Location and Presentation of Slumber party by Eric Fischl Describe information about the location and presentation of the work “Slumber party” by Eric Fischl.
Location and Presentation of Slumber party by Eric Fischl
Include details about the kind of artwork it is, and the period/style of the artwork. Include a critique of the artwork by art critics that includes references, and synthesizes the various theories of art. Rely upon at least 3 cited primary or secondary sources. Use first-hand interviews or articles published in “refereed journals”. Do not use Encyclopedias, like Wikipedia, or blogs, and privately published “fan” Websites. You may use the artist’s personal website as a primary source. This is not a essay about the artist, but about the artwork “Slumber Party”.
Discuss Different Aspects of Realism in 19th Century Art In this paper you will discuss different aspects of Realism in 19th century art:
1- In the first part, give definitions of the different aspects of Realism we have encountered in our study of 19th century art: optical realism,(the Barbizon School), idealism (The Hudson River School) social realism, (Courbet, Millet, Daumier).
Discuss Different Aspects of Realism in 19th Century Art
2- Context: explain the importance of: the industrialization during the 19th century, the role of photography, the development of unions and political activism (social realism) in the development of Realist art.
3- For the third part of the paper, select 3 different works of art by different artists, that in your opinion, illustrate the variety of “realist” approaches in the visual arts: Optical Realism, Idealism and Social Realism. Select artworks with different subject matters.
4- Make sure that you analyze clearly the visual elements for each of the selected works that allow you to discuss them as examples of realism. Point out the differences and/or similarities.
Discuss Different Aspects of Realism in 19th Century Art Checklist
– Include images of the selected works on the title age of your paper with the ID for each artwork: artist’s name, title of work, dimensions, medium, collection where artwork is kept (usually a Museum)
– Do not forget introduction and conclusion.
-Take time to re-read and proofread your paper before submitting it.
– Do not forget to cite the sources when using information from a book or the Internet. Follow the MLA format and cite the sources in the text first.
– Add a works cited page at the end of your paper.
Lê exhibit at the San Jose Museum of Art A. Attend the Dinh Q. Lê exhibit at the San Jose Museum of Art.
https://sjmusart.org/exhibition/dinh-q-le-true-journey-return
Lê exhibit at the San Jose Museum of Art
Include the name you are registered under AND the name you prefer to go if different
(REQUIRED) Submit a selfie photo of you at the exhibit showing the exhibit in the background
Name of artist and title of exhibition
Location of exhibition
Dates of exhibition
Date you attended exhibition
Lê exhibit at the San Jose Museum of Art Paper Writing Requirement
Select a photographic piece from the exhibit and write a 2-3 paragraph observation paper that addresses the following:
Medium (traditional or digital, color or black & white, or alternative process)
Size (what was the approximate dimensions of the work)
Presentation (how was the work presented? Was it matted and framed, in a slide show, in an artist book, photo sculpture, etc)
Subject Matter (what were the images of? ….landscapes in France, people of India, etc)
Personal Thoughts (What was your personal reaction to the work. Did it make you feel happy/sad, comfortable/uncomfortable, etc)
Observations (What observations did you make about the exhibition space, lighting, and other attendees? Does seeing work in person change the viewing experience in any way versus seeing images in books, slides, etc. ?)
Compare and Contrast Two Art Objects Snake Goddess and the Greece art object: Peplos Kore (Archaic period)
1. Write a 7 -8 pages, double-spaced compare and contrast essay that investigates how two artworks from two different period styles illustrate a particular theme in art.
Compare and Contrast Two Art Objects
2. Your chosen period style to exemplify your thesis statement. Introduction paragraph with a clear, controlling idea (thesis statement)
3. Artwork identification: title of artworks, artists (if known), medium, and period styles
Descriptive analysis of EACH artwork
Comparison/Contrast structure (to compare is to discuss how the images are similar and to contrast is to discuss how the images are different)
Conclusion paragraph (summarize your argument and connect to greater idea)
Works Cited Page: a separate page of sources in MLA style formatting (use at least 3 academic sources)
Brunelleschi in Giorgio Vasaris Lives of the Artists Read the chapter on Brunelleschi in Giorgio Vasari’s Lives of the Artists (volume 1). You can find this volume in most public libraries. Respond: What did you learn about Brunelleschi?
Brunelleschi in Giorgio Vasaris Lives of the Artists
How, in Vasari’s words, did Brunelleschi father the Renaissance style of architecture? What, specifically, did Brunelleshi do that was so different from previous architects? (1.5 to 2 typed
pages). In his Lives of the Artists of the Italian Renaissance, Vasari demonstrated a literary talent that outshone even his outstanding abilities as a painter and architect.
Primary Source of Power on Over the Hedge Movie State what R.J. the Raccoon’s primary source of social power/influence was in the movie “Over the Hedge”.
