Judicial Opinion Issued by the US Supreme Court Each student is expected to submit a judicial decision (opinion) of the type issued by the US Supreme Court.
Judicial Opinion Issued by the US Supreme Court
Students will be given an awareness of relevant constitutional precedents, they will be asked to develop an “opinion of the court” stating how the law should be applied in the case, and providing a rational for their decision. “Slip” opinions are the first version of the Court’s opinions posted on this website. A “slip” opinion consists of the majority or principal opinion, any concurring or dissenting opinions written by the Justices, and a prefatory syllabus prepared by the Reporter’s Office that summarizes the decision.
Fausett and Company Inc vs Bullard 217 Ark 176 1950 The case is attached below in Word. Please make sure to thoroughly read the case before you begin writing.
Fausett and Company Inc vs Bullard 217 Ark 176 1950
Please message me if this is your first case brief or you need assistance. Additionally, please review the attached Rubric below.
Fausett and Company Inc vs Bullard 217 Ark 176 1950 Essay Instructions and Rubric
Your brief should be approximately 1-2 pages in length, single spaced, 12 point Times New Roman font, with 1″ margins. You should put your name and student number at the top of the paper. A title page is not needed. You must include your name, Student ID and the date or you will not receive credit.
Attach your case brief here in Word format.
Your brief must be structured with following headings in bold face as follows:
CASE CITATION: This is done for you above in proper Bluebook format.
PARTIES: Who are the Defendants? Plaintiffs? Appellants? Appellees?
FACTS: Who did what to whom? Include all facts the court considered significant. Summarize in your own words. DO NOT cut and paste from the opinion. Don’t forget in-text citations.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Who is asking the court to do what? How did the case procedurally get before this court?
ISSUE: What question did the court have to answer in order to make their decision? Your issue(s) should be stated in the form of a question.
HOLDING: Which way did the court answer the questions posed in the issue? What did they decide in a one sentence rule of law?
REASONING: Why did the court decide the case the way it did? What legal standard did they use or establish? What prior cases did the Court rely upon and why?
DECISION: This section gives the Judgment rendered by the court.
Fausett and Company Inc vs Bullard 217 Ark 176 1950 Case Final Disposition
Describe the final disposition of the case. Did the court affirm the lower court’s decision, reverse it, and/or remand it for additional proceedings?
COMMENTS: Is there anything else that should be mentioned about this case? Is it a “landmark” case? Was the court “divided”? Were there any weaknesses/discrepancies in the court’s opinions? What were your personal thoughts on the case?
Legal case names should be done in standard “Bluebook” format. Example: York v. Smith, 65 U.S. 294 (1995). For more information on case brief format see “How to Brief a Case” below. There is also a model case brief in the case attached that you may review. I want the brief to be in your own words, so do NOT include extremely long quotes from the opinion itself. Your brief should be approximately 2 pages in length. The majority of the citations will be inside the Reasoning section. Case briefs are used to highlight the key information contained within a case for use within the legal community as court cases can be quite lengthy.
When writing case briefs, all information must be properly cited. Make sure you are not JUST copying and pasting from your source. Most of the material should be paraphrased; quotations should make up no more than 10% of the brief. HOWEVER, just because you are paraphrasing does not mean you do not need CITATIONS!!! Your case brief should have a citation after almost every sentence, even when you do not have a quotation.
Restorative Justice for Aboriginal People Description: write a critical essay of no fewer than 8, double-spaced pages.
Restorative Justice for Aboriginal People
Essays should include references to at least 6 academic sources external to the course outline. Students should present and defend a clearly-defined thesis statement.
The final research paper should be a no less than 8 pages (and no more than 10 pages) in length, including references but not including attached appendices/bibliography. You must use a minimum of 6 references to academic materials (peer-reviewed academic articles, official government reports, reports of international organizations such as the UN). You may also use reputable, supplementary references (i.e. credible media sources) but these WILL NOT COUNT towards the aforementioned minimum 6 sources required. These references must be consulted in a substantive way – i.e., they must make a theoretical or empirical contribution to your essay.
TOPIC: Restorative Justice and Aboriginal Peoples in Criminal Law: Restorative justice stands as one of the core principles of sentencing in Canada. Identify the core features of this model and the unique ways in which it applies to Aboriginal offenders. In particular, select and evaluate the pros and cons of either “Gladue courts” or Aboriginal sentencing circles.
Listening to Law Hearing and Discussion Summary Many state and federal agencies, as well as several local bodies, hold public meetings where they discuss rules and policies they wish to pass in the near future.
Listening to Law Hearing and Discussion Summary
For instance, the California Public Utilities Commission often holds public hearings both in person and online. The Federal Communications Commission also holds several live meetings every month that are broadcast online.
Listening to Law Hearing and Discussion Summary and Federal Commission
Finally, C-SPAN airs many federal commission hearings and has recordings of previous hearings. Action Items Attend an in-person or online federal, state, or local rulemaking hearing.
