Causes of America’s War in Vietnam Paper

Causes of America’s War in Vietnam
Causes of America’s War in Vietnam

Causes of America’s War in Vietnam

Causes of America’s War in Vietnam

Formatting
12 font or smaller, standard script (e.g. Calibri, New Times Roman), 1.00-1.25
margins maximum, double spaced, clean appearance, etc.
Basic organization is simple—
don’t make it difficult
Title—
choose one that reflects your views on the topic to inform and engage your reader from
the start, do not repeat the title of a book

e.g.
The Things They Carried
Introductory Paragraph
that simply introduces your topic/paper to your reader, and states your
thesis or underlying view of the topic (that’s all)
Organize the Body
of your paper in some coherent, clear way that your reader can follow—
decide how you want to address various aspects of the topic, and do so
INCLUDE NUMEROUS QUOTES DIRECTLY FROM BOOKS—
you need to find and include many
examples from the book (s), they fuel your analysis, clarify your understanding, demonstrate
your reading, research, work—they also add power and texture to your paper. For example,
this excerpt from Ho Chi Minh’s declaration of independence in 1945 is quite telling, as it draws

directly from the American document, “All men are created equal. They are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights: among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of
Happiness…Nevertheless, for more than eighty years, the French imperialists, abusing the
principles of Freedom, Equality, and Fraternity, have violated our Fatherland and oppressed our
fellow-citizens” (Young, Fitzgerald, Grunfeld 27-28).
Plagiarism
is not acceptable

write in your words and indicate clearly when you use those of an
author. Do not succumb to cutting and pasting from Sparknotes or Wikipedia, as this is utterly
lame and academically illegal!
Proof Read

clean up misspellings, typos, wording issues, grammar, citations, etc.
Cite your sources
on all quoted material, specific data, or close paraphrasing of the author’s
words—e.g. (O’Brien 234)
Conclusion—
every paper should end with a paragraph that sums up your views on the topic—
this is your last chance to convince your reader that the paper was worth your time to write
and their time to read
Works Cited Page—
every paper should include formal, bibliographical entries for all sources
used (quotes, paraphrased, statistical data) and cite

HIST 2130—America’s War in Vietnam
First Formal Paper—Understanding the Causes of America’s War in Vietnam
Be sure to read
The Tragedy of Vietnam
and
The Vietnam War: A History in Documents
closely
to develop a sound knowledge of the topic.
These are to be your only sources for the paper

draw evidence (short quotes and specific data) from them and cite to where you found it.
Focus Questions—be sure to answer these in preparation for writing your paper.
1.
What sort of history had the people of Indochina had with foreign invaders/occupiers when
the United States stepped into Vietnam?
2.
Who was Ho Chi Minh and how would you describe his commitment to independence for the
people of Vietnam?
3.
How would you describe Ho’s relationship with the COMINTERN and/or commitment to the
ideal of global communist revolution—expansion of communism?
4.
What do you make of Ho Chi Minh’s declaration of independence in 1945?
5.
What was the U.S. view of the reassertion of French colonial rule in Indochina in 1945?
What had served to change this view by 1950?
6.
What was decided in the Geneva Agreements of 1954—at the end of French rule? Why were
the elections scheduled for 1956 never held?
7.
Who was Ngo Dinh Diem and how would you describe his rule in South Vietnam—1955-63?
8.
How did the Eisenhower and Kennedy Administrations view the situation in Vietnam/S.E.
Asia?
9.
How concerned were American leaders about what Eisenhower called the “domino theory?”
10.
What led Lyndon B. Johnson to take the U.S. to war in Vietnam 1964-65?
For the formal paper:
In essence, one by one in paragraph form within your paper you should address the questions
above. But read below for another way to think about your task here.
What central aspects of the historical context (the who, when, where, what) does your reader
need to consider before understanding this important historical subject? Explain.
What were the central causes of this conflict in Southeast Asia—how would you explain
America’s involvement in Vietnam leading to the Vietnam War?
Your job is to undertake an informed analysis (drawing heavily from the documents) of how one
can best understand this historical issue. The vast majority of the American public know little or
nothing about the origins, policies, events, decisions that led to this conflict—your paper should
seek to present essential aspects to an informed understanding of this important topic.
There is the important matter to consider regarding Ho Chi Minh’s bottom line convictions. You
must decide what you think makes the most sense here. Was Ho Chi Minh a COMINTERN
agent first and Vietnamese nationalist leader only second—the spread of Communism had to be
stopped and thus the U.S. response? Or was Ho a Vietnamese nationalist first and foremost and
therefore much less inclined to have a goal of furthering the spread of communism beyond
Vietnam’s borders? Or did it really matter either way to U.S. policymakers who were inclined to

