Skills For Criminologists Concepts and Theories

Skills For Criminologists Concepts and Theories Refer to a minimum number of sources (books, articles, academic papers, reports)
What is Crime?

Skills For Criminologists Concepts and Theories
Skills For Criminologists Concepts and Theories

Introduction
Crime is a contested concept
Constitution is diverse
Historically relative
Competing theoretical perspectives
Main body
Begin to discriminate between criminological phenomena, concepts and theories
Attempt to explain their value in addressing question
Conclusion
Recap the key points for the reader
Crime is not a self-evident and unitary concept
It is diverse, relative, and continually contested
Competing theoretical positions
Those theoretical positions shape our definitions of crime & answers to the question ‘what is crime?’
in 200 words answer these questions about the eassy.
Did I enjoy writing this eassy?
What particular challenges did I encounter?
Which exiting study skills did I draw on?
Which new skill did I learn, or develop?
Which skills could I benefit from practicing more?

Zimbardos Prison Experiments and Stereotype Study

Zimbardos Prison Experiments and Stereotype Study Use the following link in regards to the essay:
http://www.prisonexp.org/psychology/1
Social Psychology attempts to explain the social forces that influence attitudes and actions.

Zimbardos Prison Experiments and Stereotype Study
Zimbardos Prison Experiments and Stereotype Study

Topics on Stereotyping and Prejudice, Attribution Theory, and the power of social roles are important for psychologists to understand. Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment demonstrates how in-groups / out-groups conform to external standards and clearly define stereotypical roles.
Review Zimbardo’s Prison Experiment using the link “Zimbardo’s Prison Study” link in the Supporting Lesson Links folder.
Using Zimbardo’s Prison, address the following topics:
1. Identify social roles in society where Conformity, Prejudice, and Stereotyping occur.
2. Explain how social roles lead to conformity and hypothesize why individuals lose themselves in these roles.
3. How may leaders prevent abuse of social roles among their employees or other authority figures?
4.Discuss how our social roles dictate our positions in society and how we can facilitate cohesiveness to accomplish the group’s goal without demonstrating
Prejudice and Stereotyping.
5. Does obedience to authority explain Nazi Germany? If so, could it occur again? Using your understanding of Conformity and Social Roles, explain your answer.

Crime Scene of Stolen Car then attempted Kidnapping

Crime Scene of Stolen Car then attempted Kidnapping The crime is: Stolen car then attempted kidnapping.

Crime Scene of Stolen Car then attempted Kidnapping
Crime Scene of Stolen Car then attempted Kidnapping

You need to do my section/part of this assignment which is:
My section: writing the report plus filling out the 3 forms that I attached which are
Ohio Uniform Incident Report + Incident Report Part 2 + Victim Supplement.
You must turn in a completed narrative report using Ohio Uniform incident report forms.
To understand more here below each student’s part to do:
1st student: he collected evidence + filled out the evidence forms
2nd student: he took photos
3rd student: she did a sketch
Me: I still need to turn in a completed narrative report plus filling out the 3 forms which mentioned above. I just scanned them, so print them out and fill
them out by getting an answer from the crime scene details attachment ( 1st attachment) that contains the Anna and Mike statement plus police reports. After that – scan them with your answer and I will take care of the rest.
I attached a sample of the narrative report in order to guide you to the right path and help you a little bit.
Then – I attached the Victim Answers+ recording, just in case you need some answers when you will write the Report. My Badge Number is 5674.
to sum up:
1st page: fill out the 1st form
2nd page: fill out the 2nd form
3rd page: fill out the 3rd form
4th page: write the narrative report

Criminology Persistence and Resistance Theories

Criminology Persistence and Resistance Theories This assignment for criminological theory course and here is the description:

Criminology Persistence and Resistance Theories
Criminology Persistence and Resistance Theories

In class, we watched the movie Girl Trouble. Briefly summarize Sheila’s past criminal history and at least two specific situations that Shelia made decisions
and engaged in behavior that: (1) resulted in persistence in offending, and (2) resulted in resistance or termination from offending. In your answer, define the terms persistence, resistance, and termination of criminal offending. Finally, do you think one theory explains both decisions/behaviors (persistence and resistance) or do you think there are separate theoretical explanations for each decision/behavior? Name the theory or theories that explain her decisions/behaviors and explain why you think the theory or theories are most appropriate.
Your responses should be typed and double-spaced using 12 point font. In your assignment, please indicate your name, use professional language, staple and number all pages and do NOT exceed 5 pages of text (maximum of 5 pages). Include a reference page and in text citations when necessary.

