Twelve Years a Slave Viewing Assignment Solomon Northrup and other slaves are put in some horrible situation and forced to make some impossible decisions.
Twelve Years a Slave Viewing Assignment
These are called “choiceless choices“. discuss some examples of “choiceless choices” from the film. Do you agree with the choices made? why or why not?
It is easy to focus on the impact of slavery on the slaves but as Alexis DeTocqueville showed it warped the character of the owners as well. Discuss two examples of how slavery affects the character of those associated with it. Especially pay attention to how they rationalize their actions.
How is Northrup able to resist his captivity? What methods does he use and they effective? How does he hang on to his humanity?
This paper is ONLY for individuals who have read the book Samuel Scheffler, Death and the Afterlife. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
This paper only focus on pages 85-110 in a section titled “Fear, Death, and Confidence.”
The paper should be 2500-3000 words long. The paper should be typed, double-spaced. Include a word count at the end of each paper. (2500 is fine)
The paper should describe the issue on which you have chosen to focus, lay out the position you have chosen to take on that issue, and defend that position. Your position might be, for example, a criticism of a particular philosopher’s view, or a defense of a particular view from a certain objection, or a suggested revision of a view that enables it to avoid a certain criticism.
You might need to explicate a view or an argument you are focusing on; do this clearly and accurately. A major part of the paper should consist of your argument for the position you have taken. Present reasons why your view should be accepted, consider objections to your position, and reply to those objections. Aim to persuade your reader.
The paper should draw from at least one of the assigned readings for the course. You may, but you need not, draw from additional sources.
Crediting sources: If you get an idea from something that you have read, include a footnote or endnote identifying the source. If you quote something, use quotation marks and include a footnote or endnote. The first time a reference appears in a note, give full bibliographic information. For a book, give author, title, city where published, publisher, publication date, and page number(s). For an article in a journal, give author, title, journal name, volume, year, and page numbers. For a web source, give the web address and date accessed.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
What seems to be the story’s perspective on the government in newly independent Sudan? What’s the relationship between the government and the villagers?
2) Isabel Allende, “And of Clay are We Created”
What do you think the significance of Allende’s title is? What does it mean to be made of clay?
3) Toni Morrison, “Recitatif”
Why do you think Morrison chooses not to be explicit about which girl is African American and which girl is Caucasian?
4) Borowski, “This Way for the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen”
Explain the significance of the story’s title, “This Way to the Gas, Ladies and Gentlemen.” What seems strange about it?
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Book Précis – For this assignment, you’ll write a précis on the required readings (book and articles) used in this course. A précis is a summary and critical evaluation of scholarly works (In this case a book and at minimum three articles). It will typically take the following form:
Full bibliographic citation in Chicago of Style Manual format of the book.
First paragraph: an objective summary or abstract of the publication. This paragraph should present the information as objectively as possible. You’ll have a chance to critique the argument in the second part of your précis. You should not use the abstract published for the book. The first paragraph should contain the following information:
The overall argument that the author is making, including the author’s thesis, the logical thread of the argument, the kinds of support provided, and so forth. If the author invents or uses special terms to argue the case, mention and define them.
The context for the argument. What critics or points of view is the author attempting to refute? Where does the author’s argument fit into the larger critical discussion of the issue? Is the author attempting to overturn certain assumptions about the work, and, if so, what are those assumptions.
Second and third paragraphs: a critical analysis of the publication. In this paragraph, you’ll assess the strengths and weaknesses of the article and discuss the implications of its reasoning for future study of the work.
These questions may help you get started:
What parts of the book/articles were especially strong or insightful, and why?
In what parts of the scholarly works (if any) did the author make claims that were not supported by the evidence? Were there any flaws in the logic of the piece?
In what ways is this book useful for understanding the historical topic covered? How significant is it?
You may use more paragraphs if you need to, but you should follow this basic format.
Length: Approximately 2 typed, double-spaced pages
Late submitting will be penalized a letter grade or more.
A Good Man Is Hard To Find by O Connor 600-800 words in length (that’s 3-4 pages)
A Good Man Is Hard To Find by O Connor
Typed in 12-point Times New Roman font, with 1” margins; use MLA formatting for a formal paper for header and page numbers.
The paper must have a descriptive title (which is not “Character Analysis”).
The paper must have a unified organization and use specific evidence from the text—both direct quotes and paraphrasing to support your ideas. Cite page numbers for both quotes and paraphrases.
A successful paper will briefly summarize the character and story in addition to in-depth analysis.
NO RESEARCH ALLOWED FOR THIS ESSAY. This analysis should be solely your own reading of the text.
Read “A Good Man Is Hard To Find” by Flannery O’Connor and the character I chose is the grandmother.
Questions to consider
What major conflict(s) does the character face?
Does the character change over the course of the story? How? Why? What brings about this change?
