Concept of positivism Analysis Assignment

Concept of positivism

Below is a list of key concepts that are analyzed in this class. Your assignment is to select one and, in a four to six-page, double-spaced paper, research its significance by conducting a literature review. Critically analyze the concept in a brief essay which clearly examines the meaning of the concept as it has been defined and interpreted by different theorists. Your analysis should begin with a review of the concept from the perspective of the theorist studied in this class. For instance, if you decide to analyze the concept of positivism, begin your analysis with a summary of August Comte’s understanding of the concept, and then in the remainder of the paper explore the origins (intellectual roots) of the concept (i.e., before Comte), and the subsequent development of the concept (i.e., after Comte). If you wish to write on a course concept that is not on the list, please ask the instructor for permission.

You are required to employ at least six published sources in your analysis of a concept. Your sources should include a sample of studies that are published in reputable journals or books, and authored by different social theorists. Be advised that most of the theories presented in this class are part of on-going theoretical debates between different schools of thought within sociology. Your analysis should summarize and review these publications within the larger context of these debates (when relevant).

The papers will be graded according to the following criteria:

1) The ability to articulate a clear and concise understanding of the concept presented in the course;

2) The ability to find sources within the literature that have a close bearing on the concept;

3) The ability to compare and contrast (in writing) the ideas and claims of the different theorists.

Since the page limit is short, keep quotes brief; no long passages in quotes. If you quote someone, or make allusions to their ideas in your paper, place their name, the publication year of the work, and the page number in a parenthetical statement like thus: (daniel, 2018: p.156). A full citation of the work should be made in the bibliography at the end of the paper. The paper is due in class at the last regular meeting, Wednesday, December 5. No papers will be accepted after the deadline. No email submissions please.

List of Concepts

alienation
positivism
capital
ideology
democratic (administrative) despotism
tyranny of the majority
commodity fetishism
conspicuous consumption
social facts
anomie
fashion
division of labor
collective representations
bureaucracy
iron cage
verstehen
social Darwinism
social differentiation
collective conscious
Protestant Ethic
compounding
primitive totemism
tragedy of culture
ideal types
double consciousness

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Molyneux’s problem Research Paper

Molyneux’s problem

William Molyneux was an Irish natural philosopher and writer on politics. He was a contemporary of John Locke’s and after Locke had written The Essay Concerning Human Understanding Molyneux was very impressed and started a correspondence with Locke. In one of his letters, Molyneux presented Locke with the following thought experiment.

“Suppose a man born blind, and now adult, and taught by his touch to distinguish between a cube and a sphere of the same metal, and nighly of the same bigness, so as to tell, when he felt one and the other, which is the cube, which is the sphere. Suppose then the cube and the sphere placed on a table, and the blind man made to see: query, Whether by his sight, before he touched them, he could now distinguish and tell which is the globe, which the cube? To which the acute and judicious proposer answers: ‘Not. For though he has obtained the experience of how a globe, and how a cube, affects his touch; yet he has not yet attained the experience, that what affects his touch so or so, must affect his sight so or so…'”

To summarize Molyneux is asking us to imagine a person who was blind from birth and was taught to distinguish shapes by touch. We then imagine that the shapes are placed before him and his sight is magically restored. Would he be able to distinguish the shapes he had learned by touch, using just his sense of sight?
Apply Locke’s empiricism and his distinction between primary and secondary qualities to a novel problem.
Discuss Locke’s epistemology with your peers.

Instructions

How do you think Locke would answer Molyneux’s question? Explain why Locke would give that answer. What do you personally think the correct answer is and why? (write at least THREE paragraphs).

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Comparison and contrast between two theories

Compare and contrast between Transference and Countertransference in Psychodynamic Approaches to Counselling
The research for the paper will involve consulting pertinent materials including and going beyond the required readings (peer-reviewed journal articles, books published by experts in the field, official websites). The paper should consist of approximately 2500 words, (i.e., 10 double-spaced typed pages, Times New Roman font size: 12, APA format), excluding the reference page and the title page. Please, format your assignment in Word

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Impact of Relevant Gender Theory on Witchcraft

Explain and discuss the impact of relevant gender theory on witchcraft.. Approach the topic through history and/or across different societies.
1. Developed a critical approach to gender and social theory.
2. An understanding of the key concepts involved in the study of gender, diversity and society
3. Acquired knowledge of structures and processes experienced by women and men in different geographical and social contexts.

