Poetry Analysis Sheet Assignment Paper

Poetry Analysis Sheet
                 Poetry Analysis Sheet

Poetry Analysis Sheet

Instructions: Use the attached poetry analysis sheet (PDF) to analyze the poem “Upon Reading that Eric Dolphy Transcribed Even the Calls of Certain Species of Birds” by the contemporary poet John Murillo.
Poem: https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poetrymagazine/poems/58805/upon-reading-that-eric-dolphy-transcribed-even-the-calls-of-certain-species-of-birds

Poetry Analysis Sheet
For this project you will read and analyze a poem written by a Latino poet. The following instructions will help you uncover the meaning of the poem.
1. What does the title mean?
Take a look at the title and reflect on what it means:
(You will need this for the introductory paragraph.)

2. Put it in your own words
Read the poem two or three times. You will see something different each time you read the poem. Write a brief summary of the poem in your own words. Highlight or list some of the words (nouns, verbs, phrases) that are important to understanding the poem.

3. What do you think the poem means?
Now think about the meaning of the poem, not just the obvious meaning of each word but what they
mean beyond the literal. Do these words suggest something else?
Answer these questions:
• Who is the subject of the poem?

• What are they talking about?

• Why do you think the author wrote the poem?

• When is the poem happening?

• Where is the poem happening?

• What is the poet’s attitude?

• How does the poem shift from person to person or between different times or places?

Most poems tell us about a poet’s understanding of an experience so the beginning will be different then
the end. The change may be in feelings, language (slang to formal), or connotation (positive to negative).
Explain how these shifts convey the poem’s message.
continued Poetry Analysis Sheet (continued)
Copyright 2009 IRA/NCTE. All rights reserved.
ReadWriteThink materials may be reproduced for educational purposes.

4. Poetic devices: Tools of the poet
Identify different poetic devices and how they convey the poem’s message.
• Simile – comparison using like or as

• Metaphor – a direct comparison

• Personification – giving human qualities to nonhuman things

• Tone – what emotion does the speaker use as he talks

• Point of view – who is the telling the poem

• Imagery – creating pictures with words

• Alliteration – repeating the same letter

5. Theme
Identify the theme (central idea) of the poem. How does the theme convey the poem’s message?

6. Look at the title again
Now look at the title again. Do you now have a different interpretation of the title?

7. Begin writing your analysis
Start with the introductory paragraph. It should contain the title, the author, and an explanation of the writer’s position as well as the significance of the title. Include a brief overall statement of the meaning
of the poem. This will lead you into the body of the analysis. In the body of the analysis, discuss how
the poem was written, which poetic devices were used, the tone, the poet’s attitude, and the shift of the poem from the beginning to the poet’s ultimate understanding of the experience in the end. Add your
interpretation of the poem.

8. Historical and cultural context
Integrate the research you have done on your author into your poetry analysis. Explain how the author’s
history and culture have influenced the poem.
List two important experiences that influenced the author:

List two conditions in the author’s country that influenced his/her life (poverty, political unrest, war, lack of opportunities, social constraints especially for women):

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Summary Reaction and Analysis Paper

Summary Reaction and Analysis Paper Please use APA Citation Style when writing your paper. Do not format your paper in APA Style, only cite in APA.

Summary Reaction and Analysis Paper
Summary Reaction and Analysis Paper

Paper Length: 5 pages (no more, no less)

Page 1: Introduce (Introduction) the paper and summarize (Summary) Crash—one complete page in length

Introduction:

Introduce Crash and Privilege, Power and Difference, as well as the key concepts that you will be discussing in your analysis. Your thesis should contain all five concepts you will discuss in your analysis. Your introduction should be brief, no more than 3-5 concise sentences.

Please note, concepts are not random quotes pulled from the text, concepts are significant words/phrases used throughout the text (Examples: racism, sexism, isms, matrix of oppression, matrix of domination, oppression, path of least resistance, dominance, etc., but are not entire paragraphs pulled from the textbook). If the concepts/term cannot be defined in Johnson’s words it is not a concept/term/connection. No concept/quote should be more than three sentences from Johnson. No blockquotes are permitted.