Social Process and Control Theories of Crime

Social Process and Control Theories of Crime Required Text Book: 1. Introduction to Criminology: Why Do They Do It? By Pamela J. Schram, Stephen G. Tibbetts. (Only Source). Social process theory has three main branches:

Social Process and Control Theories of Crime
Social Process and Control Theories of Crime

(1) social learning theory stresses that people learn how to commit crimes; (2) social control theory analyzes the failure of society to control criminal tendencies; and (3) labeling theory maintains that negative labels produce criminal careers. The social learning branch of social process theory suggests that people learn criminal behavior much as they learn conventional behavior. Differential association theory, formulated by Sutherland, holds that criminality results from a person’s perceiving an excess of definitions in favor of crime over definitions that uphold conventional values. Akers has reformulated Sutherland’s work using psychological learning theory, and he calls his approach differential reinforcement theory.

Foundational and Modern Criminological Theories

Foundational and Modern Criminological Theories Analyze foundational and modern criminological theories, their interrelated concepts, and the influence of culture on crime

Foundational and Modern Criminological Theories
Foundational and Modern Criminological Theories

The criminal justice system is grounded in both foundational and modern criminological schools of thought. Most often modern theory is interwoven with threads of foundational theory supporting contemporary ideas. Social control and the judicial process stem from such theory, yet no theory is capable of explaining crime in its entirety.
Identify, define, and discuss a foundational theory of your choice, its concepts and premises, and how it was influenced by the culture in comparison to the
concepts, premises, and cultural influences of a modern day theory of which it is connected.
Then evaluate each theory?s use in the judicial process or for social control and/or how they are used in the judicial process or for social control today.
Helpful Tip: For initial postings, use Bloom?s Taxonomy as a framework for building your response beginning with level one working your way up slowly and broadly to hone in on the analysis in level four.
My expectation of students is that you include three journal articles per the main post.

Civil and Crime Procedure Assignment

Civil and Crime Procedure Assignment Search and Seizure
Review the FindLaw database and identify a case concerning the 4th Amendment. It may also be helpful to research the Strayer Online Library for this
assignment.

Civil and Crime Procedure Assignment
Civil and Crime Procedure Assignment

Complete a four to five (4-5) page legal memorandum in which you:
1. Include a brief summary of the case.
2. Explain the court’s decision, including whether there has been a violation of the plaintiff’s 4th Amendment right against unlawful search and seizure by
the government.
3. Summarize the court’s opinion.
4. Summarize any dissenting opinion.
5. Use at least two (2) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
• Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-
specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and
the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
• Explain the differences and commonalities between civil and criminal law and procedures.
• Use technology and information resources to research issues related to civil and criminal procedures.
• Write clearly and concisely about issues in law and the legal system using proper writing mechanics.

Causes of vulnerability to abuse and harm Assignment

Causes of vulnerability to abuse
Causes of vulnerability to abuse

Causes of vulnerability to abuse

Causes of vulnerability to abuse

Order Instructions:
If is possible please to do for sunday.

1. Explain why particular individuals and groups may be more vulnerable to abuse and harm self and others . — (900 words )
2. Review risk factors which may lead you to incidents of abuse and harm self and others. (900 words)

SAMPLE ANSWER

Causes of vulnerability to abuse and harm

Self harm is a complex issue not only in its definition but also in relation to the insufficiency of data available with regards to the patterns and frequency of this subject across the globe. It is important to not that there is no “universal definition” of self harm. Moreover, diverse views have been raised concerning the causes and risk factors among individuals that harm themselves or others.

According to the study conducted by Hawton et al, it was determined that some people may harm themselves or others as a means of communicating their distress to the general public (Hawton et al, 2012). This disorder can also be an act of rebellion and the attempt to individualize oneself, a manner of relieving intense anxiety temporarily, a way to regulate pain, an effort to manage emotional numbness, or more still an effort to manipulate other people. Individuals who harm themselves or/and others may develop an immediate sense of relief by partaking in it. However, it is worth noting that this feeling is a temporary solution the feelings that were distressing them initially will end up recurring once more. This paper seeks to find out why some individuals are more vulnerable to abuse and harm self and others as well as the associated risk factors to this type of behavior.