Primary Source of Power on Over the Hedge Movie
Give at least one specific example from the film that portrays this source of power. Finally, in one or two sentences, compare this source of social power directly and unambiguously to the primary source of social power used by General Frank Savage at the beginning of the film “12 O’Clock High“. Spring has sprung, and Verne and his woodland friends awaken from their long winter’s nap to discover that a large, green hedge has cropped up right through the middle of their once-natural habitat.
Romanesque Europe and the Interrelated Phenomena Romanesque Europe is said to be defined by three interrelated phenomena: monasticism, pilgrimage and the Crusades (see p. 473).
Romanesque Europe and the Interrelated Phenomena
Consider two massive portal sculptures from the churches of Moissac (p. 493) and Autun (p. 496). What is the relationship that each has to issues of pilgrimage and monasticism? Compare and contrast the imagery found on each of these monumental portals. What impact do you believe these had on their original audience? How does each comprise a “sermon in stone?” Romanesque art, architecture, sculpture, and painting characteristic of the first of two great international artistic eras that flourished in Europe during the Middle Ages.
Rococo to Contemporary Contextual Analysis For this assignment, you’ll reconsider the work you selected for your formal analysis (from the Portland Art Museum).
Rococo to Contemporary Contextual Analysis
Building on the observations you presented about the formal qualities of the work in the previous essay, you’ll expand your discussion to contextualize the work within the time and place it was made—its art historical period. (You may select a work other than the one you originally wrote about, if you wish.)
Assuming you’re writing about the object you studied for your formal analysis, you should already be familiar with the basic facts about it (artist name, title, date, period, materials). Your essay should describe the key features of the period to which your object belongs, such as French Rococo or American Romanticism. If you’re not sure of this, consider the works displayed in the gallery alongside your work; this should give you a sense of the artistic period. You’ll have to describe the major stylistic trends of art for the period and place of origin for the artwork. Is this work typical or atypical of the period style to which it corresponds? How so? You might compare and contrast it with a representative work of that period style in your essay. If your artist is well-known, and many, but not all, of the artists shown at the PAM are, you might also consider how this work relates to others you’ve seen by him/her, such as those in the textbook. Again, is this work typical or atypical of the artist’s oeuvre (body of work)? How so? This section of the paper will require you to consult with your textbook. If you need to consult further resources, I have compiled some in D2L (see “Content” then
Rococo to Contemporary Contextual Analysis Essay Instructions
“Essays: Instructions, Turn in site” then “Resources for Essay 2”).
Next, you’ll need to organize your observations into a coherent essay with an introduction and conclusion. Please give credit to all your sources by with citations (in-text parenthetical citations and a list of works cited at the end). Format your citations and list of works cited according to the MLA style (see the link in “Resources for Essay 2” in D2L).
Rococo to Contemporary Contextual Analysis Essay Guidelines
Essays should follow these guidelines:
2-3 pages/600 – 800 words in length
Double-spaced in 12 point, Times New Roman or Arial font
1-1½ inch margins
Use of MLA (Modern Language Association) format for citing sources
Put the title of a work of art in italics not quotes
Use of paragraphs and proper grammar, syntax, punctuation, and capitalization (edit and proofread your document)
Follows PSU’s policy on academic honesty (see the syllabus)
The essay is worth 60 points and is due in D2L by 2:30pm on December 6. Essays that are turned in late will be penalized 6 points per day late; essays submitted after December 8 will not be read.
Points will be assigned according to the following rubric:
A (60 – 54) This is a model essay that follows all the instructions given above. It explains how the object corresponds to the period style in which it was and how it differs from said period style (if applicable). When possible, the essay will also consider if the object is typical or atypical of the artist’s other works. All sources are properly cited with in-text citations and a list of works cited in the MLA style. This essay is well-written, easy to follow, and free of errors in grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and syntax.
B (53.5 – 48) This is a strong essay that follows the instructions given above. It explains how the object corresponds to the period style in which it was and how it differs from said period style (if applicable). When possible, the essay will also consider if the object is typical or atypical of the artist’s other works. This essay may have minor problems with contextualization, perhaps not considering features specific to the period style or features present in the work. Alternatively, the body of the essay might be well-done but perhaps the citations are incorrect or incomplete. But, this essay is well-written, easy to follow, and with minimal errors in grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and syntax.
C (47.5 – 42) This is an average essay that follows most of the instructions given above (it might be late). It relates the work to the period style but is most likely generalized in its discussion. It may not consider key elements in the selected work of art or period. It may have incorrect or improperly formatted citations. And, it will likely have numerous errors in grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and syntax.
D (41.5 – 36) This is essay will have many problems. It will likely be late and may only follow some, but not all, of the guidelines given above. This essay will demonstrate significant problems with the contextual analysis, perhaps failing to reference key aspects of the selected artwork or period, or even relating the work to an incorrect period. This essay will likely have considerable errors with citations along with grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and syntax.