Summary:

Use your own words to summarize the movie, cite at the end of your summary

Do not borrow language from movie trailers or movie critics

Do not waste space identifying the actors and the role they played

Do identify the major characters

Focus on those parts of the movie that connect to concepts in Privilege, Power, and Difference the major themes of this class—leadership, ethics, activism, diversity, democracy, and social responsibility; however you should not be discussing these pillars in this paper. You must focus on scenes in the film that connect to these concepts.

Page 2: React to Crash—one complete page in length

Do not express whether you thought the movie was boring, exciting, well-acted (etc.)

Use “I,” but do not use an informal or unprofessional tone

Make sure that this section is coherent and well organized (do not fall into the ramblings associated with a “free-flow of consciousness”)

Do express your reaction to critical events in the movie

Do express how critical events in the movie might connect to your life

Do express how you may have acted/reacted under similar circumstances

Do select two to three scenes/events from the film and react to them (tell me how they made you feel, what you would have done in that position, etc.)

 

Page 3 and 4: Analysis—connecting the movie to significant concepts in Privilege, Power, and Difference.

Use direct quotes from Privilege, Power, and Difference to define significant concepts/terms. **If you cannot define it in Johnson’s words then it is not a concept/term. Your quotes should not be more than 3 lines in length. No block quotes are permitted. Please make sure you are not pulling random quotes, the quotes you select must identify and define a concept.

At least 5 connections, which are direct quotes from Privilege, Power and Difference, that define a concept/term, explained through specific scenes in CRASH.

Make at least three well developed connections. **Connections are where you find a concept/term in Privilege, Power, and Difference and you define it in Johnson’s words. You then connect that concept to an event in the film CRASH. Concept/terms selected must be definable in Johnson’s words, they cannot be random quotes pulled from the text.

Please note, concepts are not random quotes pulled from the text, concepts are significant words/phrases used throughout the text (Examples: racism, sexism, isms, matrix of oppression, matrix of domination, oppression, path of least resistance, dominance, etc., but are not entire paragraphs pulled from the textbook). If the concepts/term cannot be defined in Johnson’s words it is not a concept/term/connection. Direct quotes should not exceed three lines of text in your paper.

Page 5: Work Cited

Use APA citation style

Cite Crash & Privilege, Power, and Difference only

Make sure that your entries are in alphabetical order

Make sure that if your entry is two lines in length that you indent the correct line

Additional requirements:

Do not include a cover page (it is not necessary since you will be submitting your paper via the Blackboard site.

Name in right hand corner of page #1.

Header on every page with last name and page number

Title: Summary, Reaction, and Analysis Paper #2: Crash—centered directly below name (SHIFT+ENTER one time below your name, SHIFT+ENTER one time below the title of the paper).

Do not include the date or the name of the class (since you are uploading it to Blackboard, I have this information).

Double-spaced

10-12 point font

Standard (that is, not funky) font (Times New Roman or Arial)

Standard margins (1” all the way around)

Standard indent at the beginning of each paragraph

Standard paragraph length

Standard space between paragraphs (not two double spaces)

Italicize titles

Succinct introduction that introduces Crash and Privilege, Power and Difference, as well as the key concepts that you will be discussing in your analysis. Your thesis should contain the five concepts you will be discussing in your analysis. Your introduction should be concise, no more than 3-4 sentences.

Succinct conclusion that ties everything together

 

Warning: You will earn a deficient grade (D+ or below) for committing any one of the following critical errors:

Not introducing Crash and Privilege, Power and Difference in the first paragraph, as well as the key concepts you will be discussing in your analysis in your introduction paragraph.

Not italicizing titles of book and film

Not following the paper structure (to a tee)

Not including direct quotes from Privilege, Power and Difference (at least 5 direct quotes defining major concepts from Privilege, Power and Difference and connecting them to major scenes in CRASH)

Not citing Crash and Privilege, Power and Difference and on your works cited page and in-text

Incorrectly formatting in-text citations (this includes putting the period in the wrong place, adding a comma where there shouldn’t be one and not adding a comma where there should be one, not including the p. # for direct quotes, etc.

