Selection a few key concepts, what caught your attention?
Pay attention to the arguments the authors are making? Do they present clear evidence? What it is your take on it?
Try not to summarize entire chapters, instead focus on what was critical or what stood out?
Feel free to add personal responses, how are you connecting with the material?
One page minimum. In this impassioned and provocative collection of 17 essays, Trask, a well-known activist, argues the case of indigenous Hawaiians, persons of Polynesian descent, who have been overwhelmed by the dominant culture.
How Much is One Crazy Human Life Worth Please post your answers to the following questions:
•Do you consider yourself a critical thinker? Why or why not?
Dilemma 3
How Much is One Crazy Human Life Worth
Please read How Much is One Crazy Human Worth from the textbook and answer the following questions:
•Can the subsequent dollar cost of this exercise be justified by the organization resolving this situation peacefully and without loss of life?
•Had you been the commanding officer of this operation, keeping in mind the enormous media and political pressure to bring this situation to a peaceful end,
what limits do you think there would have been on your patience?
Who Moved My Cheese by Spencer Johnson Characteristics of minorities and diverse populations encountered by counselors. Includes issues among those groups which affect the counseling process. (3
Lec.)
Who Moved My Cheese by Spencer Johnson
Textbooks and Other Course Materials: Diversity in Counseling by: Robert Brammer 2nd edition. Thomson/ Brooks/ Cole, 2012, ISBN# 13:978-0-8400-3453-3
4. Each student is required to read “Who Moved My Cheese” by Spencer Johnson and write a typed, two-page summary about how this book applies to the course material, and to one’s personal life. A personal reflection of how the book impacted you as an aspiring competent multicultural counselor is what is
required. A simple summation of the book’s content is not acceptable and will receive a negative grade. Remember, we all have opinions and believe our
opinions to be “gospel” however as college students and budding counselors, understanding the finiteness of one’s opinion is essential in being open to other experiences, opinions, and information that may conflict with your current position such as the information contained in your text. Thus, making a connection between one’s opinion and evidence-based information can assist in the expansion of one’s worldview and critical thinking process.
i)Describe the subject matter in detail
ii) Name and describe the style. Give reasons for the designation.
iii) Analyze in details the way the artist has handled the designed elements, specifically: Line, Shape, Color, Light and shadow, and Space.
iv) Describe in details how the artist has organized his work and what it conveys
v) Describe the size and how the size affect your perception and/or meaning of the piece.
vi) Describe the material used in the artwork explaining the techniques used and how the artist particular material and technique enhance the meaning of the work
vii) The interpretation of the above-listed analysis.
It is very important that the writer read carefully the instructions here below and understand it well before engaging in responding to any of the 3 points below. Proper APA must be use throughout the entire paper, and the articles to be used for the paper must be properly cited.
Article Review and Analysis
In this course, you have learned methods for statistically manipulating research data and explored the importance of ensuring validity in the methods that are used to collect research data. Consider the various aspects of validity you have explored. How might you prioritize their importance?
With these thoughts in mind:
Review the article “Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research,” by Straub, Boudreau, & Gefen and focus your analysis on each of the following guiding questions. You should address each set of questions in a short paragraph. Be sure to refer directly to the article where appropriate.
• Briefly describe the types of validity presented. What are the critical differences among them? Assess the authors’ performance in explaining them.
• Select a previous article that presents a quantitative study. How would you assess the study’s validity? What information would you need in order to be able to do so, and is that information present in the article?
• Based on Table 8 on page 415 in the article by Straub, Boudreau, & Gefen, which positivist design contingency best describes the previous article you selected ? Which best describes your potential Doctoral Study (Effects of HRM Practices on Employee Performance)? Explain your selections.
I will email the reference article in this order form,, and for the other quantitative article, the writer will search for a suitable article of not more that 5 years old to be use in completing the paper,
SAMPLE ANSWER
Introduction
To provide complete and accurate view of research work, a given construct must draw confidence in its representation and ability to validate its own concepts based on its empirical findings (Straub, Boudreau & Gefen, 2004).
