Nursing Critical Analysis of Quantitative Study Order Instructions: Details: Prepare a critical analysis of a quantitative study focusing on protection of human participants, data collection, data management and analysis, problem statement, and interpretation of findings.
Nursing Critical Analysis of Quantitative Study
The quantitative research article can be from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article.
Each study analysis will be 1,000-1,250 words and submitted in one document. As with the assignments in Topics 1-3, this should connect to your identified practice problem of interest.
Refer to the resource entitled “Research Critique Part 2.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. You are also required to include an Introduction and Conclusion.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Submit the assignment along with an electronic version of the article used for the analysis. If an electronic version is not available, submit a clean unmarked copy of the article.
NRS433V.v10R.ResearchCritiquePart2Guidelines_student.docx
Nursing Critical Analysis of Quantitative Study Sample Answer
Introduction Critical appraisal refers to in-depth analysis of a quantitative study for various reasons. In nursing, a critical appraisal is normally done for three major reasons including a) improve nursing practice, b) broaden nursing knowledge and understanding and c) give a baseline for conducting a study (Shimoinaba, O’Connor, & Lee, 2010). To ensure that these three reasons are achieved, the following special considerations to the article being critically appraised must be put into considerations. These include issues such as research findings are appropriate to the study situation and study setting. The study must identify the further study research and what pilot studies that need to be conducted before the study findings and intervention are incorporated into practice, in order to ensure that patient safety and effectiveness is maintained. Additionally, the article must indicate the clinical implications of the study finding (O’Shea, 2014).
Thesis statement for composing this assignment is that critical appraisal of this quantitative article will broaden my nursing knowledge and understanding of nursing care, which will improve my nursing practice. The article that is critically appraised is “Mc Donell, S., &Timmins, F. (2012). A quantitative exploration of the subjective burden experienced by nurses when caring for patients with delirium. Journal of clinical nursing 21, 2488-2498.” The nursing main topics that will be included in this critical analysis includes protection of the human subjects participating in the study, methods of data collection, data management, the study’s problem statement, findings and the nursing implications (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
Protection of Human Participants
Research study is the best approach in advancing treatment and quality care in healthcare. The author does not mention the risks and benefits that participants received. However from evidence based practice, some of the benefits that the participants could have achieved include receiving more attention and oversight as there were frequent designated evaluation points during the evaluation processes. Additionally, it would have helped in combating participants feelings of helplessness as they undertook an active role in the healthcare, thus improving the quality of life and general well-being of the patient. The main risk identified in the study is psychological harms associated with undesired changes in the participant’s emotions. However, these risks are transitory and thus had minimal potential for causing serious psychological harm (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
To ensure that the human participants are protected, the researchers sought permission from the various ethical authorities, including the University ethical review board. Additionally, the participants were required to fill in and sign informed consent. The study indicates that the participants were not forced or coerced in to participating (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
Data Collection
The data collection design for the study is quantitative descriptive design. The study design was chosen because of its flexibility attribute which is important particularly during data collection as it enhances multifaceted data collection strategy. The study population consisted of 800 registered nurses from the Republic of Ireland. To ensure that the study population was not biased, the population conducted a random sampling (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
The participants were required to fill in their questionnaires was collected using the Strain Of Care for Delirium Index (SCDI), derived from the Clinical Assessment of confusion (CAC-A) tool. The independent variables collected included psychological behaviors such as depression, physical injuries, anxiety, and burnouts. The dependent variables collected included gender, age, area of work and participants qualifications as well as a number of professional training that the participants had attended (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
This method of data collection was chosen because enabled the researcher to ensure wider participation of researchers. Additionally, the method ensured that it offered a non-threatening as well as non-intrusive method, and simultaneously maintaining patient’s anonymity. This ensured that the inherent biases are reduced, and most importantly, it allowed a wide range of responses from the nurses who worked in various areas of healthcare practice. The time frame that was used to collect the data was approximately six months (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
Once the data was collected, it was entered into thematic charts, which aimed at improving the analysis as well as the interpretation of the data. This was done according to the policies and regulations of the ABA policies. The data in the thematic charts was coded to ensure easy data analysis using the statistical tools and parameters (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
Data Management and Analysis
The data management instruments used was the Strain of Care for Delirium Index (SCDI). Once the data had been gathered from the questionnaires and grouped into thematic charts, it was subjected to data analysis done using SPSS Version 16 Inc., Chicago, IL, USA. The statistical analysis conducted included measures of deviation, and means of variances. These measures were used to ensure that the distribution of pattern could be understood effectively. The analysis of question was done in a manner that it ensured that each of the study questions was analyzed effectively (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
Additionally, the appropriateness of the statistical measures that were applied included the Cramer’s V association measures, which was used to determine the correlation that existed between variables. To ensure that the statistical analysis was conducted the triangulation techniques, which was done to ensure that type I & II errors were minimized. Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
Findings / Interpretation and Implications for clinical practice
The study findings in this articles are reported in percentages and in rations. The study also included the study statistical significance. The study findings summaries are done adequately and in presentations of graphs and figures. From the study findings, it was evident that the RN experienced suffered from subjective burden when delivering care to patients diagnosed with delirium. The study indicated that the main challenging aspect of the disease included hyper activity as well as hyper alertness, recorded at M=3.41, which were followed by uncooperativeness which was reported as M=3.58. There were no accidental findings that are reported, but the study conclusion that RN lack knowledge on ways to manage patients suffering from delirium, and that the nurses suffered subjective burden when delivering these care can be generalized. The findings are valid and also an accurate reflection on what is shown in reality. The main limitation of the study was the poor response from the questionnaire, which could have introduced bias due to confounding effects (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
The implications of the study in clinical practice are derived from the interpretation of the study findings. This indicated that the RN suffers from subjective burden especially when delivering care to patients diagnosed with delirium. The study indicated that there is need to enrol the healthcare providers and the nurse staff to education programs that focus on effective delivery of care for patients diagnosed with delirium (Wu et al., 2014). The study recommended that future studies in research should focus on strategies that they facilitate in understanding the aspects of delirium, its risk factors, pathophysiology, indicators and preventive measures in order to facilitate early identification of the disease, and early establishment of strategies that will lower the burden of care (Mc Donell, & Timmins, 2012).
Nursing Critical Analysis of Quantitative Study Conclusion
This study and the critical appraisal activity provide substantial implication for nursing practices, particularly when delivering care for patients. This is important because nurses spends most of their time in providing direct care, which creates a prolonged intimate relationship with the patients, which could lead to burden to nurses when delivering care. In some situations, the challenging behaviours that are exhibited by patient can lead to significant nurse distress, and potentially impact negatively on the patient care.
This activity has helped me understand the perceptions and challenges experienced by the nurses, which is a good step in helping me broaden my nursing knowledge and understanding of nursing care, which will improve my nursing practice. Additionally, this will facilitate smooth transition from nurse student into nurse practitioner.
Nursing Critical Analysis of Quantitative Study References
Mc Donell, S., &Timmins, F. (2012). A quantitative exploration of the subjective burden experienced by nurses when caring for patients with delirium. Journal of clinical nursing 21, 2488-2498
O’Shea, M. (2014). CE. AJN, American Journal Of Nursing, 114(11), 26-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000456424.02398.ef
Shimoinaba, K., O’Connor, M., & Lee, S. (2010). Japanese head nurses’ perspectives regarding issues of nurses working in palliative care units and current support systems. Progress In Palliative Care, 18(6), 358-363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1743291x10y.0000000008
Wu, X., Gao, Y., Yang, J., Xu, M., & Sun, D. (2014). Quantitative measurement to evaluate morphological changes of the corpus callosum in patients with subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. Acta Radiologica, 56(2), 214-218. doi:10.1177/0284185114520863
Maternal morbidity and mortality is a national health problem. Preventing complications of pregnancy is included in the 2020 National Health Goals. The purpose of this written assignment is to describe how evidenced based findings can improve patient outcomes related to obstetrical care.
Tanya Kim, 36, G4 P4, was in labor for 36 hours when she had a cesarean birth for a failed induction of labor. She delivered a 9 pound 8 ounce male infant. Tanya’s labor was induced with oxytocin at 41 weeks gestation and continuous epidural was placed during active labor. The epidural was discontinued after delivery. She has iron deficiency anemia but otherwise an unremarkable medical history. She has no known allergies. Her obstetrical history includes 1 spontaneous abortion 6 years ago, vaginal delivery of twins 4 years ago, one singleton vaginal delivery 2 years ago and the cesarean birth today. Tanya plans to breastfeed her infant.
Two hours post-delivery the RN assesses the following:
Vital signs: BP 90/62, pulse 88, Respirations 22, temperature 98.6°F
Skin color: pink
Fundus: boggy, firms with fundal massage, midline and at umbilicus.
Lochia: Heavy rubra with nickel-sized clots
Pain: Uterine cramping rates pain 4 out of 10 on verbal pain scale
Intravenous fluids: 3000 mL Lactated Ringers with 20 units of Pitocin in each bag.
Urinary output: 200 mL since delivery (urinary catheter in place)
Patient comments: “I’m really tired. I have been up for the last two nights.”
One hour later the patient puts her light on and makes the following comment:
“I’m really bleeding a lot!” The RN comes in the room and notes increased vaginal bleeding. The patient is pale, diaphoretic, and the uterine fundus is boggy. The fundus does not firm with massage.
Using APA format, write a 2-3 page paper (excludes cover and reference page) that addresses the following:
1.Identify at least one (1) risk factor from the patient’s obstetrical history associated with the primary problem. Describe why this piece of obstetrical history places the patient at risk for the identified problem.
2.Early identification of emergencies in the obstetric setting is essential to save lives. Four (4) approaches are identified in the literature that can be utilized to positively impact patient outcomes: simulations, drills, protocols, vital sign alerts. Select one of these approaches and address the following: ?
Discuss two (2) benefits and two (2) limitations of the selected approach.
Describe two (2) ways by which this approach will improve patient outcomes in the perinatal setting.
A minimum of two (2) current professional references must be provided. Only one (1) textbook that is no more than one (1) edition old may be used.
Current references include professional publications that reflect nursing care provided within the United States. Current nursing professional references must be current (five [5] years or less). Reliable internet sources such as those offered by government agencies, academic institutions or nationally recognized professional organizations may also be used. Examples of unacceptable internet sources include but are not limited to: Wikipedia, medicinenet.com, allnurses.com, and any nursing blog site.
Compose your work using a word processor (or other software as appropriate) and save it frequently to your computer. Use a 12 font size, double space your work and use APA format for citations, references, and overall format. Information on how to use the Excelsior College Library to help you research and write your paper is available through the Library Help for AD Nursing Courses page. Assistance with APA format, grammar, and avoiding plagiarism is available for free through the Excelsior College Online Writing Lab (OWL). Be sure to check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors before you submit your assignment
FYI: Current text books being used for this course and materials are:
Textbooks (Chapter numbers and titles may differ in subsequent editions of a given textbook. If your edition is different, use the Table of Contents in the textbook to locate the appropriate chapters to read):
Hinkle, J., & Cheever, K. (2013). Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing (13th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Kee, J., Hayes, E., & McCuistion, L. (2015). Pharmacology: A nursing process approach (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
Nursing Diagnosis Guidebook – A pocket-size nursing diagnosis guidebook of your choice that is no more than one edition old, that includes NANDA International-approved nursing diagnoses, definitions, defining characteristics, and possible nursing Interventions.
Pillitteri, A. (2014). Maternal & child health nursing: Care of the childbearing and childrearing family (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.
FYI Paper rubic.
NUR209 M6A3: Improving Obstetric Patient Outcomes Paper Rubric
The Case Study assignment addresses the following Student Learning Program Outcomes (SLPOs) and Course Outcomes.
Student Learning Program Outcomes (SLPO) Course Outcomes (CLO)
SLPO #2 (Nursing Judgment): Apply the nursing process to make nursing judgments, substantiated with evidence to provide safe, quality patient care across the lifespan.
2. Apply the nursing process when making nursing judgments to provide safe, quality,
nursing care for families and patients with perinatal and reproductive health care needs.
SLPO #6 (Spirit of Inquiry): Use interpreted published research and information
technology to improve the quality of care for patients.
6. Incorporate evidence-based findings and interpreted research into the provision of safe, quality nursing care for patients with perinatal and reproductive health care needs.
The following criteria are used to grade your two (2) to three (3) page (excluding the cover page and reference page) Case Study Assignment, which accounts for 10% of your final course grade.
Performance levels for each criterion include the following:
Unacceptable indicates that the student’s attempt at the assignment is poor in quality and fails to meet minimum “adequate” criteria.
Adequate indicates a student has met minimal requirements.
Good indicates all expectations of the assignment were met in a comprehensive manner.
Exceptional indicates that expectations of the assignment were exceeded, whereby a student went above and beyond the assignment as written.
Exceptional performance is considered rare.
Expectations described under each performance level define the minimum performance that must be demonstrated to earn the minimum points at that level.
**Plagiarism is not acceptable. Evidence of plagiarism will result in a zero (0) grade for the assignment and may also result in academic discipline.**
SAMPLE ANSWER
Improving Obstetric Patient Outcomes Paper
Labour complications are the leading cause of long term disabilities, mortalities and morbidity for both the mother and the babies. One of the approaches is to assess the patient obstetrical history to identify if the pregnancy is a high risk or not. Certain maternal risks factors are associated with risk factors and are identified by assess the outcomes of previous pregnancies. In this context, the patient had suffered from spontaneous abortion during her first pregnancy. Additionally, the patient had undergone other pregnancies (multiple delieveries), and this could have had an impact with her delivery. This is the main factor that could be associated with the prolonged labour and increased bleeding post-delivery. The excessive may result due to the opened blood vessels during the caesarean delivery (Pillitteri, 2014). This is because a pregnant uterus has the most blood supplies as compared to any other body organ. Therefore, the walls of the uterus are cut wide open to access the baby. Although most of the women have the ability to tolerate the blood loss without presenting any health complications, in some few people, some complications could arise. This is severe especially in patients who have difficult in clotting; making it difficult to stop bleeding even with minor cut or even shears. Research indicates that postpartum haemorrhage is common and affects about 6% of the women undergoing caesarean delivery(Kee, Hayes, & McCuistion, 2015).
To save the lives of both the child and the mother, it is important to identify emergencies in the obstetric settings early enough. This is because emergencies can lead to the permanent disabilities or even death of the mother, the infant or both. The main approaches identified by the evidence based practice that can be utilized includes, drills, protocols, simulation and vital sign alerts. In this case study, the best approach that should be used is the protocols. The most strategic approach in this case is use of protocols. Protocols refer to set of rules and procedures that must be followed based on the conventions that have been proven to work in such incidences (Kee, Hayes, & McCuistion, 2015).
The main advantage is that it helps the healthcare provider make the most ethical decision as required by the organization and their professional standards (Kee, Hayes, & McCuistion, 2015). Secondly, because the information in the protocols are written according to the evidence based research, it provides the most effective remedy to patients irrespective of where or who delivers the care i.e. makes quality care the standard. The main challenge is the possibility of err in healthcare protocols, because the judgement value made by guideline could be the wrong choice for this particular patient. Secondly, effective use of protocols is determined by the nurse experience and clinical opinions, and thus, for an inexperienced nurse can pick the most inferior options due to misconceptions or misrepresented community norms (Hinkle & Cheever, 2013).
In this context, the protocol of postpartum assessment includes the assessment of patient’s vital signs, the assessment of breasts, bladder, fundus, perineum, lochia, legs as well as any other incision in the body. The patient pain must be assessed including the location, the type of pain, quality and degree of severity. If necessary, pain medications can be administered to reduce the irritation as well as the swelling. From the assessment records, the postpartum condition of the patient was normal. However after one hour, the patient calls for help, as she feels that she are bleeding a lot (Pillitteri, 2014).
