IT Ethics and Monitoring Employee Behavior

IT Ethics and Monitoring Employee Behavior Video Case: IT Ethics in the Workplace

In the digital age, most organizations are tracking employee activity in all kinds of ways in an effort to become more productive.

IT Ethics and Monitoring Employee Behavior

Some are measuring keystrokes or using programs that can tell supervisors when a keyboard has been idle for 15 minutes. Others use keywords to flag which websites employees visit-and block ones that aren’t related to work-or are checking employees e-mails and instant messages to make sure that they don’t contain inappropriate or proprietary material

Indeed, nearly every aspect of work is now measurable in some way: Hours are tracked via security badges and fingerprint scanners, locations are monitored using GPS, and certain employee activities are captured by digital camera and video. While it’s clear that employers can measure nearly everything employees do, the question for many is whether they should. To find out, it’s important for companies to have a clear sense of what they hope to accomplish-and to be forthcoming and transparent in their communication with employees. When employee monitoring is done poorly, businesses may find that what they hoped to gain in productivity is undermined by what they lose in engagement and trust. Visit YouTube and search for the video “Ethics in the Workplace to IT Team 8.” Answer the following questions.

IT Ethics and Monitoring Employee Behavior

What are the reasons why an employer might monitor the online behavior of employees? How might the organization benefit from this monitoring?
Name the policies the company has put in place in regard to ethics in the workplace.
What are the possible consequences of not monitoring such behavior?
What monitoring technologies does the company use to keep track of sites employees access?
Do you think it’s ethical for employers to monitor sites that employees access?
What are some of the arguments against employers engaging in such monitoring?
Which is more expensive-firing an employee or putting policies in place for employees to follow?
Research vendors that offer employee monitoring software. Summarize the types of solutions they offer and their costs. If you were going to pick one of these to recommend to your organization, or one with which you are familiar, which would you choose? Why?

IT Ethics and Monitoring Employee Behavior

The critical thinking it will also contain: introduction body conclusion

Your well-written report should be 9-10 pages in length, not including the cover and reference pages. Use Saudi Electronic

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Deviant Identities Norms and Their Violation

Deviant Identities Norms and Their Violation Norms and their violation are part of everyday life, and thus all of us have been labeled at least somewhat deviant at some time or another.

Recount your own experience with deviant labeling, or the experience of someone you know. How did the person in your example come to be known as deviant?

How did the person deal with her/his deviant identity? Did they embrace this identity/label?

Did s/he use any of the stigma management strategies we have discussed in this course, or perhaps some other strategy?

Explain how the strategy(ies) worked in your example. [Hint: Make reference to the norms in question, but also discuss relevant ideas from symbolic-interaction analysis such as primary and secondary deviance, stigma, retrospective labeling and master status.]

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ethical principle of Utilitarianism Essay Paper

Ethical principle of Utilitarianism to approve this moral issue.

Choose a contemporary moral issue in our society (course materials) and apply the ethical principle of Utilitarianism to approve this moral issue.

You must pick a moral issue that you strongly support and apply the utilitarian claims (course materials) to back up your arguments.

The paper must be done in MLA format with a minimum of 500 words (quotes are not included in the word count). You must use at least 3 sources. You must apply Bentham/Mill’s “Principle of Utility” for 50 points and Bentham’s Felicific Calculus for 50 points.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

Case Study on Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative

This assignment will incorporate a common practical tool in helping clinicians begin to ethically analyze a case. Organizing the data in this way will help you apply the four principles of principalism.

Based on the “Case Study: Healing and Autonomy” and other required topic study materials, you will complete the “Applying the Four Principles: Case Study” document that includes the following:

Part 1: Chart

This chart will formalize principlism and the four-boxes approach by organizing the data from the case study according to the relevant principles of biomedical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice.

Part 2: Evaluation

This part includes questions, to be answered in a total of 500 words, that describe how principalism would be applied according to the Christian worldview.

Remember to support your responses with the topic study materials.

APA style is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ethical decision making Term Paper

Ethical decision making

In general Dempsey’s white paper, American- a profession of arms he asserts that the men and women of the Armed forces must be held to higher moral and ethical standards compared to the U.S. society as a whole.