F (below 35) This is essay will have many problems. It likely be late will not conform to the guidelines given above. This essay will demonstrate significant problems with the contextual analysis. This essay will likely have considerable errors with citations along with grammar, punctuation, capitalization, and syntax.
Claude Monet Sunrise Museum Artwork Please title your paper with the name of the artwork you have chosen. Make sure to always italicize titles of artworks.
Claude Monet Sunrise Museum Artwork
Your title page will also include your name, my name, the date and the class you are in: Art Appreciation
Introduction: Introduce the artwork you have chosen. Your introduction will state where you observed the artwork (museum).
Claude Monet Sunrise Museum Artwork Introduction
You will want to introduce the reader to your overall experience at the IMA. Your introduction will need a thesis statement that you will recap in your conclusion. What do you want to tell people the most about this artist or artwork? Example: Hopper’s work often explores themes of loneliness, which can specifically be seen within this piece. – Then, the rest of the paper will focus on explaining that statement.
Discuss the FORMAL PROPERTIES of your selection- size, materials, technique, color, and any other details about its physical attributes. Don’t forget to tell whether the artwork is a painting, sculpture, print, architecture, installation, video media, drawing, photograph, etc…
ARTIST: Please include a few brief words about the artists involvement in any specific style (associated with the image you chose) as well as his/her contribution to the art movement and style- not an entire biography.
Claude Monet Sunrise Museum Artwork Essay Paper Description
Please provide the CONTEXT of the work of art- its culture of origin, time period or art movement, religion if applicable and artist information if available.
Be sure to DESCRIBE the look of the artwork in your own words as much as possible. Be specific, as though you were explaining it over the phone to someone who couldn’t see it. Classify the work; is it Representational, Abstract, or Nonrepresentational? What is the subject matter and/or the content of the work of art? Also, analyze the work of art. Artists don’t generally emphasize all the elements of art equally. Use the provided Gathering Information template to collect information on the elements and principles of art. If the artist emphasizes SCALE (principle of design), then talk about scale, etc. Discuss the artist(s) intent for the artwork. Does the artist achieve his/her intent? Does the artwork visually explain what it was intended to? Refer back to chapter one where the text discusses the roles of artists to help with your judgment.
Analyze your work of art for any SYMBOLISM or Iconography. Research should guide you in this if you select a work of art from a time or cultural we haven’t studied yet.
It may be interesting to provide a HISTORY of the work itself and any restoration efforts. (If known)
Next, please tell the reader what inspired you to pick this work. Why did it speak to you? The look? A religious or emotional connection? Travel experience? You tell me.
CONCLUSION: the conclusion should summarize and restate your thesis statement. Consider an additional leading thought to encourage the reader to want more information beyond these images
Van Eyck Analyzing Art In Northern Renaissance “Van Eyck and Analyzing Art in the Northern Renaissance” Please respond to the following, using sources under the Explore heading as the basis of your response:
Explain whether you agree with the interpretation of either Sayre or Koster of Van Eyck’s Arnolfini double portrait, identifying the most persuasive part of that interpretation. Describe two (2) symbolic elements of the painting and any other features that stand out to you. Pretend you are having a portrait done of you and a significant other; describe at least four (4) symbolic elements that you might include in the painting, and explain why.
Explore Van Eyck Analyzing Art In Northern Renaissance
Jan Van Eyck’s Arnolfini Double Portrait
Henry Sayre’s interpretation in Chapter 16, (pp. 548-551, Figs. 16.7-16.8); review Week 8 Music Folder
Margaret Koster’s interpretation at http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+Arnolfini+double+portrait%3A+a+simple+solution.-a0109131988
Week 8 Discussion Template
Here is my main post for the Week 8 Discussion “Van Eyck and Analyzing Art in the Northern Renaissance”
My interpretation of the Arnolfini painting is in agreement with Van Eyck Analyzing Art In Northern Renaissance.
There are only a few things to say here either you:
Agree with Sayre that the portrait represents a wedding ceremony
Agree with Koster that the portrait represents an engagement/betrothal ceremony
The theory that the portrait is a memorial to Arnolofini’s dead wife
Be VERY clear which interpretation you believe, just use one of the above statements
Here’s why . . .
Discuss in some detail the reason for interpretation Van Eyck Analyzing Art In Northern Renaissance
Discuss in some detail WHY you made the interpretation you did, this should be at least 3 or 4 sentences and assess which parts of the painting suggest your interpretation Explore
Symbolism I see in the ‘Arnolfini Portrait’
There is a lot to discuss here, please assess several symbolic elements and then discuss what the symbolism is and why and whether or not you agree with it Van Eyck Analyzing Art In Northern Renaissance
Symbolic elements I would put in my own ‘me and my significant other portrait’
Please come up with a few items and then EXPLAIN why they are symbolic for you
Of course once you make your main post, please reply to at least 2 other student posts, thanks
