As far as organizing this assignment, the following subject headings are REQUIRED:
Introduction: Preview key insights from your paper in such a way as to capture your reader’s interest. This section is often written last and should be no longer that 10% of the total length (word count) of your paper.
Situation/Setting/Description: In this section, you should describe the unfamiliar setting in which you immersed yourself. How did you prepare for your visit?
Observation/Reflection: Record, in an almost journal-like way, what you saw, heard, read, experienced, as well as your reactions (both thoughts and feelings) to these observations/reflections. This section should be as detailed, specific, and complete as possible. Conduct research to understand what you felt, thought, experienced, and observed during your visit.
Analysis: This is the “core” of a good Reflection Paper and should be 33% to 50% of its overall length. What do your observations and reflections teach you? What preconceptions did you change as a result of your experience? What beliefs, ideas, hypotheses were confirmed as a result of your experience? Of what changes in yourself are you aware? In what ways might these changes make you a better leader/manager? Why?
Summary/Next Steps: This section should be more than simply restating points you’ve already made. You should also describe a plan for expanding or implementing what you have learned through your reflection and analysis. The more specific and detailed your plan, the better.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Evaluating Sources-Annotating Your Sources-Writing Plan
This assignment has 3 parts. Please read all instructions carefully.
Part 1 Evaluating Sources
You will need to find three sources.
After you find a credible source that can be used for your persuasive essay, you will fill out the attached document called (TheCRAAPWSrevised.doc. Then, explain how the source fared with the C.R.A.A.P test by answering the following questions in one fully developed paragraph:
What were the total points the source earned on the test?
Where did it earn the most amount of points? How did it earn these points?
Where did it earn the least amount of points? Why did it lose points here?
Ultimately, how will this source help support the main argument (or counterargument) of your essay?
Part 2 Annotating Your Sources
You’ll create a bibliography entry by following the steps and answering the questions as thoroughly as possible. The questions will prompt you to engage in a conversation with your sources. You will need to complete this activity three times (for your three different sources). see attached document called Annotating Your Sources.doc
Part 3 Writing Plan
In this part you will use the document attached called writing notes. Revisit the Writing Notes and revise the responses to produce a complete, polished document that addresses all of the below elements. By reconsidering the responses from the Writing Notes, you will construct a Writing Plan. This process will allow you to develop a potential structure for effectively persuading readers to agree with your argument. This plan will be helpful in keeping your thought process on track when you begin writing and revising your essay. Answer the questions that is attached on the document called Constructing Your Writing Plan, each response should be one fully developed paragraph in length (5-8 sentences).
Critical Elements
argument*
key points*
audience*
goal*
potential resources*
evidence*
feedback*
revision
Attached is the Essay that should be used for all three parts of assignment, Guidelines and Rubrics, and everything else that you will need.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The role of leadership competencies in innovation in the UAE last few years.
Research report should follow established research design principles, and support their proposal with a comprehensive and critical literature review clearly establishing the contribution of the proposed research, identifying data-sources and justifying methodological choices.
Individual Report Guideline
Research Title
Student must clearly mention the title (question) of the study.
Abstract
In a paragraph, student must provide a summary of the study, highlighting the topic, sample, data collection and analysis methods, and main finding of the study.
Introduction and Background of the Study
In this section, student must provide an introduction where a background of the study and how the research question was created with relation to existing theories in the field of the study. In addition, the introduction section must also illustrate the motives behind the study. Student must also highlight research philosophy and framework of the study. Finally, the introduction must explain the structure of the study.
Objectives, problem statement and importance of the study
In this part, student must state the research problem, which is a justification for conducting the research. This will help the student emphasize the objectives of the study, state what makes this study important, and the study’s contribution towards the existing literature.
Literature review
In this section, the student must review enough relevant literature, theoretical or empirical. This will demonstrate the student’s understanding of the research topic, and help in identifying the gap in the literature.
Hypotheses of the study
Student must clearly list the main hypotheses of the study. The null hypotheses are stated and put for testing.
