The subject is American History. You must read from this text book Discovering The American Past 7th Edition. Chapter 8 Japanese Internment from page 236 to 259. What were the constitutional issues involved in Korematsu v. United States? In your opinion, did the facts presented support the claim that the military situation justified the temporary suspension of parts of the Constitutions? Use the documents in Chapter 8 of DAP to respond to this prompt. Be sure to use the documents to explain your answer. How to Answer a Document Based Question (DBQ)
Your Document-Based Question should be 4 typed pages. To answer a DBQ, follow these steps
1. Try to answer the prompt in one or two sentences. This will be your argument or “thesis.”
2. Develop at least three reasons why your answer is correct. Each reason will be the topic of one paragraph in your essay.
3. Pick at least six pieces of evidence (two for each reason) to support the arguments you will make in the essay. Read the sections on “Method” and
“Questions to Consider” in Discovering the American Past (DAP) carefully–they will give you some hints about how to analyze the evidence.
4. Begin to write with an introduction that states your thesis and the reasons you believe your answer is correct. Next, write a paragraph about each reason,
using the evidence you have identified to support your argument. Remember that you must explain WHY you believe your evidence supports your argument–it is not enough simply to list the evidence. Finish with a conclusion that summarizes your argument. Additional notes: this is an essay, so it has to have a conclusion, as well as the references from the text book (Discovering The American Past)chapter 8.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Based upon your reading of the selected primary documents and incorporating such secondary sources as your textbook, answer the following 4 questions. Provide specific examples from these documents that support your arguments.
1. What perceptions of “others” are reflected attending Miss Columbia’s School House (Document 1)? How does Aguinaldo’s criticism of America’s policies towards the Philippines (Document 2) echo the 1894 political cartoon? What do these two documents suggest about the way America perceived conquered peoples and the likelihood that they would ever be fit for American citizenship and its liberties?
2. What relationship does President Eisenhower draw between events in the modern Civil Rights Movement and the goals of the US in waging the Cold War (Document 3)? How does the Alcatraz Proclamation (Document 4) and “The Soiling of Old Glory” photograph (Document 5) reflect the increasing radicalization of the Civil Rights Movement by the 1970s as well as the violent responses it could produce within Anglo American communities? Based upon Eisenhower’s speech, how do you believe he would respond to Documents 4 and 5 in the context of the Cold War?
3. According to President Reagan (Document 6), what does “having a positive view of American history” mean and what values does the country stand for? What should modern Americans think of their country’s past in regards to race relations according to Senator Obama (Document 7)? Do you agree with these documents arguments about America’s past? Why or why not?
4. Based upon your reading of these documents, to what extent do you believe America’s past continues to influence American society and modern debates about inequality? Does our past and efforts to confront and resolve issues of inequality empower us with a moral authority to dictate world affairs today? Why or why not?
SAMPLE ANSWER
What perceptions of “others” are reflected attending Miss Columbia’s School House (Document 1)? How does Aguinaldo’s criticism of America’s policies towards the Philippines (Document 2) echo the 1894 political cartoon? What do these two documents suggest about the way America perceived conquered peoples and the likelihood that they would ever be fit for American citizenship and its liberties?
Americans have a superior view of themselves. To them, their way of life is superior to all others. For everybody else, the opportunity to be American is to be cherished above all. The view projected to everybody else is that America is the land of opportunity where everything is possible if only to the brave who are willing to apply themselves accordingly (Aguinaldo, 1899).
Unfortunately, this is far from the truth. America is a disorganized society which expends considerable energy trying to create a semblance of order (Aguinaldo, 1899). To America, it views are superior to all others. When there is competition between two views, the Americans will push for their view disregarding any other view that may be there and which they do not view as adding value to the American view.
Americans view everybody else in need of their help in developing. Thus to America, all have to put away their personalities and identities and take up that which the Americans define them by (Aguinaldo, 1899). However, despite the low opinion that America holds of its conquered people, the conquest does offer the best chance at development – as defined by America.
American views itself as a mother to the conquered who need her love and guidance to develop to their best potential. This makes her the only source of knowledge and her standards and definitions become the law to all. Dissenting views are tolerated if they do not conflict the overall American view. When in conflict, America employs all her power and might to push through her view (Aguinaldo, 1899). Despite its clear and obvious flaws the American way still offers better prospects than the others.
