Death of a Salesman-Producer Essay

The essay topic is death of a salesman which is a famous show you could find it online, here is a link
“www.pelister.org/literature/ArthurMiller/Miller_Salesman.pdf“. And our group play from the beginning until that in page 9

Linda;” Go down, try it. and be quiet.” Our group only had 5 people, so only 2 actors play Linda and Willy.
General: The purpose of this exercise/project is to gain awareness of the collaborative nature of theatre and to further understand the nature of individual contributions to that process.

What does it take to get a play from page to stage?
What happens when a production concept is realized?
What are the various roles necessary for a performance to be produced?
What are the problems to be overcome?

Producer:

You are ultimately responsible for the play possibilities and make final decisions if the group is divided. You make decisions about the type of production and production values (scale and expense of the show). Decide who the audience will be. You cast the show in consultation with the director. (Describe the kind of actors you will need; you can refer to known actors if you want.) Decide what the special requirements of the show will be. Decide how to get it funded. Make sure that your decisions about scale and complexity are appropriate for the budget. Create a basic budget. You will need to investigate some local theatre companies as part of your research. (See chapters 2 & 5 in the text.) All of the above will be based on the whole play.

Call the group together, organize work sessions and present the final written report. Individuals will be responsible for writing their separate parts; you will see that it gets bound together and turned in.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Representation of The House in Howards End Novel

Representation of The House in Howards End Novel What does the house, Howards end, represent in the novel?

Does it symbolize different things for different characters, and if so, what does it symbolize? Introduction. Body paragraphs. Summary. 12 point type. Times New Roman with one inch margins. No outside sources for this paper. Use quotes and in-text citations after each quote. Howards End is E.M. Forster’s symbolic exploration of the social, economic, and philosophical forces at work in England during the early years of the twentieth century. Written in 1910, the novel offers an extraordinarily insightful look at the life of England in the years preceding World War I.

Operation Barbarossa Literature Review

Your literature review should be 6-8 pages (not including your title and references page) and should synthesize the body of literature that is important to
your case study.

All research projects include a literature review to set out for the reader what knowledge exists on the subject under study and helps the researcher develop
the research strategy to use in the study. A good literature review is a thoughtful synthesis of important information that pertains to the current study.

Literature reviews include a summary and critical assessment of the arguments that exist (including whether or not you agree with them) and are arranged thematically. At the end of your literature review, you should discuss some of the clear gaps in knowledge and explain how your research will help fill this void and further our knowledge of the subject under investigation.

Format: Your literature review should include a title page, body, and reference page. Your paper should have 1-inch borders on all four sides, use times new
roman-12 point font, be double spaced, and not have an extra space in between paragraphs. (You may need to turn this off in MS word by going to paragraph and
clicking Don’t add space between paragraphs of the same style)

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The study of World Literature Thesis Paper

What is the nature of the interaction between the study of World Literature and that of Comparative literature?

Start with an introduction that introduces the subject and justifies your choice of it,
State your purpose and your direction
Develop your argument or analysis by use of subtitles
Provide your essay with a focus or a thesis
Show that you have a logical sequence of information
Provide a coherent discussion of the topic
Document your statements by reference to the text or to other critical opinions
Use examples when necessary
Imaginative final comment and conclusion are important.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

“The Making of a Quagmire” by David Halberstam

Write a short answer for each of the following three questions. Include one Works Cited at the end of your response.

1. What was an important lesson that you learned from reading TMOQ? Be specific and include names and page numbers in your answer where appropriate.

2. Evaluate the actions of one of the following. This requires a value judgment on your part and you must cite evidence from the text in a simple
parenthetical note with the page number: Ambassador Henry Cabot Lodge or
GEN Paul D. Harkins or Ngo Dinh Diem or LTC John Paul Vann or Madame Nhu or the Buddhists taken as a group (as opposed to an individual Buddhist leader).