Data and methodology
This section provides a discussion of the size of data, data collection, sampling procedure, and statistical tools used by the study to analyze the data.
Data analysis and results
In this part, student must explain the data analysis procedure, and present results clearly with the help of tables and graphs. The results must be then explained and discussed in the light of previous literature and hypotheses.
Conclusion and recommendations
In the conclusion part, student must summarize the results of the study, highlighting the main finding of the research and stating whether a positive or a negative relationship was found.
References
Student must list all the references cited in text in an alphabetical order using APA reference style.
Appendix
Attach a copy of the questionnaire
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
People over 50 years old may marry for different reasons than couples in their early 20s. When you are at a different stage in your life you have more life experiences and different motivations Think about people 50 years old and older. Conduct research online to locate at least two articles to help you better understand this population and their preferences for marriage. Summarize each article. Next, use the information you researched to respond to the questions here.
Most of us have had to participate in some type of training on our jobs, such as new employee orientation, lunch-and-learn workshops, Employee Assistance Program training, technical skill training, employee benefits update meetings, or management development workshops. Some of us have experienced on-the-job training. Others have participated in professional development workshops or skills-based continuing education classes. Think about the best and worst training experiences you have had. What made the best experiences excellent and what made the worst experiences terrible?
Assignment
Write a 10-page essay (not including cover and reference pages) analyzing one of your best training experiences and one of your worst training experiences. Be specific in discussing what made the experiences good or bad. Please review the content of Weeks 4-8 (uploaded files) on learning theories, the design of training, training methods, training evaluation, and transfer of learning. This material should be reflected in your essay.
Your essay should include brief descriptions of the training experiences:
The target audience
The objective(s) of the training (see Week 5 in The training site
Training methods used (see Weeks 7 and 8 uploaded files)
The major focus of your paper is your analysis.
Your analysis should include:
An assessment of the specific factors that contributed to the success or ineffectiveness of the training; for example, consider these questions:
o Did the training achieve its objective(s)?
o Was the training site conducive to learning?
o Were the methods chosen appropriate for the topic and the audience?
o Did you have opportunities to practice and receive feedback?
A discussion of the learning theory or theories that you believe guided the training (see Week 4).
A discussion of how your learning as well as the effectiveness of the training were evaluated (see Week 6).
An assessment of the competencies, knowledge, and/or skills demonstrated or not demonstrated by the trainer(s). The ATD competency model (see Week 1 uploaded files) is a good resource.
A discussion of whether or not you transferred what you learned to your job, and what contributed to your successful or unsuccessful transfer (see Week 4 uploaded files).
Your specific recommendations for improving the training, based on what you now know about effective training programs.
The information above should be included in your paper but you are free to organize your essay in whatever way makes sense to you. You may use the first person (I attended a program or the trainer told us) in discussing your experiences. Support your analysis with citations from the readings from this class or other HR courses, and additional resources posted in our classroom. Make sure you define all key terms and cite the source(s) of your definition. Since this is not primarily a research paper, no specific number of references is required. However, you must cite your sources.
Use APA format for all citations, quotations, and references. References should be listed on a separate page as required by APA style. Your paper should be double spaced with one inch margins and a font size of at least 11 points; do not include any spaces between paragraphs or sections.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Dissociative Identity Disorder Informative Research
there also is a grading sheet of how the essay is going to be graded so PLEASE READ THIS AND FOLLOW WHAT IT SAYS. ALL SOURCES NEED TO BE PRIMARY SOURCES, SOURCES SHOULD JOURNALS, BOOKS, ENCYCLOPEDIAS, NEWSPAPERS.
Writing 2 Dissociative Identity Disorder Informative Research Assignment Sheet
A 1000 to 1200-word informative research report. You will choose a topic that you would like to inform a specific audience about, and then present interesting and relevant researched information about that topic that meets your audience’s perceived needs.