How is the character described? Are there details in addition to visual ones? How does the character’s sense-based description relate to his or her character?
What are the character’s values? How does the character’s behavior reflect these values (or not)?
How does the character relate to other people? How do these relationships affect the character?
Is the character likable? What tone does the narrator take toward the character? Does this matter?
Konnikova book on Sherlock Holmes Assignment Here are the instructions for the Konnikova (2013) “Mastermind: How to Think Like Sherlock Holmes” book.
Konnikova book on Sherlock Holmes
Read the Konnikova book on Sherlock Holmes.
You are required to present a brief synopsis of each chapter and explain clearly how it is relevant to our course and how understanding the book, chapter-by-chapter including the Postlude, will help you become a better investigator. CLEARLY LABEL EACH CHAPTER WITH THE CHAPTER NUMBER AND TITLE OF THE KONNIKOVA CHAPTER. Do not combine chapters into one entry. Each chapter and the postlude must show up separately within the Word-format document.
It is an excellent book and highlights an important failing of forensic education: Students must not only be taught techniques but should also receive
education about how to think well using those techniques. The Konnikova text, in its way, does that.
Submit your chapter-by-chapter writeup in one Word-formatted document by uploading it to Canvas, here.
This book report needs to be around 5-6 pages (double spaced) 12 point font. It is about the book “The Age of Innocence” by Edith Wharton. The theme is ‘how society and class governed/impacted the lives of New Yorkers in the 1870s’. there needs to be an introduction (title, author, theme, brief overview of book), a summary of the book which is about a page – page and a half long, a paragraph on the theme in the book (with quotes from the book supporting evidence) which is about a page long, a character development paragraph also at least a page long (talking about how the main character Newland Archer changes throughout the book, with quotes from the book to support claims), and a concluding paragraph
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Getlein Mark, Living with Art, 11th Ed., New York: McGraw-Hill, ISBN13: 978-0073379319
First Assignment
Imagine that you are in a debate with someone who asserts that, just as beauty is in the eye of the beholder, art is whatever the spectator thinks it is; there are no rules, no criteria, no universal boundaries delineating what is and what is not art, who is and who is not an artist. If something expresses or creates an aesthetic or emotional response, it is art.
Your task is to take the other side of the debate: How would you respond to and rebut this view? In the first chapter of Living with Art, Getlein lists six roles that artists fulfill; these may help you in coming up with your response. Come up with points and specific examples of art works to support of the other side of the debate, which is that not just anything can be art, not just anyone can be an artist: There are established and justifiable criteria to confer that status upon objects and individuals.
Second Assignment
In Chapter 5, Getlein covers the principles of design. For each term listed, identify an art work art included in the text, Living with Art, but NOT mentioned in either Chapter 4 or Chapter 5, that illustrates the principle in question and explain why you chose it.
Note: in some cases you will find both the contrasting principles in the same work, (i.e. a painting that has both emphasis and subordination). You will have a minimum of 5 art works selected, maximum of 9. A required part of this question is to explain WHY you chose each work. Make sure we can “see” what you are seeing. Please include both the page number and illustration number in your response.
1) unity and variety (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
2) symmetrical and asymmetrical balance (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
3) emphasis and subordination (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
4) scale and proportion (describe an example of both terms here, either in the same work or in 2 different works)
5) rhythm
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
For this course, you will be required to complete two 1000-1250 word (approximately 4-5 pages) book review papers. Each paper will analyze a book that focus on some aspect of American history up until 1816.
While you may choose any non-fiction works of history focusing on this period, I highly recommend that you send me the title and author of the book to have it approved before you write your essay. I will approve only college-level works of history. The easiest way to ensure that the book you choose meets this standard is to check it out from the library at Foothill College. The vast majority of books students choose are approved; I am simply trying to make sure that you do not accidentally choose a collection of primary sources or a book geared to a high school audience. If you do not send me your book information ahead of time and review an inappropriate book your paper grade will be penalized.
If you are having trouble choosing a book I am happy to offer a suggestion. Just send me a message saying what topics you are interested in (for example, women’s history or military history or Native American history) and I’ll come up with a couple of possible titles. Another good way to find a book is to look at the end of the chapters in the textbook. You will find a list of suggested “further reading” at the end of each chapter. All of these books would be good choices.
Once you have chosen a book to review, you will write a 1000-1250 word essay analyzing the text. Because many students may think of a “book report” as little more than a summary of a book’s contents, I have used the term “book review” to emphasize that something more is expected. The student is expected to go beyond merely outlining the contents. Although it is, of course, important to summarize the contents of the book as part of the review, the student should analyze it in some depth. In reading the book, the student should pay attention to the footnotes and bibliography, seek out information about the author, and consult the text and other books to gain a wider perspective on the book’s subject.