What relationship does President Eisenhower draw between events in the modern Civil Rights Movement and the goals of the US in waging the Cold War (Document 3)? How does the Alcatraz Proclamation (Document 4) and “The Soiling of Old Glory” photograph (Document 5) reflect the increasing radicalization of the Civil Rights Movement by the 1970s as well as the violent responses it could produce within Anglo American communities? Based upon Eisenhower’s speech, how do you believe he would respond to Documents 4 and 5 in the context of the Cold War?
The modern Civil Rights Movement championed the implementation of goals that would spread out the enjoyment of a better life to many – especially those who previously did not. Where as in the cold war the desire was for the populations living under communism to taste, have access and enjoy capitalism – the superior economic system, the Civil Rights Movement fought to have the blacks enjoy equal rights as everybody else – democracy (Eisehower, 1957).
After trying passive demand of addressing historical injustices and making right the wrongs perpetuated on a race, the civil right movement decided if they could not get what they were demanding for in peace, they could as well take it be force. Increasing, the civil rights movement gravitated towards the use of violence – albeit minimal at the start, as a way of eliciting response from oppressors (Strange & Loo, 2001). Even though in some instances the Civil Rights Movement could have been accused of going overboard with their tactics, the value importance of what was being fought for especially among those fighting for it, was very higher – higher than a reasonable citizen would probably assign to it.
President Eisenhower would have responded by directing the implementation of all the civil rights with immediate effect. President Eisenhower all through his presidency distinguished himself as a defender of the civil rights of all population (Strange & Loo, 2001). In the context of the cold war, the president would have worked extra hard to ensure that all that the capitalist economy prides itself with as being different from the communists actually work and is beneficial to the practitioners.
According to President Reagan (Document 6), what does “having a positive view of American history” mean and what values does the country stand for? What should modern Americans think of their country’s past in regards to race relations according to Senator Obama (Document 7)? Do you agree with these documents arguments about America’s past? Why or why not?
Having a positive view of American history is according to President Reagan making a deliberate effort of focusing only on the positive in the American narrative (Reagan, 1983). It means choosing to view America as a nation that has moral values that it espouses and practices. This meaning is best captured in the case of citizens who came together with a view to establishing a program focusing of girls in view of the significant and worrying increase in illegitimate births and abortions. This is especially aggravated by the fact that the majority of these girls are below the legal consent age – they are actually minors.
Despite this honorable endeavor, by dispensing advice and birth control drugs and devices to minors without consent from their parents is a violation of the rights of a parent (Reagan, 1983). The parents need to know what their children are being taught. After all, they are the ones who have to bear the consequences’ of the choices made by their children.
As a country, it does have values that are largely pro-life. It is the view of the county that is as much there is a significant increase in the number of illegal abortions and unwanted births, advice on and access to birth control drugs and devices to underage girls can only be allowed with the express authority of the parents.
According to Senator Obama, modern American need to ashamed and proud of the past interactions with regards to race relations (Obama, 2008). It is the senators’ view, which the past shows where the society failed in its obligations to the minorities in society. Conversely, the nation managed to overcome deep racial difference to emerge a strong nation where each has an equal opportunity at success if they apply themselves.
It is true America’s past has some very rotten and unpalatable instance Obama, B (2008). However it is this history that is also shackled with instance of success that offers the present generation grounding when dealing with race relations.
Based upon your reading of these documents, to what extent do you believe America’s past continues to influence American society and modern debates about inequality? Does our past and efforts to confront and resolve issues of inequality empower us with a moral authority to dictate world affairs today? Why or why not?
It is clear that the American past does influence the American society view of inequality presently. When debating inequality, the American society draws great lessons from the past to dictate how it reacts to different stimuli within the environment. Despite monument’s failure in race relations within America in the past, the country has made significant investment in improving race relations.
The past failures act as constant reminders of the country of the price to be paid for not putting in place strategies that address race issues. The lessons learnt on race relations are the basis for the current interaction in the race debate.
Whereas it could be argued that America’s past record with regards to inequality make it as guilty as everybody else, the lessons learnt and strategies developed and employed to ensure discrimination is eradicated could make America a contributor to the global standard on morality. American despite its poor equality past has emerged as an important case study when learning how to deal with world affairs in the present world. In today’s world, America does indeed stand in power to offer direction with regards to moral authority to dictate world affairs.