Just like all other mental disorders, there is no single factor that predisposes a person to engage in self harm. In general, self harm results due to inability of a person to properly manage psychological pain in a manner that is healthy. Often, individuals who engage in this form of unhealthy conduct find it difficult to regulate, express, or understand their emotions.  The factors that make individuals to be prone to abuse and harm self or others can be classified as follows;

Social factors

These are ranked as the commonest cause of abuse and harm due to the emotional distress that they arouse in people. Social factors that have been pointed predispose individuals to harm include;

  • Having difficult relationships especially with friends and partners
  • Difficulties at work such as demotions, unfair treatment by senior workers and layoffs can also make people to be prone to harm and abuse.
  • Bullying: This can be at home by older siblings, relatives, or neighbors. It can also be exercised in school or at work. An example of harm to others that was due to bullying is the recent case that was all over the news whereby an American student went to school with a gun and started shooting fellow students randomly (Fisher et al, 2012).
  • Poverty, whereby a person has several responsibilities such as paying house rent, paying for children school fees, and providing the basic needs for his/her family. This is common among adults who end up being depressed and may subject their depression on their children by beating them up over petty reasons or even without any reason at all.
  • Drug and substance abuse: Individuals prone to alcohol and substance abuse disorders tend to be aggressive and are more likely to make claims of having suicidal thoughts or even previous suicidal attempts. In a recent study by Daine et al (2013) of about 6500 adults who enrolled in addiction treatments it was proven that individuals who had engaged in serious acts of violence such as murder, rape, and assault leading to serious injury were more than twice likely to report several suicidal attempts.
  • Sexuality- Persons who come to terms with their sexual orientation such as being bisexual or gay may be a danger to themselves.
  • Cultural expectations can promote vulnerability of harm to self. A good example is that of arranged marriages whereby ladies are often forced into marriages against their will or worse even at a tender age.
  • Trauma can also enhance vulnerability of this disorder. Some causes of trauma include; physical or emotional, sexual abuse such as rape or domestic abuse. The death of a close family member or a close friend and having a miscarriage are also common predisposing factors.

Emotional Distress

Emotions have also been linked abuse and harm vulnerability. An unhappy situation or the distress from a traumatic experience can result in feelings of self hatred or low self esteem. These emotions gradually build up and it becomes difficult for people to seek help. Therefore, self harm or harming others may be a means of releasing these pent-up feelings. They also indulge in this behavior as a way of coping with their problems.

People that are more prone to harm themselves and others may be having difficulties in regulating or managing their emotions (Figley et al, 2013). Therefore, they use self harm as a means of managing the anger and tension. Further research also reported that such individuals are poorer in solving problems.

 Psychological Causes

These also increase the tendency of people to take part in abuse and harm. For example;

  • People may be having repeated thoughts about harming themselves and they feel like doing it,
  • Self harm can also be linked to borderline personality disorder- a disorder that causes instability in a manner that one thinks, behaves, or feels,
  • Dissociation or loss of touch with oneself- self harm occurs without realizing it,

Organic reasons have also been associated with aggressive outbursts. Take an example whereby a person has damage to his/her frontal lobe or certain forms of epilepsy. In such circumstances, it is difficult to pin-point comprehensible argument for the expression of aggressive episodes.

  1. Risk Factors for Harming Self and Others

The risk factors of self harm and others are not static. Their value of prediction keeps changing depending on period they occur in a person’s development, social contexts, and the circumstances that one faces. They can be found in an individual, the surroundings, or the individual’s ability to react to the requirements or demands of the environment. Some factors start manifesting as early as childhood while others do not appear at all until adolescence period or adulthood.  Some risk factors entail the family, the school, the neighborhood, or the peer group. Risk factors will be classified as follows for clarity.

Depression and mental illness

This is one of the most obvious risk factors for indulging in harm to self and others. According to the research conducted by Andover et al, it was proven that mental and addictive disorders result in almost 90% of the suicidal cases reported (Andover et al, 2012). At least one in every twenty youths suffers from mental disorders that are severe enough to impair judgment. However, the sad news is that less than 20% of these individuals receive treatment. Most of those who harm themselves suffer from depression.