The nurse assessment notices the vaginal bleeding, the patient if diaphoretic, pale and her fundus is boggy even with a firm massage. This is an indicator of postpartum haemorrhage, which could be due to uterine atony and trauma. Postpartum haemorrhages are grouped as emergency complications, and must be treated by a qualified physician. According to the protocols, the patient should be administered oxytocin IV or IM. If the intravenous oxytocin is unavailable, or the bleeding still continuous, then the following medication should be used, including the intravenous ergometrine, prostaglandin (sublingual misoprostol, 800 µg) or combination of oxytocin-ergometrine is strongly recommended. With effective treatment as indicated by the protocol, 90% of the patients make recovery few weeks. In some cases, blood transfusion can be administered to patients who have lost a lot of blood. Other supplements such as iron supplements, vitamins and nutritious dietary could facilitate improve the patient strength and increase patients’ blood supply. The approach will reduce the bleeding rate and improve the patients’ quality of life (Kee, Hayes, & McCuistion, 2015). The protocol also helps in the identification of the risk factors associated with postpartum haemorrhage including history of post-partum, prolonged labour, fetal macrosomia, multiple deliveries. However, it can also occur in patients not presenting the risk factors. The healthcare plan must be identified and designed before delivery. This coupled with assessment of vital signs can improve the patient’s delivery process and help in the detection of both slow and steady bleeding (Kee, Hayes, & McCuistion, 2015).
References
Hinkle, J., & Cheever, K. (2013). Brunner and Suddarth’s textbook of medical-surgical nursing (13th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Kee, J., Hayes, E., & McCuistion, L. (2015). Pharmacology: A nursing process approach (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier.
Pillitteri, A. (2014). Maternal & child health nursing: Care of the childbearing and childrearing family (7th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Infection Control in Perioperative Environment Order Instructions: Type OF Document is PROJECT REPORT. I have chosen this project question.
Infection Control in Perioperative Environment
How can a nurse maintain infection control and prevention in the perioperative environment?
Identify a nursing problem or issue that relates to the specialty area of practice in which you are completing your clinical placement for this unit.
Once you have identified a nursing problem/issue you will need to develop this into a question for exploration which is subject to approval by your LIC/Tutor. This question needs to be realistic in the context of your speciality clinical placement in relation to nursing practice. This question will lead you to contemporary literature. From your reading of this literature you will discover what is known or not known about your question. The information that you have gained from your reading and your observation of practice should then enable you to draw conclusions concerning your nursing question.
Infection Control in Perioperative Environment Sample Answer
Introduction
Perioperative environment maintenance will include the visual cleaning and inspection of the operation theatre’s horizontal surface and anesthetic rooms preoperatively (Ousey et al., 2015). The maintenance will also include the surgical lights, equipment, operating table, and furniture. The practice will be intraoperative to ensure that contamination is kept to the lowest level. Terminal cleaning and postoperatively practice are done after each procedure at the end of the operating lists. It is the role of the nurses to carry out preoperatively environment cleaning and also oversee the delegation of cleaning tasks in an appropriate manner (Bowlt & Gasson, 2013).
Topic Identification
The topic under study under this research will entail the investigation of the best strategies for controlling, prevention and maintenance of the preoperative environment. The topic will expound more on the effective measures adopted by the nurses in ensuring the effective prevention and control of the infections in their area of practice that is the preoperative environment (Wood et al., 2014).
Background Information
Effective prevention and control of infections must be an everyday practice that should be consistently applied by everyone. Safe working practices must be adopted regardless of the suspected or known infections. The standard precautions will efficiently access the operations or activities to be completed (Bowlt & Gasson, 2013). It is the right of every patient to be treated with respect and dignity. One way of achieving this is the effective maintenance of the preoperative environment. Standard precautions will be vital in the elimination of infection risks in the most appropriate way. The topic will explore some of the best ways to enhance the operations are done successfully enough to bring positive results (Ousey et al, 2015). The exploration will be made possible through the collection of information and the necessary data from the various sources.
The scope of the Report
The scope of the report will focus on the adherence of the measures that will ensure long-term maintenance of the preoperative environment. The scope of the practices in which the report will concentrate on will be based on the adherence to the standard precautions by the nurses in the maintenance of the pre-operatively environment (Sallasa et al, 2014). Identification of the principles that emphasize the appropriate practices performed by the nurses at their place of the work as they try to reduce the risks of infections will be essential.
Literature Review (Synopsis of the Articles/Journals)
According to the article inter-operative nursing care article, the main goal of the nurses in this field will entail the safeguarding the rights of patients for the best surgical outcomes (Kelvered et al, 2012). The environment and health are the main focus while carrying out individualized nursing care procedures. The nurses ensure patients safety through maintenance of the aseptic environment, checking the amount of sterile equipment and also observing the position of the patients. It is also essential to monitor circulation and fluid losses in the patients. The introduction of the WHO checklist will promote the teamwork in the surgical team especially the preoperative safety check (Kelvered et al, 2012).
In the journal patient culture and patient’s safety, evidence reviewed for the report credits the work and efforts of the nurses in the maintenance of the preoperative environment despite the many threats to the patient safety. Mitigation of errors will be the basis for the efficient performance of tasks in the theatre. The implementation of the evidence-based for reducing the surgical related infections e.g. the central-line associated bloodstream infections will be crucial in the prevention and control of infections in the pre-operatively environment. The vigilance by the nurses is needed in many tasks to reduce the errors that mostly affect the patients under their care. According to (Ulrich & Kear, 2014) the nurses also need to be proactive as they perform the maintenance tasks to cultivate a patient safety culture which will highly reduce the high prevalence of the infections occurring in the preoperative environment.
In the journal Nurses perception of standardized assessment, it is essential for nurses to have the positive perception that would help them in observance of the procedural standards for controlling and prevention of infection arising in the pre-operative environment. The nurses are supposed to carry out exposure prone procedures in their tasks. Provision of the sufficient evidence confirming that the nurses have no infections is vital. The evidence concerning their immunity should also be presented by the nurses as they seek to start their mission ineffective maintenance of the preoperative area from the various infections (Soh et al, 2013). Maintenance of personal hygiene by the nurses will be vital as they play a major role in influencing the environment. The nurses ought to wear the theatre attire to minimize the transfer of the microorganisms from the skin, mucous membrane to the patient from the surgical team.
Data Collection Methods
Data collection will be essential in the acquisition of important information regarding the project. Critical observation was made from the local health centers that have implemented these measures and practices as proposed by the journals. An integrative literature review was undertaken to collect information. The use of questionnaires and conducting interviews will be necessary for the data collection process. The main interviewees will be some of the patients and families that have undergone the theatre operations or had any experience concerning the preoperative environment (Sallasa et al., 2014). The questioners to access the effectiveness of the practices in reducing the infections risks as confirmed by the nurses and other health workers will be used to collect information. The documented sources will be used as materials to obtain data about the previous practices that were effective in reducing the risks of infections. The study methods carried out earlier before this research, also were also adopted as sources of the study that is vital information for the project (Salassa et al, 2014). The books and journals will also be used as materials for collecting information concerning the appropriate standard procedures for maintenance of the preoperative environment. The methods of collecting the data were reliable and valid in nature which facilitated the effective acquisition of data from a large number of respondents (Galor et al., 2013). The data can also be used to carry out statistical tests to a show effectiveness of results.
It is important to replicate the project that promotes the adherence of the procedures and strict observance of the standard procedures by the nurses. Similar projects have shown positive results after their implementation (Farthing et al., 2013). Assessment of the results from the project also approves the adoption of the project. In this case, the experiment project can be replicated in future projects.
Results
The results acquired after the implementation of the project indicate positive outcomes. The operation related infections have reduced immensely as indicated by the statistics provided by some of the healthcare centers where the project measures were implemented. The infections have reduced from 15% to 10%.The maintenance of hygiene; sterilization and appropriate handling of surgical equipment have been found to be most effective in the control and prevention of infections in the preoperative environment.
Discussion of observation/Conclusion
According to the results of the project after critical assessment, the adherence to the standards and procedures of maintenance will be effective in reducing infections. These measures will require the commitment of all nurses and support of the other health workers (Farthing et al, 2013). These results will approve the importance of hygiene as key in prevention and control of infections. In my area, statistics provided by the various health centers credits the adherence to standards of procedural by nurses as practice that should be adopted for the effective maintenance of the infections in the pre-operative area. The method used in acquiring the results has its main limitation that is the acceptance rate and to be approved as most effective. These results will be applied in areas with high prevalence of infections in the preoperative environment.
Nurses should comply with glove procedure, gown and also the surgical rub requirements whenever working in the theatre environment. Adherence to the hygiene policy is crucial for observance by all the nurses as it helps in reduction of infection risks. Sterile field maintenance observed by the nurses will ensure safe preoperative experience by the nurses (Wood et al, 2014). Safe transportation of endoscopes to the containers by the nurses should be ensured. The endoscopes should be stored in designated places. Disinfection and cleaning of endoscopy policies should be enhanced by the nurses working in the preoperative environment to reduce the contaminations and risks of infections (Wood et al, 2014)
Infection Control in Perioperative Environment References
Bowlt, K., & Gasson, J. (2013). Perioperative infection control. Companion Animal, 18(2), 22-27.
Farthing, M. S. N., & Reigard, R. N. (2013). Winning the Battle Against Surgical Site Infections.
Galor, A., Goldhardt, R., Wellik, S. R., Gregori, N. Z., & Flynn, H. W. (2013). Management strategies to reduce risk of postoperative infections. Current ophthalmology reports, 1(4), 161-168.
Kelvered, M., Öhlén, J., & Gustafsson, B. Å. (2012). Operating theatre nurses’ experience of patient-related, intraoperative nursing care. Scandinavian Journal Of Caring Sciences, 26(3), 449-457. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00947.xs
Ousey, K. J., Edward, K. L., Lui, S., Stephenson, J., Duff, J., Walker, K. N., & Leaper, D. J. (2015). Perioperative warming therapy for preventing surgical site infection in adults undergoing surgery. The Cochrane Library.
Salassa, T. E., & Swiontkowski, M. F. (2014). Surgical attire and the operating room: role in infection prevention. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 96(17), 1485-1492.
Soh, K. L., Davidson, P. M., Leslie, G., Digiacomo, M., & Soh, K. G. (2013). Nurses’ perceptions of standardised assessment and prevention of complications in an ICU. Journal Of Clinical Nursing, 22(5/6), 856-865. doi:10.1111/jocn.12017
Ulrich, B., & Kear, T. (2014). Patient Safety and Patient Safety Culture: Foundations of Excellent Health Care Delivery. Nephrology Nursing Journal, 41(5), 447-457.
Wood, A. M., Moss, C., Keenan, A., Reed, M. R., & Leaper, D. J. (2014). Infection control hazards associated with the use of forced-air warming in operating theatres. Journal of Hospital Infection, 88(3), 132-140.
Please use the *Topic title above and search your records because you have this paper description on your webpage already so you have wrote on the same topic before.
SAMPLE ANSWER
Concept Synthesis: Personal Nursing Philosophy
The necessity of philosophy in nursing is to facilitate practice by enhancing the understanding of nurses about the concepts they encounter when executing their roles. Nursing is an old profession and theoretical models help pass the knowledge and experience of predecessors to the current generation of practitioners. This ensures that nurses can solve issues more efficiently when using models than they would do in the absence of the philosophies. It is therefore imperative that the current nursing is better than that of the older days, and theoretical models are vehicles of practice advancement. In this paper, I reflect on the application of the four metaparadigms of nursing as they are outlined in nursing models and as they apply to practice. I will discuss the nursing, patient, health, and environment aspects comprehensively and conclude by outlining several propositions that connect the discussed metaparadigms.
The Four Nursing Metaparadigms
Metaparadigms are ideas that describe the holistic functioning of a particular system. In nursing practice, such metaparadigms are rigid in that they would not change with the emergence of new theories, and instead, developed models fall within the metaparadigms. Basically, nursing practice falls within the four established concepts, and practitioners rely on their understanding to deliver care that is satisfactory to their clients. The metaparadigms interconnect in a way that they form the scope of practice and offer references for nurses when making of clinical decisions.
Health
I understand health to be the outcome or the objective of the entire process of nursing. The purpose of nursing is to restore health or well-being in patients regardless of the methodologies that they apply. The responsibility of nurses is to know what factors hurt health and how people could remain healthy through approaches such as preventing disease and treating them. I also consider health to be a form of satisfaction. People are unhealthy if they have bothers regardless of the nature of such bothers. Usually, alleviation of health could be physical, psychological, or spiritual. Lack of satisfaction from any of the three approaches translates to dissatisfaction which is the disease status. Since health entails the maintenance of processes to a certain regular state, it is possible for people to lose it through distractions that would interfere with physical, psychological, or spiritual normalcy. Disease is the problem that motivates nursing practice and the interaction between patients and nurses, and health is the expected outcome of the holistic process. Failure to achieve the state of wellbeing is therefore a frustration to nursing practice. It is also important to note that health cannot be described as a discrete status, but it is rather a relative condition. For instance, what could be health at a certain age could be unhealthy at a different age. Other factors that could influence the perception of health include gender, environment, and one’s physiological condition. Again, it is worth noting that while various factors could influence the perception of health without necessarily causing disease, others would predispose people to abnormalities.
Environment
Far than it may seem, the environment is essentially important to nursing practice. Usually, it is the vehicle that nurses propel to generate health. Nightingale suggested that the curing or treatment process only entail the provision of a combination of environmental situations that would favor the restoration of normalcy in the human body (Jones, 2010, Pg. 190). The philosopher argued that healing itself is a natural occurrence and nursing, just like any other area, has minimal contribution to bringing health into persons. Instead, the practice facilitates the occurrence of desirable natural outcomes by manipulating the environment so that it increases chances of happenings being desirable. The scope of the environment is broad and it could be interpreted to incorporate the nature and all other conditions that influence the wellness condition of patients. As such, the environment could be so broad so as to entail factors such as the behavioral practices that nurses perform. Generally, anything whose presence influences the outcomes of the wellness status in people would constitute the environment. It is essential to know that the concept of environment in nursing entails both external and internal determinants. The external factors range from the geography of the setting of patient care and social factors such as culture and interactions. On the other hand, internal factors include the prevailing health outcome determinants such one’s mental health. Nurses are obliged to understand the environment of their patients for them to offer effective and satisfactory care. For instance, they would require the knowledge of the environment when determining the level of patients’ predisposition to diseases.
Person
The person as explained in the metaparadigms of nursing refers to the subject of care. The concept would refer to the patient at a glance, but upon a more comprehensive analysis, it would also entail other interested persons such as patient’s families. In other words, the person is any party that would directly enjoy the outcomes of the nursing process. The nursing process directs its services to the person and seeks to achieve satisfaction. The person is important in the nursing process as factors that such as the culture and beliefs of the recipient of care would shape the structure of nursing. Parties such as Patients’ families are also critical in nursing as they are involved actively in making clinical decision together with patients and nursing. Rodger’s theory explains the concept of person in nursing practice as a unitary being that develops after the interaction of physical, social, and other environmental determinants of health. Other philosophers who gave a comprehensive understanding of the person in nursing include Henderson and Watson. In his philosophy, Henderson explained that the biological, psychological, and spiritual determinants of the recipient of care are essential when considering the nursing process (Jarrin, 2012, Pg. 17). On his side, Watson explained the necessity of the unity of the nature, mind, and body in driving nursing practice (Bell, Campbell, & Goldberg, 2015). When caring for patients, nurses pay attention to the person by promoting the mental and physical health of their clients prior to initiating treatment. They also pay attention to the person by promoting cultural-sensitive care as different patients would present with specific cultural and belief needs. When nurses focus on the needs of the patient, they comply with the models of nursing that require care to be directed to the person concept.
Nursing
Nursing as defined in philosophical models is the professional practice whose competence one acquire through training, knowledge search, and experience. Qualified professionals conduct themselves in a particular way that allows them to establish healthy interactions with their patients. For effective nursing, there are virtues that professionals must express toward their patients. For instance, the virtue of compassion would apply on everyday nursing practice as the professionals would always deal with suffering clients whose wellness would require emotional support. The nursing component also involves activities such as promoting and preserving the dignity of patients. Peplau described nursing practice as a therapeutic process that involves interpersonal relationships between parties for the best outcomes (Deane & Fain, 2015). Important activities that happen within the concept of nursing as models indicate include critical decision-making. In most cases, clinical decisions would not be straight-forward, and it would be necessary for nursing practitioners to determine the appropriate approaches through critical thinking. Commitment and dedication to service are also virtues that would facilitate nursing practice. Nursing involves caring for others, and therefore, commitment and dedication are inseparable from practice for it to be efficient. Also, it is worth noting that nursing upholds human values and its purpose is to protect such values by addressing the health needs of people.