References
Aguinaldo, E (1899) Emilio Aguinaldo Criticizes American Imperialism in the Philippines, Reading the American Past: Selected Historical Documents, Vol. 2, pp. 96-99
Nutter, K. B (2010) The Soiling of Old Glory: The Story of a Photograph that Shocked America, The Journal of Popular Culture, Vol. 43, No. 3, pp. 659-660
Colonial Society in period Leading to American Revolution Order Instructions: Discuss the changes to Colonial society in the period leading to the American Revolution.
Colonial Society in period Leading to American Revolution
Be certain to discuss the reasons for the changes and what the results of these changes were. In other words, trace the “cause and effect” of the alterations in American society. What did these changes mean to the common man? What did they mean for the collective colonies and their relationship to the “mother country”? Be certain to provide specific information on at least two colonies.
Colonial Society in period Leading to American Revolution Sample Answer
Colonial Society
There were changes to colonial society in the period leading to the American Revolution. These changes had a considerable effect on American society. One of the changes was the increased need to protest for religious freedom. Most Americans in Boston and Massachusetts wanted the church to be separated from the government. This led to people of these colonies to come together to fight the British. This change is important to a common person as it gives the opportunity to freedom to profess and to maintain an opinion in issues of the religion of which shall not affect the civil liberties (Kammen & Wilson, 2013). Another change in the colonial society that led to the American Revolution is increasingly aware of women about their rights and freedoms. This move prompted women of both colonies to unite to fight a common enemy (British) to regain the political freedoms and equal rights for themselves. This change is important to a common person as it exhibits the fact that woman is responsible to instill America’s moral values to generations, and cannot be exempted in fighting for any freedom or right.
Before the revolution, societies in Massachusetts and Boston had started experiencing concentrated hereditary aristocracy. Therefore, the people in these colonies saw the need to dismantle this type of aristocracy while maintaining the social hierarchy (Kammen & Wilson, 2013). This made the people come together to fight for a country in which there will be equality in property ownership. This move was to counteract British laws that restricted white males only to own a certain amount of money (Kammen & Wilson, 2013). This is crucial to the common person as equal opportunities in society bring about self-determination and improvement. In summary, therefore, all the changes made the people of the colonies be patriotic to their mother country (America). There was a need to deal with an external problem before tackling the problem within themselves.
Colonial Society in period Leading to American Revolution References
Kammen, C., & Wilson, A. H. (2013). Encyclopedia of local history. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
In what states (states not cities) does the Dust Bowl strike?
What “environmental cataclysm” brings on the Dust Bowl?
By 1936 how much money are farmers losing a day?
WW11
1) Describe the D-Day invastion. (Who invaded? Where? Why? How so?) [The best depiction of D-Day is the beginning of the Steven Spielberg film Saving Private Ryan. If you have time, watch this film or re-watch it.]
2) How did women in America help fight WWII? Specifically, who was “Rosie the River” and what did this character encourage women to do?
3) What was the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944? What was decided at this international meeting that propelled the US to the superpower it became?
4) What was the “GI Bill”? What all did it do for returning vets (and can you discern how these benefits would change life in the US for this generation)?
Be sure to know key terms and ideas from my posted notes, ok?
Who was Carrie Nation?
A protestant that opposed manufacturing and selling of alcohol. She attacked breweries and smashed bottles of alcohol.
After WWI, support for Prohibition grew “by three factors”. What were these?
New soldier recruits could be tempted to drink alcohol
To conserve grain
Anti-Germany, sentiments against beer manufacture
Prohibition is repealed in 1933, and what couple of Depression-era rationales supported the repeal?
Great depression
Help farmers to sell grain to make alcohol
Government could get revenue by taxing alcohol brewers
Why did many African-Americans migrate north to big cities around the time of WWI, according to the video?
Were renowned for what they did. Moved to explore and to lead better lives
Artist and intellectuals for artistic exploration
what musical becomes a crossover smash hit?
Shuffly music
What caused the Harlem Renaissance to “fade”?
Crush of stock market
3) Many Moods of Al Capone (2:00)
1) How did Capone and his mafia make money?
He worked in a bowling alley
2) How was he a philanthropist?
He created a citywide program and gave free milk to school kids
3) List THREE other facts you found interesting about his life.
Invented gasoline that powered vehicle -automobile
How did Ford take better care of his employees than other industrialists?
Paid competitive wages
For whom were Model T Fords built, making them different from cars in the past?
What did banks do that regular people were also doing before the Crash?
Speculating stock prices
What’s a bank run?