see it through a Cold War lens anyway? (recall the “domino theory” advocated by D.D.
Eisenhower, JFK, and LBJ—as well as Containment Policy at the base of U.S. foreign policy)

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

US Marine Veteran Who Fought In the Pacific

US Marine Veteran Who Fought In the Pacific For this week’s forum, I will be paying the role of a US Marine veteran who fought in the Pacific. The war is finally over.

US Marine Veteran Who Fought In the Pacific
US Marine Veteran Who Fought In the Pacific

You would not believe the tragedy and death I saw on the Mariana Islands, Iwo Jima, and Okinawa. I can tell you right now as a man who fought these relentless people that they would never surrender no matter what. They would rather die and take as many of us Americans with them. As we stood by for a possible invasion towards the mainland I could only imagine the death that would occur. Not only my brothers in arms but the innocent civilians that lived on the island that would soon be dead. If it wasn’t for our Commander and Chief I might not be here today. The decision to drop the atomic bomb ended this war and brought the Japanese to the table. As they saw the power and destruction that the United States can bring to the table with just one bomb. I remember talking to my friends who were pilots who gave not only Imperial Japan a warning but the people as well. I believe it was called the “Potsdam Declaration and Leaflets”. My friends who were pilots dropped these leaflets across 35 cities warning them that their cities could be a target and should evacuate. I know there wasn’t a mention of the use of an atomic bomb but should we really tell the enemy what we have in advance so they can plan a counter attack. I was in full support of using the A-bomb it not only saved my life but hundreds of thousands of Americans and millions of innocent Japanese civilians. I don’t believe anyone can change my mind as I saw firsthand the barbaric acts by the Japanese and know firsthand these people would not surrender. The only outcome was death in their eyes and if they didn’t it would be a dishonor to their country. Sources: “The Decision to Use the Atomic Bomb: Arguments in Support.” History. July 06, 2018. Accessed December 11, 2018. https://www.historyonthenet.com/decision-use-atomic-bomb-arguments-support. R/S

Scientific technology in war Research Paper

Scientific technology in war
          Scientific technology in war

Scientific technology in war: examine the deployment of one weapons system, or a country’s record using a scientific technology in a specific conflict

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

History World in Conflict Research Paper

History World in Conflict
History World in Conflict

History World in Conflict

History World in Conflict

Rules:
USE THE LECTURE NOTES AND THEN ADD MATERIAL FROM TURBULENT PASSAGE OR ANY TEXTBOOK YOU USE YOU DON’T NEED TO USE FOOTNOTES OR ENDNOTES, JUST CITE THE MATERIAL WITHIN YOUR ANSWER LIKE THIS: [PAGE XX]. YOU DO NOT HAVE TO CITE MATERIAL FROM THE LECTURES OR VIDEOS.YOU CAN USE OTHER TEXTBOOKS [PRINTED, NOT WEB]AS WELL SO LONG AS THEY ARE COLLEGE LEVEL AND YOU CITE THEM BY AUTHOR AND PAGE. GIVE ME A SOURCES CITED PAGE AT THE END. DO NOT:USE WEB SOURCES, ESPECIALLY WIKIPEDIA, HISTORY.COM, QUIZLET,ETC.DO NOT CUT AND PASTE FROM THE WEB OR EVEN FROM THE LECTURE NOTES. THIS INCLUDES PARAPHRASING WHERE YOU COPY BUT CHANGE A FEW WORDS HERE AND THERE. USE THE IDEAS BUT PUT THEM IN YOUR OWN WORDS.
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING . YOU MAY DO SO EITHER IN A SINGLE ESSAY OR BREAK IT UP INTO SEVERAL SMALL ESSAYS. I’M LOOKING AT A MINIMUM TWO PAGES SINGLE-SPACED TOTAL . YOU WON’T BE PENALIZED FOR WRITING MORE AND YOU WILL LIKELY NEED TO.