In The Wonder’s of the Invisible World, Mather not only warns against witchcraft, he gives
his own version of what the women, who were both prosecuted and used as witnesses, said during
the course of the trials. This is significant for a couple of different reasons. Mather is an example of a
man writing about what women are saying in response to an issue that was largely female-centric
[the men who were involved tended to be the ones passing judgment, however there were a few
men who were accused themselves like Giles Corey and John Proctor but they were a minority].
Most of the people accused were women; also most of the accusers and witnesses were women. Yet,
Mather does not mention gender other than to spout the general belief that women were more
susceptible to coercion from the devil.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Psychological Theories Research Paper

Psychological Theories

Just casual opinions about theories of Spinoza, Kant, Rousseau, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer and Hobbs. 4 pages each of them.
Please do not use any citation or references except the book called B. R. Hergenhahn & Tracy Henley, An Introduction to the History of Psychology, 2017. 7th ed. Thomson/Wadsworth, 2014. please write about them separately , also don’t have to be too formal.

Spinoza’s Psychological Theory

Spinoza addresses two of the most serious challenges facing his thoroughgoing naturalism. First, he attempts to show that human beings follow the order of nature. Human beings, on Spinoza’s view, have causal natures similar in kind to other ordinary objects, other “finite modes” in the technical language of the Ethics, so they ought to be analyzed and understood in the same way as the rest of nature. Second, Spinoza attempts to show that moral concepts, such as the concepts of good and evil, virtue, and perfection, have a basis in human psychology. Just as human beings are no different from the rest of nature, so moral concepts are no different from other concepts.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Theoretical Underpinning Case Study

Theoretical Underpinning Case Study The answer should have good theoretical underpinning drawing on the appropriate theories/issues of communication and should not be just a repetition and description of facts that are contained in the case study.

There should be evidence of an in-depth examination of relevant issues with supporting evidence from the case. There should be evidence of logical development of arguments. Older adults with mild dementia are at an increased risk of falls. Preventing those at risk from falling requires complex interventions involving patient-tailored strength- and balance-challenging exercises, home hazard assessment, visual impairment correction, medical assessment and multifactorial combinations.

Mark Twain The Golden Age Theoretical Integration

Mark Twain The Golden Age Theoretical Integration This assignment must include the following:
(1) your description of the good political life: (2) identify that one aspect of the good political life that you are going to write about, why it’s
important, what you hope to “prove;”

(3) a description of the method you are using – theoretical integration with its three parts (normative, empirical, and prudential); (4) identify the political philosopher(s) you are utilizing; (5) identify the “mass/popular” journal article you are using (6) include one Chicago style footnote; and (7) attach the “mass/popular journal” article you are using. These are seven requirements; any missing piece will result in
points being deducted from your overall score.
Paragraphs must be at least four sentences in length.
(1) through (3) could easily be the first three paragraphs. Paragraph 4 might be a description of how your aspect of the good political life “should be” (the
normative), and paragraph 5 would begin the description of what the situation with your topic actually is (the empirical).
You have considerable liberty to arrange the paragraphs to your liking. You could, for instance, begin your paper with a story or anecdote that would precede your description of the good political life. Be creative, but include the seven requirements. The philospher to use is Mark Twain. Everything must be done Chicago Style and there has to be at least 1 foot note Then the rest of the paper we have until
November 15 or 16 to finish. I would like the 5 paragraphs as soon as possible so we have a chance to look it over.

The Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories

The Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories Department of Philosophy
University of Toronto at Mississauga
PHL105Y5S: Introduction to Philosophy Fall 2018
Essay 1 J. Brunning

The Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories Readings

Brian Keeley, “Of Conspiracy Theories”, The Journal of Philosophy, 96 (1999): 109-26.
In his essay “Of Conspiracy Theories, Brian Keeley discusses certain epistemological issues as they pertain to conspiracy theories. Keeley argues that there are certain features shared by most major conspiracy theories that
make them irrational to accept.
Write an explication of Keeley’s essay, omitting sections I and II. You should read sections I and II for important background information, but your explication should start with the sentence “What is a conspiracy theory?’ on p. 116.
Your essay should be exclusively exegetical. You need not (indeed should not) offer any view of how well Keeley argues for his positions or how satisfactory those positions are. Your are expected only to show that you understand the essay by stating clearly what Keeley is doing. You should begin your essay with a clear formulation of the problem that he is discussing and an account of why it is a problem. You should then provide an explication of Keeley’s position on this problem.

The Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories General Questions

In general, an explication of an essay should tackle the following questions:
(i) What is the problem that the author is discussing? Why is it a problem?
(ii) How does the author set out the problem? How does he or she define the central concepts?
(iii) What is the author’s position on the problem?
(iv) What are the various alternative positions that the author discusses? How does he or she characterize them?
(v) What are the main arguments that the author uses to support his or her own position and to reject alternative
positions?
Length:
Your essay should be 1,200-1,500 words in length. Essays longer than 1,500 words may be penalized. (Please
include a word count at the end of your essay.)
Essay Submission:
Essays are to be submitted in electronic format. Information on how to do this will be distributed separately.