A situation where depositors demand for their deposits in bank but the bank does not have money to give them
What happened to many, many thousands of people who were ready to retire?
They could not get their money as banks did not have money
7) Dust Storms Strike America (2:56)
In what states (states not cities) does the Dust Bowl strike?
Colorado, New Mexico, Texas, Kansas and Oklahoma among others
What “environmental cataclysm” brings on the Dust Bowl?
Extensive deep plowing
By 1936 how much money are farmers losing a day? More than $1dollars
WW11
1) Describe the D-Day invasion. (Who invaded? Where? Why? How so?) [The best depiction of D-Day is the beginning of the Steven Spielberg film Saving Private Ryan. If you have time, watch this film or re-watch it.]
The D-Day invasion occurred on 6 June 1944. The Allied forces invaded Germany at the seaborne. This invasion led to the restoration of French Republic as well provided contribution to Allied victory during the war.
2) How did women in America help fight WWII? Specifically, who was “Rosie the River” and what did this character encourage women to do?
They took the role of men who participated in the WWI. Rosie the River was a woman that worked in factories that manufactured ammunitions and war equipment. She encouraged women to support their men counterparts and championed social movement that saw an increased number of women get jobs.
3) What was the Bretton Woods Conference in 1944? What was decided at this international meeting that propelled the US to the superpower it became?
Was a meeting that brought together delegates from 44 nations (Allied) at Mount Washington Hotel. Contributed to the formation of International Monetary Fund
4) What was the “GI Bill”? What all did it do for returning vets (and can you discern how these benefits would change life in the US for this generation)?
A law that provides various benefits to veterans that returned after World War II. The law allowed various benefits such as low interest rates for starting a business, low cost mortgages, expenses to attend university, vocational education of high school, cash benefits, one-year unemployment compensation.
The benefits would change the current General if they were provided. The veterans’ would be in a position to lead good lives as well further their education to impact on the society.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Reflection Paper on the History of Chaplaincy Order Instructions: The historical roots of chaplains from the Roman imperial period, 27 BC–1600 AD will be examined.
Reflection Paper on the History of Chaplaincy
This broad historical sweep of chaplain history starts with religious figures assisting in pagan worship, but takes a dramatic leap forward when Emperor Constantine Christianizes the Roman army and takes priests and deacons with him to battle. Further, the researcher will note that by the mid-thirteenth century, the sacramental and moral aspects of the chaplain’s office had achieved a firm basis in law. Finally, it may be observed that the Protestant Reformation and wars of religion propelled chaplaincy to the shores of the American continent.
Write a 3-page paper (following the current Turabian edition) explaining the emergence of the chaplaincy from its infancy in 27 BC until 1600 AD and the evolution of the chaplain’s ministry opportunities. what is now called “The Chaplain.” This assignment will require at least 3 distinct sources.
NO PLAGIARISM OR COPYING PLEASE
Reflection Paper on the History of Chaplaincy Sample Answer
Reflection Paper, the history of Chaplaincy
Introduction
The position of the Chaplain as it is known today is not a modern creation. It is more of a work in progress that has been constantly undergoing changes for just above two millennia. The evolution of the role of the chaplain has been precipitated by the constantly changing needs of the members of the militaries and their masters the governments that sponsor them. The only thing that has remained constant throughout the ages is the need for a figurehead to provide spiritual guidance to foot soldiers as well as their commanders. The manner in which this has been carried out is what has defined Chaplaincy through the different periods. In this exercise, Chaplaincy will be analyzed with respect to its historical development right from the time this concept first emerged around 27BC up until the 1600AD.
Chaplains in the Military during the Roman Imperial Period
The Imperial Roman period took place between 27 AD and 500 BC. During this period the military was the most treasured organization within the government and this is because it provided foot soldiers who defended the empire, helped expand it and also maintained its legitimacy within its borders. This is to say that the military carried out the work assigned to today’s policemen or law enforcement personnel. Their biggest role, however, was that of battle and this meant that they had to use whatever leverage they could get to overcome their opposition on the battlefield. This called for dependence on a higher power who would help tilt the odds in their favor in light of the strenuous and unpredictable nature of battle coupled with the grave implications held by a win or loss.
