Write two pages (4-5 paragraphs) on the character you believe to be an antagonist to Nick, to Gatsby, or to both men.
Answer the following questions in your essay:
What qualities does this character have that make him or her an opposing force?
How might encounters with the antagonist change Nick or Gatsby?
As you write your essay, make sure to complete the following instructions.
Your opening must do the following:
Include an underlined thesis statement containing your essay’s main idea. Include a sentence listing specific ideas to be discussed in paragraphs to follow in the body of the essay. Bold this sentence.
Other suggestions: You MUST quote from the novel “The Great Gatsby” (21) using textual evidence to support your assertions about the essays central questions.
Include an interesting closing that does not merely repeat what you have said earlier in the essay. Provoke thought, stir interest, quote from an outside source, etc.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Deadpool Diagnosis Abnormal Psychology Movie Essay
Abnormal Psychology Movie Assignment
For this class, you will complete one assignment which has been divided into three parts; the movie selection, outline and sources, and the final paper. There are numerous movies highlighting the various psychological disorders that we will be discussing this semester. For this assignment, you will select one of those movies and then analyze a main character’s pathology. Please ask for help at any stage of this process and remember that you can turn in additional drafts to me for review prior to the deadlines if you feel like you need the assistance.
In your paper, you will be required to use a minimum of one peer reviewed outside source in addition to your textbook to support your assertions. Your final paper should attempt APA formatting (including a references page and in-text citations). All submissions must be typed with size 12 font, double spaced, and have standard margins. Late or improperly formatted submissions will be subject to penalty and all submissions will be made via the Assignment Instructions link on our Canvas site. There are 150 total points available for this assignment and the complete directions and due dates for each component are described below.
Length: 5-6 pages (not including the title or reference pages)
Contents:
Brief introduction/summary of the movie you selected (1-3 paragraphs)
A description or profile of the character that you will be analyzing (include information such as demographics, background, personality attributes, and any other relevant information)
Diagnosis of the main character’s disorder and the diagnostic criteria for that diagnosis (create a clinical picture of your character – what are the symptoms required for the diagnosis you made? Is there a differential diagnosis – does it look like they might have some elements of a different disorder but don’t completely meet the criteria?)
Provide specific examples/evidence from the movie (describe scenes or events that support your diagnosis and the diagnostic criteria for the disorder)
Identify possible causes or contributors to your character’s pathology (if none are identifiable in the film, speculate to the best of your ability)
Discuss treatment options and prognosis for your character (which options would be viable and how would you decide on what treatment option to select)
Closing remarks and comments on your character, the film, and other relevant information. Note: Some movies will provide their own diagnosis or treatment options with which you may or may not agree. Comment on the accuracy of their diagnosis, accuracy of the portrayal of the specific disorder, and if you would’ve pursued other treatment options.
Include a references page and in-text citations (works cited should include your film selection, required outside source, and any other sources you used in the process of writing your paper.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
The Shack tells a story on two levels, one as a terrible tragedy and one as a parable or allegory. There will come a point several chapters into the book where you will have to make the decision to suspend disbelief to enter fully enter the storyline. Please do so; the journey will be worth it.
Please keep in mind that this novel was written as a parable or allegory (or a kind of metaphor), and the beginning of the story is written as realistic fiction, which takes place in today’s time. It is NOT scripture although it certainly introduces Biblical topics and concepts for further contemplation. It also features an interesting, “fantastical” plot that allows for analysis of literary elements you are studying. One of the purposes of literature is to give you insights or opportunities for thoughtful extended consideration from other points of view.
(Note: You will have three (3) response assignments for the The Shack, and they are spaced throughout the eight units of the course. Each will follow the same format, but will address different sections of the novel.)
Assignment
Prepare a 250+ word response (based on one of the following: Prologue – Chapter 4).
Directions and Format for preparing Shack Responses
Please use the MLA Format for the form of your paper.
Refer to chapters 29 and 30 in your textbook for general format.
Below are important items to include.
First-page header:
On left side of page one, include: Shack #1 Response
And the chapter number and title which you chose
Running Headers:
Include runner headers on top right side of each page of your paper.
Title: Create an original title for each Shack Forum Response that reflects the content of your writing.
Paragraph 1: Briefly summarize the major action/ideas of the chapter and tell why you chose this particular chapter.