School risk Factors

Individuals who view their instructors as not understanding or caring or do not coexist peacefully with their peers have vulnerability of harming others or themselves. They may be associated with the following features;

  • Past suspension or expulsion for violent behavior
  • Social isolation, aggressiveness in grade K-3 or hyperactivity
  • Misbehaving in class, truancy, or being involved frequently in fights
  • Severe disciplinary issues
  • Anger or frustration when handling school artwork or essays
  • A student that has previously brought a weapon at school
  • Academic failure when joining school
  • Academic pressure from parents and guardians.

Community risk factors

Persons that are highly exposed to community violence are at severe risk of engaging in self-destructive behavior. This usually arises when one shapes his/her conduct after what they have learned and experienced in the community. Moreover, some youth who grow up without having meaningful connections with responsible adults lack the necessary guidance that they should acquire so that they may cope with their daily lives (Moran, et al, 2012). Other community risk factors include;

  • Severe economic deprivation
  • Easy accessibility to guns, weapons, and other dangerous equipments
  • Poor community organization and low attachment in the neighborhood
  • Few recreational activities for people in the community especially the youth
  • Individuals who have engaged previously in vandalism and destruction of property

Personal Risk Factors

  • Persons who have been involved in violent behavior previously
  • History of being bullied by friends, classmates, or relatives
  • History of uncontrolled angry outbursts and tantrums
  • Individuals who have previously bullied their peers and younger youths
  • Aggression to animals
  • Alcohol and substance abuse
  • Previous attempts of suicide
  • Fire- setting
  • Persons that result in calling of names and cursing when they are mad
  • Recent experience of loss, humiliation, or rejection
  • Cult or gangs involvement
  • Unstructured time
  • Preoccupation with explosives and other weapons
  • Does not own up and blames others for problems they are responsible for
  • Often having mood swings and significant depression

Family Risk Factors

  • History of possession of a weapon and use by a family member
  • History of being punished frequently
  • Previous family violence
  • Inconsistent or severe punishment
  • Lack of support or proper supervision from parents and guardians
  • Youth has a past history of abuse by a family member
  • Individuals who grew up without clear expectations or standards of behavior being imposed on them by their care givers.

Cultural Risk Factors

Conformity issues and assimilation, variations in expectations and gender roles feelings of victimization and isolation can all increase the levels of stress and vulnerability of people. In addition, some cultures especially the Pacific and Asian cultures view self harm particularly suicide as a rational reaction to shame.

Situational Crises

Daine et al argues that about 30% of individuals’ cases of abuse and harm to self and others are linked to an identifiable precipitating occurrence such as loss of a valued relationship, divorce of parents, the passing away of loved one, or sexual abuse. Normally, all these events coincide with other risk factors (Daine et al, 2013).

Conclusion

Some individuals view self injury engagement as a means of coping with their emotions. However, the troubles they are running away from will still be present even after their self-mutilation. Moreover, the relief that these individuals feel after involving themselves in self harm or abuse of others is usually short term.

Some of the interventions that can be used include interpersonal treatments, therapies of problem-solving, and use of “emergency card” mode of interventions (Rossouw and  Fonagy, 2012). Other treatment forms that have proved to be essential include dialectical conduct therapy which is administered often among individuals who self-harm themselves and/or others from time to time.

The burden associated with injury to self and others is often a heavy one, especially because people who engage in this behavior do it in private where they hide their secret from their loved ones and friends. They create a burden that is extremely hard to carry. This may result in more severe self injury to escape the feelings. Therefore, proper platforms should be established whereby such people can be access easily for counseling and support.

References

Andover, M. S., Morris, B. W., Wren, A., & Bruzzese, M. E. (2012). The co-occurrence of non-suicidal self-injury and attempted suicide among adolescents: distinguishing risk factors and psychosocial correlates. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health6(11), 1-7.

Daine, K., Hawton, K., Singaravelu, V., Stewart, A., Simkin, S., & Montgomery, P. (2013). The power of the web: a systematic review of studies of the influence of the internet on self-harm and suicide in young people. PloS one8(10), e77555.

Figley, C., Huggard, P., & Rees, C. (2013). First do no self harm: understanding and promoting physician stress resilience. Oxford University Press.

Fisher, H. L., Moffitt, T. E., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Arseneault, L., & Caspi, A. (2012). Bullying victimisation and risk of self harm in early adolescence: longitudinal cohort study. bmj344, e2683.

