Refer to two different cantos, from two different circles. Discuss and make sure to include any quotation to support. The Divine Comedy, Italian La divina commedia, original name La commedia, long narrative poem written in Italian circa 1308–21 by Dante. It is usually held to be one of the world’s great works of literature. Divided into three major sections—Inferno, Purgatorio, and Paradiso—the narrative traces the journey of Dante from darkness and error to the revelation of the divine light, culminating in the Beatific Vision of God.
The Gift of Sex Christian Book Critique The Gift of Sex: A Guide to Sexual Fulfillment
Open by Clifford Penner; Joyce J. Penner
The Gift of Sex Christian Book Critique
BOOK CRITIQUE INSTRUCTIONS
You will complete a Book Critique that will be submitted in 2 parts during this course.
Part 1 must include the Title Page, a 150–250-word Abstract, and a Reference Page. The Reference Page must include a minimum of 5 external scholarly references for the paper. The Penner and Penner book should also be listed on the Reference page but does not count toward your 5 (minimum) required external sources.
The final submission must be 6 – 8 pages of content with a section-by-section summary of the key ideas and themes in the book followed by a critique of each section. (The length of the paper does not include the Title Page, Abstract, and the Reference Page. Points will be deducted for papers shorter than 6 pages and longer than 8 pages. There must be a minimum of 5 external scholarly references for the paper in addition to the textbook. The Penner & Penner book must be listed on the reference page. The Bible is an acceptable reference, but does not have to be cited on the reference page. Acceptable references for the paper are published books and scholarly journal articles; Wikipedia and arbitrary internet websites are not acceptable references. The critique sections are a good place to integrate your external references. Your external sources may agree or disagree with the book. Make sure statements you make in your critique section are well-articulated and well-supported by your external research. If you have questions regarding professional or scholarly references feel free to email your instructor. Your summary and critique sections of the book must be objective, not personal, and written in third person format using formal and academic tone.
Each part of the critique must be in current APA format and use a formal, academic tone. This includes headings, margins, in-text citations, and the Reference Page. Refer to the following site for additional resources:
The Novel about Their Eyes Were Watching God Throughout the novel, Janie is really three different women, adjusting her behavior, speech, and even dress and appearance to fit into the worlds of each of her three marriages.
The Novel about Their Eyes Were Watching God
Discuss how Janie adapts herself to suit each situation, and ways in which she refuses to change (or changes the situation to suit herself, as in the case of joining Tea Cake in working on the Muck).
The Novel about Their Eyes Were Watching God and the Support Evidence
Be sure to use evidence with page numbers from the novel to support your position. Discuss how Janie adapts herself to suit each situation, and ways in which she refuses to change (or changes the situation to suit herself, as in the case of joining Tea Cake in working on the Muck). Be sure to use evidence with page numbers from the novel to support your position.
After reading Anna Labzinas book Days of a Russian Noblewoman Anna Labzina’s memoir of life with her first husband offers a rare glimpse into the family and private lives of an elite and well-educated noble family in late eighteenth-century Russia.
Anna Labzinas book Days of a Russian Noblewoman
It is particularly interesting because it offer’s a woman’s perspective, and it says a great deal about a number of men and women (e.g., herself, her mother, her niece, her mentor’s wife), boys and girls, masculine and feminine. Anna Labzinas book Days of a Russian Noblewoman Does she see men and women as fundamentally different, either by nature or in terms of their morality or religiosity?
Anna Labzinas book Days of a Russian Noblewoman Discussion and Questions
To what extent, in her writing, do women have the capacity to shape or control their own lives in the Russia of her time, and to what extent are they beholden to or subject to the wishes of men? In answering this question give specific examples and discuss more than one set of relationships and more than one individual. Anna Labzina’s memoir of life with her first husband offers a rare glimpse into the family and private lives of an elite and well-educated noble family in late eighteenth-century Russia. Anna Labzinas book Days of a Russian Noblewoman It is particularly interesting because it offer’s a woman’s perspective, and it says a great deal about a number of men and women (e.g., herself, her mother, her niece, her mentor’s wife), boys and girls, masculine and feminine. Does she see men and women as fundamentally different, either by nature or in terms of their morality or religiosity? To what extent, in her writing, do women have the capacity to shape or control their own lives in the Russia of her time, and to what extent are they beholden to or subject to the wishes of men? Anna Labzinas book Days of a Russian Noblewoman In answering this question give specific examples and discuss more than one set of relationships and more than one individual.
ii. Give the book’s key argument/point.
iii. Discuss the book’s sources and methodology: what kind of evidence and methods the author uses to make his/her point.
iv. Analyze if the argument hold water. Is the point well-made and supported with solid evidence and reasoning? If you were a juror, would you buy the author’s argument/point or not? Why or why not?
v. Your take. What did you think about the book? Did it interest or entertain you? Was it well written and clearly organized? This is the only openly subjective part of your review.