Paragraph 2: For each of the four Shack Responses, identify and describe at least one literary term (e.g., point of view, character, theme, conflict) and one literary theory (e.g., formalism, reader response theory, psychoanalytic criticism) in My Literature Lab (or your textbook or other sources) that help you to better understand the selection you have chosen. Cite your sources for the usage of these literary tools and give examples from your reading. Please bold the terms you use in this paragraph. Vary your terms and theories from response to response.
*See below for MyLiteratureLab guide.
Paragraph 3: Question the author and make predictions. Be sure to describe personal connections you have to this chapter (experiential, emotional, etc.)., thus, aiding in your understanding and interpretation of the materials (refer to MLL: Reading Response Theory).
In-text Citations: Include in-text citations in MLA format throughout your paper.
Works Cited: Include a Works Cited page at the end.
Attach your submission to this assignment link for grading.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Motion Graphics Video about a Tourism Commercial on Adobe after effect. I need to do an after effect video about a tourism company and I need an animated logo for the company I have the name of the company I need to choose 1 country with 5 landmarks I’ve chosen the country it’s London with 5 landmarks in it such Big Ben.
Motion Graphics Video about a Tourism Commercial
A Traveling Agency is looking for 2D animation designers to create a
Transform the movie ‘The Wizard of Oz’ into a visual presentation by using MS PowerPoint.
Use graphs, charts, pictures, links and sound effects, including whatever else you can think of to allow the audience to understand the presentation within a visual and aural format.
Be sure to cite sources with a citation page (this includes every image!)!
Give your audience a clear, organized, and focused summary of your interpretation, stating any relevant background information on your subject, your thesis, your major points, and the key examples which support your major points. Improve the argument!
The presentation will need to be as long as it takes to present the argument.
I do not have a slide or word quota, but the argument should be clear.
The attachments are only to be used as an example. The speaker notes that you will include (outline), will then have my voice added later on once it has been completed. They both received an ‘A’.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Assignment: a 3 to 5 page reaction paper to the film Fight Club
Specifications:
Assignment: to examine one of the following sociological topics in the film: gender, collective behavior or economy (see below.) You will need to pick one area to focus on for your paper. The questions are meant to guide you. You are not required to answer the questions in your essay, however they may help you in organizing your paper sociologically.
Organization: You will need to format and organize this paper into a standard college essay. In order to do this, you will need a strong introduction with a thesis statement which summarizes your paper in one to two sentences. Use you thesis statement to show your understanding and interpretations of the film and how it portrays your chosen topic as well as how accurate that portrayal is. You will also want to make sure that your body is organized by topics with strong transitions. Finally, you will need a good conclusion which not only summarizes your paper but re-states and supports your thesis. All papers should be double spaced, for format use New Times Roman font 12pt. and should be formatted with 1î margins. The file must be in either in either Word or Google Document format, NO PDFs!!!!!!
Paper Support: You will want to use lots of examples from the film and support your arguments with at least 3 academic outside sources (yes, you may use your text-book as one of these sources). Sources must be of the following types: 1) an article from an academic sociological journal. 2) an article using a sociological perspective from a specialized academic journal (such as a medical journal, or business journal). 3) An academic book which deals with the topic in a sociological manner. Pop magazines such as Newsweek and Times are not acceptable sources. If you use the internet you need to get my permission of the source before using it unless it is from a library database. Wikipedia is not an academic source.
There are several academic papers over the movie, it is ok to read them and use them for ideas, you must cite them and they do not count towards your 3 sources. Your outside sources should relate to the topic chosen NOT the movie!
Citations: You will be required to make extensive references to the course readings. In order to give the authors’ credit for their ideas as well as avoid plagiarism, you will need to properly cite all of your quotations and paraphrases. In order to do this you will need both in paper citations and a bibliography or works cited reference page. I do not care which format (APA, MLA, ASA, etc,) you use for your references as long as you cite the authors. I have given you an example of ASA below:
For quotes (if you use more than three words from someone else, you need to quote them): To be or not to be, that is the question. (Shakespeare (Author), 1977 (Date of Publication), p. 888).
For paraphrases (summaries of others’ arguments): Macbeth ponders the meaning of life (Shakespeare, 1977).
In bibliography: (you must cite the works in your paper and have a bibliography)
Book: Author. Date Published. Title. Publishing city: Publisher. Example:
Shakespeare, William. 1977. Macbeth in William Shakespeare The Complete Works. Habrage, Alfred (ed.) England: Viking Publishing.