Concepts Specific to Practice
Evidence-Guided Nursing
Nursing is a science, and therefore, it is informed by scientific evidence. Evidence-guided practice is associated with the application of the best available strategies of care. Nursing adopts the evidence-based nature so as to promote patient outcomes. Scientific evidence mainly applies to practice by facilitating decision-making and describing the safety of choices made. The approach enable nurses to link practice to research so that information is appraised through research prior to its application to patient care. It also enhances the competence of nurses by ensuring that they stay informed and updated about the available practice approaches. In addition, evidence-based practice enables practitioners to address the preferences of their clients effectively. The current nursing has more than forty-seven models that offer guidelines concerning the application of evidence-based practice at its disposal (Stevens, 2013).
Patient Education
The scope of nursing entails roles such as mentorship, guidance, and teaching of patients. Nurses promote patients’ well-being by ensuring that they are informed ion various matters of health. Information enables patients to participate actively in the health care provision by facilitating practices such as decision-making and administration of self-care. Other advantages of patient education to nursing include promotion of patient compliance as people can understand the necessity of specific treatment procedures. However, due to other patient factors such as illiteracy, nursing may find it frustrating to educate patients. So as to overcome such limitations, practitioners explore theoretically advocated approaches to patient care. Activities involved in such practices include the assessment of individualized teaching, maintenance of favorable learning environment, application of effective strategies, and evaluation of the effectiveness of teaching (Smith & Zsohar, 2013).
Propositions
Proposition dictate the assumptions that theories incorporate in their structure for their suggestions to be applicable. The following are the propositions I deduced from the discussion of various metaparadigms of nursing:
Nursing is a holistic practice that addresses both clinical and non-clinical factors that influence the health of patients.
Nursing entails the manipulation of environmental factors so that they favor the natural occurrence of the desired outcomes.
Social and cultural factors of patients such as interactions in the community and beliefs are important determinants of health approaches that nurses should consider during their practice.
Poor mental health is a set back to the provision of quality health care services to patients.
Patients would be able to manage their health if they are informed accordingly by nursing professionals.
References
Bell, E., Campbell, S., & Goldberg, L. R. (2015). Nursing identity and patient-centredness in scholarly health services research: a computational text analysis of PubMed abstracts 1986–2013. BMC Health Services Research, 15, 3. http://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-014-0660-8
Deane, W. H. & Fain, J. A. (2015). Incorporating Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations to Promote Holistic Communication Between Older Adults and Nursing Students. Journal of Holistic Nursing. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854267
Jarrin, O. F. (2012). The Integrality of Situated Caring in Nursing and the Environment. Ans. Advances in Nursing Science, 35(1), 14–24. http://doi.org/10.1097/ANS.0b013e3182433b89
Smith, J. A. & Zsohar, H. (2013). Patient education tips for new nurses. American Journal of Nursing, 43(10). doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000434224.51627.8a
Stevens, K., (2013). The Impact of Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and the Next Big Ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18(2). DOI: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Reducing Patient Falls in Elderly Patients Orthopaedic Dept Order Instructions: Hourly rounding reduces patient falls in elderly patient’s orthopedic department.
Reducing Patient Falls in Elderly Patients Orthopaedic Dept
For this assignment, we are required to locate a minimum of eight(8) secondary literature sources that relates to a nursing issue topic. The Nursing issue chosen for this assignment is FALLS PREVENTION; Preventing falls and harms from falls in older people. we are required to construct a Clinical Practice Improvement (CPI) report using the supplied CPI template that I HAVE ATTACHED a copy of. we must address each criteria outlined on the attached template such as the Project Aim, Relevance of clinical governance to the project, Evidence that the issue/problem is worth solving, the key stakeholders involved, CPI tools(PDSA/PEPPA definition and how it is used and how it was applied in your paper), summary of proposed intervention, Barriers to implementation & sustaining change, and finally evaluation of the project (we can’t really evaluate the project as we have not carried the project out but we can discuss what could be done such as having surveys, feedback, pre, and post-session knowledge tests etc)
PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF THE Literature used for this assignment because I need it when submitting this paper also please provide a link if it is an online article for future reference.
Reducing Patient Falls in Elderly Patients Orthopaedic Dept Sample Answer
NURS2006 ASSIGNMENT 3
Clinical Practice Improvement Project Report
Project Title:
Hourly rounding reduces patient falls in elderly patient’s orthopaedic department.
Project Aim:
The project aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of hourly rounding on patient fall rates in the orthopedic department. This is because several studies have established protocols that have varying ranges of rounding’s, but the most commonly identified by evidence-based practice are hourly rounding’s. The project aims to integrate hourly rounding into the healthcare patient-fall management interventions.
Relevance of Clinical Governance to your project
The concept of clinical governance is very important as it acts as an umbrella that covers the quality care that is safe. The key pillars of CIP include patient focus, information focus, quality improvement, staff focus and leadership. The effectiveness of an organization largely depends on the contribution of each theme. The main focus on CIP is how these themes interact, which is facilitated with the central role. The concept management of CIP are illustrated clearly by the principles of nursing. This is important because these principles articulate what is expected in the healthcare setting, irrespective of the healthcare provider and the stakeholders involved. The proposed project highlights the four pillars of CIP in that it addresses the importance of integrating individualised care to meet each patient individual needs (patient focus) (Goldsack et al., 2015).
Additionally, the project addresses the nurses pivotal contribution especially during communication (information focus), and also emphasize the benefits of multidisciplinary and friendly working environment (quality improvement). The project will also emphasize the value of effective leadership skills in reducing patient-falls. The proposed project will ensure that patient hospital stays, and the healthcare costs are reduced considerably. The proposed project will ensure that patient access more integrated care, care that will ensure that people meets the demands and the priorities of the community the healthcare community demands. The overall consequence is low patient –fall rates, readmission rate, cost of care, lengthened hospital stays and improve patient satisfaction and quality of life (Haines et al., 2013).
Evidence that the issue / problem is worth solving:
Patient falls is a great threat in public healthcare. The rates of patient’s falls are considerably high in orthopaedic department, and especially among the elderly patients. This is attributable to the fact that these patients are undergoing physiological changes such as poor eyesight, poor hearing abilities, lower cognitive functions, poor balancing and increased muscle weakness and fatigue (Hempel et al., 2013). Research indicates that hospital falls are the leading cause of mortality, and lengthened hospital stays. Despite the numerous researches on this topic, numerous data are continuing to be recorded because the strategies identified usually lack long term solutions (Trepanier, 2014).
Patient falls among the elderly are the main source of non fatal injuries as well as trauma. Research indicates that patient-falls rates correlate with the staffing ratio and organization safety culture. The healthcare providers, especially the nurses are responsible for patient safety (Hutchings, Ward, and Bloodworth, 2013). It is estimated that integration of evidence based practice in the healthcare will reduce approximately, 1000 falls every month. In some nations, the concept of safe and quality care is being emphasized too an extent that the public medical insurance fails to cater for hospital costs associated with patient safety, claiming that these costs are preventable if the healthcare staff practice EBP (Hicks, 2015).
Literature indicates that a lot of resources are wasted during the treatment of the hospital falls rather than identifying the approaches that will strategize on minimizing the rates of hospital falls (Rowe, 2012).This calls for a change of approaches by the healthcare providers, and to embrace the innovative strategies that are identified by evidence based strategies to prevent patient falls. This includes the use of assistance during toileting, use of fall assessment risks during admission and integration of the healthcare providers in refresher training programs that are geared towards reduction of patient falls in hospital setting (Kieke, 2014).
Key Stakeholders:
Stakeholders are very important especially when implementing change within an organization. Understanding the impact of the proposed project in the organization will require understanding of the types of stakeholders, and analysing how the proposed project will influence their interest. Stakeholders are people within an organization who have something to lose or to gain through the implementation of the proposed project. The stakeholder engagement is important as it effectively elicit their views on the proposed project. This is important, particularly when conducting project assessment. It is important to identify the external and internal stakeholders, the nature of each and their influence in the proposed project (Trepanier & Hilsenbeck, 2014).
The internal stakeholders who will be involved in this project include clinical staff in the orthopaedic department including the physician, general practitioners and the orthopaedic manager, whereas the external stakeholders include the customers and the healthcare organizations that support safe and quality care. The internal stakeholders in this project will be involved in funding, coordination and resourcing of the proposed project (Olrich, Kalman, & Nigolian, 2012). The role of the external stakeholders will be informed of advises based on their experiences and their views in addressing the issue of patient falls. The engagement of these stakeholders is important as it facilitates in decision making. This is because the stakeholders have values that important in the health care facility. The integration the stakeholder addresses the negative perceptions and any source of doubts regarding the policy changes (Lowel and Hudgson, 2012).
CPI Tool:
Plan-do-study-act (PDSA) offers effective cycles that can be used to evaluate the outcomes that results from the proposed solution. This method is accepted in healthcare. The planning stage involves setting of goals based on the patient demands. The Do stage is the implementation stage, whereas the study stage involves the analysis of the outcomes. Act is the step conducted to ensure that the improvements made are permanent (Dyck et al., 2013).
From this framework, the planning stage will involve intensive research to identify the healthcare facility safety measures to identify the underlying gap that is causes increase in patient –fall rates. This framework will facilitate in the process of identifying the conditions that precipitate the project, the areas affected, and the people affected by the poor safety measures in the orthopaedic department. This framework guides the exploration of the causes of this critical issue and the characterization of the problem. The framework helps in the establishment of the baseline that will be used to evaluate the outcome (Falls free, 2014). In this context, the number of injuries associated with fall rates will be recorded before and after the implementation of the program. This data will be used to examine the rates of readmission rates due to issues associated with patient-fall incidences, and the additional cost of care due to lengthened hospital stays. This is proposed to take place for six months. This short term project is aimed at providing conclusive decisions that can be applied in long term strategies (Zephir, Minel, and Chapotot, 2011).
PEPPA refers to “participatory, evidence-informed, patient centred process for project development, implementation and evaluation processes.” This framework outlines nine key steps that will be used in this project. The first stage is to define the population and describe the present patient safety measures in the organization. The next step will be to identify the relevant stakeholders and the recruitment processes. The recruited stakeholders will participate in discussions to identify the critical issues, which need to be addressed to improve the quality of care (Trepanier, 2014). The fifth step is to define the strategic interventions that will address the critical interventions that will fit within the healthcare facility goals and mission. The next step is planning of the strategic implementation, including the identification of outcomes and the evaluation plan. The facilitators and barriers of the project will also be identified. The plan (hourly rounding) will be identified, evaluated and monitored (Graham, 2012).
Healthcare quality improvement requires a broad range of activities with varying level of complexity in their methodological as well as the statistical rigor, which involves developing, implementation and the assessment of the interventions proposed. All processes of improving quality in the health care is geared towards achieving effective, safe, timely, efficient , patient centred and equitable healthcare services (Trepanier, 2014).
Summary of proposed interventions:
The proposed intervention is to perform hourly rounding in the orthopedic department. The department ward will be divided into groups; the intervention group will have a nurse perform hourly rounding from 6 am to 10 pm in addition to the healthcare facility safety measure process. The other ward will have only the tradition measures in place, which includes use of call lights, labeling of the slippery floors and use of wrist bands indicating the high-risk patients (Bennet et al.,2014).
Prior to the implementation process, the nurses and assistive nurses will undergo training on the relevance of the proposed intervention. As stated previously, the hourly rounding will begin at 6.00 am to 11 pm. After every rounding, the nurses in charge will fill in the log book provided. The logbook will indicate the patient admission date, reason for admission, patient fall incidence and any other information relevant to hospital stays. The rounding will be routinely monitored by managers and will be supplemented by questionnaires filled by patients (Dykes et al., 2010).
After every two weeks, a formal meeting will be conducted. This will form the platform for the nurses’ dilemmas and challenges during the implementation process are addressed. At the end of the proposed project, 45 minutes focus group interview will be conducted. Data collected included semi-structured interview as well as the use of questionnaires. This will ensure that the data is explored holistically (Graham, 2012).
Barriers to implementation and sustaining change:
The possible barriers that would affect the proposed strategy will involve limited knowledge on their expected of the nurse during the hourly rounding. There are challenges that there could be under reporting of the proposed research. There is issue of organizational culture readiness. This is because there is always some staff resistance to change, which could affect the study results and conclusions. This should be addressed by assessing the organizational readiness.
Evaluation of the project:
The process of evaluation will be conducted to ensure that proposed intervention is sustainable. This process is important because it indicates if the intervention outcomes have beneficial or adverse effects. In this context, the evaluation process will be done after the implementation of the project. Additionally, the evaluation process will be done after every twelve months after the initiation of the study. However, it is important to note that the interventions outcomes may not be realised immediately. This is because it takes some time before change is accepted, integrated in the organization and realization of the outcomes (Baker, 2014).
The evaluation process will be conducted using questionnaire and patient’s feedback. The questionnaires will be structured in a way that it appraises the patient’s perceptions on threats and vulnerability associated with patient falls. It will also assess the patient healthcare relation and interaction to evaluate on how it impacts patient falls.
Reducing Patient Falls in Elderly Patients Orthopaedic Dept References
Barker, W. (2014). Assessment and prevention of falls in older people. Nursing Older People, 26(6), 18-24. doi:10.7748/nop.26.6.18.e586.
Dyck, D., Thiele, T., Kebicz, R., Klassen, M. and Erenberg, C. (2013). Hourly Rounding for Falls Prevention: A Change Initiative. Creative Nursing, 19(3), pp.153-158.
Dykes, P., Carroll, D., McColgan, K., Hurley, A., Lipsitz, S., & Colombo, L. et al. (2010). Scales for assessing self-efficacy of nurses and assistants for preventing falls. Journal Of Advanced Nursing, 67(2), 438-449. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05501.x
Falls Free. (2014). Issue Brief: Funding for elder falls prevention. Retrieved from http://www.caremanager.org/wp-content/uploads/Falls-Prevention-Issue-Brief-3-26-14.pdf
Graham, B. (2012). Examining g Evidence-Base d Interventions to Prevent Inpatient Falls. MEDSURG Nursing, 21(5), 267-272
Goldsack, J., Bergey, M., Mascioli, S. and Cunningham, J. (2015). Hourly rounding and patient falls. Nursing, 45(2), pp.25-30.
Haines, T., Hill, A., Hill, K., Brauer, S., Hoffmann, T., Etherton-Beer, C., & McPhail, S. (2013). Cost effectiveness of patient education for the prevention of falls in hospital: economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trial. BMC Medicine, 11(1), 135. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-135
Hempel, S., Newberry, S., Wang, Z., Booth, M., Shanman, R., & Johnsen, B. et al. (2013). Hospital Fall Prevention: A Systematic Review of Implementation, Components, Adherence, and Effectiveness. Journal Of The American Geriatrics Society, 61(4), 483-494. doi:10.1111/jgs.12169
Hicks, D. (2015). Can rounding reduce patient falls in acute care? An integrative literature review. MEDSURG Nursing 24(1); 51-57
Hutchings, M., Ward, P., Bloodworth, K., (2013). Caring around the clock: a new approach to international rounding. Nursing management, UK. 20(5) 24-32
Kieke , R. (2014). Joint commission center for transforming healthcare approach leads to reduction in in patient with injury. Journal of Health care compliance 27-28
Lowel, L., & Hodgson, G. (2012) Hourly rounding in a high dependency unit. Nursing standard 27(8); 35-40
Rowe, R. (2012). Preventing Patient Falls: What Are the Factors in Hospital Settings That Help Reduce and Prevent Inpatient Falls?. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 25(3), pp.98-103.