Hawton, K., Saunders, K. E., & O’Connor, R. C. (2012). Self-harm and suicide in adolescents. The Lancet379(9834), 2373-2382.

Moran, P., Coffey, C., Romaniuk, H., Olsson, C., Borschmann, R., Carlin, J. B., & Patton, G. C. (2012). The natural history of self-harm from adolescence to young adulthood: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet379(9812), 236-243.

Rossouw, T. I., & Fonagy, P. (2012). Mentalization-based treatment for self-harm in adolescents: a randomized controlledtrial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry51(12), 1304-1313.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

 

Criminal Procedures and Biblical Scriptures

Criminal Procedures and Biblical Scriptures Order Instructions: Each of the scriptures below concern a given criminal procedure topic.

Criminal Procedures and Biblical Scriptures
Criminal Procedures and Biblical Scriptures

All scriptures are from the New International Version, 1984. Begin this assignment by meditating on the given scriptures. You may even want to pray about them. Psalm 119:18 recommends this prayer: “Open my eyes that I may see wonderful things in your law.” Once you have done that, answer the questions below.

Witnesses:

Deuteronomy 19:15 “One witness is not enough to convict a man accused of any crime or offense he may have committed. A matter must be established by the testimony of two or three witnesses.”
Deuteronomy 17:6 “On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness.”

Cross Examination:

Proverbs 18:17 “The first to present his case seems right, till another comes forward and questions him.”
Deuteronomy 19:16–19 “If a malicious witness takes the stand to accuse a man of a crime, the two men involved in the dispute must stand in the presence of the LORD before the priests and the judges who are in office at the time. The judges must make a thorough investigation, and if the witness proves to be a liar, giving false testimony against his brother, then do to him as he intended to do to his brother. You must purge the evil from among you.”

Physical Evidence:

Deuteronomy 22:13–18 “If a man takes a wife and, after lying with her, dislikes her and slanders her and gives her a bad name, saying, “I married this woman, but when I approached her, I did not find proof of her virginity,” then the girl’s father and mother shall bring proof that she was a virgin to the town elders at the gate. The girl’s father will say to the elders, “I gave my daughter in marriage to this man, but he dislikes her. Now he has slandered her and said, ‘I did not find your daughter to be a virgin.’ But here is the proof of my daughter’s virginity.” Then her parents shall display the cloth before the elders of the town, and the elders shall take the man and punish him.”
Exodus 22:12-13 “But if the animal was stolen from the neighbor, he must make restitution to the owner. If it was torn to pieces by a wild animal, he shall bring in the remains as evidence and he will not be required to pay for the torn animal.”

Answer the following questions for your thread:

–Did these scriptures change or confirm your views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic?

–How does our current system deal with each topic?

–How could our current system change (or not) to deal with each topic in a more biblical manner?

–Provide at least 1 reference and 1 different scripture (other than those given above) in support of your post.

Criminal Procedures and Biblical Scriptures Sample Answer

  1. Did these scriptures change or confirm your views about how criminal procedure should operate according to each topic?The scriptures confirmed my views on how the criminal procedures should be conducted.  I have always known that witnesses play significant role during the criminal procedures as they give the jury with relevant information that could guide them in reaching the appropriate decision.  Although I knew the higher the number of witnesses the better, I had not thought keenly on the appropriate number of witnesses. The following scriptures have made me embrace the fact of many witnesses 2 Corinthians 13:1; Hebrews 10:28 and Numbers 35:30 (Burnside, 2011). Similarly, the issue of cross examination and use of physical evidence are heavily relied upon even when dealing with minor cases. Therefore, the scriptures only confirmed my views. These criminal procedures ensure that innocent people are not convicted. For example, Deuteronomy 17:6-7 and Numbers 5:11-31, which indicates that   whatever the cases, it must be related to the evidence which will ensure that execution is not done executed

2. How does our current system deal with each topic?
In our current systems witnesses play a vital role in criminal cases as they narrate to the jury of the matters they know. In our constitution, they are required to make an oath that they are telling the truth (Kenny, 2014). The issue of cross examination is vital in each case proceeding.  The scriptures Proverbs 18:13 and Proverbs 18:18 support this concept as it argues that a person that makes decisions before hearing and examining it will result to folly and shame.  Cross examination of a case and use of physical evidence is supported by the current systems, where each case presented, witnesses and evidences are cross examined before a judgement is made. This is important as it helps prevent biased judgement (Burnside, 2011).