Content Validity
The construct would be more helpful and meaningful if the validities chosen reflect the heuristics presented in the study. Assessing content validity is very difficult as researchers are uncertain on how to rate the degree or level of completeness of their own research work. Content validity is basically sampling and evaluating the contents of research work for its validity (Straub, Boudreau & Gefen, 2004).
Construct Validity
Construct validity provides the measurement between constructs or operations. Construct validity appeals more to the content of the construct’s validity than the substance of the construct. It raises the fundamental question as to whether the construct fits in its application by the researcher in an attempt to capture the significance of the construct. The application of nomological network is applied to test if there are links similar to the ones existing on the construct literature. Construct validity focuses more on the likeness or differences of the construct linkages and their strengths on past literature (Straub, Boudreau & Gefen, 2004).
Predictive Validity
It is also known as concurrent validity and it establishes relationship between different measures and constructs through demonstration of posited measures directed on specific construct correlations. Predictive validity predicts outcomes for given variables but they also provide conceptual meaning applies to the constructs antecedents and ramifications. The goal of predictive validity is basically prediction while also reinforcing the concept of the theory base (Szajna, 1994).
The author has explained the differences as well as the similarities of the various validity measures. For example, the author has explained that predictive validity validates both the exogenous as well as the endogenous constructs based on the use of z-scores (Szajna, 1994).
The peer review research article by Klein and Olbrecht (2011) demonstrates the need to widen and work on more exploratory research work. The article summarizes the triangulation of qualitative and quantitative data analysis. The oral presentation and the other protocols provided as the basis of the research work requires more cognitive frameworks to present constructive and validated data. The intractable domains are also difficult to establish as the research relies on limited primary data. To assess the validity of the primary data I would require the questionnaires that were used to compile the research report (Straub, Boudreau & Gefen, 2004).
The non-theoretical work which bases its findings on the primary descriptive data would provide a basis for predictive validity. The predictive validity predicts outcomes for given variables but its conceptual meaning applies to the constructs antecedents and ramifications which are collaborated with the content validity. The research work can only be validated by confirming the constructs relationship with other research work from well established research streams. The article confirms that the validity of scientific that is based on positivist science needs based not only on highly biased observations but also on a series of random anecdotes that tests the intellectual constructs of the research presented. The article requires the rigor of intelligent, careful and thoughtful collection of primary data (Carrier et al, 1990).
The best description of my potential doctoral study is the exploratory that specifically probe the areas in HRM that are not well understood like valuation of human resources as a key element of a company’s capital structure.
References
Carrier, M. R., A. T. Dalessio, and S. H. Brown (1990). “Correspondence between Estimates of Content and Criterion-Related Validity Values,” Personnel Psychology (43) 1 (spring), pp. 85-100.
Klein, T. and Olbrecht, M. (2011) Triangulation of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Panel Peer Review Research, International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education (IJCDSE), Volume 2, Issue 2, June, pg 345 -348.
Szajna, B. (1994) “Software Evaluation and Choice: Predictive Validation of the Technology Acceptance Instrument,” MIS Quarterly (17) 3, pp. 319-324.
Straub, D., & Boudreau, M., & Gefen, D. (2004) Validation Guidelines for Positivist Research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol 13, pg 380 – 427.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
GoodStrategy Bad Strategy by Richard Rumelt o Thesis – identify the central lesson the author is trying to teach
Good Strategy Bad Strategy by Richard Rumelt
o Central pillars – define and discuss at least three major learning outcomes
o Discussion – the reflection on the book’s impact on the future manager. Good Strategy/Bad Strategy: The Difference and Why it Matters was chosen as one of six finalists for the Financial Times & Goldman Sachs Business Book of the Year award for 2011.
“There are precious few books that enable you to not only re-think the way you think but also improve your performance. Richard Rumelt’s brilliant Good Strategy/Bad Strategy is one, a milestone in both the theory and practice of strategy. Cutting to the core of what makes the difference between success and being an also-ran, Rumelt uses vivid examples from the contemporary business world and global history that clearly show how to recognize the good, reject the bad, and make good strategy a living force in your organization.”
Six reader response journal entries; three for each novel.
Two character development charts.