Trepanier, S., & Hilsenbeck, J. (2014). Sylvain Trepanier Julie Hilsenbeck A Hospital System Approach At Decreasing Falls with Injuries And Cost. NURSING ECONOMIC$/, 32(No. 3), 136-144.
Trepanier,S., (2014). A hospital system approach at decreasing falls with injuries. Nursing economics. 32 (3);132-140
Zephir, O., Minel, S. and Chapotot, E. (2011). A maturity model to assess organisational readiness for change. International Journal of Technology Management, 55(3/4), p.286.
Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice Order Instructions: You will develop a summary that you could use within an evidence-based practice (EBP) committee or related venue to share with your colleagues.
Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice
•Select (1) one of the following issues: HOMELESS
• Analyze and critique the guidelines and complete the Clinical Practice Guideline Summary Sheet in Doc Sharing. Components include
o scope and purpose of the clinical practice guidelines;
o stakeholder involvement;
o the rigor of development;
o recommendations; and
o application.
References should be no more than 5 years old. Please see attached rubric and guidelines for the summary.
Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice Sample Answer
Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice Guideline
Scope and Purpose
The document addresses HIV and AIDS as two distinct diseases (Audain, Bookhardt-Murray, Fogg, Gregerson, Haley, Luther, Treherne, & Knopf-Amelung, 2013). It is targeted toward disease management practices, their prevention, as well as treatment. In addition, the guideline includes the diagnosis, evaluation, and patient counseling practices in its scope for the two ailments. The document covers multiple medical specialties including infectious diseases, obstetrics and gynecology, hematology, and psychiatry among others. The targeted users of the document include advanced practice nurses, physicians, pharmacists, nurses, dieticians, social workers, public health departments, and other relevant groups. The document has the objective of assisting clinicians to offer high-quality services to unstably housed HIV patients. The designers of the guideline hope to do so by providing evidence-based recommendations regarding optimal management practices for patients of HIV and AIDS in the selected population. The targeted patient population for the guideline is unstably housed people including the youth, women, minority groups, and immigrants. The guideline investigates the prevalence rates for both HIV and AIDS among the selected population. It also focuses on important concepts of the diseases such as CD4 cell count and viral loads among users of antiretroviral medications. Other considered outcomes include the complications of the two diseases, their morbidity, as well as mortality. The interventions in the guideline focus on disease diagnosis, treatment, as well as management.
Stakeholder Involvement
The document engages different professionals as well as lay people. It includes peer educators, peer advocates, and outreach workers who are expected to facilitate access to the targeted patient population (Audain et al., 2013). The group would also facilitate practices such as diagnostic testing and treatment of individuals for the two diseases. The team also includes clinical professionals who are expected to actively engage patients when delivering services to them. The clinical team includes paraprofessionals in addition to professionals. Clinicians are expected to assess patients and understand their personal challenges influencing their management of the selected diseases. Stakeholders from the clinical setup would base their care on patient-centeredness so as to engage patients in decision-making approaches. Clinicians also have the role of addressing psychosocial and medical factors that bar patients from accessing high-quality health care. Team members would establish a therapeutic relationship with the patients and build mutual trust. The team would engage in regular meetings so that members can support one another and promote professionalism. Members would also engage in continuous education so as to promote both active engagement and professionalism. Possible conflicts of interest include a tendency by healthcare professionals to pursue financial gains at the expense of patient wellness during the study. For instance, some professionals may be motivated by marketing drugs and other services to the target population rather than focusing on helping the troubled community. However, the authors state that the clinician network would practice in a way that it avoids any conflicts of interest. The network further indicates that members who would have conflicts of interests would disclose them and withdraw from making decisions where the conflict of interest would happen (Audain et al., 2013).
Rigor of Development
The developers of the guideline relied on both primary and secondary sources of data. They also consulted electronic databases, and they used both qualitative studies and randomized control trials hence enhancing the rigor of their document. The developers relied on authoritative and reliable data from sources such as World Health Organization, National Health care for the Homeless Council, Pubmed, and Google Scholar (Audain et al., 2013). The designers also enhanced the rigor of the guideline by ensuring that their data search was thorough, and it covered a considerably lengthy period of clinical practice. In their development of the guideline, the authors considered pre-existing guideline and borrowed insight from informative bibliographies (Audain et al., 2013). The authors also indicated that their inclusion criteria involved an expert evaluation of the importance of different sources to clinical practice. Only sources that would apply to clinical care for homeless persons with HIV or AIDS were included. Shortcomings in the developing the rigor of the document include failure by the authors to indicate the exact number of sources they consulted. Also, the authors failed to indicate the methodologies they applied in determining the quality of the sources they used. Again, the authors did not indicate the methods they used in analyzing the evidence they gathered. However, the developers indicated clearly that they used expert consensus when developing the recommendations. They also peer reviewed the document before publishing it. Such activities were necessary in enhancing the rigor of the document. The authors also indicated the benefits of applying the guideline to the target community. The primary benefit was that the guideline would increase the accessibility of standard healthcare services to homeless persons who had HIV or AIDS. In addition, the authors outlined the potential harms of applying the guideline to clinical practice. The document advocated for the use of antiretroviral medications, yet patients could develop severe reactions to the drugs. The living conditions including lack of proper shelters would exacerbate side effects such as explosive diarrhea, a reaction that often accompanies the use of protease inhibitors. In addition, symptoms such as nausea and numbness would be exaggerated if patients did not take enough food. The treatment of HIV and AIDS may also trigger mental illnesses, and the guideline placed patients at such a risk. Other severe occurrences associated with the interventions proposed in the guideline include development of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and hepatic impairment.
Recommendations
The document offered recommendations for the design of service delivery, engagement of stakeholders, effective diagnostic approaches, and patient management strategies (Audain et al., 2013). The recommendations would have optimum applicability to nursing practice. A plan developed on the basis of the recommendations would require clinicians to establish flexibility in the service system. They would do so by allowing walk in appointments, providing outreach services, and resolving challenges instantly (Audain et al., 2013). The document also requires clinicians to facilitate the accessibility of mainstream health care to the patient population of interest. Again, the stakeholders would coordinate interdisciplinary practice so as to provide healthy foods to the patients, proper housing facilities, clothing, and other fundamental needs. Nurses would play the role of treatment advocates where they would encourage medication adherence among the selected population (McCarthy, Voss, Verani, Vidot, Salmon, & Riley, 2013). They would establish therapeutic relationships with the patients and educate them on the benefits of adhering to treatment when managing diseases. They would also be educators where they would enlighten patients on the basics of HIV and AIDS. They would teach the population on preventive measures and management practices that would promote the quality of their lives. In addition, nurses would educate patients on effective self-management approaches to maintaining one’s health at its best. The professionals will also be important in diagnosing and testing target populations for the two diseases (Kurth, Lally, Choko, Inwani, & Fortenberry, 2015). Their contribution would require financial support from the relevant agencies. Crucial facilities for the effective implementation of the interventions include correctional facilities and shelters. The professionals would also require laboratory equipment that would not only enable them determine the HIV and AIDS status, but also the health of their clients regarding other illnesses such as hepatic impairment and tuberculosis. For optimal outcomes of their interventions, nurses would also require to provide basic commodities such as food to their clients, especially if they suggest that patients use antiretroviral drugs. Other needs that would require financial input include educative materials such as books as well as things such as protective condoms.
Implementation
The authors of the document did not include an implementation strategy for their guideline. The guideline is associated with the occurrence of numerous undesirable experiences for patients. Such complications would hinder the adoption of the proposed approaches to disease management. In addition, the selected population is likely to face multiple personal challenges and they may not cooperate in the promotion of their health. Patients may also face societal stigmatization and fail to contribute actively to the implementation of the suggested strategies (Saki, Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi, Mohammadi, & Mohraz, 2015). Also, the scheme would require considerably large amounts of funds that may not be available. The above factors would be hindrances to the effective implementation of the interventions. The authors did not include a cost analysis in their document. Their proposed interventions would require the healthcare sector to invest more in the care of HIV and AIDS patients. The sector would also make such that care is accessible to the disadvantaged population. In addition to medication, the document advocates for provision of basic services to the unstably housed population. Such a move would necessitate extra funding in the healthcare sector. Reduced morbidity and mortality of HIV and AIDS among the selected population would be outcome indicators for the interventions. Other indicators would include improved quality of lives among the target group.
Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice References
Audain, G., Bookhardt-Murray, L.J., Fogg, C .J., Gregerson, P., Haley, C .A., Luther, P., Treherne, L., & Knopf-Amelung, S. (Editor). (2013). Adapting your practice: treatment and recommendations for unstably housed patients with HIV/AIDS. Nashville, TN: Health Care for the Homeless Clinicians’ Network, National Health Care for the Homeless Council, Inc.
Kurth, A. E., Lally, M. A., Choko, A. T., Inwani, I. W., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2015). HIV testing and linkage to services for youth. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 18(2Suppl 1), 19433. http://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.18.2.19433
McCarthy, C. F., Voss, J., Verani, A. R., Vidot, P., Salmon, M. E., & Riley, P. L. (2013). Nursing and midwifery regulation and HIV scale-up: establishing a baseline in east, central and southern Africa. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 16(1), 18051. http://doi.org/10.7448/IAS.16.1.18051
Saki, M., Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi, S., Mohammadi, E., & Mohraz, M. (2015). Perception of Patients With HIV/AIDS From Stigma and Discrimination. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 17(6), e23638. http://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.23638v2
An Advance Care Directive (‘Living Will’) is a written statement regarding someone’s wishes for their future health care. An Advance Care Directive can be made by anyone who has the capacity to do so. An Advance Care Directive is only used if, at some point in the future, the person becomes incapable of making health care decisions for themselves (due to illness or injury) (Advance Care Directives, 2014).
Health care professionals are required to respect patients choices and gain consent (or, at least, assent) prior to providing treatment or care. They are also required to respect patient confidentiality. Based on what you have learned in this unit discuss the ethical issue of informed consent in relation to the following:
• What are the features of a valid (legal) consent; and how does this relate to an advanced care directive?
• Why does it matter ethically speaking that a patient’s choice be respected?
• Are there any expectations to the requirement to respect patient’s choices?
• Is Paternalism ever ethically justified in the provision of heath care?
• What is the role of the HCP in relation to advocacy for a patient’s wishes and in particular when an advance care directive is present?
• What are the legal and professional frameworks that guide a health care professional’s practice in Australia?
Consider the above question from the point of view of your own professional prospective and from the perspective of another health care team member. Respond to this question by drawing on what you have studied in this unit for example: relevant codes of conduct, ethics and practice and laws, theories, ethical concepts, principles and values.
Conversion and clarification from Lecture in Charge regarding this assignment
Dear Students,
I wanted to provide further assistance in preparation for the final assessment task. Ethics essay writing has some specific and key features. An ethics essay always presents an argument and as such has to be reasoned (ie supported with evidence), an ethics essay usually presents two sides of the argument and then the author will come to the conclusion as to what is the best position and why.
The Outline of the essay for the unit gives you six key areas to discuss in your essay. They are as follows.
1. What are the features of a valid (legal) consent; and how does this relate to an advanced care directive?
2. Why does it matter ethically speaking that a patient’s choice be respected?
3. Are there any expectations to the requirement to respect patient’s choices?
4. Is Paternalism ever ethically justified in the provision of heath care?
5. What is the role of the HCP in relation to advocacy for a patient’s wishes and in particular when an advance care directive is present?
6. What are the legal and professional frameworks that guide a health care professional’s practice in Australia?
Essentially the questions are centred around a person’s autonomy and the role of the health care professional in the implementation of an advanced care directive. So you may be able to combine these questions into themes and undertake the following in the formation of your arguments.
ANALYSIS – What do the experts state regarding the topic? Here you present the research you have undertaken and looking at different perspectives.
SYNTHESIS – What connections can I make regarding the research into expert discussions and ethical theories or principles, possibly professional codes of ethics or position statements, legal frameworks or national/international human rights charters.
EVALUATION – What conclusion do I come to after presenting the arguments based on my analysis and synthesis?
– It is important to note that this is an academic essay and should be written in the third person.
Paragraph and Essay Structure
– Each paragraph should have an introductory and concluding statement.
– Each paragraph should have a direct connection with the one prior and one after it. This allows the essay to flow.
– The introduction should provide the reader with a framework for the paper and what will be discussed.
– The conclusion should provide a summary of the key points presented in the essay.
– The definitions used in your essay should only use academic references (not online dictionaries)
– The essay should present at least 2 ethical theoretical perspectives and/or two ethical principles.
– The essay should present at Code of Ethics Framework or Human Rights Charter statement or make a connection to professional practice (this is where you could use a scenario as an example)
– There is no minimum requirements for the number of sources you use however as a general guideline an academic paper can have 1 source per hundred words. In regards to the currency of the references, it is generally expected that sources are within 5 years published age. However if you have sourced a reference that is older than this you must demonstrate how it is relevant in your writing. There are historical perspective in ethics hence it is likely that you might find an excellent source that is older than 5 years.
I hope this has been helpful. I am planning another webinar to answer any final queries you may have. In the mean time please do not hesistate to contact me if you require further clarification.
Please include this one too
2000 words count with referencing
APA Referencing
At least 25 genuine references from 2010 to 2015 study based, 90 % references has to be research based Journal article AND books Australian and Newzeland based study article preferable.
Please have a look Rubric guideline for given topic, I need good grades in this assignment so please do me a favour and try to make a good essay
Regards
SAMPLE ANSWER
Introduction
Medical practice is complicated today than ever because of the increased factors that have been impinging the physician patient relations. In the modern world, the patients are either well informed or ill informed about their health condition. The healthcare professionals are mandated to respect patient’s choices, and obtain consent from these patients when delivering care. Patient confidentiality must always be respected (Gergen, 2011). Informed consent refers to the process where patient’s gives permissions for the treatment to take place after being informed about the treatments procedure; the benefits as well as the risks associated the treatment. This process is intertwined with many ethical issues. Additionally, there many barriers associated with the informed consent process, which includes communication barriers, cultural barriers and the religious dogmas between the service users and the service providers (Chong, Aslani, & Chen, 2013).
In this context, the ethical issues surrounding the informed consent will be discusses and the HCP roles when delivering care for patient with advanced healthcare directives. The two perspectives that will be discussed in this paper are the registered nurses and physicians perspectives. This will help empower the healthcare provider bearing in mind those patients demands are changing continuously throughout the illness course, and according to their changes in the patents mental and physical capacities. This paper will be drawn on relevant codes of conduct, theories, ethics laws and practice, principles and values of informed consent.
Features of valid and legal consent
The valid consent is more to a mere form where patients can append their written signature. For the consent to be valid, the following elements should be included, and understood by the patients. These elements include procedures that are to be carried out, benefits of the treatment, risks and alternative treatment available (Aasen, 2014). All information related to the patient’s circumstances must be specific, without any invalidating factors. This is particularly important in patients under advance care directive. An advance care directive refers to the process where a patient records their wishes when they are unwell to understand their medical health complication and treatment options available. This is a form where the patient communicates their wishes. ACD is not similar valid legal consent, and the two legal documents roles are different and should not be used interchangeably (Hamrosi, Raynor, & Aslani, 2014).
There few circumstances where this could pose ethical dilemma for the HCP. For instance, there have been many questions about end of life care attributed to the advancement in technology. There are cases where many patients are not willing to subject their relatives to prolonged suffering through prolongation of his or her life even where there is little hope (Heggland, et al., 2013). The best way to maintain control is this through use of ACD to record patient’s preferences as guided by the physician and the loved ones. However, the law supports the ACD directives as stipulated by the Patient Self Determination Act of 1990. However, the advance care directives are valid at common law if the following conditions have been met; to start with the patient capacity at the time of advance care directive is done is stable and the patient can communicate effectively (Randall, 2008). The patient must have the capacity of weighing the information and make an informed choice between risks and benefits. The directives must be made voluntarily and of high specificity. There are no legal ramifications that the directives should be done in writing and under witness, but these are vital are necessary as they indicate that the directives have been done under the requirements (Korhonen, Nordman, & Eriksson, 2014).