Incorrectly formatting work-cited page (this includes not putting the entries in the correct order (alphabetical) and not indenting the second and third lines of entries)

Plagiarizing (representing someone else’s work as your own)

You will earn an automatic zero (0) for submitting a paper that does not meet the basic section and page length requirements.

My professor is kind of a B*tch as you can see.

willing to give you the money to buy the book.

Do not have time to do this BS this wee

This American Lifes the Problem We All Live With

This American Lifes the Problem We All Live With For your rhetorical analysis, rhetorically analyze: This American Life’s the Problem We All Live With (parts 1 and 2)

Analyses must be a minimum

This American Lifes the Problem We All Live With
This American Lifes the Problem We All Live With

of six full, double-spaced pages; of course, you are welcome to exceed the minimum. Analyses must conform to MLA formatting: 12 point Times New Roman point, 1-inch margins all around, with last name and page number included in the top, right-hand corner of each page. A works cited page should be included (does not count towards your page count) that includes a citation for the text. Refer to Purdue OWLís online MLA guide to aid in composing your works cited page correctly. Professional prose should be used as well as standard edited English. Staple drafts. Use https://www.thisamericanlife.org/562/transcript as the one source for the essay.

 

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Museum analysis Assignment Paper

Museum analysis
                    Museum analysis

Museum analysis

Description

http://tampamuseum.org/current-exhibitions/

-select any current exhibit/collection artwork to write about

INSTRUCTIONs

A work of art is the product of the dynamic interrelationships between the various art elements and principles. As you analyze the artwork, ask yourself why the artist made such choices. By considering the formal elements and principles of design involved, you can make yourself look more closely at the work of art, and thus understand more fully the artistís intended vision, as well as noticing how the work reflects the time and place from whence it came.

You must address ALL the prompts below within your essay, but your response need not be organized in the exact order given. Your paper must include proper introductory and concluding paragraphs.

  1. Formal Analysis (this section should be the ìmeatî of your paper): Find any work of art in the museum that interests you. You will engage in a thorough visual analysis of that work. Follow the guidelines below.
  • Identify the work fully (artist name if known, title if available, time period or date, medium, dimensions or approximate dimensions).
  • Provide a brief description of the subject matter of the work.
  • Analyze, describe, and discuss the work in terms of three (3) formal elements of art.
  • Analyze, describe, and discuss the works’ composition using three (3) principles of design.

**IMPORTANT: It is expected that the analysis of the workís formal elements and principles of design be the most in-depth and therefore most time should be spent on this section. You must demonstrate your understanding of the concepts learned in the course by utilizing appropriate course vocabulary within your analysis. Please use precise terminology associated with the elements and principles chosen. Failure to do so will result in a reduced grade. Consult the chapters and course material from Module 2.

o Spend a good amount of time looking at the work and taking notes. It is helpful to provide the reader with an overall picture of the work you are describing. You may find it useful to pretend you are describing the work to someone who cannot see, but must create an impression of the work based solely on your words. Clearly and articulately analyze and describe the formal elements and principles of design that you see in the work. There may be many, but be selective and try to determine the most significant elements of composition. Remember to utilize key terms from the textbook associated with the specific elements/principles chosen.

Is the work non-objective, representational, figurative, or abstract? Note that a work of art can fall into more than one of these categories. Please explain fully and in a way that demonstrates you have a correct understanding of the term(s) as it relates to our course content.

  1. Discussion of Medium: Examine your artwork further by discussing the medium used and the artist’s technique and application of materials. Is the object two- or three-dimensional? What limitations, if any, might the chosen medium create for the artist? Below are some further questions to consider, depending on the type of medium employed. See Part Two of your textbook (Media & Processes) for further information on art materials and media.