Clark, Eve. Fall 2006. How Not to Plagiarize, Introduction to Sociology. 1: 1-30.
Topics: (Pick one)
Gender
What does the film tells us about gender? How does it define masculinity, femininity? What is the importance of violence in the film, what does it tell us about American manhood? Where are the women? Does this film describe a patriarchal society, if so how?
Collective Behavior and Group Behavior
What does the film tell as about the power of the group? How did the group control their lives? What does the film tells about leadership? Were these men acting rationally? What type of collective behavior was this, would you consider these men in a social movement? Why did the men join? Is it a successful movement?
Capitalism and Consumerism
What does the film tell us about Post-Industrial societies, what about capitalism? What is the importance of consumerism? Why is the main character not sleeping? What importance does money play in this world? What is the importance of the ending and how would it effect our capitalist society?
This is your paper!: Although I hope the above guidelines help you start thinking about the various topics portrayed in the film, this paper is your way of demonstrating you understand your chosen topic and what you have learned about it throughout the semester. You can address these issues in the way you feel best demonstrates your understanding of the course and the topics we have covered. Just be sure your ideas are clear and well supported.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Throughout the course, you will be required to write six short written responses to the texts we will be reading or the films we will be watching. The purpose of this assignment is to have you grapple with our written texts before you come to class (and/or to reflect rigorously on the films). I say ‘grapple’ because they’re often very difficult to understand. Indeed, lectures will be largely devoted simply to making sense of the readings. But as an upper-level degree course, I believe you should be practicing reading and making of sense of ideas on your own as much as possible. You might also find that engaging in readings closely prior to class will make the lectures and discussions more interesting and informative.
Instructions:
1) What to write on: Each response should be only on the text or texts that we will be covering on the week that you hand it in. For example, if you write one for week 3, it can only be on Camus’ Myth of Sisyphus. Whether you’ve attended the previous classes or not, I won’t be accepting responses on previous weeks’ readings. As an exception to this rule, you may write on ‘I [Heart] Huckabees’ or ‘The Fire Within’ (which are films) after the class when it’s shown.
2) Length: Each response should be approximately 400 words and typed.
3) Title: The title of each should say which response number it is. So if you’re handing in, say, your third response during week 5, the title should look something like this: ‘Henrietta Hershberg – Response #3’. This will greatly help keep me organized (and prevent the need for you to resend all of them near the end of the term.) You may include more in the title if you like.
4) What I’m looking for: You may write the response as you like. I’m looking for:
a) evidence of having read (or watched) the material closely;
b) evidence of understanding/interpreting the text in a sensible way;
c) evidence that you actually thought about the material and did something with it
(e.g., applied it to your world; compared it to other texts or parts of texts, related it
to other ideas, interpreted a particularly difficult passage to make sense of…);
d) clear, grammatically well-formed sentences, and nice overall flow.
5) More detailed guidelines: If you want more guidelines, then I suggest something like the following:
i) The first 250 words or so should be devoted to summarizing either a whole or a significant part of the text that you choose. If it’s a long reading, it’s best to select a part you think is significant. (A 200 word summary of all of, say, Camus’ Myth of
Sisyphus would be too superficial.) Try as best as possible to explain the main ideas of
the text in your own words. Also include at least one quotation from the text
itself. This lets me know you’ve actually read it.
ii) The last 150 words or so should be dedicated to your own thoughts or feelings about the text you have just summarized. You have many options here: you may interpret the meaning of certain passages or symbols; you may analyze characters; you may agree or disagree with something and say why; you may comment on the effectiveness of a technique used by the writer; you may illustrate how certain passages reflect comments made in the introductions or in previous classes; you may link the ideas to your experiences or experiences of other people you know; you may link the ideas to other written and artistic works either from this course or elsewhere; or you may simply describe the effects the text had on you if that seems significant to you. (If you do the last option, don’t be vague and do take your description seriously.)
6) On choosing short sections: If you are approaching your written response by trying to find the easiest way out—which usually involves selecting the shortest and simplest passage to discuss—I’ll likely get that sense while reading yours, and you won’t do all that well (though you can certainly pass if this is what it’s come to). That being said, if you have good or deep thoughts about a short and simple passage, please do feel free to write on it. You could still potentially get a very high grade. I want you to select what you find interesting.