Prior to Emperor Constantine’s action of introducing Christianity to Rome, the prevalent religion was Paganism. What this shared in common with Christianity was a belief that the fate of humans was controlled by beings or a being that wielded great supernatural powers. As such the Roman society strove very hard to demonstrate its allegiance to the Pagan deities so as to ensure good favor for itself, a key part of this being religious victory. The importance of this meant that there were specific priests who were given the responsibility of taking the soldiers through their worship sessions so as to ensure they were at peace with the gods prior to and during any battlefield engagement. Here is where Chaplaincy has its roots as it is the first instance in history where there was a need for a person whose key purpose was to provide spiritual guidance in a military. These individuals oversaw religious ceremonies and rituals being carried out by the army.
Emperor Constantine is often credited as being the man who converted the Roman Empire to Christianity from its Pagan way of life. While this is true to a great extent, it is also true that his move had the impact of Romanizing Christianity and this refers to the inclusion of practices that were exclusively Roman into Christian practices. Key among this was the application of spiritual leadership within the military. All of this was achieved through the emperor’s action of reversing the edict that had rendered Christianity a banned sect. this move effectively provided legitimacy to the appointment of Priests to lead the Soldiers in Christian practices so as to appease God an win his favor, something Constantine believed was crucial for the success of the Roman Military. Priests and Deacons became a permanent fixture during the battle under his orders and they also prayed for victory among other activities they carried out (Bergen, The Sword of our Lord).
In the 13th Century, the role of the Chaplain became more defined effectively making such a person’s role much more than blessing the weapons that soldiers were going to use in the battlefield. The office of Chaplain gained recognition by the highest levels of government in the 13th Century when they were now being included as part of the Navy with each of the King’s ships being expected to have a Chaplain. This was supported by the fact that Church and state did not exist as separate entities during this period. During the protestant revolution when Martin Luther spearheaded a rebellion against the Roman Catholic Church the role of chaplains also transformed depending on the religious orientation of the army or government they served (Vallance, Revolutionary England and the National Covenant). During this period the prominence of Chaplains grew in predominantly Protestant regions such as the United Kingdom whose dependence on its military, specifically the Royal Navy grew tremendously. Given that the United Kingdom rose to be a super-power prior to the World Wars, it got to spread a protestant model of Chaplaincy to many countries, the United States included.
Another factor that led to the appreciation of Chaplains in the United States Military was the apparent moral authority-vacuum that presented itself during the civil war. The need for chaplains within the ranks of the army became clear when many of the young soldiers overindulged in antisocial behaviors of the time such as gambling and drunkenness among others making it difficult for them to render their services effectively in the crucial battle. Abraham Lincoln then ordered the commanders of all regiments to appoint Chaplains. Many in the North looked down upon the South whose soldiers were considered undisciplined for lack of an effective spiritual guidance system. The Confederates are said to have been too keen to have men able to fight rather than have disciplined units, something that could have contributed to their defeat (Beringer, Why the South lost the War).
Reflection Paper on the History of Chaplaincy References
Bergen, Doris L. The Sword of the Lord: military chaplains from the first to the twenty-first century. Univ of Notre Dame Pr, 2004.
Vallance, Edward. Revolutionary England and the National Covenant: State Oaths, Protestantism, and the Political Nation, 1553-1682. Boydell Press, 2005.
Beringer, Richard E., Archer Jones, and William N. Still. Why the south lost the Civil War. University of Georgia Press, 1991.
For this assignment, you will analyze the major points of George Washington’s “Farewell Address” and write a 3-page analysis, considering contemporary government and including differing points of view.
Your analysis must adhere to the following specifications:
• No more than 3 double-spaced pages (12-point font with 1-inch margins).
• Must include a title page (not counted in total page number) that contains:
o A title,
o Your name,
o Your section (GOVT 200-S02),
o Your instructor’s name, and
o The date the assignment is due (all single-spaced in the footer of the cover page).
• No page number is necessary for the cover page or for the first page in the body of the paper.
• Pay particular attention to the grading rubric for how your paper will be graded.
SAMPLE ANSWER
Washington’s Farewell Address
George Washington was a prudent man endowed with acerbic wits; in 1796 he gave a farewell address to tell the elector’s that he would rather retire than accept another term as the U.S President. Washington gave sound judgments in all things, and just before his retirement he gave the famous farewell address highlighting the defects that he thought would be detrimental to American liberty. Having worked in a republican government he was thoroughly acquainted with its workings, and he knew ways in which it could be misused.