Respecting patient choices
Informed consents and ACD are meant to value patient autonomy. This principle of autonomy is associated with the ability of patients to make their own choices about the healthcare treatment that they will receive. The main principles that arise when addressing patient’s autonomy are privacy, confidentiality, and fidelity and patients freedom of choice (Krishna, Watkinson, & Beng, 2014).
Several criticisms have been done about the principle of respecting patient’s autonomy. This is especially on the fact that patients must be informed about the healthcare treatments even if it would make the patient stand back from undertaking treatment. There are also concerns that respecting patient choice would impair clinical recognition. Beuchap and Childress illustrates that autonomy principle fails to protect the competent patients, but those who lack confidence, and are unsure or have conflicting priorities (Barlem, & Ramos, 2014).
However, respecting patient choices is important because it indicates that patient’s dignity is respected. This is important also because it discourages inappropriate paternalism, thus protecting the patient from unwanted interventions that they would consider burdensome other than of benefit. Additionally, respecting patient autonomy improves beneficence. This is because the patient is informed about the treatment benefits, risks and costs, and the patient is allowed to make informed choices that benefit them. The issue of non-maleficence is addressed as patient is adequately informed to enable them make decisions that makes patient avoid causation of harm. The harm caused by the treatment must disproportionate the treatment benefits. The distribution of risks and benefits as well as the treatment cost must be of justice (Cole, Wellard, & Mummery, 2014).
Nevertheless, patient wishes may not be respected all the time. This is especially if the patients traditions or beliefs about treatment are proven to be inconsistent, untrue or inadequately informed. In this contest, the HCP will be mandated to make decisions that are in best intention of the patient. This process is referred to as paternalism, which will be discussed later. The expectations to respecting patient choices include that patient mental capacity must be stable enough to make decisions independently. An informed patient must do the decisions voluntarily (Binder & Lades, 2015).
Paternalism in healthcare
The concept of paternalism begun with the Hippocratic ideals where he argued that the healthcare provider decisions must be aligned to patients best interests. For some reasons, patient’s medical decisions may not be respected to ensure that the option picked is to benefit the patient (Lathrop, Cheney, & Hayman, 2013). For instance, an oncologist makes a decision for a patient scheduled for mastectomy in our healthcare facility. This is was because the patient laboratory findings indicated that the patient’s body was not in a position to recuperate. Despite the patient wishes, the healthcare provider supremely controlled the treatment process (Smith et al.,2015).
Paternalism can be categorized as hard or soft, narrow or broad, impure and pure. Soft paternalism occurs when the HCP believes that they make decisions, which would be done by the patient if the patient had the strength and capacity. The hard paternalist is done by the HCP when they believe that the patient could have been mistaken or confused, and thus not in a capacity to make their decisions. This is justifiable if the treatment choice made is advocated and accepted by the HCP as indicated by evidence-based research (Mccullough, 2010).
From the HCP perspective, most physicians prefer shared decision-making process. Research indicates that the older physician are more likely to practice paternalism that the younger. Physicians in the surgical department are the least likely to practice paternalism as compared to physicians in the acute settings (Sjostrand, Eriksson, Juth, & Helgesson, 2013). However, as a registered nurse, I feel that paternalism should not be practiced, unless it is the only choice left. This is because it acts as false signal that the nurse knows about the person’s desires or their wishes. In my perspectives, these patients should be advised to write their ACD, or have their relatives make medical choices for them, as some choices could interfere with the patient’s psychological status, and diminish their self-esteem and morale (Lin, Huang, Chiang, & Chen, 2012).
The healthcare facility should gear their efforts towards a patient centered care. In most cases, the patient may be critically ill and unable to give consents. This is advisable for the healthcare providers to provide the patient with ACD, which can be conducted in presence of the patient relatives. This will mitigate the chance that the HCP will pressurize the patient to make independent decisions, which makes them feel overwhelmed. However, the healthcare provider must intervene to ensure that the patient does not go along with the family’s decisions, but they are allowed to make their own preferences (Baykara, Demir, & Yaman, 2014).
The HCP professional frameworks bind them in determining the patient best treatment based on their knowledge, experience, and judgment. In a case where a patient rejects treatment at the expense of the patient’s life, the HCP are bound by the ethical principle of beneficence (Wortley et al., 2015). The most vital aspect of the HCP frameworks is to establish a mutual relationship with the patients, and to maintain trust between them. This is important because it helps the patient understand that doctors will empathize with them, thus facilitating patient centered as well as a holistic care. In some cases, treatment modification can be done to ensure that the principle of non -maleficence is maintained. It is important for the HCP to value cultural competence to ensure that the care provided is just and holistic (Suzuki, Ota, & Matsuda, 2014).
HCP advocacy role in decision-making process
The professional and ethical frameworks guide the HCP role in healthcare. The HCP delivery of care should be based on knowledge, experience, and sound judgment (evidence-based practice). The codes of ethics are set of principles that help HCP in delivering quality care. The main ethical issues in day-to-day ethics include treating patient with dignity, respecting the patient, fair treatment and supporting patient treatment preferences (Bradford, Caffery, & Smith, 2015). This is accordance to the four ethical principles, which include autonomy, beneficence, justice, and non-maleficence. The ethical rules also guide the HCP in decision-making process, which includes veracity, confidentiality, fidelity, and privacy. The ethical theories that help in ethical decision-making processes are the theory of HCP accepting the consequences of their actions (consequentialism), basing the decision making process on set of principles (deontology) and applying decision-making processes based n the most prominent consequence theory (utilitarianism) (Valentine et al., 2013).
The HCP role in their practice is to support the patient’s decision-making about their treatment preferences. This is normally done using advance care directives, and it is the role of HCP to facilitate the initiation of ACD. This is due to the unique bond that exists between the patient and their caregivers. Their roles in advocacy for ACD are to reflect ethically if the patient’s beliefs and values support or are against patients. The HCP must be adequately be informed about the ethics of care, patients medical care status, and other socio-demographic dynamics that could influence the decision making processes (Tee et al., 2013).
For example, an elderly patient signs an ACD declining all treatment because the patient does not want to burden the family members. In scenario,’s where the family disagrees on medical matter such as turning of life support machine, the HCP must educate the family on the importance of respecting patient dignity, and encourage them to support the ACD (Brodtkorb et al., 2014). In this context, it is the nurse’s role to enter into discussions with the patient to discuss their values, beliefs and to make them understand the context of the status. The nurse role as an advocate of ACD is to teach the patient to express their ideas and wishes. The HCP are legally bound to ensure that the care provided is consistent with the client’s preferences, and is entitled to ensure that there is effective communication of the patient’s ACD to the other HCP team (Terlazzo, 2015).
Code of conduct for HCP in Australia
The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) outlines the legal frameworks and code of conduct for HCP in Australia. The summary of these legal frameworks and code of conduct provisions is that HCP must provide evidence based care, which shared decision-making processes. The HCP is expected to maintain their professional performance, and ethical conduct to minimize patient risks. Additionally, these codes of conduct are framed under the principles and frameworks of the United Nations “Universal declaration of Human rights, International covenant on Economic, social and cultural rights, and the international covenant on civil and political rights.” The provisions are also according to the World Health Organization’s constitution, which involves Health and Human rights (AHPRA, 2013).
The code of ethics are supported by the National competency standards for RN, NP and enrolled nurses as well as the code of professional conduct for nurses in Australia. The codes are complementary to those of international council of Nurses (ICN), which stipulates that the nurses must deliver quality care to all. They must respect patient autonomy, value kindness and remain culturally competent. Additionally, the nurses must value the socio-economical sustainability of a patient to ensure that health and patient’s wellbeing are promoted. The purposes of these legal frameworks and code of ethic is to guide the nurses with a reference point from where they can base their ethical decision-making (Mccullough, 2010).
Conclusion
Ethical decision-making process is complex and challenging. This is especially in advance care directs which is one of the good clinical practice feature. From the health ethics analysis, ACD carries significant ethically moral force and respect. There are legal binding directives but should not limit patients treatment preferences. The code of ethics includes quality nursing care, respect patient decision, value the patient diversity and the culture of safety. The informed choices about ACD must be done according to the ethical management frameworks.
References
Aasen, E. (2014). A comparison of the discursive practices of perception of patient participation in haemodialysis units. Nursing Ethics, 22(3), 341-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733014533240
AHPRA. (2013). Codes, guidelines, policies. Retrieved from http://www.medicalboard.gov.au/Codes-Guidelines-Policies/Code-of-conduct.aspx
Baykara, Z., Demir, S., & Yaman, S. (2014). The effect of ethics training on students recognizing ethical violations and developing moral sensitivity. Nursing Ethics, 22(6), 661-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733014542673
Bradford, N., Caffery, L., & Smith, A. (2015). Awareness, experiences and perceptions of telehealth in a rural Queensland community. BMC Health Services Research, 15(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-1094-7
Brodtkorb, K., Skisland, A., Slettebo, A., & Skaar, R. (2014). Ethical challenges in care for older patients who resist help. Nursing Ethics, 22(6), 631-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733014542672
Chong, W., Aslani, P., & Chen, T. (2013). Shared decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in mental healthcare: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators. J Interprof Care, 27(5), 373-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2013.785503
Cole, C., Wellard, S., & Mummery, J. (2014). Problematising autonomy and advocacy in nursing. Nursing Ethics, 21(5), 576-582. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733013511362
Hamrosi, K., Raynor, D., & Aslani, P. (2014). Enhancing provision of written medicine information in Australia: pharmacist, general practitioner and consumer perceptions of the barriers and facilitators. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 183. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-183
Heggland, L., Mikkelsen, A., Øgaard, T., & Hausken, K. (2013). Measuring patient participation in surgical treatment decision-making from healthcare professionals’ perspective. J Clin Nurs, 23(3-4), 482-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12184
Korhonen, E., Nordman, T., & Eriksson, K. (2014). Technology and its ethics in nursing and caring journals: An integrative literature review. Nursing Ethics, 22(5), 561-576. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733014549881
Krishna, L., Watkinson, D., & Beng, N. (2014). Limits to relational autonomy–The Singaporean experience. Nursing Ethics, 22(3), 331-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733014533239
Lathrop, B., Cheney, T., & Hayman, A. (2013). Ethical Decision-Making in The Dilemma of the Intersex Infant. Issues In Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 37(1), 25-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01460862.2013.855842
Lin, M., Huang, C., Chiang, H., & Chen, C. (2012). Exploring ethical aspects of elective surgery patients’ decision-making experiences. Nursing Ethics, 20(6), 672-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733012448967
Sjostrand, M., Eriksson, S., Juth, N., & Helgesson, G. (2013). Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy. Journal Of Medicine And Philosophy, 38(6), 710-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht049
Smith, L., Anand, P., Benattayallah, A., & Hodgson, T. (2015). An fMRI investigation of moral cognition in healthcare decision making. Journal Of Neuroscience, Psychology, And Economics, 8(2), 116-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/npe0000038
Suzuki, C., Ota, K., & Matsuda, M. (2014). Information-sharing ethical dilemmas and decision-making for public health nurses in Japan. Nursing Ethics, 22(5), 533-547. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0969733014549879
Tee, M., Balmaceda, G., Granada, M., Fowler, C., & Payne, J. (2013). End-of-Life Decision Making in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients. Clinical Journal Of Oncology Nursing, 17(6), 640-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1188/13.cjon.640-646
Terlazzo, R. (2015). Autonomy and Settling: Rehabilitating the Relationship between Autonomy and Paternalism. Utilitas, 27(03), 303-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0953820815000060
Valentine, S., Nam, S., Hollingworth, D., & Hall, C. (2013). Ethical Context and Ethical Decision Making: Examination of an Alternative Statistical Approach for Identifying Variable Relationships. J Bus Ethics, 124(3), 509-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1879-8
Wortley, S., Tong, A., Lancsar, E., Salkeld, G., & Howard, K. (2015). Public preferences for engagement in Health Technology Assessment decision-making: protocol of a mixed methods study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 15(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-015-0176-0
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
500 word Essay addressing:
o What skills and qualities do you bring to the Nurse Practitioner role?
o What are the most important things you need to learn to be a successful Nurse Practitioner?
o How does the Lewis University mission integrate with your personal and professional identity?
I am attaching my resume as well to connect it to my skills.
Thank you
JULIA GRIGORIAN, RN
308 E 11th Ave
Naperville, IL 60563
917-945-1595
yuliyagrigorian@yahoo.com
NURSING EXPERIENCE
Coney Island Hospital Brooklyn, NY
Case Management Department March 2013-June2015
Care Manager
Provided care coordination services to a select group of patients during transition from acute care to the next level of care and community. As an Inpatient Care Manager, I was involved in patient’s one on one education on disease process and flare up symptoms prevention measures, follow up appointment scheduling and transitional telephonic follow up according to the components of the Re-Engineered Discharge (Project RED).
Educated the patient/family about her or his diagnosis and disease management, how to prevent the flare up symptoms of chronic diseases throughout of hospital stay, provided the patient and family with the educational booklets and materials, assessed patient’s or family degree of understanding with Teach Back method, organized post discharge services, coordinated and planned patient’s appointments with physicians, follow up tests and studies, instructed on discharge medications and provided telephonic reinforcement of the discharge plan. Utilized my advanced clinical skills to facilitate the provision of care including the assessment, planning, intervention, and evaluation of patient care. Promoted and evaluated the effective utilization of resources using my clinical knowledge, awareness of community services to achieve optimal clinical and resource outcome.
Compassionate Care Hospice Brooklyn, NY
Nurse Liaison Intake Dept June 2011-October 2013
The Hospice Nurse Liaison act as an advocate for area hospice programs and providing education for healthcare professionals. Serves as a liaison between referral sources, patients and families, advocate for hospice patients to ensure receipt of entitled benefits. Work with physicians, social workers, and other medical professionals to educate about Hospice Medicare benefit program and hospice philosophy and criteria of hospice admission. Assess each referral to determine the appropriateness for hospice admission, based on individual hospice criteria. Inform patients and their families about the hospice philosophy, goals and services to meet patient’s needs. For patients deemed appropriate for hospice, conduct a full assessment and admission to hospice services. Encourage timely consideration by physicians for hospice referrals as an alternative mode of care, assisting in identification of appropriate patients for the purpose of improved palliation of symptoms and supportive care for terminally ill patients. Perform other duties as per request.
St.Mary’s Healthcare Lombardi New Hyde Park, NY
Care Coordinator June 2010-March2011
Responsible for arranging and coordinating the continuity of care for pediatric and adult patients referred for Home Care, maintaining clinical records in accordance with New York State and Federal regulations, and Home Care policy and procedures, providing Home Care nursing service in accordance with the plan of treatment signed by the physician, making the initial evaluation visit to the patient and coordinating the total plan of care, evaluating, and regularly re-evaluating the nursing needs of the patient, teaching and counseling the patient and family regarding nursing procedures, evaluating the Home Health Aides on a continuous basis, creating and reviewing 485 Forms and f/u with physicians, families and all other disciplines, planning the budget with Medicaid HRA representative.
Caring Hospice Services Brooklyn, NY
Case Manager/ Intake Nurse February 2010-June 2011
Provided direct nursing care with special emphasis on control of pain and other symptoms to the Hospice patients. Implemented plan of care based on nursing process. Performed ongoing assessment of patient’s condition, physical care needs and needs of family for support in giving care. Train, supervise and support the family in provision of care to the patient.Referred patient and family to other appropriate Hospice discipline and other community resources as appropriate. Participated in team meeting to enhance team communication, coordination and quality of services. Provided palliative care and wound care to Hospice patients.
North Vista Hospital April 2009- Sept.2009
Medical-Surgical Unit Las Vegas
Working in Medical Surgical Unit, focusing on direct care for medical surgical patients. Provide acute care, including pain control, blood transfusions, wound care. Provide assessment and planning for individualized patient care. Educate patients on effect of surgery and rehab methods, provide discharge planning and teaching. Monitor patient conditions, updating physicians and family as needed. Respond quickly and accurately to changes in condition or response to treatment. Accurate documentation and charting medical records, reporting to the next shift with all necessary information.