Page 2 of 3

Painting: How did the type of paint affect the strokes the artist could make? Was it fresco, oil, tempera, or watercolor? Was it a fast-drying paint that allowed little time to make changes? What kind of textures and lines was the artist able to create with this medium? Does it lend a shiny or flat look? How durable was the medium?

Does the work look the same today as when the artist painted it?

Drawing: Consider the materials utilized: metal point, chalk, charcoal, graphite, crayon, pastel, ink, and wash. Is the artist able to make controlled strokes with this medium? Would the tool create a thick or thin, defined or blurred line? Was the drawing intended to be a work of art in itself, or is it a study for another work, a peek into the artist’s creative process?

Printmaking: What is the process the artist undertook to create this work? Did he or she need to carve or etch?

Did the medium require a steady hand? Strength or patience?

Photography: What is the process the artist undertook to create this work? Is it an example of early photography or more recent processes? Is it created from digital, film or other processes? Documentary? Staged?

Sculpture: Is the sculpture high or low relief, or can we see it in the round? What challenges did the material present to the artist? Was the work created through a subtractive process or an additive one? What tools did the artist use to create the form? Is your work created from constructing or assembling things together?

Craft: Is it made of fiber, textile, ceramics, metalwork, glass, etc? Is the art object considered craft or fine art?

Why? Can works of fine art be utilitarian, in your opinion?

Alternative media and processes: Is your work a video, sound art, interactive, a work of conceptual art or even a performance piece? How does it differ from traditional works of art? Did you encounter the actual work itself, or is it documentation of an event or a time-based piece? Do you find it easier or more difficult to apply a formal analysis to this type of work? Explain.

III. Interpretation: This is the part of the paper where you go beyond description and offer a conclusion and your own informed opinion about the work.

Consider how the formal aspects of the work and the subject matter work together to produce significant meaning.

How did the artist’s choice of materials and medium affect its message and reception?

What questions does the work raise or leave you with, if any? Is it possible to make a reasoned statement about the artist’s aim?

Describe your personal reaction to the work. Did a visual analysis change your first reaction and interpretation of the work?

Page 3 of 3

In addition to the above, include the following within your essay:

  • Which museum did you attend? (This should be stated in the introductory paragraph.)
  • What is the basic organization of the museum’s collections? Discuss your personal overall impression of the experience itself, the museum, the exhibitions and their presentation.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Nike Case Study Analysis Assignment Paper

Nike Case Study Analysis
       Nike Case Study Analysis

Nike Case Study Analysis

University of Phoenix Material

Nike Case Study Analysis

Nike: Spreading Out to Win the Race

Nike is indisputably a giant in the athletics industry. The Portland, Oregon, company is known worldwide for its products, none of which it actually makes. It has thrived by knowing how to stay small, focusing on core competencies, and outsourcing manufacturing.

But if you don’t make anything, what do you actually do? If you outsource everything, what’s left? A lot of brand recognition, as it turns out.

Behind the Swoosh

Nike continues to outpace the athletic shoe competition while spreading its brand through an ever-widening universe of sports equipment, apparel, and paraphernalia. The ever-present Swoosh graces everything from bumper stickers to sunglasses to high school sports uniforms. Nike products embody a love of sport, discipline, ambition, practice, and all other desirable traits of athleticism.

The company has cleverly kept its advertising agency nestled close to home, but has relied extensively on outsourcing many non-executive and back office responsibilities to reduce overhead. Nike is structured around its core competency in product design—not manufacturing. It has taken outsourcing to a new level, with sub-contractors producing all of its shoes.

Whoops

Although outsourcing production hasn’t hurt product quality, it has challenged Nike’s reputation for social responsibility, especially regarding work conditions and labor practices at some suppliers. In a move designed to turn critics into converts, Nike posts information on its website detailing every one of the hundreds of factories that it uses to make shoes, apparel, and other sporting goods. It released the data in conjunction with a comprehensive corporate responsibility report summarizing the environmental impact and the labor situations of its contract factories.