3. Who was right and why? The press or the US (or VN) government? Why? Be specific in your commentary, though I suggest you limit it to a particular action or a particular member of the press. Or Halberstam? The best responses here will only address a limited aspect of the question.
Note: Minimum word length is 750 words.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Murder of Tutankhamen by Bob Brier

The Murder of Tutankhamen by Bob Brier Research paper should have a cover page with a title on it, your name, date, course name.

It should start with a brief introduction on why you chose that topic, then go on to explain your topic. There should be a short conclusion stating what you
have learned from doing the research. What is the purpose of the book?
Their should be transitions throughout paper.
The Murder of Tutankhamen by Bob Brier –please use this book as a source/reference. In his eccentric but entertaining Egyptian Mummies (1994), Brier (Philosophy/C.W. Post Coll.) announced his intention to conduct a mummification of a human cadaver in the ancient manner.

The Wisdom of Bones Book by Walker and Shipman

The Wisdom of Bones Book by Walker and Shipman The paper will be 5-7 pages and typed (10-12 pt font, double spaced, one inch margins on all perimeters).

You will take one of the topics listed below, and
using the discussion on that topic from your assigned book, The Wisdom of the Bones, discuss how the points of view taken by Walker and Shipman can be
informed by (and how they inform) the assigned textbook reading (Humankind Emerging)and lectures, that pertain to the same topic. Outside research is also
encouraged but not required. The papers will be due on Wednesday, November 20
Topics for discussion:
-What is it to be human?
-What do we know about the emergence of language with Homo erectus?
-When speaking of the first year for humans, that between birth and one year, Alan Walker says "I am convinced it is the most important twelve months in
our lives" What does he mean? elaborate in detail.

A Review of Ray Bradburys Novel Fahrenheit 451

A Review of Ray Bradburys Novel Fahrenheit 451 Your assignment is to write a three page (or longer) persuasive review of Ray Bradbury’s novel Fahrenheit 451, which must have a title, a thesis statement,
a beginning, middle, and end.

You will also need a works cited page, in which you list Bradbury’s novel as a source.

A Review of Ray Bradburys Novel Fahrenheit 451 Essay Structure

Please follow the five-paragraph essay structure. Use prewriting techniques to generate ideas if you need to.
The purpose of a persuasive review is to convince the reader of the merits (and/or weaknesses) of a piece of art, such as a novel. Imagine that the
reader is trying to decide whether or not to pay his or her hard-earned money to read Fahrenheit 451. Are the characters believable? Did the plot make sense?

A Review of Ray Bradburys Novel Fahrenheit 451 Elements for Discussion

You must discuss at least two of the following elements of the novel in your review:
Character.
Plot.
Structure.
Setting.
Theme.
Symbol.
You may, if you wish, also answer one or more of the following optional questions in your essay:
Which modern inventions (such as big-screen televisions, the I-Pod, and online role-playing games) does Ray Bradbury predict in Fahrenheit 451?
In the opening scene, why are the books compared to birds?
Montag says that “You never wash it off completely,” referring to the kerosene. What could this mean symbolically?
Why do you think that Bradbury would introduce Clarisse before Montag’s wife, Mildred?
How is life in Montag’s house very different from that of Clarisse’s house?
Is there anything unusual about the way the two men go about helping Mildred? How is it unusual?
How is Clarisse different than Mildred?
Why does society consider Clarisse “anti-social” (page 29)?
On page 40, Beatty reveals something very important about himself and his knowledge. What is it?
What has happened to Clarisse? How did it happen?
What is unusual about the way Mildred told Montag about Clarisse?
Pages 55 to 62 contain great truths about our world. Discuss three things Beatty talks about in his speech to Montag that are true about our world.
The first draft will not be graded.
You will write a final draft, and staple the first draft to it. Relax and have fun!
The Work Cited page for this assignment should look like the example below:

Compare and Contrast Shakespeare and Stoppard

Compare and Contrast Shakespeare and Stoppard You are to write a Compare AND Contrast essay on the 2 plays: Hamlet by William Shakespeare AND Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead by om Stoppard.