  1. How could our current system change (or not) to deal with each topic in a more biblical manner?

As indicated, all of the three topics are embraced by the current system, so there is no much that needs to be changes. All cases must be thoroughly investigated, and the information gathered becomes cross examined to ensure no details are omitted.  The only issue that tend to differ with the scriptures is the exact number of witnesses needed to make judgements about a person. Our current system allows evidence from one person, as long as the evidence is convincing beyond reasonable doubt, and supported by physical evidence and findings from cross examination (Kenny, 2014).

Although the bible does not support the use of one witness as indicated in 2 Corinthians 13:1, one witness comprehensive information can be sufficient to convict a person- for example consider rape case where only the suspect and victim are involved, but the suspects DNA or incriminating evidence is found on victims body- isn’t the evidence and witness testimony to make a conclusive decision (Burnside, 2011)? If the use of two witnesses is to ensure that innocent people are not accused wrongly, then, is there a chance for the witnesses to be corrupted?  In this case, what is the ideal number of witnesses in a court ruling? What are the strategies used to reach such decisions? This is an interesting topic that would I would be interested to explore further.

Criminal Procedures and Biblical Scriptures References

Burnside, J. (2011). God, justice, and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kenny, P. (2014). Sustainability of Restorative Justice. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

To Torture or Not To Torture Assignment

To Torture or Not To Torture
To Torture or Not To Torture
To Torture or Not To Torture

To Torture or Not To Torture

Order Instructions:

INSTRUCTIONS

To Torture or Not to Torture

Note: In order to fulfill this assignment, you need to have read chapters 5–7, 14 from the Holmes text.

Ethics Approaching Moral Decisions.

ISDN 978-0-8308-2803-6

Note: In order to fulfill this assignment, you need to have read the Group Discussion Board Forum 2 Instructions and the following chapters from Holmes: chs. 4–7, 14. If you have not done so, please stop and read that material.

For your thread, post an answer to the question:

“Should they torture the prisoner?” employing the two points below. Remember your initial thread must be a minimum of 350 words:

From your understanding of Holmes’ discussions, explain how each of the following theories might answer the question: utilitarianism, Kantian duty-based ethics, virtue ethics, and Christian-principle based ethics.
Select the theory you think is the appropriate one to take in this case and explain why.

Any quotes from sources must be cited and will not count towards your word count.

SAMPLE ANSWER

To Torture or Not to Torture

To start, many people will agree that this subject is considerably delicate for exploration. Regardless of if morally justified or necessary, torture has never been too easy for there to be a solid answer. Always, values play a cardinal role when it comes to debates like this one. This can be explored from four perspectives; virtue ethics, utilitarianism perspective, Christian-principle based ethical perspective, and Kantian duty-based ethics.

If looking at torture from the utilitarian perspective, this would involve assessing the various torture issues and determining if they fit their right or good’s description. For example, if torturing a minute group of individuals would save thousands or hundreds of others, then a utilitarian would consider this to be a good thing as opposed to torture. Therefore, whenever cases arise where some people are needed to be tortured so that many others can be saved, a utilitarian would permit it (Shute, 2013). On the other hand, the Kantian duty-based ethics can basically assess if someone is fulfilling the duties from the higher command. There would be no consideration of if the person was made to feel bad, so long as the duties got fulfilled, and that was the proper thing to do.

It is worth pointing out that the virtue ethics adopts an approach that is very similar to the Kantian duty-based ethics (Shute, 2013). Nonetheless, there is a keener focus on the feelings of the person, as opposed to the motives. Following the virtue ethics approach, one would normally enjoy them while torturing is going on, and it is believed that this is meant for personal gain (Park, 2014). Therefore, in case a person is carrying out the torture based on the love he or she has for the culture or country, then such a person is justified.

Following the Christian-principle ethical point-of-view, the torture subject is situational. All Christians are required to adhere to the principles of honoring God as well as sharing His love and care for all humanity and other creatures. Therefore, torturing is not precisely the way someone should use to describe love from the Christian perspective. In the bible, issues like killing for self-defense have been mentioned, but none of these issues ever brought up torture. However, sometimes, God utilizes torture without even being aware about it (Holmes, 1984).