From the beginning of his address, George Washington seeks to defend a well-built, central government. The point he was passing across was not that autocratic governance would usurp power from the citizens and impose its will on them but rather a sturdy system that would shelter the citizenry and make sure that their liberties are protected (SENATE DOCUMENT NO. 106–21, WASHINGTON, 2000). He requested the Americans to be united in purpose and have a feel of oneness; he wanted them to feel as though they belonged to one nation irrespective of the states they come from. Washington also wanted to reinforce the power of the newly implemented constitution which safeguards individual welfare and the rights of the U.S citizens. He knew united Americans would be strong; but alienation would make them weak and vulnerable (Ellis, 2001).
The other element that Washington addressed was the harm that political parties would precipitate. Since every person would seek to back his identity with his state and background, there were high chances that regional parties would tear down federal unity. Union in his terms is considered as the main strut of individual liberty; he challenged the Americans to preserve each other through bonds of love. In the modern America unity has been sustained but the regional parties as Washington feared are the very vehicles that threaten the future American unanimity (SENATE DOCUMENT NO. 106–21, WASHINGTON, 2000). George Washington hated parties and wanted them thrown out, although to the modern thinker this kind of approach serves to throttle democracy and cannot be accepted in the modern American society. Nonetheless, Washington did not hate the parties per se he feared that selfish individuals would use parties as vehicles of disrupting unity in order to take power for themselves.
The manner in which the democrats and the republicans compete displays the spirit of revenge that George Washington prophesied long time ago. Despotism has been rampant in the party politics as one party seeks to exert itself, or by implementing policies intended to serve one ideology over the whole nation. Washington foretold that when people became disorderly and miserable they would seek security and recline in the unconditional power of the party leader (SENATE DOCUMENT NO. 106–21, WASHINGTON, 2000). For instance, the terrorist revolt compelled George Bush to take more power than the presidents had before. Economic down times also pushed Barrack Obama to add to the presidential power. In these two cases, the leading parties accorded presidents’ power through great lenience in what they did. As the U.S citizenry continue to support the dynamic rivalry between the national parties they allow them to groom powerful figures who take advantage of the citizens.
Creating powerful presidents poses a great danger as it could give hem liberties to change the constitution and this could compromise on the rights and privileges of the U.S citizens. Washington wanted the U.S citizens to have mutual checks that would ensure that political power is not abused; this could only be achieved if political power was distributed into diverse depositaries, ordaining each to be the guardian of the public weal against attack by the others. He urged political leaders to be guided by religion and morality. A people guided by religious morals could not abuse power or bring disunity.
He urged the leaders to use public credit sparingly; this would help Americans to minimize debt accumulation. In the past, America operated with a balanced budget and balanced credit but in the modern U.S the nation lives beyond its means. The loss of good credit could essentially compromise the American liberty. In order to have peaceful existence America was advised to observe good faith and justice towards all nations at the same time cultivating harmony with all; these elements could only be attained through morality and religion. Liberty could be perpetually attained by keeping away from foreign powers. But there is a notable aversion for Iraq and fealty for China amongst the Americans that contravenes Washington’s wisdom.
George Washington gave Americans a blueprint for enhancing liberty. He illuminated the core things that could pose a threat to the American freedom such as regional and ideological factions, power seekers, foreign debts and commercial entanglements (Gilbert, 1965). Currently, America faces each of the named threats. Washington came from a unique viewpoint. He had thorough knowledge of what it felt like to live under repressive regime. Being amongst the founding fathers of the nation since its conception and infancy. Washington saw how the power moved and how its patterns worked, so he was well-positioned to predict the outcome of power play. Washington considered it his duty to warn the Americans so that they don’t fall into despair and lose their liberties (Ellis, 2001). Gradually, the U.S leadership let Washington’s waning slide, today the many things he predicted are happening. Americans now have a duty to listen and act and pursue the path that our founding fathers etched for us.
References
Ellis, J., J. (2001) Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation. New York
Gilbert, F. (1965). The Beginnings of American Foreign Policy: To the Farewell Address. New York: 1965.
I need an essay at least with 5 paragraphs for each point and plus one introduction and one conclusion that in total be 7 paragraphs. The following is what I need to write about it:
3. You have been asked by a local community organization to give a one hour presentation on the development of the American political economy, from 1950 to the present. Outline at least 5 main points and the information you would include to explain those issues to an audience. The focus of your presentation can be any of the following: consumerism, foreign policy, production, military engagements, or views of the citizens of the United States.
Note: focus should just be on one of the followings: (consumerism, foreign policy, production, military engagements, or views of the citizens of the United States) which it should be concluded from 5 main points about that focus.