7) No introduction or conclusion: Jump right in without any introductory paragraph, and do not recap your main points in a concluding paragraph. Each is too short for these.
8) About references and secondary sources:
a) I would prefer you to use only the text we are covering in class without any secondary sources at all. Perhaps the main point of the assignment is to have you practice reading difficult material and trying to make sense of it. It’s better to tackle a small piece of the text than give me a regurgitated overview of the whole thing that you got from the internet. What I’m looking for is YOUR engagement with the text, however that turns out.
b) If you only use the text we’re covering in class, then there’s no need for you to include any bibliography or footnotes/endnotes, unless you happen to be using a different copy of the text (which is okay with me). If you are simply using the assigned text, just say what page your quotation is from in brackets in the text. If you do use another version of the text, please do indicate which one in whatever format you like. If you are using someone else’s words directly, make sure to put them in quotation marks.
c) If you really feel you need help, first send me an email with questions. If you’re really in a jam, do what you need to do online—but make sure that you fully reference your source. If you use any other source than the text and you do not indicate it, you will (assuming I figure it out) get 0/10 on that response, and you will not have the opportunity to redo that one. Please be aware that after having read over 15,000 student assignments, I have a pretty good sense of authorship (largely based on grammatical constructions). Not worth it!
d) If you are unsure about whether you might be plagiarising, I recommend watching a tutorial video, courtesy of our library: go to www.georgebrown.ca/LLC, click on ‘Study Tools’, then click on ‘Tutorials’ at the bottom of the menu on the left, then click on ‘Avoiding Plagiarism and Research Skills’. The Toronto Daily News says it’s “Hilarious! A tour de force!”
9) Handing it in: You may hand in the assignment as a hard copy or email it to me at jkoffman@georgebrown.ca. Please put your name and the written response number (i.e., how many you’ve written) in the file title . You may always see me in person outside of class to get more detailed feedback. Just come with at least two responses so I can best help you.
10) Value: Each one is worth 10% of the total marks for the course. So none of them is all that big of a deal taken individually—i.e., don’t panic if you don’t do so well at first. However, cumulatively, they are worth 60%, so they are the most significant form of evaluation overall.
Good luck, enjoy the readings if possible, and contact me if you have any questions.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
To complete this project you will want to choose a central character from the movie “The Great Debaters” and A theoretical paradigm from the readings we have completed this for in this class the book Interplay fourteenth Edition – The Process of Interpersonal Communication – Chapter 1-8.
This paper should do the following:
Explain the rhetorical situation (content) of the film. Consider the external context of the film (era in which it is written, social issues it deals with, etc.) and the is internal context within the film that your character is facing (what is the physical and emotional setting which governs the film and the characters in it. What is the specific relational content facing your character.)
Summarize how your character changes throughout the film particularly in self-perception and it’s impact upon the communication choices made.
Select at least one theoretical paradigm that we have studied in class and explain how it applies to your observations of your characters growth and communication changes. Include quotes from the textbook to prove your ideas have validity.
Support your theoretical claim with specific observations and examples from the film. Consider a particular internal thought patterns and communication choices your character makes as the plot on unfolds and describe them. Explain these decisions both within the context of the film and how they individually illustrate the theoretical paradigm used to analyze the movie.
Analyze how the communication choices your character makes impact other characters in the film and your characters relationship with them.
– Explain how your theory of choice impacts communication in real world contexts.
– Analyze what the film says to its audience about these communication choices.
Your papers should be 3 to 5 pages in length. You may use whatever format your major requires or you are most comfortable writing. Your textbook serves as your primary source; however you may want to do some additional research on your film or the theory that you are using as your paradigm for analysis. Make sure your information is cited.
Do your best to write professionally using proper grammar and mechanics and punctuation. Keep in mind the primary consideration for your grade will be in the content you generate and how well you support it.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Ben Hur 1959 and Gladiator 2000
In this module we will learn about the evolution of biblical and historical epics, as well as accompanying significant technological advances, including ‘widescreen’ cinema, the screen spectacular.
Compare the ways in which our two films for this week – Ben-Hur and Gladiator portray Rome (as a state and empire). Do they represent Rome (and the Roman characters) in a positive or negative light?
Explain, using examples from the film and film language .
How is this related to the context of the times in which these films were made?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