The most important aspect of the essays is to determine the thesis or main argument of the book and describe how this is presented and supported. Is the case convincing? Does the author seem to have approached the topic from a relatively objective point of view, or is a clear bias apparent? What sources did the author use? Is the author clearly arguing against another historian’s interpretation of the subject? What is your opinion about the argument the author is making?
All books of history have some argument in the material they are presenting. Try to identify what this argument is and give your opinion about the validity of this approach.
The main body of your reviews should be at 1000-1250 words in length (this is equivalent to at least 4 full pages in length, typed and double spaced, with margins no larger than 1 inch in width, using a standard word processing program). Every paper must have a full citation of the book being reviewed and a proper bibliography in the MLA style at the end if you have consulted any additional works.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Punk Orientalism by Garry Neil Kennedy Write a formal review of one of the artworks in the Mackenzie Art Gallery exhibitions: Punk Orientalism, Garry
Neil Kennedy: Ya Ummi, Ya Ummi …, or Home Economics: 150 Years of Canadian Hooked Rugs. You must write your review on a work of art you have seen in person this semester.
Punk Orientalism by Garry Neil Kennedy
Format
1000 words (not including footnotes and bibliography)
Typed; double-spaced; 12 point Times New Roman font
name your files as follows: LastName_FirstName_ArtReview_WI18.docx
do not include a title page or other cover
put your name and student ID # on the top left hand corner
Centre your title above the body of your paper.
If possible, include an image of the artwork.
You will lose 20 points if you go more than 50 words over or under 700 words.
No paper will be accepted beyond two weeks late
This is NOT a research paper. However, you may consult other sources for background information. If you do, be sure to cite the sources of your quotations and paraphrases using Chicago Manual style. Failure to cite your sources correctly is plagiarism and may result in a grade loss of 20%-100%.
Grading will be based on adherence to assignment guidelines, research, content, format, and organization. For details, refer to the Art Work Review rubric posted on the class UR Courses website.
If you are unable to submit your written work on time due to illness or other serious circumstances please contact me immediately to make arrangements.
Submit all written assignments as .doc or .docx files using the assignment tool on the class UR Courses website.
Please follow the structure outlined below:
1. Introduction
2. Description and Exploratory Question
3. Formal and Conceptual Analysis
4. Critical Evaluation and Conclusion
Punk Orientalism by Garry Neil Kennedy Introduction
The first paragraph should deal with the facts: identify the artwork’s maker, title, size, date, and medium, as well as the location where it was seen along with the exhibition title and dates.
In the second paragraph you will identify the work within its art historical context (style, movement, mode) and relate this work to the artist’s practice as a whole (you may cite the artist’s statement).
Description and Exploratory Question
Before further analysis you will provide a clear description of the work that allows the reader to visualize the work and better understand the analysis that follows: what does the viewer see? Conclude this section with a clearly stated exploratory question: the key critical question that the work of art raises for you, makes you wonder about, frustrates you, or inspires you. But don’t answer the question yet! It is this exploratory question that will guide the rest of your art review, which will be aimed at skillfully unpacking the meaning of the work to allow you lead the reader to the answer(s) to your question.
Formal and Conceptual Analysis
This section will provide the reader with greater insights and clues into the nature of your exploratory question.
Provide a formal and conceptual reading of the work using appropriate art terms that you have learned in class.
The formal and conceptual reading of the work is tied to a reading of the content of the work: What formal and conceptual strategies are used, and how do these generate your thoughts and feelings about the work? What do you think the work means? What does the artist intend, or, what do you think the artist intends through this work?
Why do you think the artist made the work this way? If the work of art is more conceptual than formal, the formal analysis can be shorter, but the description and reading of content and concept will be longer and go into more depth.
Critical Evaluation and Conclusion
In this final section you will provide a reasoned judgment of the work, describing if, if not, or to what degree the artist was successful in communicating their intended goal in making this piece. Your critical evaluation of the art work must be clearly developed out of your earlier analysis and comments, and connected explicitly to knowledge gained through your exploration of the work (i.e. the often open-ended answers to your exploratory question).
TIPS
Be sure the review has an argument and structure that holds the paper together.
Do not write the review as if the professor is your reader. Imagine you are writing to someone like you. They know a little about art but have not seen this work.
Subjective responses should not dominate the ‘voice’ of the paper. Usually, the first person (“I”) is reserved for the first and last paragraphs, or when you are describing a subjective encounter with the work.
Punk Orientalism by Garry Neil Kennedy Biographical Information
Only include biographical information on the artist if it advances your argument.
Watch out for weak opening lines: “The painting that most jumped out at me in this exhibition…”
Avoid empty and awkward exaggeration: “she is like the greatest master who ever lived;” “his amazing realism has dropped jaws all over the world.”
Watch out for vague, overly general claims and hollow truisms: “There is more to this painting than meets the eye.” “Art makes you see the world in new ways and this water colour is no exception.”
Do not open the review with a vague generalization: “…it was a work that really caught my eye.”
Avoid repetition
