suggest a minimum of 3 main points explored in a
fair amount of detail. The assigned readings should be sufficient to adequately address the topic, and should be the only materials referenced in your
essays. DO NOT CITE FROM OUTSIDE SOURCES.
? Use at least 5 of key terms FROM UNIT 2, and do so in a way that makes clear your understanding of them.
? Be sure to underline key terms.
? You MUST cite from at least 3 sources per essay, and only from the material assigned in the videos and specific reading material given. Should be sited as
follows (Author, p. 10 or Video).
PLEASE USE CITATIONS AND KEY TERMS (WITH THE DEFINITIONS) BELOW: PLEASE DO NOT CITE OUTSIDE SOURCES

Declaration and War for Independence from Britain Sources

1. (citation) ?The idea of natural rights was not a product of the American Revolution, it was not even unique to the colonies. European philosophers had
written extensively about this concept in the 17th century as part of the Enlightenment emphasis on rational, original thought. One hundred years later
wealthy land owners in the colonies seized upon European elitist ideals hoping to use them to unite the diverse colonists in a revolution against British
rule?. (Video, discussion 6)
2. (considered one key term) Thomas Paine, a writer at this time, used everyday language in his essay called ?Common Sense? which denounced the monarchy and
called for ordinary people to support the revolutionary cause.
3. (key term) Paine sometimes used very harsh language in his writings; he referred to Loyalists as cowards, as slaves. (Video, discussion 6)
4. (citation)Paine?s writings were circulated throughout the colonies and even slaves and free blacks picked up the revolutionary rhetoric. (Video,
discussion 6)
5. (citation and key term) If Indentured Servants (people who lost their freedom for a specified number of years, either because they sold it or because they
were being punished for a debt or crime. (Hine, Pg. 36)
6. (citation) The forts did nothing to help the men and women of the frontier, so ?the frontiersmen, black and white alike, rallied behind Bacon to deal with
the Native American problem themselves?. (Video, discussion 5)
7. (key term) Mose was a town the Spanish governor of Florida, Governor Zuniga, created to populate the Spanish Frontier. Mose was a town the Spanish
governor of Florida, Governor Zuniga, created to populate the Spanish Frontier.
8. (citation)Even more frightening for most white people was the Stono rebellion that began at Stono Bridge within 20 miles of Charleston in September 1739.
(Hine, Pg. 71)
9. (citation) It is no coincidence that the Stono rebellion took place only one year after the Mose colony was founded. It became clear the Spanish were
enticing the black slaves to run away from the British Colony and join the Colony at Moes. (Video, discussion 4)
10. (citation and key term) Bacon?s Rebellion basically created race-based slavery. Nathaniel Bacon was an English aristocrat who had migrated to Virginia.
?The immediate cause of his rebellion was a disagreement between him and the colony?s royal governor Lord William Berkeley over Indian Policy?. (Hine, Pg.
56)
11. (key term) The great awakening was a religious movement were slaves are converted to Christianity. The great awakening is important to race-based slavery
because the law stated that slaves who were not Christians in their native land would be slaves.
12. (key term and citation) The enlightenment ideology made popular in politics by John Locke in his essay "Concerning human understanding" he
maintained that human society, like the physical universe ran according to natural laws. He contended that at the base of human laws were natural rights all
people shared as well as the notion that the human mind at birth was tabula rasa, meaning knowledge and wisdom were not inherited but acquired through
experience thus meaning with education all people could learn and advance (Hine, pg.74).

Similarity in Napoleonic War Era and Warfare Today

Similarity in Napoleonic War Era and Warfare Today Order Instructions: 1. Create a two pages argumentative essay on the following:

Similarity in Napoleonic War Era and Warfare Today
Similarity in Napoleonic War Era and Warfare Today

Support the argument that the war in the Napoleonic era was fundamentally similar to warfare practiced today. Use evidence to justify the argument.
2. Each major points must tie a specific innovation from the Napoleonic era with modern warfare.
3. Keep in mind that while you can comment on the implications of the topic of your essay in relation to the current military force, should really present a history
essay.
The essay will be evaluated on the ability to use it as a tool to inform professional judgment.