Visiting Nurse Service of NY Brooklyn, NY
VNS Choice MLTC March 2007-Oct 2008
Nurse Consultant/Case Manager
Provided care management through a collaborative process of assessment, planning, facilitation, and advocacy to geriatric patients. Maintained members in an independent living situation. Ensure consistent care along entire health care continuum by assessing and closely monitoring member’s needs and status. Provided nursing services and authorized/coordinated services within a captivated managed care system. Collaborated with primary care practitioners, interdisciplinary team and family members to develop a patient specific plan of care. Reviewed patients records for state requirements. Provided palliative care and wound care to oncology patients.
New York Community Hospital Sept 2006- Jan 2007
Medical-Surgical Nurse
Duties include:
Care of cardiac and telemetry patients, diabetic and dialysis patients, cancer patients, patients with PEG and NG tubes, preoperative and postoperative patients and other patients with all kind of precautions. Administration of patient medications including cardiac drugs and insulin, patient treatments, IV insertion and therapy, Foley catheter insertion, performing of EKGs, telemetry interpretation and monitoring telemetry patients, wound care. Patient and family teaching of pre-op and post-op for any kind of surgery, providing discharge patient planning, teaching and instructions. Proper documentation and charting in medical records, reporting to the next shift with all necessary information.
EDUCATION:
Bachelor of Science in Nursing, Chamberlain College of Nursing, Illinois, 2015
Master of Computer Science, Pace University, New York, 2002
Associate degree in Nursing, Tashkent Nursing School, Russia, 1997
Bachelor of Science in Linguistic, University of World Languages, Russia, 1995
LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION:
New York State License of Professional Registered Nurse No 575878
Nevada State Board of Nursing License No RN 61716
IV Certification Course, 2006
BCLS Certification 2009
NYS Mandated Child Abuse Recognition and Reporting, 2003
Infection Control and Barrier Precautions , 2015
PRI Certificate , 2014
SKILLS: Proficient in Microsoft Word, Excel, Power Point, and other programs. Fluent in English and Russian.
REFERENCES: Available upon request.
SAMPLE ANSWER
The Nursing Career
My experience and skills will be valuable for me to take the Nurse Practitioner position. I understand that my skills and experience such as coordination of nursing services; provision of education/ information to the patient/ family concerning their diagnosis or conditions; symptom prevention/ management and following up on patient progress will be helpful to the new role. I have also managed chronic diseases and their associated symptoms. I am capable of planning, organizing and coordination of patient appointment services. I can work in the assessment, planning, intervention and the evaluation of the patient care services.
The other personal and professional qualities that I can offer are as follows. I can actually optimize the use of available resource designed for maximum patient gain or benefit. I don’t comprise on the wastage of resources, they are limited and hence should be used wisely and optimally. Earlier, I had worked as an advocacy officer to oversee that patients’ rights were being obeyed and their benefits offered in its entirety.
I am competent in organizing, planning and provision of continuity of care services in accordance to existing laws and guidelines. My scope of experience is not only limited to inpatient care, but I can also handle outpatients and home care services to a satisfactory degree of success. Hospice patients normally require specialized services. I have worked with them, largely by managing their pain, educating their caregivers, offering palliative services and wound management services.
I have also interacted and provided service and care to surgical patients. This involved the provision of urgent services such as blood transfusion, pain management, wound management and changing treatment intervention plans when deemed necessary. In this time was responsible for charting medical records, providing patient updates to their family members and the physicians in charge.
Nurse Practitioners are expected to offer safe, quality and effective healthcare services. These are the three basic skills I have to master effectively. I am expected to achieve patients’ satisfaction and positive feedback outcomes after the provision of healthcare services. This will be a hard endeavor to attain as patient satisfaction due to the fact that its success depends on a lot of factors. But I have to do my best to the best of my knowledge, skills, experience and in accordance to the existing professional codes of conduct. I have to be assessing myself always based on the outcomes, safety, quality, and on the effectiveness of care. Training needs and recommendations will be based on the same (Stanik-Hutt, Newhouse, White, Johantgen, Bass, Zangaro, Wilson, Fountain, Steinwachs, Heindel & Weiner, 2013).
The Lewis University (2015) provides an environment for a busy and complex nursing environment. It also provides for a training based on the current nursing challenges in accordance to current knowledge and evidence based studies. The training will also focus on the safety of healthcare service and current approved therapeutic intervention measures. The training in the university will also boost my career based o the quality of services I will offer; performance based on viable evidence; and to systematically address clinical patient issues (Lewis University, 2015),
References
Stanik-Hutt, J. Newhouse, R. P., White, K. M., Johantgen, M., Bass, E. B., Zangaro, G., Wilson, R., Fountain, L., Steinwachs, D. M., Heindel, L., & Weiner, J. P. (2013). The Quality Effectiveness of Care Provided by Nurse Practitioners. Journal of Nurse Practitioners, 9(8), 492 – 500.e13.
You are now in Phase 6 of your Capstone project. You have developed a comprehensive care plan for the aggregate. Over the next two weeks, you will implement your plan in the aggregate.
You have only about two weeks to implement your care plan, so begin small—say, one or two families, or a small group of 5-10 people.
The first step to effective implementation is planning. As you go about this task, answer the following questions:
What small group have you selected (for example, three families with young children, a group of five CANCER patients, and so on)? What made you select this particular group?
What portion of the plan would you like to implement in the small group?
What health risk do you expect to tackle by implementing this intervention?
What results do you expect?
How do you plan to implement this intervention? Do you have any specific strategy in mind? What resources will you need?
How long do you think it will take for the results to be seen?
By Tuesday, October 6, 2015, prepare a 1-page Microsoft Word document with your responses to the questions above and submit it to W8 Assignment 2 Dropbox.
Submit your proposed implementation to the Discussion Area simultaneously and discuss it with your classmates and your instructors—you may receive valuable feedback from them that will help in making your implementation more effective.
Then, visit your aggregate and begin implementing the care plan.
Mobilize the resources you need, talk to the small group, recruit volunteers, etc.
When your resources are in place, put your plan into action.
SAMPLE ANSWER
Implementation of the Care Plan
So as to test and facilitate the implementation of the care plan, the learner selected a group of five African American breast cancer patients as the preferred population. The five came from different counties within the state of New York. The population would serve as an excellent study group to start with as most of the aspects of the care plan would apply to them. African Americans record high death rates as a result of breast cancer and prioritizing the population in the implementation of the care plan would most likely generate the most remarkable outcomes (Daly, & Olopade, 2015, Pg. 141).
The learner will use the group to implement the initial portions of the plan particularly, that of identifying both the immediate and long-term objectives. They include reducing the mortality rate of breast cancer among the high-risk population. The student will evaluate the effectiveness of various approaches of reducing the risk of the population to the condition as well as applicable measures of improving the prognosis of the condition. The researcher will later identify the most effective strategies and use them to further the project by applying them to subsequent portions of the plan.
Implementation of the described intervention would most likely present health risks such as disease progress while still developing interventions. Some of the participants could be old and it would be difficult to counter their likelihood of developing a poor prognosis for the disease. The intervention purposes to lessen the severity of the disease prognosis in the selected persons and hindrances to attaining the objective could result in poor health for the patients. The means of reducing the severity of cancer outcomes would involve initiation of medication, and the move may result in adverse health effects. Fertility complications and mental health deterioration are common with most cancer regimens (Hulvat & Jeruss, 2009, Pg.308).
Successful implementation of the selected part of the plan will allow the learner to develop promising interventions toward people’s protection from breast cancer and proper management of the ailment to achieve a less severe prognosis and reduced rates of mortality. The ultimate achievements would entail improvement of patients’ quality of life and reduced mortality. The approach would lead the learner toward developing the most effective practices of improving the health of breast cancer patients.
The identification of immediate and long-term solutions to cancer management would entail comprehensive research work and involvement of stakeholders from various disciplines. The learner has plans to liaise with the regional and national healthcare officials so that they can facilitate the implementation of strategies such as enhancing the availability and accessibility of quality care for cancer patients. Studies have implied that the considerably high cost of managing cancer has contributed significantly to the high mortality rates among patients (Siddiqui, & Rajkumar, 2012, Pg. 935). As such, the learner would also collaborate with financial agencies for enhanced applicability of the plan. Financial resources would be indispensable for both long-term and immediate interventions.
Some of the results achieved with the application of the proposed intervention would be seen after a short while, particularly those that are for interventions designed to have immediate solutions. A period of one month would be sufficient to observe outcomes such as improved life quality. On the other hand, interventions designed for long-term solutions may take long periods to generate observable results. The learner may require more than a year to assess outcomes such as reduction of mortality rate of the disease.
Hulvat, M. C., & Jeruss, J. S. (2009). Maintaining Fertility in Young Women with Breast Cancer. Current Treatment Options in Oncology, 10(5-6), 308–317. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-010-0116-2
Siddiqui, M., & Rajkumar, S. V. (2012). The High Cost of Cancer Drugs and What We Can Do About It. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 87(10), 935–943. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.07.007
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
using APA format, the information from this course, and your assigned readings write a six (6) to ten (10) page paper (excludes cover and reference page) addressing the application of the nursing process to a patient care scenario. Use these directions and the scoring rubric as you develop the paper. Outlines and abstracts are NOT required with this paper. Do not include the scenario in the paper
A minimum of three (3) current professional references must be provided excluding a nursing diagnosis book. Current references include professional publications or valid and current websites dated within five (5) years. Additionally, a textbook that is no more than one (1) edition old may be used. Do not use abbreviations…write out everything.
The paper consists of three (3) parts:
1. The meaning and use of the nursing process in making good nursing judgments that effect patient care
2. The development of a plan of care using the nursing process for a specific patient situation
3. The preparation stage for a teaching plan to prevent a recurrence of a similar situation
The following sheet will assist you when composing the plan of care for the paper: Overview of the Nursing Process.
Part 1 (3-4 pages)
Review the required readings about the nursing process. In your own words, define each step of the process and provide an example for each step.
In the implementation step, what is meant by direct and indirect care as described by the Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC) project?
Discuss the three (3) types of nursing interventions (nurse-initiated, dependent, and interdependent) that applies to the patient care situation. Provide an example of each (refer to your textbook).
Explain how the nursing process provides the basis for the registered nurse to make a nursing judgment that results in safe patient care with good outcomes.
Discuss how the registered nurse evaluates the overall use of the nursing process. Identify three (3) variables that may influence the ability to achieve the desired outcomes for the patient.
How is the plan of care modified when the outcomes are not met?
How does the RN use the nursing process to make decisions about the priority of care?
Part 2 (3 pages)
Patient scenario
A 78-year-old man is living in an assisted living facility. He is able to walk very short distances and uses a wheelchair to transport himself to the communal dining room. He administers his own medications independently and bathes himself. Over the last year he prefers to remain in the wheelchair even when in his room. He has a history of CHF, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and lower extremity weakness. He is able to state his current medications include metoprolol (Lopressor) 50 mg once daily by mouth, furosemide (Lasix) 20 mg once daily by mouth, Quinapril (Acupril) 20 mg once daily by mouth, atorvastatin (Lipitor) 20 mg once daily by mouth. During a routine examination, his physician noted a pressure ulcer over the ischium on the right buttocks. The wound is oval about 10mm x 8 mm, with red and yellow areas in the middle and black areas on some surrounding tissue. It has a foul odor. The patient had been padding the area so “it doesn’t get my pants wet”. The physician arranged for him to be admitted to the hospital in order for intravenous antibiotic therapy and wound care to be initiated. After being admitted to the hospital his medications are: metoprolol (Lopressor )50 mg orally every 12 hours, furosemide (Lasix ) 40mg once daily by mouth, quinapril HCl (Accupril) 40 mg once daily by mouth, cefazolin (Ancef)1.5 Grams in 50 mL 0.9 % Normal Saline intravenously three times a day. The result of the wound culture identified Methicilin-resistant staphylococcus aureus. After a surgical debridement of the black tissue a SilvaSorb® (antimicrobial gel) dressing was ordered daily.
Develop a Plan of Nursing Care for this patient that includes all steps of the nursing process:
• One (1) actual NANDA-I nursing diagnosis statement addressing the priority problem the patient is experiencing. You need to provide the entire nursing diagnosis statement. For example: Acute pain, related to tissue trauma, as evidenced by patient rating pain at 7 on the 0-10 verbal pain scale. Provide a rationale, with evidence, why this nursing diagnosis is the priority for this patient.
• What is the assessment data that supports the use of this nursing diagnosis? These are the assessments you will collect to determine if the patient has this nursing diagnosis. For example: Will assess the patient’s pain using the 0-10 verbal pain scale.
• One (1) expected outcome (realistic, measureable and contains a time frame). that addresses the diagnosis and meets the criteria for an expected patient outcome. Discuss whether the outcome is a cognitive, psychomotor, affective or physiologic outcome. Discuss why the time frame selected for the evaluative criteria was selected. Use evidence as the basis for the time frame and criteria. You need to be specific to this particular patient. For example: Patient will rate pain at 3 on the 0-10 verbal pain scale. Of course, you would also need to answer the rest of the items in this section.
• Four (4) nursing interventions that includes at least one (1) nurse-initiated, one (1) dependent, one (1) interdependent intervention. Label your interventions as above. Provide a rationale for each intervention that is evidence-based. Lastly, your interventions must be able to move the patient toward the achievement of the outcome. Select interventions, you as the RN can perform, that could reduce the pain and provide the rationale as to why; be sure they are evidence-based. For example: Teach patient guided imagery to distract attention and reduce tension.
Part 3 (1-2 pages)
To assist the patient in preventing a recurrence of a similar incident once he returns to the assisted living environment, the RN needs to develop a teaching plan. Use the nursing process to consider the information the RN would need prior to development of the plan. Respond to the following and be able to support your answers. You will not be developing a teaching-learning plan but demonstrating using the teaching-learning process to prepare for an individualized plan.
• How does the RN decide the format of the teaching plan, i.e., written, verbal, or other?
• How does the RN know which information needs to be included?
• When does the RN determine how and when to evaluate the teaching-learning process?
Compose your work using a word processor (or other software as appropriate) and save it frequently to your computer. Use a 12 font size, double space your work and use APA format for citations, references, and overall format. Information on how to use the Excelsior College Library to help you research and write your paper is available through the Library Help for AD Nursing Courses page. Assistance with APA format, grammar, and avoiding plagiarism is available for free through theExcelsior College Online Writing Lab(OWL). Be sure to check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors before you submit your assignment.
You are required to submit your paper toTurnitin(a plagiarism prevention service) prior to submitting the paper in the course submission area for grading.Access is provided by email to the email address on record in your MyExcelsior account during week 2 of the term. Once you submit your paper to Turnitin check your inbox in Turnitin for the results. After viewing your originality report correct the areas of your paper that warrant attention. You can re-submit your paper to Turnitin after 24-hours and continue to re-submit until the results are acceptable. Acceptable ranges include a cumulative total of less than 15% for your entire paper, and no particular area greater than 2% (excluding direct quotes and/or references).
See the videos below for instructions on how to submit your paper to Turnitin and view your Originality Report.
Video – Submitting a Paper
Video – Viewing Your Originality Report
When you’re ready to submit your work for grading, click Browse My Computer and find your file. Once you’ve located your file click Open and, if successful, the file name will appear under the Attached files heading. Scroll to the bottom of the page, click Submit and you’re done.
This activity will be assessed according to the NUR104 M6A3: Application of the Nursing Process
Paper Rubric.
PART 1
The nursing process is a series of organized steps designed for nurses to provide excellent care. They areassessment, diagnosis, planning, implementing, and evaluation. It is a five-part systematic decision-making method focusing on identifying and treating responses of individuals or groups to actual or potential alterations in health.The nursing process is a scientific method used by nurses to ensure the quality of patient care.
The first phase of the nursing process is assessment, which consists of data collection by such means as interviewing, physical examination, and observation. It requires collection of both objective and subjective data. During this phase, the nurse gathers information about a patient’s psychological, physiological, sociological, and spiritual status. This data can be collected in a variety of ways. Generally, nurses will conduct a patient interview. Physical examinations, referencing a patient’s health history, obtaining a patient’s family history, and general observation can also be used to gather assessment data. Patient interaction is generally the heaviest during this evaluative phase.