SAMPLE ANSWER
The Kite Runner by Khaled Hosseini
Journals
My first impression after reading the novel mainly on Hassan was on how the author described him. His perfect round face that is described to resemble a China doll. His face has a flattened nose and eyes that were narrow and slanting his eyes were of varying colors from sapphire, to gold or even green. He is described by the author to have a pointed chin. Hassan is said never to deny Amir anything he desired. The author paints a picture of a man who would go to the edge in order to assist a partner or friend.
Hosseini uses a hyperbole in his descriptions of Baba. He tells of how the character wrestled a bear with no weapon but his bare hands. The story portrays baba as a strong individual. To drive the point home, the author indicates that had this story been of someone else the people would have dismissed it as untrue. The character is depicted in the novel to hold a lot of power and respect of all people. Everyone believes what he or she hears from him. The author further depicts him as a “Hurricane” who would uproot a willow tree or even kill the devil by his glare alone.
The author shows greed in Amir who wants Baba all for himself. He avoids all cases of Hassan being present fearing he can impress Baba and snatch him away from him. As a reader, I understand that Amir is like an unwanted child who works exceedingly hard to please his father. To Baba, the only unlawful thing is theft and therefore what Amir has been learning in school is not helpful. He wishes to see Amir as businessperson or a wealthy man in the future.
Rahim Khan – Baba’s best friend and business partner Amir’s uncle
Hassan – Amir’s best friend and servant
Ali – Hassan’s father
Complicated Kindness by Miriam Toews
Journals
The term “Mennonite” to modern people, has differing meanings. However, according to the author, the area that provides the novels background is in Russia. It focuses on people from Mennonites in Manitoba. My understanding is that the author tries to paint a picture of a society that will give the readers a point to think about as they read her work.
Naomi Nickel is portrayed as a protagonist in the novel. My attention was drawn by her curiosity and defiance. She gives me the idea of normal sixteen years old who is very inquisitive. Her nature is similar to other teenagers who often find themselves in conflict with the society they live in. she later learns that her sister ran away with her boyfriend which further drives her curiosity.
The novel also gives me the picture of a family living in a village, where everyone is expected to do as those in authority tell them. Naomi becomes a victim of these beliefs where she has to conform or live in opposition with the society and her family. Her nature makes her a target of confrontations between hospital staff, her teacher Mr. Quiring and her father. Eventually her father gives her the freedom to do as the desires. The life of Naomi makes readers think of the sacrifices parents have to make. It also depicts what teenagers go through and the life lessons of their endeavors.
Character Chart
Naomi nickel also Nomi – main character and a protagonist
Raymond Nickel also ray – Naomi’s father who is reserved. Caught in conflict between family and society
Natasha nickel also Tash – Naomi’s older sister,
Travis – Naomi’s broadminded boyfriend
Hans Rosenfeldt – Naomi’s uncle, poster conservationist
Lydia Voth – Naomi’s friend from a conservative family
References
Hosseini, K. (2009). The kite runner.Review. London: Bloomsbury.
Toews, M. (2014). A complicated kindness.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Please use the following format in preparing 4-MAT Book Reviews:
1. ABSTRACT. Summarize what you have read, boiling the book down into 300 words (1 page). Prove you comprehend the readings by writing a no-nonsense summary. The abstract is not a commentary or listing of topics but rather an objective summary from the reader’s viewpoint. Abstract equals “boiled down.” This section should include a minimum of 2 footnotes to the text being reviewed.
2. CONCRETE RESPONSE. Get vulnerable! In no less than 150 words and no more than 1 page, relate a personal life experience that this book triggered in your memory. Relate your story in first person, describing action, and quoting exact words you remember hearing or saying. In the teaching style of Jesus, this is a do-it-yourself parable, case study, confession. You will remember almost nothing you have read unless you make this critical, personal connection. What video memory began to roll? This is your chance to tell your story and make new ideas your own.
3. REFLECTION. This is the critical thinking part of the review (not critical in the sense of negative, but in the sense of questioning). In no less than 150 words and no more than 1 page, describe what questions pop up for you in response to what you have read. Keep a rough-note sheet at hand as you read. Out smart the author by asking better questions than he/she raised in the book. Tell how the author could have made the book better or more appealing to those in your field of service. One way to begin this section is by stating what bothered you most about the book. This is not a place to provide an endorsement or affirmation of the book.