Notes to take into consideration(Very important):
1) The paper must be accompanied by a Works Cited that MUST include a citation from BOTH the poems that I mentioned above and at least 3 outside source from a database such as JSTOR.

Compare and Contrast Shakespeare and Stoppard Introduction

2) Introduce each play by author’s name and title in your first paragraph. Once having introduced your authors by their full names, you may refer to them by
their last names only. ALSO, clearly state a thesis please about the aspects you will compare and contrast.
3)Essay should focus on the “elements” (plot, character, point of view, setting, theme, etc.) listed on the Terms of Literary Analysis and Drama(will be
uploaded). – Do not simply retell the story, or stories. A summary of a work is called a précis; you are writing a thesis-driven essay, not a précis.
4) When you write the essay please follow those guidelines AND After your introduction, in the next paragraph (or sequence of paragraphs) discuss one point of comparison in terms of BOTH works or characters, and then move on to discuss the second point in the next paragraph or section in terms of both, then the third, and so forth, until you’re done. This method is known as the alternating or point-by-point method. After finishing one point, start the other.
5) Make use of terms from my handout on Dramatic Terms as much as you can. ( will be uploaded)
6) One approach to the paper might be from a critical perspective (Freudian, biographical, historical, deconstructive, etc.). Otherwise, you are welcome
focus on one or more of the literary elements.
* Please follow all the 6 points carefully, each point matters a lot. Also, feel free to contact me any time.
* Please use the two plays mentioned: amlet by William Shakespeare AND Rosencrantz & Guildenstern are Dead by om Stoppard.
* Do not forget to clearly set a thesis statement in the introduction.

Virtue of a Confucian in Traditional Chinese Literature

Virtue of a Confucian in Traditional Chinese Literature Filiality as the Cardinal Virtue of a Confucian Society as Represented in Traditional Chinese Literature Try to follow the simple but effective structure of 1) introduction/ stating of argument/ thesis; 2) development of argument, including examples; 3)
conclusion/ summary of argument.
Strive for clarity in stating your argument or idea; ask yourself? What point do I want to make with my analysis??

Make your argument as compelling as possible and strive for originality; do not simply restate what others have already said; write about what you have to say.
Your essay should be analytical, not simply descriptive (description should form the basis to your argument and analysis, not an end in itself).
Give specific examples to bolster your argument(s).

Virtue of a Confucian in Traditional Chinese Literature Topic

Below is a passage from the Confucian Analects:
The Duke of She said to Confucius, " In my land, there is an upright man. His father stole a sheep, and the man turned him into the authorities."
Confucius replied, " The upright man in my land is different. The father will shelter the son and the son will
As this anecdote suggests, a society which takes filial piety (xi?o ? ) as its cardinal virtue is sure to encounter contradictions in the application of this
virtue-conflicts in which one form of obedience enters into conflict with another.
With this issue in mind, examine the narrative poem " A Peacock Southeast Flew"(Mair, 255-265) How does the poem establish the conflicting loyalties
it depicts–say, the relation of parent and child, the relation of husband and wife, and so on? How does it weigh the legitimacy of each bond? Does it aim
for a solution, and if so, how successfully is the resolution achieved?
Don’t write a paper on the Analects, but use the Analects to direct your thinking about the poem.
Source: "A Peacock Southeast Flew" from

The Shorter Columbia Anthology of Traditional Chinese Literature

http://books.google.com/books?id=sV3ZzccfeC8C&pg=PT431&lpg=PT431&dq=A+Peacock+Southeast
+Flew&source=bl&ots=Mf87su_DNu&sig=nGwgLoSQ2RmMujLf0N2_LMYJoVU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=hU6aUv_qKsj7oATqsYGQDw&ved=0CEsQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&amp
;q=A%20Peacock%20Southeast%20Flew&f=false