Nursing diagnosing is the second phase in the nursing process, a clinical judgment about individual, family, or community nursing responses to actual or potential health problems/life processes. Provides the basis for selection of nursing intervention to achieve outcomes for which the nurse is accountable (NANDA, 1990);the diagnosing phase involves a nurse making an educated judgment about a potential or actual health problem with a patient. Multiple diagnoses are sometimes made for a single patient. These assessments not only include an actual description of the problem (e.g. sleep deprivation) but also whether or not a patient is at risk of developing further problems. These diagnoses are also used to determine a patient’s readiness for health improvement and whether or not they may have developed a syndrome. The diagnoses phase is a critical step as it is used to determine the course of treatment. Nursing diagnoses are different from medical diagnoses because they address patient problems that result from the disease process while medical diagnoses focus on the disease process alone.
The third phase of the nursing process is planning, which requires establishment of outcome criteria for the client’s care.Once a patient and nurse agree on the diagnoses, a plan of action can be developed. If multiple diagnoses need to be addressed, the head nurse will prioritize each assessment and devote attention to severe symptoms and high risk factors. Each problem is assigned a clear, measurable goal for the expected beneficial outcome. For this phase, nurses generally refer to the evidence-based Nursing Outcome Classification, which is a set of standardized terms and measurements for tracking patient wellness. The Nursing Interventions Classification may also be used as a resource for planning.
Implementing is the fourth phase of the nursing process). This phase involves demonstrating those activities that will be provided to and with the client to allow achievement of the expected outcomes of care.The implementing phase is where the nurse follows through on the decided plan of action. This plan is specific to each patient and focuses on achievable outcomes. Actions involved in a nursing care plan include monitoring the patient for signs of change or improvement, directly caring for the patient or performing necessary medical tasks, educating and instructing the patient about further health management, and referring or contacting the patient for follow-up. Implementation can take place over the course of hours, days, weeks, or even months.
Evaluating is the fifth and final phase of the nursing process. It requires comparison of client’s current state with the stated expected outcomes and results in revision of the plan of care to enhance progress toward the stated outcomes.Once all nursing intervention actions have taken place, the nurse completes an evaluation to determine of the goals for patient wellness has been met. The possible patient outcomes are generally described under three terms; patient’s condition improved, patient’s condition stabilized, and patient’s condition deteriorated, died, or discharged. In the event the condition of the patient has shown no improvement, or if the wellness goals were not met, the nursing process begins again from the first step.
An Example of the Nursing Process
Assessment
A patient visits his general physician on Monday because he was feeling sick over the weekend. When he is called back from the waiting room, the nurse on staff takes his temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure. She then asks the patient a series of questions about how he’s been feeling lately. The nurse notes his responses when he says he’s been having difficulty breathing and has been feeling very tired. She also sees on the patient medical history that he has had previous problems with his cholesterol levels and blood pressure. The patient also has a blood sample taken during his doctor’s visit.
Diagnosis
The nurse looks over patient’s symptoms and notes that his heart-rate is higher than average and his blood pressure is elevated. She also considers that he’s experienced fatigue and shortness of breath before when his cholesterol levels were very high. The nurse determines that the patient is experiencing Hyperlipidemia, also known as having high levels of fat within the blood. John’s blood tests confirm this hypothesis. The nurse is also concerned that the patient is at risk for heart disease.
Planning
The patient returns on Tuesday for a follow-up visit. The nurse sits down with him in a closed room and explains his cholesterol levels and high blood pressure. She suggests that the patient be put on medication to help lower these numbers and recommends he exercise at least twice a week. The nurse also tells the patient he should stay away from salty foods and eat less red meat. John agrees with the nurse, and they setup a follow-up appointment two weeks later. The nurse reminds the patient to call if there are any changes in his condition, or if he starts to feel worse.
Implementation
the patient is prescribed the medication and takes it as recommended. One week later, he has a day where he feels especially sick and calls the doctor’s office. The nurse explains that the medication could cause it, stomach. The patient continues taking the medication and goes to the gym four times during the two week period. Once the two weeks has passed, he returns to the doctor’s office for his follow-up appointment.
Evaluation
When the patientreturns, a series of questions about how he’s been feeling areasked.The patient replies that he has been having easier time breathing and feels significantly less tired since exercising and taking the medication. The nurse marks “Patient’s Condition Improved” on his official medical records and congratulates the patient on his wellbeing. She then advises him to remain on the medication for one more month and to continue his exercise.
In the implementation step, what is meant by direct and indirect care as described by the Nursing Intervention Classification (NIC) project?
According to the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses Delegation Handbook, direct patient care refers to activities that “assist the patient in meeting their basic needs.” Indirect patient care refers to activities that “focus on maintaining the environment in which nursing care is delivered and only incidentally involves direct patient care.” There is a fine line between these two care providers and it is important to note that each situation is different.With Direct Patient Care, the caretaker takes patient vital signs, including blood pressure, respiration, temperature, pulse rate,and patients’ daily weightare Measure and record, Patient’s intake and output are also taken. The care taker Help patients through daily living activities, such as bathing, shaving, and brushing teeth, Change patient bedding and clothing Feed patients and calculate daily calorie intake. Assess and assist patients with mobility… Indirect Patient Care involvescleaning any medical equipment used by the patient Clean the patient’s home environment Preparefood or deliver meal trays. Taking any patient specimens to clinical laboratories, making phone calls, assembling patient care orders and scheduling appointments. Stock patient supplies Stocking patient supplies can apply to room, utility, and other supplies since indirect care providers often work at assisted living homes.
Discuss the three (3) types of nursing interventions (nurse-initiated, dependent, and interdependent) that applies to the patient care situation. Provide an example of each (refer to your textbook).
Nursing interventions are the actual treatments and actions that are performed to help the patient to reach the goals that are set for them. The nurse uses his or her knowledge, experience and critical thinking skills to decide which interventions will help the patient the most. There are different classifications of nursing interventions that can involve care of the entire patient. This can be anything from promoting bowel functioning, educating the patient on new medication side effects or just keeping the patient safe. Interventions can be focused on basic physiological needs, complex physiological needs, behavioral functioning, promoting safety, caring for the family, using the health system and/or the overall health of the community. As nurses we are caring for the total patient, so there can be interventions concerning every area of the patient’s life.
Some of the nursing interventions will require a doctor’s order and some will not. There are different types of interventions: independent, dependent and interdependent. Let’s learn about each and go over a few examples. Independent are actions that the nurse is able to initiate independently. The following would be an example of a health promotion nursing intervention, which is an independent nursing action. Dependent interventions will require an order from another health care provider such as a physician. For example the patient’s blood pressure is consistently 180/100. The nurse reports this to the physician. The physician orders an antihypertensive medication for the patient. The nurse administers the oral medication to the patient as ordered.interdependent are actions that
Are going to require the participation of multiple members of the health care team. For example the patient reveals to the nurse that she consumes a diet very high in sodium. The nurse includes diet counseling in the patient care plan. To help the patient even more, the nurse enlists the help of the dietician that is available in their facility to spend time with the patient to educate her on the role that diet plays in the control of high blood pressure
How is the plan of care modified when the outcomes are not met?
Ongoing assessment is the key of the plan of care modification. Evaluation, which isthe last phase of the nursing process, follows implementation of the plan of care;it’s the judgment of the effectiveness of nursing care to meet client goals based on the client’s behavioral responses. Evaluating is a planned, ongoing, purposeful activity in which clients and health care professionals determine the client’s progress toward achievement of goals/outcomes and the effectiveness of the nursing care plan. Evaluation is continuous; it isdone immediately after implementation to make on the spot modifications in an intervention. Evaluation is performed at specified intervals. Evaluation continues until the client achieves the health goals or discharged from nursing care. Evaluation includes goal achievement &self-careabilities. ThroughEvaluation, Nurses demonstrates responsibility and accountability for their actions indicate interest in the results of the nursing activities. Process of Evaluating Client Response, Collecting data related to the desired outcomescomparing the data with outcomes andrelating nursing activities to outcomes. Drawing conclusions about problem status Continuing, modifying, or terminating the nursing care plan. When determining whether a goal has beenachieved, the nurse can draw one of the possible conclusions; The goal was met, that is the client response isthe same as the desired outcomes; The goal was partially met, that is either a short-term goal was achieved but the long term was not, or the desired outcome was only partiallyattained.–The goal was not met. Relationship of Evaluation to Nursing Process. When goals have been partially met or when goals have not been met, two conclusions may be drawn: the care plan may need to be revised, since the problem is only partially resolved, OR the care plan does not need revision, because the client merely needs more time to achieve the previously established goals. So the nurse must reassess why the goals are not being partially achieve and thus modified the plan of care.
How does the RN use the nursing process to make decisions about the priority of care?
Prioritizing patient care is the key in health care field. Triage decision making is an essential skill for nurses. Through initial assessment, a nurse must be able to prioritize patient care on the basis of appropriate decision making. the Triage Decision-Making Inventory, measures the identification of critical thinking, cognitive characteristics, intuition, and experience when making triage decisions .decision making is an essential skill for nurses who provide direct patient care or supervise nurses in both acute care and community settings. Anticipating and immediately identifying potential problems are part of the assessment phase of the nursing process. Triage is prioritizing care and making decisions on the next best steps or interventions. The general assumption is that triage occurs in the emergency room setting, but in actuality prioritizing care is performed in all clinical or community care setting.
PART 2
Impaired tissue Integrity related immobility as evidence bythe presence of pressure ulcer over the ischium on the right buttocks.
Rationale: The patient sits most of the time on the wheelchair even when in his room. This put a lot of pressures on the ischium which may lead to poor perfusion of the skin at the site follow by maceration and skin break down.
Assessment: The nurse will assess the skin over the ischium at the buttocks.
Outcome: Patient will display no wound over the ischium of both buttocks after eight weeks of treatment.
Interventions:
Patient will be repositioned by self or by staff every two hours to relief pressure from the decubitus/interdependent
Dressing will be changed as ordered and as needed to promote healing and comfort/independent
Pain medication will be administered as ordered/independent
The nurse will inspect wound daily for changes (eg sign of infection, complications, or healing).
Provide or encourage optimum nutrition (including adequate protein ,lipids, calories) to promote tissue healing and adequate hydrate to reduce and replenish cellular water loss and enhance circulation
• How does the RN decide the format of the teaching plan, i.e., written, verbal, or other?
• How does the RN know which information needs to be included?
• When does the RN determine how and when to evaluate the teaching-learning process?
Patient teaching is a function of nursing and a legal requirement of nursing personnel. In some states teaching is included in the legal definition of nursing, making it a required function of nursing personnel by law.. The patient should trusts the nurse to have the required knowledge and skills to teach, and the nurse respects the patient’s ability to reach the goals. This relationship is enhanced by communication that is continuous and reciprocal, once mutual trust and respect have been established. The goal of patient teaching is the patient’s active participation in health care and his compliance with instructions. Once the nurse begins instructing a patient (or family/support persons), the teaching process should continue until the participants reach the goals, change the goals, or decide that the goals will not help meet the learning objectives. The nurse should Use all appropriate sources of information ,and Review the patient’s medical records. The nurse should Read the history of medical problems as well as diagnoses, physical examinations, documentation of the nursing assessment, and the nursing interventions that have been performed. The patient and the family or support persons are the best source of needs assessment information. Identify the knowledge, attitude, or skills needed by the patient or family/support persons. Learning can be divided into three domain, cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Assess emotional and experiential readiness to learn. Assess the patient’s ability to learn. The teaching approach must be appropriate to the developmental stage of the learner. The nurse should assess the patient’s intellectual development, motor development, psychosocial development, and emotional maturity. Chronological age does not guarantee maturity. Identify the patient’s strengths. Learning strengths are the patient’s personal resources such as psychomotor skills, above-average comprehension, reasoning, memory, or successful learning in the past.. Use anticipatory guidance. Anticipatory guidance focuses on psychologically preparing a person for an unfamiliar or painful event. When patients know what to expect, anxiety is reduced and they are able to cope more effectively. . Diagnose the Learning Needs, and Be realistic.. Confirm your diagnosis with the family. In addition, assess your own knowledge base and teaching skills. Planning ensures the most efficient use of your time and increases the patient’s chances for learning. Create a teaching plan. One nurse or several nurses can prepare and use a teaching plan. There are standardized teaching plans available for major topics of health teaching (some for computer use). Individualize the standardized plans to the patient’s needs and abilities.
Match content with the appropriate teaching strategies and learner activities. For example, content explaining why certain treatments and medications are needed may be matched with printed or audiovisual materials. Children respond well to teaching strategies that permit them to participate actively. Schedule teaching within the limits of time constraints.Shorter, more frequent sessions allow the patient to digest the new information and prevents him from becoming tired or uncomfortable due to his illness. Decide on group or individual teaching and formal or informal teaching. Some learner objectives are met more readily in a one-to-one encounter (i.e., colostomy care) while others are met more easily in a group discussion with other patients that have similar problems. Formal teaching is the planned teaching done to fulfill learner objectives. Informal teaching occurs during nursing interactions with the patient and his family. Informal teaching often leads to planned, formal sessions. Formulate a verbal or written contract with the patient. The contract is informal and is not legally binding; however, such an agreement serves to motivate both the patient and the nurse to attain the learning objectives. It points out the responsibilities of both the nurse (teacher) and the patient (learner). Whether verbal or written, the contract should not be intimidating, but viewed as an aid to learning. Failure to meet contracted objectives should be redirected into new learning and decision-making situations. Implement the Teaching Plan. The implementation phase may be only a few minutes or the sessions may extend over a period of days, or perhaps months. Use interpersonal skills as well as effective communication techniques. Do not use technical and medical terms unless the patient has a medical background, but avoid a condescending attitude. Your attitude has a greater effect on the patient than any other factor. If the patient must learn special techniques or procedures, tell him or her that it takes time and practice to perform these new skills confidently. Review the contractual agreement before implementing the teaching plan
With chronic disease management being very complex, we often skim over the values of patient teaching in our nursing education. This is despite the fact that patient teaching and education are essential components of the nursing process (Jones, 2002). Data indicates that when patients are provided with a solid knowledge base about their disease process and treatment, the outcome is more favorable (Boswell, 2007).
In order to teach, the nurse must first have an understanding of the patient education process. The following are part of this process:
Assessment. The nurse must first identify the patient’s needs. In this initial process, she must identify the needs and the problems of an individual patient and his/her family.
Planning and diagnosing. Based on this assessment of the patients needs, the nurse then formulates a diagnosis and treatment plan. It should be tailored to the patient’s needs and educational level. The end product of this assessment is a diagnosis which will serve as a guide for treatment. This diagnosis is a sound judgment based on data and information (Rankin, 2001).
In the hospital, it is especially important for nurses to begin patient teaching at the time of admission. It is equally important to document this teaching for evaluation and reimbursement purposes. However, in the acute care setting, nurses often report feeling that they do not have enough time for it.
The following is a list of strategies that promote the incorporation of teaching into daily nursing practice:
Emphasize what is necessary. In the inpatient setting, many patients fear losing their independence (Jones, 2002). Patients will be motivated to learn what is necessary for them to care for themselves; therefore nurses should emphasize these strategies.
Choose the right time. Remember that when teaching, timing is crucial. For instance, if the patient has just been informed of a diagnosis, he or she will need time to cope with this information. There might be associated feelings of grief, powerlessness, fear, and vulnerability (Jones, 2002). These will cloud the ability to learn.
Look for teaching moments. Like choosing the right time for teaching, it is equally important to look for teaching moments. Imagine caring for a patient with end-stage renal disease. A teaching moment would be when the patient receives his tray and there is only a small amount of fluid. In this situation the nurse could ask, why is it important for you to monitor your fluid intake? Plan teaching during an uninterrupted time. When teaching the patient, timing is crucial. It is not appropriate to fit everything into the day of discharge. Similarly, it would not be appropriate to provide complex lessons during meal time or visiting hours.Use basic principles. It is important to consider the educational level of the patient when teaching. After all, not everyone has had a nursing education. Some patients might not be able to understand complex medical jargon. They may even be illiterate and are unable to read handouts.