Nike also encourages designers to develop environmentally sustainable designs like the Nike Free, a lightweight running shoe that boosted sales dramatically. Nike’s Sustainable Business & Innovation Lab funds outside startups focused on alternative energies, more efficient approaches to manufacturing, and the promotion of healthy lifestyles.

Pesky Competition

Nike has so far balanced size and pressure to remain successful by leveraging a decentralized and networked organization structure. Individual business centers—such as research, production, and marketing—are free to focus on their core competencies without worrying about the effects of corporate bloat.

This company has found continued marketplace success by positioning itself not simply as a sneaker company but as a brand that fulfills the evolving needs of today’s athletes and athletes-at-heart. Will Nike continue to profit from its organization structure, or will it spread itself so thin that its competition has a chance to overtake it?

Source: Schermerhorn Jr., J.R., Bachrach, D.G. (2016) Nike: Spreading Out to Win the Race. In Exploring Management (Cases for Critical Thinking).

Case Analysis Questions

Answer the following in up to 350 words each.

1. Describe the factors that drive Nike’s decision to stick with some form of network organizational structure rather than own its manufacturing operations.

2. Assess why Nike’s choice of a decentralized and networked organization structure worked well for the

3. Summarize the current state of competition in this industry. Assess if Nike continuing to pull away from rivals, or if they are catching up.

4. Assess whether Nike’s organizational structure is still a major strength that contributes to its success, or if it is creating problems that will call for organizational design changes in the future.

5. Determine whether a matrix structure could improve performance for Nike.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Film Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Film Analysis
                        Film Analysis

Film Analysis

There are two movies that are chosen to write about. Please read this below and the pictures about the prompt in the files i attached carefully!!!! Thanks so much.

TV show# The Green Hornet(1966)
1.What is about?
It’s a very old personal hero idea series. It’s talk about Green Hornet fight with bad guys and saves the city.
2.What themes from this show are you interested in analyzing ?
The reason why The Green Hornet failed.
Unfortunately, this series in the United States failed to succeed. By investigation, the reason may be related to the character modelling is not enough to please. The green hornet only got black suit with a black patch. He lacks the characters like the hero in American comic book heroes, such as superman, batman, Spiderman. All of them have distinct image. However, The Green Hornet more like secretly bandits than outlaw hero, plus their action, mind and skills. They are not outstanding, everyone is ego inflation in the United States in the 60s , such characters is doomed to failure.
3. .What scene could you analyze in relation to these themes/ topics.
In a fight with Bruce lee’s who is the sidekick of green hornet, it’s clear what sets him apart from other superheroes. Although Bruce lee’s kung fu is very good, but he does not have any super power, He can’t stimulate the brain of the audience in a moment. Coupled with the cliched story, this shows can’t attract the attention of the audience.

TV show# The flash
1.What is about?
The revenge of flash. He want to know who killed his parent and the reason. The growth of a boy to a real hero.
2.How does it relate to show#1
Both of them are super hero series, and the destination of both hero is to save their country. But the difference is that the former did not succeed, while the latter gained success and a large number of fans.
3.How does it speak to the socio-historical moment in which it was produced ?
With the continuous progress of the society,
more and more high technologies come into being.
Nowadays, the audience is no longer curious about the setting of history, they are more curious about the future, what they do not know, and the imagined world.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Watch a YouTube video and make an analysis

Watch a YouTube video and make an analysis
Watch a YouTube video and make an analysis

Watch a YouTube video and make an analysis.

Draft a 700 word (min) response to the Harris/Craig debate: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yqaHXKLRKzg. Include an analysis of the Divine Command Theory.
– Must watch the Video and write an analysis.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Art Visual analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Art Visual analysis
Art Visual analysis

Art Visual analysis

For your Final Paper, you are to choose
one artist and one work of art by that artist and give a 2 page visual analysis of that work of art.

I expect 1 cover page, and 2 FULL pages of text, Times New Roman font, 12, double spaced.
Do not adjust the margins, do not increase the size of your text, do not plagiarize!

You are also to include an image of the work of art you have chosen on the cover page.