How to do it:
Choose a topic that fits either one of these prompts:
?A topic that you are familiar with and would like to
educate others about, or? A topic that you are not familiar with and you wish to explore. You can then report your findings to a similarly curious audience.
Choose an appropriate audience, one that needs to be informed for a specific purpose.
Identify six to seven specific topic questions that you know your audience would like answered about the topic.
Research the answers to those Dissociative Identity Disorder Informative Research questions using a variety of primary and secondary sources that alternately appeal to the three Aristotelian appeals.
Cite all sources properly using MLA format (the eighth edition, use the stylebook on CANVAS). Three to four outside sources should be used, and primary research should be used whenever possible
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
INSTRUCTIONS: this needs to be what you found interesting about the revolution and why you thought it was interesting. Also explain why it was important to that time. follow these instructions as well as the following…
THE OFFICIAL INSTRUCTIONS GIVEN BY THE PROFESSOR:The reflections/ writing assignments will include all reading materials assigned and including course content in Module 2. You are not to summarize chapters or chapter but to select an event, person or timeline within any chapter. However you can combine events in chapters. The exercise is meant to enhance your critical thinking skills. :
In your own words, journal through a reflection, what historical event, person, or timeline stood out most to you as student in the assigned course readings. Each writing assignment will include a 400-500 word count in MLA essay form using the proper grammar, content, perspectives and will be uploaded in the course Eagle Online Canvas or emailed to me at steve.lopez@hccs.edu. Late Papers will receive a 10 point deduction for every day the assignment is late. You papers should start with the following:
Ex. What I found most interesting in chapter Ö..
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
With the increase in prosperity brought about by industrialization came a number of ills such as the exploitation of workers, including children. Unbridled capitalism and the pursuit of wealth, while also giving rise to the middle class, led to the greatest wealth disparity the country had ever seen at the expense of the working class, whose members found themselves working six or seven days a week up to 12 hours a day in horrible conditions, often not making enough to support themselves and their families. In response, a group of people emerged, the Progressives, who sought ways to make the lives of this wretched class better. Among the most prominent Progressives was President Theodore Roosevelt and his progressive sentiments are illustrated in his speech, Who is a Progressive?
Who is a Progressive? Theodore Roosevelt, April 1912
Construct the case study by responding to the following prompts:
According to Roosevelt, what are the characteristics of a progressive?
Explain what are the characteristics of those who are “anti-progressive” and what types of activities do they engage in?
What are the goals of progressivism and what areas of society should be addressed?
Analyze what progressive achievements does Roosevelt highlight in his speech?
Make sure to cite and reference sources. Make sure that the writing is clear, well-developed, and free from spelling and grammatical errors. Please note that part of your grade is to include a documented example of the primary source.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The essay is a case study of a past disaster. Essays must include the following information:
Description of the Event
This section can function as the introduction to the essay. Only the specific disaster should be described here rather than describing the generalities of the hazard. For example, in an essay on the Haiti earthquake, it is not necessary to include information on general aspects of earthquakes in this section (i.e. why subduction zones are associated with earthquakes).
Causes
In this section, you can address the event from the general to the specific (i.e. a discussion of what causes that type of disaster and then focusing specifically on the cause of your case study).
Impacts
Describe the impacts of the event. These could include social, economic, and/or environmental impacts.
Response
Describe the reaction to the specific disaster. Were there proactive responses to the hazard in place or were they more commonly reactive?
Recovery
What has changed since the disaster? Have new policies or regulations been developed?
Provide a description of the resiliency of the local area.
Suggestions
Reflect on what further work has been suggested as well as your own thoughts about what needs to be completed to protect people and property from a similar event in the future.