Please use good detail! The last book review I got from your company I got a low “B” on the report Disposable People by Kevin Bales Good book review will do the five things:
i. Tell what the book is about. Do not give a summary of the story, but give the topic, geographic area, and timespan that the book covers.
Disposable People by Kevin Bales Courses and Methodology
This should take only one mid-length paragraph.
ii. Give the book’s key argument/point.
iii. Discuss the book’s sources and methodology: what kind of evidence and methods the author uses to make his/her point. Disposable People by Kevin Bales
iv. Analyze if the argument hold water. Is the point well-made and supported with solid evidence and reasoning? If you were a juror, would you buy the author’s argument/point or not? Why or why not?
v. Your take. What did you think about the book? Did it interest or entertain you? Was it well written and clearly organized? This is the only openly subjective part of your review. Disposable People by Kevin Bales
Please use good detail! The last book review I got from your company I got a low “B” on the report
Testing the Theories of Outliers By Malcolm Gladwell
It is very important to follow the assignment instructions in the attached file. You must talk about someone who was not mentioned in
the book.
Here is the criteria for a letter grade of A:
1- Critical Engagement: the essay consistently demonstrates an excellent level of critical engagement with the subject.
– Understanding of the text(s), experiences, or subject matter is discerning, logical, and thoughtful.
– The essay explores issues in depth, advancing convincing claims and providing rich detail.
2- Development: the development of the essay is compelling throughout, advancing a sustained line of reasoning, supported by persuasive evidence, and weighing alternate perspectives where appropriate.
3- Thesis: The thesis, whether explicit or implicit, is clear and perceptive.
Testing the Theories of Outliers By Malcolm Gladwell Example
Example of what a thesis should look like in this essay:
Person X is successful due to his birth in an advantageous era of birth, birth in demographic trough, and exposure to meaningful work. Perhaps successful people are opportunists rather than simply inherently talented.
4- Organization: essay’s organization reinforces the development of ideas and uses effective strategies to create coherence.
5- Word Choice: varied, precise, and sophisticated in context.
6- Sentences: vary in length and type in ways that advance meaning
7- Grammar and Usage: the grammar and usage are consistently accurate, supporting meaning. The assignment description can be found in the attached files. It is very important to follow the assignment instructions in the attached file. You must talk about someone who was not mentioned in
the book.
Testing the Theories of Outliers By Malcolm Gladwell Writing Criteria
Analysis of Ralph Nader’s The Seventeen Traditions Your review is an evaluation that should tell the reader not only what the book contains and attempts to achieve but also what reactions it evokes in you and what use it can be for you and readers.
Analysis of Ralph Nader’s The Seventeen Traditions
It must be objective in presenting what the book says, but it must also discuss your personal responses to the ideas in it.
To let the reader know what book you are writing about, begin the review with a bibliographic entry. The common format for this information is as follows:
Title. Author. Place of Publication: Publisher, date of publication. Number of pages.
• The first time you mention the book in the review, you should repeat the author and the title so that the reader does not
have to refer back to the bibliographic entry at the beginning.
Analysis of Ralph Nader’s The Seventeen Traditions Introduction
• Write an introduction or an opening paragraph that is a direct statement about the kind of book you are reviewing and its main topic – followed by a few words of evaluation. If this book raises some questions that you will explore later, you may briefly outline them here but avoid listing. This brief opening paragraph lets the reader know what direction your review will take, so state your evaluation. (one paragraph)
• In the remaining section of the review, you are free to carry on the discussion or evaluation of the book in a variety of
ways. Consider the following questions: How well has the book achieved its goal or purpose? What other possibilities are
suggested by the writer’s conclusions? Do you agree or disagree with some or all of his specific points? Did it suggest some
connections between your experiences and its observations? Were you impressed by his writing style? What contributed to your enjoyment or lack of it in this book? What has the book left out? Use these questions to think about these aspects and write your commentary, pointing out the strengths or weaknesses of the book. Use personal tie-in and SEC strategies for developing and supporting discussion of your ideas or insights about the book. For your discussion in this section of the paper, you can select 4-5 ideas from Nader’s book. Your discussion of each idea can use Personal Tie-in and SEC strategies for development and support. (4-5 paragraphs).