Similarity in Napoleonic War Era and Warfare Today Sample Answer

 

War in the Napoleonic era is fundamentally similar to warfare practiced today

Napoleonic era war and modern warfare are fundamentally similar according to my own view. The military revolution, as many scholars will put, brought in innovations in warfare from artillery to the general organization of the army (Parker, 2001). Revolution in the military refers to the use of technology in military systems consisting of innovative operational concepts and organizational adaptation in a manner that changes the conduct and features of a conflict (Guy, 2004). Many history researchers believe that it was the revolution that engineered modern political, cultural and government bureaucracy. It is indeed this transformation that overtook Europe at a time when she was at the top of the globe (Moore, 2006). But amidst all, the question that remains is this: Has there been a fundamental change in warfare or it remains the same as during the Napoleonic era in France?

Considering specific innovations, it is indeed factual that warfare has fundamentally remained the same. The Napoleon revolution is viewed in four aspects. It encompassed strategy, artillery, firearms, and movement. For any military commander, these cannot escape their attention. Napoleon employed strategies to defeat his opponents. He divided his army into divisions and corps (Chandler, 2006). He aimed at destroying his enemy completely. He employed both grand and operational strategy, where he used both political and economic measures to wage war. He would ask his officers to use the man-oeuvre (move on the rear) to battle and dictate how and where the battle will progress. Using this strategy, the French army was able to gain victory by splitting the allied army. They would apply flanking and central positioning, attacking their opponents unexpectedly (Moore, 2006). This approach would leave the opponents with no option and Napoleon would now draw a new battle line as he advanced his conquest and effectively leading to the surrender of the opponents’ army and subsequent victory for him. This is actually the modern guerrilla warfare that is being waged in many conflict areas like Syria, and civil wars in many parts of the world particularly in Africa. Napoleon advanced his wars with the help of new artillery that had been developed almost in every European nation. The French developed cannons and guns like the Gribeauval guns between 1774 and 1775 (Guy, 2004). They also had pounders of within 6 to 8 inch. These two forms of artillery were Napoleon’s choice because they were lighter than any European standard at the time. Along with artillery, the army had vast quantities of mortar, furnace bombs, grapes and canister shots that provided substantial fire support. These artilleries played a huge role in the war at the sea.

Most ships would contain anywhere from 50-100 cannons. For instance, in 1798, Napoleon flagship L’orient, with 120 guns, became the most heavily armed vessel in the world. This quick destructive artillery force enabled Napoleon to win many of his wars (Chandler, 2006). Today many nations have built artillery and cannons that were used in the two world wars. Many suicide bombers conveniently assemble mortars and use them to bomb enemies and western forces in Iraq and conflict areas of the world like Somalia. Naval ships were developed as an addition to the Napoleonic L’orient in 1798 (Guy, 2004).

The period also saw a revolution in firearms. Napoleon would equip his army with the Musket Model, the 1777 Charleville, which was indeed a product of perfection from the older models. His infantry was well trained to fire even three volleys a minute. They were always armed with a pistol as the secondary weapon to their swords. Soldiers were supposed to carry swords, bayonets, and pickets in addition to their guns (Moore, 2006). Calvary, officers, sergeants and other higher-ranking officials used swords while bayonets were equipped to the majority of infantry soldiers. During this era, rifles were also introduced into battlefields. They were more accurate to a maximum of 200 paces’ range (Moore, 2006). However, they took longer to load. This did not please Napoleon and he refused to use it in his army. He settled for the speed of the musket that was good in rapid maneuvers. However, many nations used the rifles. For instance, the British 95th regiment was entirely formed to use the rifle (Guy, 2004). The Germans too incorporated the use of a rifle in smaller numbers by their companies. Therefore, this Napoleonic innovation gave birth to how early modern warfare would be fought. Later, the British lost General Robert Ross to the American rifle fire in 1814. This shows how this Napoleonic innovation had spread across the Atlantic Ocean (Wilhoyt, 1999). Today, the rifle with additional technological modification is used by most of the elite forces in the world.