General Dempsey wrote that “(W)e must continue to uphold the values that underpin our profession to maintain and enhance the trust of those we serve, our civilian leaders in government, and the American people.” How will you uphold the values he calls our calling card (duty, honor, courage, integrity, and selfless service)?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Types of relativism, ethical individual and cultural

Paper Formatting: Papers should be in a standard 12-point font (e.g. Times New Roman or Cambria), with 1” x 1” margins, double–spaced, and include page numbers. The top left hand side should include your name, the date, the course, and the name of your instructor. Put a title on your paper but do not include a title page.
NEED to cite all quotes
Write a 3-4 page paper destroying ethical relativism as a viable ethical theory; then choose a moral issue and argue that one side is better than another.

There are two types of relativism, ethical/individual and cultural. This paper is to use ethical/individual relativism only, as this is an ethical theory class. DO NOT USE CULTURAL RELATIVISM (do not even mention it). If you do not use ethical relativism, you will not get much, if any, credit for this paper.

The aim of this paper is to explain and then destroy relativism. Relativism is the idea that ethics is simply a matter of personal opinion and that no one’s opinion is any better than another. A person once remarked to me that the most valuable thing that I teach in this entire course is that this is false. Relativism is normally a reaction to the failure of moral absolutism, the idea that there is one right answer or system in ethics that applies to all people in all situations. For example, some say “Thou shalt not kill” is an absolute moral law. Thinkers have pointed out that it is perfectly legitimate to kill in self-defense, so this is not an absolute truth. If absolutism were in fact true in ethics, I would teach that answer the first week, and then I would be done. Since there are not exact answers in ethics, like there are in math, people have a tendency to adopt the extreme opposite position, that every answer is just is good as every other one, or that ethics is just a matter of opinion or perspective. This is usually due to the fact that no one really knows with certainty what is ethically true. As with absolutism, if relativism were true, I would teach only this theory, then the semester would be over. I approach ethics with the idea that neither absolutism nor relativism work as a system of ethics (I do think there are a handful of moral absolutes: killing an innocent person is always wrong, the same with adultery, spite, sexism or racism, for instance). Ethics, like life, lives in the gray area, and as ethical thinkers we have to be okay with not having precision in this discipline. Though there may not be absolute or perfect answers in ethics, we can maintain standards and hold that there are better answers than others. This is a claim that relativism denies. If relativism is true, then every moral belief is correct, even racist beliefs, beliefs that molesting children is good, sexist beliefs, etc. If every belief is correct, then nothing is wrong, and if nothing is wrong, then there is no right and wrong at all. Also, if every belief is correct, then extreme opposite positions are equally true, like pro-choice and pro-life. If these two views are equally correct, then concerning the abortion issue, relativism asserts that we should both kill and not kill the unborn. So inasmuch as absolutism claims there is only one right answer (like the 10 Commandments, for instance), relativism claims that EVERY answer is right. In other words, it destroys the very idea of ethics, that there is good and bad or right and wrong. So you are to destroy this theory!! After you destroy the theory, you will choose an ethical issue, then argue that one side is in fact better than another. You may not have an absolute solution to the issue, but you should try to persuade your reader that your side is better.

A moral issue is not any ethical matter; rather, a moral issue involves an ongoing problem or situation about a moral value (justice, rights, autonomy, life, etc.) that presents two viable alternatives that a person must choose between in order to evaluate right/wrong or good/bad. For instance, murder is not an ethical issue, as “murder is right” is not a viable alternative; racism is certainly an ethical matter, but it is not an ethical issue, as it would be absurd to claim that racism is good or right. Also, do not confuse specific cases or historical matters with moral issues. A specific case might be: “should this person be president?”; an historical matter would be the Tuskegee Airmen, for instance. These may very well be ethical matters, but they are not moral issues. Moral issues have two viable alternatives that can be reasonably argued for concerning a persisting problem: should we or should we not experiment on people, give illegal immigrants a path to citizenship, or have doctors help patients to kill themselves.

Some current ethical issues: gay marriage and shops refusing to serve gay people, free speech and the campus protests, labeling dolphins as persons to protect them, drug legalization, embryonic stem cell research, illegal immigration, etc. Some classical ethical issues: death penalty, abortion, organ donation, privacy, the environment, etc.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Aristotelian approach to business ethics

Assignment: Compose an essay responding to ONE of the prompts provided below. Please double-space your document.