I would assert that the Christian-principle based ethics is the most appropriate theory. I have a strong feeling that all people have a call and obligation of leading Christian lives. Moreover, torture can never be the answer. According to the biblical teachings and instructions, people are called to lead based on the standards set by God, and according to the path that Jesus laid as an example (Allan, 2013). Rather than torturing prisoners, regardless of whether information is being sought from them or not, other ways can be used such as demonstrating the great love God has for them. This might make them guilty and later they may reveal whatever information is being sought. There are many ways through which love can be demonstrated. Therefore, torture is never an option. It is also worth pointing out that this topic is very sensitive, and therefore, there is a great need to handle it with a lot of caution.

Reference

Allan, A. (2013). Ethics in Correctional and Forensic Psychology: Getting the Balance Right. Australian Psychologist, 48, 1, 47-56.

Holmes, A. F. (1984). Ethics, approaching moral decisions. Downers Grove, Ill., U.S.A: InterVarsity Press.

Park, R. (2014). The reappeared: Argentine former political prisoners.

Shute, S. (2013). On The Outside Looking In: Reflections on the Role of Inspection in Driving Up Quality in the Criminal Justice System. The Modern Law Review, 76, 3, 494-528.

To Torture or Not to Torture

To start, many people will agree that this subject is considerably delicate for exploration. Regardless of if morally justified or necessary, torture has never been too easy for there to be a solid answer. Always, values play a cardinal role when it comes to debates like this one. This can be explored from four perspectives; virtue ethics, utilitarianism perspective, Christian-principle based ethical perspective, and Kantian duty-based ethics.

If looking at torture from the utilitarian perspective, this would involve assessing the various torture issues and determining if they fit their right or good’s description. For example, if torturing a minute group of individuals would save thousands or hundreds of others, then a utilitarian would consider this to be a good thing as opposed to torture. Therefore, whenever cases arise where some people are needed to be tortured so that many others can be saved, a utilitarian would permit it (Shute, 2013). On the other hand, the Kantian duty-based ethics can basically assess if someone is fulfilling the duties from the higher command. There would be no consideration of if the person was made to feel bad, so long as the duties got fulfilled, and that was the proper thing to do.

It is worth pointing out that the virtue ethics adopts an approach that is very similar to the Kantian duty-based ethics (Shute, 2013). Nonetheless, there is a keener focus on the feelings of the person, as opposed to the motives. Following the virtue ethics approach, one would normally enjoy them while torturing is going on, and it is believed that this is meant for personal gain (Park, 2014). Therefore, in case a person is carrying out the torture based on the love he or she has for the culture or country, then such a person is justified.

Following the Christian-principle ethical point-of-view, the torture subject is situational. All Christians are required to adhere to the principles of honoring God as well as sharing His love and care for all humanity and other creatures. Therefore, torturing is not precisely the way someone should use to describe love from the Christian perspective. In the bible, issues like killing for self-defense have been mentioned, but none of these issues ever brought up torture. However, sometimes, God utilizes torture without even being aware about it (Holmes, 1984).

I would assert that the Christian-principle based ethics is the most appropriate theory. I have a strong feeling that all people have a call and obligation of leading Christian lives. Moreover, torture can never be the answer. According to the biblical teachings and instructions, people are called to lead based on the standards set by God, and according to the path that Jesus laid as an example (Allan, 2013). Rather than torturing prisoners, regardless of whether information is being sought from them or not, other ways can be used such as demonstrating the great love God has for them. This might make them guilty and later they may reveal whatever information is being sought. There are many ways through which love can be demonstrated. Therefore, torture is never an option. It is also worth pointing out that this topic is very sensitive, and therefore, there is a great need to handle it with a lot of caution.

Reference

Allan, A. (2013). Ethics in Correctional and Forensic Psychology: Getting the Balance Right. Australian Psychologist, 48, 1, 47-56.

Holmes, A. F. (1984). Ethics, approaching moral decisions. Downers Grove, Ill., U.S.A: InterVarsity Press.

Park, R. (2014). The reappeared: Argentine former political prisoners.

Shute, S. (2013). On The Outside Looking In: Reflections on the Role of Inspection in Driving Up Quality in the Criminal Justice System. The Modern Law Review, 76, 3, 494-528.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!