Napoleon’s largest advantage was in the movement of his troops. He insisted on extreme speed when conducting the marches, movements, and attacks of his army (Parker, 2001). In his own words, “Loss of time is irreparable; I may lose a battle but I should not lose time”. A number of factors contributed to Napoleon’s ability to perform these flexible movements. He divided his army into independent corps systems, avoided slow-moving and lengthy supply lines (Moore, 2006). Today, to win the war, troops should feed themselves using Napoleonic idea of the constant supply line and move with speed to ambush the enemy or get the enemy unaware. Napoleon’s army lived on supplies from the ground where they waged war (Guy, 2004). They indeed had “A war must feed itself.” He went on to acquire food from the surrounding environment either by paying friendly countries or simply foraging. Napoleon had the ability to persuasively inspire his troops to victories in a big and dominant way. This left his opponents confused and unsettled. His intricate organization of troops and strategic co-ordination had profound success (Chandler, 2006).

Conclusively, the tactics developed in the Napoleonic era are still in much use today. Warfare has not fundamentally changed. It is still being won through diplomacy, information, use of artillery, an organization of the troops and the flexible movement by which the troops can move. Military strategies have been developed just like the Napoleonic time. Warzones today are still manned with similar strategies revolutionized by Napoleon. Guerrilla tactics are employed to win wars just as seen in the era of Napoleon. The Napoleonic era coupled with the French revolution changed drastically how war is waged today. For once, there was a difference in military culture that existed in Europe before and after the revolution. For example, soldiers now live in barracks and not with the civilian population. Here, they are provided with housing and support facilities. Military academies have been established where soldiers are professionally trained. Today, soldiers wear uniforms to distinguish themselves from civilians. The military is a full-time engagement unlike before when only mercenaries were on full engagement.

Similarity in Napoleonic War Era and Warfare Today References

Chandler, D. (2006). The Campaigns of Napoleon. The Macmillan Company: Toronto

Ontario.

Guy, C. (2004). Teaching in the shadow of the Military Revolution. Journal of Military History,             32(2), 1-10

Moore, R. (2006). Napoleonic Guide: Weapons of War, Infantry.

Parker, G. (2001). The Cambridge History of Warfare. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Wilhoyt, L. (1999). Military Organization: The Change from Professional to Conscript       Armies, 19th and Early 20th Centuries (Command and General Staff College).

The Illegitimacy of Chaplains in German Army in WWII

The Illegitimacy of Chaplains in German Army in WWII
The Illegitimacy of Chaplains in German Army in WWII

The Illegitimacy of Chaplains in German Army in WWII

Order Instructions:

Discussing the legitimacy of the WWII German Chaplains.
1.First, you will argue the illegitimacy of the German Chaplains from a historical and biblical basis.
2.Second, you will argue the legitimacy of the German Chaplains from a historical and biblical basis.

NO PLAGARISM OR COPYING PLEASE

SAMPLE ANSWER

The Illegitimacy of Chaplains in German Army in WWII

From a historical perspective, Chaplains in the German army served an illegitimate cause given the fact that they rendered their services to an army that became infamous for one of the most gruesome genocides in recent history. The traditional role of a Chaplain has always been to so to say ‘bless the cannons.’ What this means is that by working within the ranks of the German soldiers, they led their flock into believing that their work was sanctioned by God. This then served to tarnish the name of the Catholic church given that majority of them came from this Christian group.

From a Biblical point of view Chaplains in the German army is again illegitimized. This is because individuals in the Bible who served in roles tantamount to Chaplaincy served as the conscience of the army. This includes prophets like Samuel who ensured the soldiers adhered to their objective while maintaining a good moral standing. Evidence that emerged recently suggests that there were several incidents of murder of innocents and looting, activities that are obviously sinful and therefore condemned by scripture (Bergen, 2004).

Legitimacy of Christian Chaplains from a Historical and Biblical perspective

The fact that many of the soldiers in the Wehrmacht were serving away from home meant that it was necessary for them to continue being ministered to. Other than the distance factor the theater of war exposed them to many horrors that could have led anyone to have an acute spiritual crisis especially considering the fact that they had to come to terms with mortality first hand. As such it was essential for them to have someone minister to them, much in the same way prophets did in the Old Testament.

From a historical point of view they were very much legitimized with respect to the objective their government had. As much as it is unacceptable to many, the government was pushing a Nazi agenda and for this to work they needed to use all tools at their disposal. One of their most favored tools was propaganda. Having ‘men of the cloth’ among the ranks of soldiers helped to pacify their consciences and thus accomplish their objectives in the short run.

References

Bergen, Doris L. The Sword of the Lord: military chaplains from the first to the twenty-first century. Univ of Notre Dame Pr, 2004.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!