Compare and/or contrast an Aristotelian approach to business ethics with a Buddhist one. Use one or more specific examples to illustrate their similarities and/or differences.

Evaluate whistle-blowing from the perspective of one of the following: utilitarianism, Kantian ethics, or Aristotelian ethics. Apply your chosen theory to an actual case of whistle-blowing.

Evaluate suggestions (for what employers can do to alleviate work/life difficulties) Slaughter makes in her article from the perspective of a normative ethical theory (Aristotelian, Kantian, and/or utilitarian). Feel free to include suggestions Slaughter does not (maybe addressing issues women of different socio-economic classes face), also applying the normative theory.

I do not have length requirements. Assuming you are able to “cut out the fluff” (which is not necessarily easy to do), you should be able to respond to any of the above prompts with great depth in about three pages.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Tuskegee Experiment Research Paper

Tuskegee Experiment

Research Paper 1, ‘Tuskegee Experiment’: You may receive up to 15 points on test grades in exchange for a research paper at least 5 single spaced pages at most 10 pages with references (references are not a part of the page minimum) about the “Tuskegee Experiment.” The paper is to be about the facts and your opinion on those facts. Write about what happened, who it happened to, who was responsible for doing it, why it was done, where and when the events happened. Also write about the aftermath, are there still living victims, what laws have been enacted to ensure something like this does not happen again? Was it ethical or unethical, do the ends justify the means? List and briefly describe other instances of government funded injustice in the name of “science”. The optional paper is due by April 19, 2019. The research report should be in 12 point font in Arial or Times New Roman and the margins should not be larger than 1” (normal setting). You may include photos in an appendix at the back of the paper and referenced throughout the text with Figure #1, Figure #2, etc. but they are not a part of the 5 page minimum. References should also be in the text following a quoted or paraphrased section, for example, ”The spirochete Treponema Pallidum is the etiological agent causing Syphilis” (Tortura, Funke & Case, 2016, pp.658-659). These resources should also be included in the references section for example:
References

Tortora, G.J., Funke, B.R. & Case, C.L. (2016). Microbiology: An Introduction. (12 ed). London, United Kingdom. Pearson Education, Inc.

Finally, carefully edit your work ensuring to check your punctuation, grammar and capitalization where appropriate. Include in-text citations for anything you quote or paraphrase and follow APA 6.0 style formatting. The research paper will graded based on the above and following criteria: proper formatting, length of paper, inclusion of references and in text citations, inclusion of all of the required information, your demonstrated level of critical thinking and analysis

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Consequences of the Actions Taken In Ethical Dilemmas

Consider the following three problems.

In a written response, analyze each problem, identify the consequences of the actions taken, and

then determine whether the actions taken represented a greater good, who would benefit from the good, and whether the consequences ethically justify the decisions and actions.

Consequences of the Actions Taken In Ethical Dilemmas

1) The Mayor of a large city was given a free membership in an exclusive golf club by people who have received several city contracts. He also accepted gifts from organizations that have not done business with the City, but might in the future. The gifts ranged from $200 tickets to professional sports events to designer watches and jewelry.

Consequences of the Actions Taken In Ethical Dilemmas

2) A college instructor is pursuing her doctorate in night school. To gain extra time for her own studies, she gives her students the same lectures, the same assignments, and the same examinations semester after semester without the slightest effort to improve them.

3) Todd and Edna have been married for three years. They have had serious personal problems. Edna is a heavy drinker, and Todd cannot keep a job. Also, they have bickered and fought constantly since their marriage. Deciding that the way to overcome their problems is to have a child, they stop practicing birth control, and Edna becomes pregnant.

Using what you have learned from collaborations, discussions, and readings up to this week, explore your answers to these ethical dilemmas. How would Locke have addressed or solved the problem? Explain how his ethics and the answer he may have given are different from or the same as yours.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Ethical Implications and Choices Discussion

Ethical Implications and Choices Discussion The insurance company you work for plans to raise all premiums for health care coverage for its customers.

Your boss has asked you to proofread a letter she drafted to customers announcing the new, higher rates. The first two paragraphs discuss some exciting medical advances and the expanded coverage offered by the company. Only in the final paragraph do customers learn that they must pay more for coverage starting next year. Describe the ethical implications of this draft. What changes would you suggest? If your boss tells you not to make content changes, what will you do, and why?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!