The Epistemology of Conspiracy Theories Additional Instructions

It is expected that your essays will be formatted in accordance with the generally accepted standards for written academic work.
! Make sure that you include a title page containing the following information: your name, your student
number, the title of your essay, the name of the course, the name of the instructor, the name of your
teaching assistant, and the date. Essays that do not include a title page will be penalized.
! Please make sure that you are familiar with the document “How Not to Plagiarize”, prepared by Dr.
Margaret Procter, the University’s Writing Support Coordinator. Make sure that you acknowledge the use
of anyone else’s words or ideas.
! It is expected, as well, that your essays will be written with care and attention to matters of style, including
grammaticality (spelling, punctuation, diction, and sentence structure), clarity, and precision of statement.

Framing Theory and Islamophobia in the Western World

Framing Theory and Islamophobia in the Western World http://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/Lb8ncIQhZwhXQbWYbCqrEA
the link above includes 2 files
FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY
A literature review discuss an existing literature on a topic or a theory. a literature review combines summary and synthesis to explore different research
approaches on a particular topic.

For this particular paper, you will write a literature review on a specific communication theory the purpose of this paper is for you to develop a foundation for your own research. What kind of research has been explored using your particular theory? The literature review will
allow you to assess existing research, help justify your specific RESEARCH QUESTION and propose how your research will contribute to your theory’s body of
knowledge.

Framing Theory and Islamophobia in the Western World Strategies for Literature Reviews

FIND A FOCUS: a literature review is organized around ideas, not the sources them selves. you will not list each source and summarize. instead, consider
themes or ideas that are consistent or contradictory in your research articles.
WRITE A THESIS STATEMENT: this statement should guide your literature review. to write this, you MUST read your PEER-REVIED articles first.
ORGANIZATION: there are several ways to organize your literature review, so that you are able to incorporate summary and synths.
BASIC STRUCTURE:
introduction: what is the main topic of your literature review? give a brief background on the history and development of the theory. this should not be more
than one paragraph.
body: discussion of the different applications of your theory. what communication phenomena does your theory help explain? what methods complement the
theoretical framework? are there any consistencies or contradictions in the findings?
conclusion: discussion on your assessment of the theory. is there a void that your research can help fill? end with your RESEARCH QUESTION{{{the research
question should contribute to the evolution of your specific theory}}}
ORGANIZING THE BODY OF THE LITERATURE REVIEW: there are various options to organize the body the literature review. remember not to organize the body according to individual articles. you must include summary and synthesis. you must read your articles BEFORE deciding on how to organize the body of your
literature review.
thematic: what are consistent themes in your theoretical research?
methodological: what methods are commonly used to explore a topic using your theory? you could organize it according to quantitative or cultural methods, or
you could organize it according to survey research, interviewed, focus groups, or textual analysis, again, this will depend on the kind of methods that are
most commonly used with your theory.
TIPS FOR WRITING LITERATURE REVIEWS:
USE EVIDENCE: be sure to base your argument/main idea of your literature review in the existing research you selected to assess.
USE TOPIC SENTENCE AND TRANSITIONS STATEMENT: your literature review should have coherent flow. topic sentences help focus each paragraph and topic sentences
help build bridges between two ideas (or paragraph)
USE QOUTES SPARINGLY: only use a quote when what the author says cannot be rewritten in your own words. it should be meaningful and relevant.
PARAPHRASE, NOT PLAGIARIZE: dont plagiarize. you will FAIL this paper if i find that any part of your literature review is copy and pasted. when
paraphrasing. it is not enough to just change one word in the sentence. rewrite in your OWN words.

Personal Experience on Group Work Theory and Practice

Personal Experience on Group Work Theory and Practice Assignment 2
Assignment Type
Weighting
Word Count
Week Due
Professional Report
50
2000
Attend a group of your choice and write a report on your experience.

Refer to the Academic Skills Guide for information on the required structure of a
Professional Report.
Your report should include: an introductory summary and recommendations section articulating the topic and main findings an overview of the group, including
the type, size, composition and purpose of the group an assessment of the level of cohesion in the group a discussion of the norms that are evident in the
group an assessment of the stage of development the group is currently in a discussion of the group dynamics and any problems the group is facing an analysis
of the leadership of the group an analysis of any focal conflicts that occurred and the way they were handled an assessment of the overall effectiveness of
the group reference to relevant literature, linking your ideas to theory discussed in the unit