TELL ME HOW TOTALITARIAN DICTATORSHIPS DIFFER FROM ABSOLUTE MONARCHIES AND MILITARY DICTATORSHIPS. WHAT DID SOVIET COMMUNISM AND EUROPEAN FASCISM [INCLUDING NAZISM] HAVE IN COMMON? WHERE DID THEY DIFFER? BRIEFLY TELL ME HOW LENIN ESTABLISHED COMMUNISM IN THE USSR AND HOW STALIN CARRIED IT TO ITS FULLEST EXTENT. TELL ME HOW HITLER CAME TO POWER IN GERMANY AND TRANSFORMED IT INTO A RACIAL STATE. IN WHAT WAYS WAS WORLD WAR II A WAR OF IDEOLOGIES?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

 

The Civilian Experiences in World War Two

The Civilian Experiences in World War Two The Strains of War: Civilian Experiences in World War Two Length: 1,000-1,500 words (4-6 pages, 12-point font) The focus of this two-part mini-paper is on civilian experiences during World War Two.

The Civilian Experiences in World War Two
The Civilian Experiences in World War Two

In this assignment you are asked to: 1) Critically summarize the first chapter of Sean Kennedy, The Shock of War: Civilian Experiences, 1937-1945 (chapter 1: “The Strains of Mobilization,” pp. 13-48); 2) Using the knowledge gained through reading the Kennedy chapter, critically assess a primary source about civilian life in Nazi Germany (the source is provided as a link, below). Part One: Write a critical analysis of chapter 1 of the Kennedy book (“The Strains of Mobilization.”). This analysis should accomplish three main tasks: – briefly outline the main argument in the chapter; – concisely describe the key information provided by the author in support of the main argument; – discuss the evidence used (look in particular at the endnotes on pages 46-48). Estimated length for part one: 3-4 pages Part Two: Part 1 will have helped you to gain some background knowledge of civilian life during the war, and you can use this knowledge to help you critically assess the following primary source: “SD report to the Party Chancellery on “Basic Questions Regarding the Mood and Attitude of the German People,” November 29, 1943.” Please note that this is a two-page document and is available at: http://germanhistorydocs.ghi-dc.org/sub_document.cfm?document_id=1585 The key question is: “what we can know” from this source? To answer this question you need to: – Identify who wrote the source, what audience it was intended for, when and where it was produced, and if we know why was it preserved and by whom? [and tell us why these things matter to the credibility of the source]. If there is not explicit evidence from the source to answer these questions, you might speculate, but base your speculations on what you’ve learned from the course thus far OR from the Kennedy chapter. – Explain the content of the source. – Given what you know about the creation/production/preservation of the source, tell us “what we can know” from the source. Estimated Length for Part Two of the assignment: 1-2 pages. An A Paper will: Style: -have your name, student number, TA’s name and course number on the first page -be double spaced on either one-side or two-sided paper -include page numbers -not contain spelling errors or significant grammatical problems -have a clear writing style -include bibliographic citations for both sources used Content: -identify Kennedy’s main argument and clearly explicate content and sources -successfully analyse the primary source to identify purpose, audience, bias, content -quotes from the source where relevant to the discussion -tell us “ what we can know” (and what we can’t, due to the source’s limitations) -not contain factual error

Relation of chemical warfare and agricultural insecticides

Relation of chemical warfare and agricultural insecticides
  Relation of chemical warfare and agricultural                              insecticides

Relation of chemical warfare and agricultural insecticides

The history of the relation between chemical warfare and agricultural insecticides

Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Old War defined American thoughts and actions

Old War defined American thoughts and actions
Old War defined American thoughts and actions

Old War defined American thoughts and actions

The Cold War defined American thoughts and actions for most of the twentieth century beginning with the Red Scare in 1919 and continuing through Ronald Reagan’s perception of the “Evil Empire.” What was the Cold War, when, where and why did it erupt into violence? What were the origins and consequences of the Cold War.? Give specific examples to support your argument.

Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Neutrality Acts and aid the Allies Essay

Neutrality Acts and aid the Allies
            Neutrality Acts and aid the Allies

Neutrality Acts and aid the Allies

After World War One, America wanted to keep the United States out of another European war. Deeply alarmed by that conflict, Roosevelt adopted cautious—and possibly deceitful—methods to circumvent the Neutrality Acts and aid the Allies.

To complete the Discussion activity, please do the following:

  • Pretend that you are a neutrality advocate and argue against entrance into the war or pretend that you are an advocate for entering the war. Write a two or three paragraph argument that considers:
  • What do you believe were the main reasons that some Americans wanted to remain neutral in the war?
  • What political options did neutrality advocates have, and how did they try to stop U.S. entrance into the war?
  • Why and how did the Roosevelt administration begin moving away from neutrality once war erupted in Europe?

Part 2

The U.S. rapidly mobilized industry and the draft for the war. By 1945, the U.S. had more than 8 million people in uniform. For the first time in U.S. history, a majority of married women worked outside the home. One in five Americans county in America during the war.

Consider these and other ways the United States changed during World War II.

To complete the Discussion activity, please complete the following:

Write one to two paragraphs for each of the following questions:

  • What do you believe were the biggest opportunities and challenges that the war created in regards to America’s identity? How did this affect immigrants, African-Americans, and women?
  • Do you believe there were long-term effects that these changes had on the economy and American families? Which ones do you believe were beneficial and which ones still provide challenges today?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

United States to drop the atomic bombs on Japan

United States to drop the atomic bombs on Japan
United States to drop the atomic bombs on Japan

United States to drop the atomic bombs on Japan

United States to drop the atomic bombs on Japan

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the United States decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan.

Prompt:
Pick a side based on ethical considerations and argue whether or not the United States should have dropped the atomic bombs. You should analyze alternative choices that the United States could have made instead of the decision to drop the bombs as well as the long-term consequences of the dropping of the atomic bombs.

Requirements:
You will have to submit a five-paragraph paper that is a 1,000 words.
Develop a thesis statement, a one sentence answer to the question. The introduction should provide context, and contain your thesis (underline the thesis).
Use Topic Sentences. They elaborate on the thesis but are more specific. The body paragraphs should begin with your topic sentences.
Back up your argument with evidence. Use quotes from the primary sources and resources provided. Include MLA citation (in text citation and works cited).
Resources:

These sources are divided into groups reflecting the standpoints of politicians, the military, and scientists. Read them carefully to understand the discussions that went on at the time and the alternatives that were considered.

Once you read the summaries of the historical figures positions, you may need more specific quotes for your paper. You can find them here at the National Security Archive of GWU (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Politicians:

President Harry Truman (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. became president of the United States on April 12, 1945 upon the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Henry Stimson, (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Secretary of War
John McCloy (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Assistant Secretary of War
James Byrnes (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Secretary of State
Joseph Grew (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Under Secretary of State
Military:

General George C. Marshall (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. was the U.S. Army Chief of Staff
Admiral Leahy (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Chief of Staff
Ralph Bard (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Under Secretary of the Navy
Scientists:

Physicist Leo Szilard (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. – one of the first scientists to conceive of how an atomic bomb might work.
J. Robert Oppenheimer (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., Director of Los Alamos Laboratory
General Leslie Groves, (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. Director of the Manhattan Project
Physicist Albert Einstein (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Niels Bohr (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Letter from the Scientific Panel of the Interim CommitteeLinks to an external site.
(Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.Secondary resources:

Hiroshima: Was it necessary? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Was it right to bomb Hiroshima? (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Debating the morality of Hiroshima (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

 

World War 2 Technological Advances

World War 2 Technological Advances How did World War II represent new technology?

World War 2 Technological Advances
World War 2 Technological Advances

How did this technology affect the outcome of the war? Written in current Turabian format, must include a minimum of 3 scholarly sources, and be a minimum of 3 full pages in length. The Second World War was a conflict that saw a great deal of scientific and technical innovation. The war was a battle of scientific minds as well as of bullets and bombs and the wartime research programs came up with many important developments to help give the Allies an advantage in the struggle. As with many other aspects of the Allied war effort, Canada played an important role.