Evaluate the senses. Nurses must evaluate the patient’s ability to see and to hear. For example, if a patient has difficulty seeing, it might not be practical to give her a handout on disease management. If the patient has difficulty hearing, it might not be appropriate to guide her with verbal instructions.Keep expenses in mind. Many patients, especially elders, live on a fixed income. Therefore, it might not be practical to recommend that they join a fitness center as a means of weight reduction. When recommending a glucometer for the diabetic patient or a scale for the dialysis patient, it is important to consider the cost of each one. Clearly define goals and objectives. Before beginning, it is important to have a list of goals and objectives that are formulated by the patient and the nurse. The significance of these should be understood by each person, and they should be evaluated on a continuous basis. Remember to document. When teaching a new skill, documentation is important. This allows the incoming nurse or a nursing assistant to see what has been done and where she should start. Likewise, if the patient has difficulty with a certain skill or needs certain assistance, this should be recorded so that accommodations or further instruction can be provided.
Patient education requires that the nurse think critically. No longer are we simply responsible for administering medications and communicating with physicians. We also play a dynamic role in assuring that the patient is able to be independent in managing his disease.
In essence, we are nurse educators. After all, teaching is a vital component of the nursing process. However, the process is not uniform in nature. In order to promote learning, it is valuable to keep these proposed strategies in mind. And as part of our nursing education about the values of patient teaching, we have to remember that the patient population is indeed heterogeneous.
Evaluation, the last phase of the teaching process, is the ongoing appraisal of the patient’s learning progress during and after teaching. The goal of evaluation is to find out if the patient has learned what you taught.
Here are some ways you can evaluate learning:Observe return demonstrations to see whether the patient has learned the necessary psychomotor skills for a taskAsk the patient to restate instructions in his or her own wordsAsk the patient questions to see whether there are areas of instruction that need reinforcing or re-teaching,Give simple written tests or questionnaires before, during, and after teaching to measure cognitive learning Talk with the patient’s family and other health care team members to get their opinions on how well the patient is performing tasks he or she has been taughtAssess physiological measurements, such as weight and blood pressure, to see whether the patient has been able to follow a modified diet plan, participate in prescribed exercise, or take antihypertensive medication Review the patient’s own record of self-monitored blood glucose levels, blood pressure, or daily weights Ask the patient to problem solve in a hypothetical situation.Your documentation of patient teaching should take place throughout the entire teaching process. Documentation is done for several purposes. Documentation promotes communication about the patient’s progress in learning among all health care team members. Good documentation helps maintain continuity of care and avoids duplication of teaching. Documentation also serves as evidence of the fulfillment of teaching requirements for regulatory and accrediting organizations such as the JCAHO, provides a legal record of teaching, and is mandatory for obtaining reimbursement from third party payers. Documentation of patient teaching can be done via flow-charts, checklists, care plans, traditional progress notes, or computerized documentation. Whatever the method, the information must become a part of the patient’s permanent medical record. Table 6 shows suggestions on what to document and how.
The nursing processes are series of nursing steps designed to help the nurses provide quality care. The nursing processes are five part system used to make decisions that pertains with the identification of health complication and treatment process. These systems include diagnosis, planning, implementation, as well as evaluation. These processes are scientific and are evidenced based practice. The first step is the assessment step (Bruylands et al., 2014). This consist collection of patient’s information relevant to diagnosis, carried out using various approaches such as physical assessment, interviews, as well as observations. This involves the assessment of patient’s psychological, sociological, spiritual, and physiological status. For instance, when a patient visits a physician due to abnormal body functioning (Flemming, 2014). The registered nurse checks the patient’s heart rate, blood pressure and the body temperature. The patient is health assessment is done to identify the patient cultural and traditional values; nutritional process and lifestyles are investigated. During this stage, the blood samples are taken to the laboratory for further analysis of the patient health condition (Gratti, 2013).
The second phase in nursing process is the nursing diagnosis. This involves clinical judgment about the patient, about the potential health complication that the patient could be suffering. This is done using the health assessment, and is the basis that guides selection of nursing intervention. In this phase, the nurses are expected to make ethical judgment regarding the potential health complication. In some cases, the nurse can make multiple diagnoses in one patient. The stage is important because it helps the identification of the issue at concern, thus preventing risk of further complication. The diagnosis is also done to assess patient readiness for treatment. For instance, the registered nurse looks into the patient’s signs and symptoms. The nurse evaluates the alteration of the patho-physiology and risks of developing associated diseases.
The next nursing process phase is the planning stage. This stage involves the establishment of the care strategies and the outcome criteria for the patient care. The development of the plan action involves the prioritization the care plans and more attention and efforts are devoted to high-risk diseases and factors. Each healthcare problem is assigned a clear as well as measureable goal for the expected beneficial outcome. In this phase, the nurses are required to apply the evidence based nursing outcome classification (set of standards as well as measurements for tracking disease wellness of the patient) (Fee and Bu, 2010). Nursing intervention classification can be applied during the action phase. The Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is often used during the action planning of care. For instance, the patient pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic processes are identified, the criteria of the administration is established as outlined by the evidence-based practice.
Implementation phase is the fourth stage of nursing process. The stage involves demonstration of activities that will be given to the patient, with the aim of improving their health. This includes actions such as monitoring of patients to check for indicators of improvement, providing direct care to the patient, medical tasks, education, and health management of the patient such as follow up clinics. This could take days, weeks, and months (Mori 2014).
The last nursing process phase is the evaluation phase. This involves comparison of patient’s current state of health in comparison with the expected outcomes. The findings indicate whether the patient care plan will be revised or not (Dailly, 2011). For instance, the patient can be asked to answer a series of questions, have the symptoms been relieved, and have the patient condition improved from the last time. If the care plan is successful, the patient is advised to continue with care, as the registered nurse advices the patient on self-management strategies (Bernard, Hunter, & Moore, 2012).
Direct patient care as described by the American Association of critical care nurse’s delegation handbook includes activities that help the patient their immediate needs. On the other hand, indirect care refers to the activities that that focus in the maintenance of the environment where nursing care is delivered. Literature indicates that there is a thin line between the care providers, but the registered nurse should not the differences (Kee et al., 2009). For instance, with direct patient care, the healthcare provider will take the patient vital signs such as blood pressure, temperature, and patient’s daily weights. Direct care also involves taking daily activities such as brushing teeth and bathing. Changing patient beddings, feeding patients, and the calculation of weight are among the direct care. Indirect patient care will involve activities of cleaning equipments, taking patient specimens to the laboratories, phone calls, and communication, and the scheduling of appointments. Additionally, patients supplies stock, utility, supplies and other indirect care that is used to assist living homes (Olson-Sitki, Kirkbride, & Forbes, 2015).
Types of nursing interventions
Nursing interventions refers to the actual actions and treatments conducted to facilitate the patient achieve the goals set for them. The registered nurses use their experience, critical thinking skills and knowledge, which aids the registered nurse deliver quality care. There are various types of nursing interventions classified in to three broad categories, dependent, interdependent, and independent intervention (Kehrel, 2015). The interdependent intervention is nurse action plan that are implemented through teamwork. This includes consultations between healthcare providers during the decision making process. Dependent interventions are the strategies which as directed by the healthcare providers with higher authorities than the registered nurses. These include activities termination patients or referral process. Independent interventions are all activities implemented by registered nurses, and do not require consents from the physician or other practitioners (Nazarko et al., 2010).
Modification of care plan where outcomes have not been met
Continuous assessment should be conducted to ensure that the outcomes are met. This process is known as evaluation and is the last stage of the nursing process. This is done to ensure that the implementation plan of care, nursing diagnosis and assessment process meet the nursing care goals. Evaluating care is an ongoing purposeful practice the healthcare professionals determine the effectiveness of action plan (Doenges et al., 2013).This is done to evaluate the intervention effectiveness. It is the only to evaluate the responsibility and accountability of the nurse’s actions. The nursing process helps the nurses identify the main challenge in the patient’s body. The process helps the identification of etiology and facilitates the identification of risk factors. Through the nursing process, the outcomes are expected are often goal oriented and focuses in the provision of care (Gracia et al., 2014).
Using nursing process by RN to deliver care
Through the process, it is important to document and communicate effectively. The interventions should be evaluated to examine whether they meet the patient expected outcome. This includes working together to ensure that the outcomes have been achieved. If the interventions are not effective, then the registered nurses will brainstorm to identify the research gap and identify the variables that could cause the intervention not work effectively (Blodgett, 2009).
Some of the variables that could cause failure of the intervention include data collection, assessment, diagnosis processes, and the healthcare medical devices. In other cases, etiology can be poorly explored causing misdiagnosis. In other cases, the outcomes could be unmanageable, or unrealistic (Lu, 2013). The outcomes should result with reduced infections risks, reduced readmission rates, and improved quality of life. If the interventions is not effective, the nurses should begin planning for care overall. The nurses should conduct evidenced based research will help the nurses identify the appropriate strategy that will help address the relevant matter as necessary (Fjetland and Søreide, 2010).
Part 2; Nursing care plan
Impaired tissue integrity is the NANDA-I nursing, which associated immobility is caused by pressure causing ulcer on the ischium on the buttocks of the right side (Savage and Kub, 2009).
Rationale: The patient sits in one position for a long period in the wheelchair, in the home care facility. This puts more pressure on the ischium, causing the poor perfusion of the patient skin at that site, resulting to maceration of the skin, making the skin to break down (Nazarko et al., 2010).
Assessment: Assess skin above the ischium on the right side of the buttocks. Patient weight and height, patient temperature, pulse rates, respiration, pupils dilated, gastrointestinal system, neurovascular system, muscular system and blood pressure will be assessed.
Nursing diagnosis: Patient education, ulcer management, and pain relieve strategies.
Outcome: Patient will verbalize no pain, and wound recovers within eight weeks of the treatment
Patient will learn to reposition by themselves or with the aid of staff every two hours to relief pressure
The patient dressing will be changes as needed to promote healing and independent
Pain medication will be administered to the patient independent.
The wound will be inspected daily to monitor complications, signs of infections and if the wound is healing
The patient will be educated optimum nutrition including lipids, calories, and adequate protein to aid the tissue healing. The patient will be advised to adequate hydrate to ensure that replenish cellular loss of water, and improve circulation.
Interventions:
Establish the reason behind the preferred usage of movement aid. This will help identify strategies that will help the patient prefer mobility, yet avoid sitting so much on the mobility aid.
Patient agility will be recorded to monitor the patient movement pattern to identify the patients walking aids that will reduce pressure ulcer
Nurse will conduct research to identify evidence based practice to reduce disease progression to relieve pressure ulcer
Patient will be educated on behavioral modification , such as movements every two hours to ensure that the patient does not remain seated in one position
Assess barriers that will reduce effective medical diagnosis and medication errors.
Rationale and evaluation
Patient verbalizes pain reduction and that there is little discomfort. The pressure ulcer is caused by sitting in one position.
Routine monitoring and strategies to reduce patient pressure ulcer. Patient was advised to use roho cushion seats, rotation every two years and use of padded wear to reduce pressure wound.
To ensure that the teaching program is objective and very realistic. This will help the patient become empowered.
Part 3: patient education
Patient teaching is a core function of registered nurses as indicated by the nursing professional bodies. In some states, teaching is one of the legal requirements by the nursing standards. The patient should trust the nurse to be empowered through training (Baillie et al., 2014). The nurses should understand the patient ability to learn. The relationship is enhanced through communication that is reciprocal and continuous. The main objective is teaching the patient is to ensure that the patient is empowered. The nurse should instruct the patient, describe the disease physiology, and importance of medication (Olson-Sitki, Kirkbride, & Forbes, 2015).The nursed should use the relevant sources information, review patients medical history, physical examination, and documentation of nursing assessment, diagnosis, and intervention. The caregiver and patient support is very important. It is also important to evaluate the patient health literacy, skills, and attitudes to facilitate the learning process (Gotelli et al., 2008).
Learning process can be categorized into affective, cognitive, and psychomotor. The patient emotional as well as experiential readiness to learn. The teaching approach chosen must be used must be developmental. The nurse should assess patient’s intellectual development, psychosocial development, motor development as well as the emotional maturity. It is important to identify the patient’s strengths and weaknesses including reasoning ability, memory, and comprehension (Vaillant-Roussel et al., 2014). The nurse should use anticipatory guidance that will facilitate psychologically preparation of the person for the unfamiliar or unexpected events. The teaching plan should be created; there are standardized plans for major topics of the health teaching which can be used. The match content should be used appropriately. The teaching plan should allow active practice and should be scheduled based on time constraints. The teaching plans have shorter to enable to digest the healthcare information and ensure that the objectives are met (Svavarsdottir et al., 2014).
References
Baillie, C., A., Epps, M., Hanish, A., Fishman, N., O., French, B., & Umscheid, C., A. (2014). Usability and impact of a computerized clinical decision support intervention designed to reduce urinary catheter utilization and catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 35(9), 1147-1155. doi:10.1086/677630.
Bruylands, M., Paans, W., Hediger, H., & Müller-Staub, M. (2013). Effects on the Quality of the Nursing Care Process Through an Educational Program and the Use of Electronic Nursing Documentation. International Journal Of Nursing Knowledge, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/j.2047-3095.2013.01248.x
Doenges, ME. Et al. (2013). Nurse’s pocket guide (13ed): Diagnoses, prioritized interventions and rationales. John Wiley7 sons. New York
Fleming, J. (2014). A Future for Adult Educators in Patient Education. Adult Learning, 25(4), 166-168. doi:10.1177/1045159514546217
Fee, E. and Bu, L. (2010). The Origins of Public Health Nursing: The Henry Street Visiting Nurse Service. Am J Public Health, 100(7), pp.1206-1207.
Fjetland, K. and Søreide, G. (2010). Ethical dilemmas: a resource in public health nurses’ everyday work?. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24(1), pp.75-83.
Gracia, C. Et al. (2014). Population based public health nursing clinical manual: the Henry Street model for nurses, 2nd ed. Sigma Theta Tau.
Kee, LJ. Et al. (2009). Pharmacology: a patient centered nursing process approach. Elsevier. New Jersey
Kehrel, U. (2015). The acceptance of process innovations in drug supply – An empirical analysis of patient-individualized blister packaging in stationary nursing facilities. International Journal Of Healthcare Management, 8(1), 58-63. doi:10.1179/2047971914y.0000000085
Liu, J. (2013). Exploring nursing assistants’ roles in the process of pain management for cognitively impaired nursing home residents: a qualitative study. J Adv Nurs, 70(5), 1065-1077. doi:10.1111/jan.12259
Lu, C., Tang, S., Lei, Y., Zhang, M., Lin, W., Ding, S., & Wang, P. (2015). Community-based interventions in hypertensive patients: a comparison of three health education strategies. BMC Public Health, 15(1). doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1401-6
Olson-Sitki, K., Kirkbride, G., & Forbes, G. (2015). Evaluation of a nurse-driven protocol to remove urinary catheters: Nurses’ perceptions. Urologic Nursing, 35(2), 94-99. doi:10.7257/1053-816X.2015.35.2.94. Pratt, R., & Pellowe, C. (2010). Good practice in management of patients with urethral catheters. Nursing Older People, 22(8), 25-29. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=2010826639&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Savage, C. and Kub, J. (2009). Public Health and Nursing: A Natural Partnership. IJERPH, 6(11), pp.2843-2848.
Svavarsdottir, E., Sigurdardottir, A., Konradsdottir, E., Stefansdottir, A., Sveinbjarnardottir, E., & Ketilsdottir, A. et al. (2014). The Process of Translating Family Nursing Knowledge Into Clinical Practice. Journal Of Nursing Scholarship, 47(1), 5-15. doi:10.1111/jnu.12108
Vaillant-Roussel, H., Laporte, C., Pereira, B., Tanguy, G., Cassagnes, J., & Ruivard, M. et al. (2014). Patient education in chronic heart failure in primary care (ETIC) and its impact on patient quality of life: design of a cluster randomised trial. BMC Family Practice, 15(1). doi:10.1186/s12875-014-0208-3
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!