Formatting
– A title page must be included with specific information listed on it (see Essay Writing Criteria)
– The text of the essay should be 5 to 6 pages in length (text does not include figures, maps, graphs, images, the title page, or the bibliography)
– The essay must be double spaced and the bibliography must be single spaced
– Use margins of 2.5 cm (1 inch) on all margins (both sides, top, and bottom)
– Use Times New Roman font, size 12
– Page numbers must be included and properly formatted (see Essay Writing Criteria)
References
– Wikipedia is not considered a valid academic source and cannot be used as a reference
– Citations are required throughout the essay
– Use APA format to list references in the bibliography and include citations in the essay in the
format shown on the Essay Referencing page
– When referencing text, paraphrase it in your own words (no quotation marks should be used)
– Peer-reviewed sources are best but a variety of sources are acceptable for this essay (books,
For your second major assignment, we will continue our discussion of food production issues pertaining to sustainability and the need to feed a growing world population. In this essay you will communicate your exploration, research, and reflection as you listen to, evaluate, and record the conversation surrounding food production. Acceptable topics include a discussion of GMO foods, the Green Revolution, or Nobel Prize Laureate Norman Borlaug. This could build from the interests you explored in your first essay on sustainability, or you can follow a different track. Was there something about your definition of sustainability that piqued your curiosity and warrants further exploration? This could also be an opportunity for you to delve deeper into an issue or question surrounding your chosen field.
This assignment won’ be a formal essay but a document that demonstrates your engagement with the research process. At its completion your assignment will consist of three (3) parts, each of them recording the steps you’ve taken in researching your ethical problem or issue, understanding your sources, and evaluating the direction you’ll take for the final research-supported argumentative essay. This assignment will tell your research story from inquiry (exploration of a research question) to claim (tentativ thesis).
For guidance in successfully completing this assignment, consult RRW, Ch. 1 (summary/paraphrase, embedding direct quotations in your prose), Ch. 12 (finding and evaluating sources, preparing an annotated bibliography), Ch. 13 (studying sources) and Ch. 14 (formal documentation for MLA or APA documentation style).
The most important thing to understand is that this is not an assignment you can write in one sitting from beginning to end. Itís a construction project that, in many ways, builds from the inside out.
Think of the finished product in terms of the following general outline:
Part I: Exploratory Narrative (500+ words)
The first section of the assignment will be a 1st person narrative that tells the story of your intellectual journey, beginning with your research question. You should use your research question as the title of the document. This portion of the assignment will let the reader know how your process began and progressed, what sources you found, what they were saying, and where they led you. Iím interested here in the chronological path of your process. As you can imagine, you can be drafting this section throughout the process. Consider also that books, articles, database materials, and websites are not the only relevant sources available. An interview with someone in your field, for example, might give you further insight and background into the question.
Important:Your sources here will reflect how your research develops. There is no expectation that these sources are the ones that will appear in the final paper or that they will be balanced, that is, so many for or against an issue. In fact, it’s unlikely
that all the sources will appear in the final paper. Also, resist the impulse to select only those sources that support any opinions or judgments you may already have about your topic. Reserve judgment and see where the research leads you.
Part II: Annotated Bibliography (minimum of 6 entries – 150+ words each). At least 2 sources should be accessed using the library’s ENGL 1304 Research Guide.
An annotated bibliography is like an expanded Works Cited (MLA) or References (APA) page where your reader sees not only the formal citation but a paragraph containing a summary and explanation of each source. You’ll list your sources alphabetically according to MLA or APA citation style as you would in a Works Cited or References page. Each formal citation will be followed by a short paragraph containing description and summary, an indication of the credibility, authority, or bias of the source, and a statement of how the source might fight into an argument.
Part III: Reflection and Tentative Thesis (200+ words)
The final section will give the reader a sense of where your research stands now, what’s left to be done, and what conclusions you may have drawn from participating in the conversation surrounding your question. Like the first section of the assignment, 1st person makes sense here. You can think of your final document as a rhetorical sandwich: an objective 3rd person annotated bibliography between two 1st person narratives. You’ll have a chance to flex your voice and tone muscles with this assignment.
Conclude Part III with your tentative thesis. What stand can you take, now that you’ve looked at the sources? Will you have a definitional claim? An evaluative claim? A causal claim? A proposal? The thesis is tentative and can be revised or changed in the final assignment.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