In particular, write a closing paragraph discussing the relevance of one of the ideas for effective communication in the
workplace.
Analysis of Ralph Nader’s The Seventeen Traditions Specific Instructions
• Avoid summarizing the ideas of the book.
Use present tense in referring to the author and the book: “the author states” instead of “the author stated;” “the book
contains” instead of “the text contained.”
• It is important to distinguish between the ideas of the author and those of the reviewer. Be careful to label (Aldous
Huxley continues…; this reviewer believes…; I believe) your sentences wherever appropriate so that your ideas are separate from the author’s ideas. Confusion between the two considerably weakens your review for the reader.
The Member of the Wedding Developed Essays In a developed essays, explicate the selected scenes from Fred Zinneman?s film of Carson McCullers? The Member of the Wedding.
The Member of the Wedding Developed Essays
Focus on the following
question: what is significant about the sequence within itself, and how does the sequence embody something important about the larger film–its themes and
techniques.
You concern should be with both the ideas you present and the clarity support of your presentation. Aim agin for unity and coherence; that is, be sure that
your explication states and clearly develops a main point. Consider the following question before planning your essay:
1- What visual elements condition your response to the film sequence?
2- What aural elements condition your response?
3- Why do we see what we see and hear what we hear?
4- How does this sequence relate to what has gone before and how does it prepare us for what follows?
5- to what extent is the sequence faithful to the themes and meaning of the original text?
FOCUS
Your focus mast be on the moment that Frances leaves the house. you mast Write about when she leaves she strand next to the train and than she walk around
the town truing to find a place (describe her motion and places that se want to and people that she found) she heard some one want to kill some one when she
was waking on the street. after waking a lot she found a alcohol bar and she saw a soldier. she want inside to talk to hem and when the police came she ask
him to go some where. he told here to go inside the storage or something,but when the were there he try to attack. she hit him and than go out using the back
door to leave( describe the place clearer and the moisten as well as the music and the camera position) she decide to go back home and she found that her
brother is sick and cannot visit hem up upstart( describe how his father talk to here and how the movie end here)
Please DO NOT WRITE about the film over all. WRITE about want i ask to be “FOCUS” on
Please NO SOURCES
The Universe Within Book Analysis This is the name of the book: The Universe Within: Discovering the Common History of Rocks, Planets, and People (Neil Shubin)
The Universe Within Book Analysis
The focus of your paper should be analysis of the assigned book rather than a report. The main difference between a report and analysis is the differing
emphasis on the narrative of the book; what happened in the book. In reports, students typically reiterate the narrative of the book. In this analysis I
would like you to apply concepts and ideas from the book that are applicable to the course material.
Identify and Analyze Rhetorical Devices This Critical Thinking assignment is designed to provide you with experience in identifying and analyzing rhetorical devices used for persuasion. The topic
is overseas outsourcing.
Identify and Analyze Rhetorical Devices
While you may cite other rhetorical devices for your paper, the three YouTube presentations on the topic are provided to get you
started. Each of the following presentations makes various claims about workers outside of the United States.
1. Nike sweatshops–try not to cry. Retrieved from YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xVuScVCF1Ws
2.Myth: outsourcing is bad. Retrieved from YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qK-27LFPC4
3.Disadvantages of outsourcing. Retrieved from YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_JEOxiLRYSc
Analyze the effectiveness of the rhetorical devices used to either challenge or support the use of overseas outsourcing by corporations. The goal is to
connect these to what you may see, hear and read on this topic.
Each essay must include and demonstrate your ability to:
Identify the rhetorical device(s)
Explain how and whether it is effective in persuasion
State why or why not it is a valid argument
Analyze in detail the presentation for validity, logic, accuracy, misleading statements, credibility, etc.
State your position on the topic of outsourcing
Use additional citation, if necessary, to support your reasoning
Apply the concepts learned through the textbook readings and learning notes. Remember that critical thinking is based on objective information and premises (claims), not on opinions.