Your chosen artist/work must either be a living contemporary (recognized) artist, or a historical artist. I love your kids/nieces/nephews/friends/grand kids, but I do not want to see finger paintings for this assignment.

Organization:
1. Introductory paragraph
2. Introduce your artist and the piece you chose
3. Discuss the visual properties of the work
4. What does this piece communicate to the viewer?
5. Why did you chose this piece?
6. Conclusion

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Visual Art Analysis Essay Assignment Paper

Visual Art Analysis
Visual Art Analysis

Visual Art Analysis

For your Final Paper, you are to choose
• one artist and one work of art by that artist and give a 2 page visual analysis of that work of art.
• I expect 1 cover page, and 2 FULL pages of text, Times New Roman font, 12, double spaced.
• Do not adjust the margins, do not increase the size of your text, do not plagiarize!
• You are also to include an image of the work of art you have chosen on the cover page.
• Your chosen artist/work must either be a living contemporary (recognized) artist, or a historical artist. I love your kids/nieces/nephews/friends/grand kids, but I do not want to see finger paintings for this assignment.

Organization:
1. Introductory paragraph
2. Introduce your artist and the piece you chose
3. Discuss the visual properties of the work
4. What does this piece communicate to the viewer?
5. Why did you chose this piece?
6. Conclusion

Art Appre & Art Appre Honors Paper
Tips for writing your paper (please see syllabus for instructions):
• In your paper, you firstly need to have a clear introduction. State the title of the piece you have chosen, the artist’s name, and what you intend to write about.
• So what are you writing about? Well first you might want to write a paragraph on what you know about the artist—where are they from, what is their background, what kind of art do they generally create. This information might have been included in an Artist Statement at the gallery opening you attended. If this kind of information was not provided at the opening, it is not required for your paper, it’s just nice to have. ?
• You most definitely need a visual analysis of your chosen work. This is your chance to use all of that vocab you’ve learned this semester. What is the medium? What elements of art are used? What principles of design are used? What does this work of art communicate to the viewer?
• Don’t forget you need a cover page with your name on it, and you also need a copy of your chosen piece attached to the paper.

Tips for those of you writing the Art Appre Honors Paper:
• You must write your paper on a Contemporary (meaning the artist is still alive) artist. If you are having difficulties finding an artist you like, first use your book as a reference, and come speak with me if you continue to have issues.
• First, give some background on your chosen artist. Who is this person? Where did they learn about art? What media do they generally work with? Do they have a common theme in their art? Who do they consider to be their influences? What other artists do they work with? These might be some of the questions you approach in your paper.
• Choose one work of art from this artist and give a full visual analysis of this work of art.
• Make sure you are following the guidelines in your syllabus about sources.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Rhetorical analysis major essay Paper

Rhetorical analysis major essay
              Rhetorical analysis major essay

Rhetorical analysis major essay

Write an essay in which you analyze the rhetorical strategies of the author in the article “Reproductive Justice is Every Woman’s Right” published in 2006 in NOW Magazine Preview the document. BE SURE to include a Work Cited with the article cited as an article in a magazine. You don’t have to cite it as a PDF. DON’T FORGET INTERNAL CITATIONS!

Write an introductory paragraph that summarizes the argument, and has the name of the author and title of the article in quotation marks. Include a thesis Preview the document–it should be your last sentence in the intro. You are arguing whether or not the author argued effectively, so your thesis will say, “In [“Title of Article”], columnist Bob Jones effectively argues [you may add how he argues] that global warming is a real and present danger.”

In two or three fully-developed body paragraphs, focus on these elements:

the writer’s use of analogy, questions, evidence, description and narrative, or personal experience as support for his or her claim and reasons (logos, pathos); provide evidence in the form of quotes;
the writer’s credibility and authority(ethos); provide evidence; the match between the genre and the argument, and the genre and the audience; the audience of the argument; and the writer’s word choice and level of formality; provide evidence.
Conclude with a paragraph summing up her argument and whether or not it is effective. Aim for approximately
750-1,000 words.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!