4. ACTION. So what are you going to do about it? In no less than 2–3 page and no more than 5 pages for your entire paper.provide 3 action steps that describe what actions or changes you are going to make in your life, ministry, and/or work as a result of your reading. Action steps should be measurable and reveal a commitment to specific time, specific people, and identified steps.
5. Please provide a Turabian style* title page, pagination, footnotes, and Bibliography
6. DO NOT PLAGIARIZE. THIS PAPER COUNTS AS A FINAL EXAM GRADE. ANY FORM OF PLAGIARISM WILL NOT BE PERMITTED. THANK YOU
SAMPLE ANSWER
Book reviews
Abstract
Pipes, Jerry F,, and Victor Lee. Family to Family: Leaving A Lasting Legacy. Alpharetta, GA: North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 1999.
This book was written to assist parents in developing and bringing up healthy families by encouraging them to centre their lives on Jesus and live life in a relationship to Jesus, to each other, and to the world. It is a book about finding the purpose that God intended for the family. This publication assists families in deciding what decisions have to be made so as to fulfil that purpose. In essence, the purpose of the authors is to assist parents find out their right God-given purpose, offer tools and instruction that parents can utilize to better mentor and discipline their kids, help parents comprehend the mission of their family, and learn how to effectively impart their faith to their kids. [1]
Family to Family comprises a vital emphasis on incorporating and prioritizing scripture into all of family life until every member of the family understands and lives by the principles of the Word of God. Pipes and Lee provide a lot of inspiring stories as well as practical ideas, activities and questionnaire that could be used by families in making the study more transformational, practical, and engaging.[2] This publication does not only tell people what they need to do so as to be a family who lives under the purpose of God, it in fact goes a step further by telling people how to go about it. Family to Family is divided into 6 brief chapters that span roughly 120 pages, and includes end notes and a conclusion. Starting with Healthy Families in the first chapter and ending with sharing the message in the final one, which is Chapter 6, the authors of Family to Family provide crucial ideas and tips on the way that families could grow closer together and reach their community as well as the world for Jesus.
Concrete Response
This book has triggered something that I can relate to my personal life experience. When growing up, my father always took the matter of family time seriously. He maintained that as a family, we should have a sufficient time together. He wanted our family to remain spiritually strong. This is highlighted in the book Family to Family, especially in the 1st chapter where the authors discuss at length the importance of having family time. Pipes and Lee point out that quality family time is significant and so is quantity family time. They noted that one proper way of spending time with kids is to live out the great commission. They also discuss the significance of showing kids that Christ loves us by carrying out acts of love to those around particularly those who are lost[3]. Our parents also taught us to follow Christ and to walk in the ways of soberness and truth. We always gathered together to pray at least every morning or every night.
My parents encouraged us to pray to God for our personal needs and taught me how to build a lasting relationship with Christ. In some way, my father evangelized to us. The authors of Family to Family talk about this in the book. Pipes and Lee strongly believe that evangelism begins at home. For parents, their kids need to be their first priority when it comes to having a relationship with Christ[4]. In the third chapter, Pipes and Lee talk about how parents can help their teens or children in making the choice to follow Christ. For a teen, the parent is in a more mentoring stage of parenting. Here, Pipes and Lee focus on the significance of modelling and showing that the Word of God is key in the parent’s own life, spending time with his or her teenagers, praying with them and for them, and allowing them to discover God rather than showing them or doing for them everything[5]. With these important aspects of parenting, teenagers have a higher chance of following Christ when they are on their own. We were a happy family back then. In family life, happiness is most likely to be attained whenever it is based on Christ’s teachings.[6]
Reflection
After reading Family to Family, what really bothered me about this text is the adoption of business practices in the home setting. Is it really necessary for families to have a mission statement like companies do? Pipes and Lee noted that a family should adopt a mission statement and they express their zeal for the significance they put on the idea of a Christian family implementing a mission statement. Taking up this corporate mainstay in the family might really not be a god idea. Even though there are definitely corporate facets to contemporary ministry including evangelism, the Christian ministry is actually not a business venture. In essence, it is a mistake to treat ministry the same as a for-profit organization[7]. Bringing methods and principles of business from the business community to a family unit is a mistake.