You can attend a live meeting or watch a recorded meeting; Summarize the hearing. Discuss the parties and competing interests. Were there any public comments? If so, discuss whether you felt they were successful in influencing the commission considering the rule. Assess the hearing’s effectiveness in light of material you have previously covered. Was the hearing in line with what you have read? Did the commission or agency considering the rule seem to be cognizant of the concept of impending judicial review or the public interest? Were there competing political interests during the discussion? How do you think these affected the results of the hearing? Your work should be 2-3 pages in length
Elements of Judicial Process Critical Review The primary writing assignment for this class will take the form of a critical review. As will become
apparent throughout the course, films, television programs, and documentaries regularly feature
elements of the judicial process.
Elements of Judicial Process Critical Review
While potentially interesting subject matter, the judicial process is a
complex and nuanced component of the broader political system, and fictionalized media portrayals
have the potential to warp public understanding of an otherwise largely unfamiliar process. The goal of
this paper is to critically assess an example of a media portrayal of the judicial process and compare that
portrayal to reality.
Elements of Judicial Process Critical Review Suggested Media Portrayals
The following are suggested media portrayals. Some take the form of documentaries (both in film and
in series), some are “based on a true story,” and others are totally fiction.
Frontline: The Plea (available at Watch Frontline The Plea).
Hot Coffee (available on Netflix among others)
Making a Murderer* (available on Netflix)
To Kill a Mockingbird (available on Netflix among others)
12 Angry Men (1957) (available to rent through Amazon.com, iTunes, among others)
Gideon’s Trumpet (available to rent through Amazon.com, iTunes, among others)
A Civil Action (available to rent through Amazon.com, iTunes, among others)
Affordable Care Act Modification in Patients Should the Affordable Care Act be modified to exclude the pre-existing conditions of patients? Why or why not?
Affordable Care Act Modification in Patients
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act1 (hereinafter referred to as the Affordable Care Act), amended by the Health and Education Reconciliation Act,2 became law on March 23, 2010. Full implementation occurs on January 1, 2014, when the individual and employer responsibility provisions take effect, state health insurance Exchanges begin to operate, the Medicaid expansions take effect, and the individual and small-employer group subsidies begin to flow. Along the way are a series of crucial intermediate steps.
The Importance of the 13th Amendment Write an argument for a new Constitutional Amendment.
The Importance of the 13th Amendment
Adopt an historical persona by which you choose an existing Constitutional Amendment, engage with the argument that took place regarding your chosen amendment, and contribute a new argument. If you choose this option, you need to identify the rhetorical situation first (e.g., name the constitutional convention or congressional session, identify the historical figures who argued for and against the amendment, provide background on the causes for the amendment’s need, etc.). Then, you need to introduce your historical persona (i.e., make up and name a person who would have reasonably existed at the time and been positioned to propose or argue for or against an amendment). Briefly establish this persona’s credibility.
The Importance of the 13th Amendment Essay Paper
Finally, spend the majority of your paper arguing for or against your chosen amendment using what you have learned about rhetorical arguments. Your argument needs to be appropriate to the historical and political context of your selected amendment (i.e., rely on logical, credible, and scholarly sources). It also must be a nuanced position. While you need to address the arguments that existed at the time, you cannot merely forward a preexisting argument. This assignment requires you to invent a new position on an existing amendment as though your persona existed and participated in the argument at the time.
Evaluate Changes Antidiscrimination Laws Write a paper in which you reflect about how the significant changes in Federal anti-discrimination law occurring since 1990 have had an impact in employees and organizations.
Evaluate Changes Antidiscrimination Laws
For example, are these anti-discrimination laws providing more protections for employees such as preventing sexual harassment or more opportunities in organizations for the disabled? Are these anti-discrimination laws changing the culture of organizations so that there is more tolerance of individual employee differences? What have been the impacts of these changes? Explain why these changes are or are not necessary for gaining a competitive advantage in a global economy.
The Death Penalty Criminal Law Policy Paper Write a policy paper about the death penalty; include sources such as court cases.
The Death Penalty Criminal Law Policy Paper
Criminal law, the body of law that defines criminal offenses, regulates the apprehension, charging, and trial of suspected persons, and fixes penalties and modes of treatment applicable to convicted offenders.
The Death Penalty Criminal Law Policy Paper Detailed Information
Criminal law is only one of the devices by which organized societies protect the security of individual interests and ensure the survival of the group. There are, in addition, the standards of conduct instilled by family, school, and religion; the rules of the office and factory; the regulations of civil life enforced by ordinary police powers; and the sanctions available through tort actions.
The other Two Requirements of Jurisdiction Based on your readings, answer and discuss the following questions on Venue and on what you have already learned about Federal Subject Matter jurisdiction.
Discussion of The other Two Requirements of Jurisdiction
Discussion: What was the issue in this case and how does it relate to venue? What other venue-related cases can you find? The jurisdiction of the federal courts has been defined by the Constitution, congressional statutes, and decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. Article III of the Constitution left for the Congress to determine the distribution of federal jurisdiction within a system of federal courts and between the federal and state courts. Over the past two centuries, Congress has passed numerous statutes redefining the jurisdiction of the federal courts within the limits set by the Constitution. Throughout its history, the Supreme Court in its decisions has established additional rules and doctrines governing federal court jurisdiction.