SAMPLE ANSWER
At the stop of World War II, the American military went back home to a nation rather united from the one they had left behind. Wartime production assisted lift the American economy out of the depression, and from the late 1940s, young adults witnessed outstanding increase in their spending clout. Jobs were abundant, salaries were higher, and since the lack of consumer goods at the time of the war, Americans were keen to spend. At the same time, young couples were marrying and having children at extraordinary levels. Fresh and increased federal systems comprising of the G.I. Bill of Rights, permitted many young families to buy their own homes, frequently situated in fast growing environs. After World War II, consumer spending no longer meant only fulfilling an indulgent material want. In reality, the American consumer was applauded as a patriotic citizen in the 1950s, contributing to the final success of the American means of life (Gindin & Panitch, 2012)
Americans invested in goods found around home and family life. Nowhere in the history of America has consumerism turned out to be prevalent as in the 1950s. The 50s was an age known as the Golden Age of Capitalism, a time of unexpected economic expansion that benefited both the capitalists and employees, as a consequence of higher wages (Gindin & Panitch, 2012). The economic success amounted to an expanding middle class that demanded applications and products that would facilitate them enjoy more leisure. Inventions like the refrigerator, vacuum cleaners, amid others, became household items.
The 1950s witnessed the TV grow in popularity. By the end of the 1950s, almost nine out of ten American households possessed a television set. This radically transformed American life. Individuals began utilizing the television as a basis of information. The work that one time belonged firmly to the newspapers was shifting on to other plans. America as well started utilizing TV as their preferred choice of leisure activity. In the twentieth-century, the advancements in the standards of living of the community and the resultant emergence of the middle class, extensively applies the phrase “conspicuous consumption to all citizens who owned the optional earnings that permitted them to carry out the patterns of economic consumption of goods and services. The years unfolding following World War II were collectively ones of solidity and success for Americans. The state retransformed its war equipment into a consumer culture nearly suddenly and established for 12 million returning veterans (Gindin & Panitch, 2012).
The American economy increased remarkably in the post-war time, increasing at a rate of 3.5 percent per year between 1945 and 1970. At this time of success, many earnings doubled in a generation. The considerable raise in average household earnings inside a generation amounted to millions of office and factory employees being pushed into an increasing middle class. Between 1946 and 1960, the U.S. saw an important growth in the consumption of goods and services (Gindin & Panitch, 2012). Consumption grew by 36 percent and individual consumption expenses by 42 percent. Educational outlays were as well greater than in other nations whilst a higher percent of young individuals were graduating from high school and universities than anywhere in the globe. America produced a progressively increasing demand for better cars, clothing, applications, household vacations, and higher education.
One of the aspects that drove the success of the 50s was the growth in consumer spending. Americans enjoyed a standard of existence that was unimaginable to the rest of the globe. The period was mature for Americans to transform their spending habits. The adults of the 50s had been raised in circumstances of economic deficiency, first as a result of the collective poverty of the Great Depression and then as a result of the rationing of consumer products World War II. During the 1930s, with the lack of jobs and the economy in shambles, most American citizens could merely not afford much beyond the essentials (Gindin & Panitch, 2012).
Consumerism was fueled by advertising. Spending on goods promotion increased from $6 billion yearly in 1959 to more than $13 billion by 1963. There is little skepticism over advertising fueled the buying of new goods, which as result kept the nation’s economic wheels turning. Advertisements were now being witnessed on a mass range, as a result of the amount of television that was being watched throughout the nation. In present day consumption is deflating the environmental bases. Conversely, the nation’s economic wellbeing is calculated more according to how much American’s are ready to spend, the consumer benefit, and less in how much is yielded, the gross national product, or how even we invest (Gindin & Panitch, 2012).
Consumerism these days characterises Americans and as well separates them from one another. A consumer economy functions if consumption of products offers just temporary pleasure such as happiness is infinitely deferred, so that consumers continue to purchase more and more products and services (Gindin & Panitch, 2012). By explanation, the consumer can never be fulfilled. The pursuit of this type of contentment generates a vicious circle of expanding nervousness and displeasure.
After watching the program, you are to submit a one and a half page summary that includes:
• Name of show and the date and channel it is on.
• Civilization discussed and the time period they were talking about
• What the show was discussing, i.e. architecture, politics, burials, etc.
• What new information you learned and if how the information differs from your textbook
• Your opinion of the show
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