All in all, there is more to bringing up a family and imparting the faith of the parents to their kids than a short purpose statement. It is important to explicitly communicate the core values of the family to the next generation. Even so, it is not appropriate to adopt approaches of the business world into the family setting. Using business practices in the home perhaps could be a result of the growing trend of churches in the United States trying to emulate the business community. Pipes and Lee could have made the text better by not suggesting that homes should adopt mission statements like the business community.
Action
As a result of reading the text Family to Family, I will carry out a number of actions or changes in my life, ministry and/or work. They are as follows: (i) ministering to my own family first and spending enough time with them. In the next 14 months, I would make an effort to evangelize to my own family members first before going on to evangelize to other people. Evangelizing to my own family first will entail incorporating and prioritizing scripture into all of my family’s life until every individual member of my family knows and lives by the principles of the Word of God. I will ensure that I spend at least 6 hours per day with my family members. In essence, I will become more rational and prioritize both quantity and quality time with my families and children. I will also ensure that my family is actually centred upon Jesus Christ. According to Pipes and Lee, Christian families which do not spend time together and are not centred on Jesus have lost their way as demonstrated by nearly 90 percent of evangelical kids who leave the church by the age of eighteen years.[8] After reading this, I can also teach members of my own family how they can write their own testimonies.
(ii) Develop a mission statement for my family in the next 6 months: in Family to Family, the authors point out that a family which is serious with regard to becoming a healthy family centred on Jesus has to develop its own family mission statement. Several important tips are described by the authors that a family can use to craft its own mission statement. Pipes and Lee stated that a mission statement for a family would act as guardrails and a centreline for the family unit on the road through life and help us in making the priorities of Jesus our own priorities.[9] Even though I cannot foresee or predict what life would bring my way, having a mission statement would be helpful to me in knowing whether or not I have wandered off from the centreline of my faith whenever family life becomes difficult. In developing a family mission statement, Jesus and His purpose would serve as the starting point.
(iii) Minister and evangelize more and share the gospel with many people. In the next 2 years, I will make an effort to minister together with my family and other families both out of the country and at home in order to impact our neighbours and the world for Jesus with our witness. In ministering, we would organize family mission trips, hold block parties, and even use JESUS videos in the evangelism. This is something which the authors of the text Family to Family have explored in Chapter 5. According to the authors, 21 percent of people in America receive Jesus when they are provided with a clear and understandable presentation of the gospel via the JESUS video. Further, I will make an effort to share the gospel with other people through the use of other practical techniques for instance using my own personal testimony.
References
Pipes, Jerry F,, and Victor Lee. Family to Family: Leaving A Lasting Legacy. Alpharetta, GA: North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 1999.
Wheeler, David. Worship and witness: Becoming a great commission worshipper. Alpharetta, GA: North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 2010.
[1] Jerry F. Pipes and Victor Lee. Family to Family: Leaving A Lasting Legacy. (Alpharetta, GA: North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 1999), 4.
[6] David Wheeler. Worship and witness: Becoming a great commission worshipper. (Alpharetta, GA: North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 2010), 56
[8] Jerry F. Pipes and Victor Lee. Family to Family: Leaving A Lasting Legacy. (Alpharetta, GA: North American Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, 1999), 34
Read the Novella Siddhartha. Write a 400-500 word summary on it. No more than 500 words. The first paragraph will cover setting and the main character
description. The first sentence must contain author, title and setting, and nothing else. The next 3-4 sentences must describe the main character.
The second paragraph must tell the plot. The first/second sentences must give an overview of the novel. The next 5-7 sentences must tell the stages in the story and then the concluding action. In the next section, you must explain the motives in the story in detail. And you should briefly discuss the issues and meanings in the novella. That is probably two paragraphs. Arial font.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Reading the novel Kingdom of this world which is written by Alejo Carpentier then answer the questions. Don’t need to refer anything. I will upload the requirement but I can’t provide the novel. Is the writer able to get the novel? Any question just let me know.
There is no minimum requirements for the number of sources you use however as a general guideline an academic paper can have 1 source per hundred words. In regards to the currency of the references, it is generally expected that sources are within 5 years published age. However if you have sourced a reference that is older than this you must demonstrate how it is relevant in your writing.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
