Childrens Hour Play Reflective Paper What was the playwright trying to say about life?
What universal questions are raised? (i.e. Who am I? Why are we here?)
Childrens Hour Play Reflective Paper
What is the central conflict? (i.e. illusion versus reality, Fate vs. Free-will)
What is the main action? (What are the main characters trying to do?)
What impact does the play have on you and your life?
How does the play affect you emotionally? Intellectually? Philosophically?
What does it make you experience that you might not have experienced?
Did it reinforce the way you already think? Feel? Act? Behave? Believe? Conduct your life?
Did it change the way you think? Feel? Act? Behave? Believe? Conduct your life?
Did the playwright’s collaborative artists and craftspeople help you understand and enjoy the play or prevent you from doing so?
Choose at least four actors. Include their full names and the names of the characters they played. Evaluate their work using the following questions based on your observations and opinions:
Were the actors believable as the characters they were playing?
Did you identify/empathize with one (or more) of the characters?
Did they draw you into the play or were you aware they were “acting?”
Was the production unified in its vision? Did it flow seamlessly from one point to the next?
How did the design elements (Lights, sound, costumes, scenery) affect the production?
The Myth of the Strong Female Lead Understanding Social Life
What? So What? What Now?
For this assignment you will need to open one of the links below about Gender, Sex and Sexuality.
The Myth of the Strong Female Lead
In these link you will find an abundance of stories, news-clips and videos related to gender, sex and sexuality.
The Myth of the Strong Female Lead Assignment Guidelines
Your task is to select ONE story or video of interest, and respond to it in 3 paragraphs using the What, So What, What Now? approach. See below:
What? – In a paragraph, summarize what your story was was about.
So What? – In a paragraph, describe why this issue or topic is important. Make a personal connection if possible. What does this say about our society?
What Now? – In a paragraph, speculate on the future of this topic. What can be done to improve the issue in our society? What is currently being done with this issue? How will this impact our society going forward?
Here is the link for the topic
https://www.thesociologicalcinema.com/blog/the-myth-of-the-strong-female-lead
This is the title of the article I picked.
The Myth of the Strong Female Lead
Life Span Developmental Theory and Issues To help you understand and apply life span developmental theory and research to everyday issues, you will write a review paper under one of the broad life span developmental areas given below.
Life Span Developmental Theory and Issues
Your paper should focus on a particular issue within the broad topic given and discuss the general research findings related to the issue. You should end your paper with faith-informed policy recommendation/s for improving experiences within the relevant area.
Life Span Developmental Theory and Issues Essay Paper Guidelines
The paper should be 7-8 pages long (including the Title & References pages). It should be typewritten, double-spaced, in 12-point Times New Roman font. To do a good job, you should review, at least, six (6) empirical journal articles (professional research articles only; do not cite the textbook) for this paper.
Select one of the broad life span developmental topics below (in bold) and narrow it further to a specific issue (as in the italicized examples below the bolded developmental areas).
Broad Life Span Developmental Areas:
The Beginnings & Prenatal Development
g., Genetic Counselling, Behavioral Teratogens, Assisted Reproductive Techniques
Early Childhood Development
g., Socioemotional Development, Preschool Education, Parenting Practices and Styles
Middle Childhood Development
g., Educating Children with Special Needs, Standardized Testing, Electronic Bullying
Adolescent Development
g., Juvenile Offenders, High School Education, Identity Issues
Early & Middle Adulthood Development
g., Optimal Health Practices, Psychological Disorders, Generativity Concerns
Late adulthood & end of life issues
g., Elder Abuse, Neurocognitive Disorders, Euthanasia
Strategy Implementation Evaluation and Control The purpose of the Week 5 individual assignment is to allow the student to discuss and explain how the strategies discussed in prior weeks are converted into implementation activities both domestically and internationally, in alignment with legal, social and ethical considerations.
Strategy Implementation Evaluation and Control
Furthermore, the student has an opportunity to explain and discuss how the strategic plan and implementation activities will be monitored.
Strategy Implementation Evaluation and Control Assignment Description
Write a 1,050-word report on the company you selected in Week 3, following up on the Individual Assignment of Week 3 (Environmental Scanning), and Week 4 (Strategy Formulation), and address the following:
Strategy Implementation
Discuss International Strategy.
Discuss Strategic Implementation.
Explain the influence of Governance and Ethics.
Discuss the Company Social Value.
Discuss Innovation and Diversification.
Discuss Legal limitations.
Evaluation and Control
Explain Strategic Metrics.
Discuss Key Financial Ratios.
Restorative Justice and the State Critical Essay 2 – Finding the Balance: Restorative Justice and the State – Drawing on the different principles and theories of restorative justice that we have examined – values, processes, relationships, emotional dynamics, healing and community building – develop a rational for the place for restorative justice within a State based justice system.
Restorative Justice and the State Critical Essay
Restorative Justice and the State Critical Essay Questions
As you write consider the following questions:
How do you define restorative justice? Who participates in restorative justice? What are the emotional dynamics of restorative justice? Why are emotions important in bringing justice home? How does restorative justice strengthen our justice system? What is the relationship between restorative justice and the rule of law? What are the limits and challenges of restorative justice? How do these strengths, limits and challenges compliment the strengths, limits and challenges of the retributive system? Why does our justice system need to be trauma informed? What is the role of community?
Restorative Justice and the State Critical Essay Required Readings
Braithwaite, J. (2002). Setting Standards for Restorative Justice. British Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 563-577.
Braithwaite, V., Huang, H., & Reinhart, M. (2013). ‘Love thy neighbour’ values, needs and willingness to participate in restorative justice: A survey of Australian and Japanese victims and offenders. Restorative Justice: An International Journal 1(1), 91-121.
Llewellyn, J. J., Archibald, B. P., Clairmont, D., & Crocker, D. (2013). Imagining success for a restorative approach to justice: Implications for measurement and evaluation. Dalhousie Law Journal, 36(2), 281-316.
Luzon, G. (2016) Restorative justice and normative responsibility, Restorative Justice, 4:1, 27-40, DOI: 10.1080/20504721.2016.1149377
Braithwaite, J. (2000). Shame and Criminal Justice. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 42(3), 281-298.
Harris, N., Walgrave, L., & Braithwaite, J. (2004). Emotional Dynamics in Restorative Conferences. Theoretical Criminology, 8(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480604042243
http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1401/shame-anger-and-guilt-the-hierarchy-of-emotions-in-restorative-justice DuFour, S. N. (2016).
Sherman, L. (2003). Reason for Emotion: Reinventing Justice with Theories, Innovations and Research. The American Society of Criminology 2002 Presidential Address. Criminology, 41, 1-38.
Randall, M. & Haskell, L (2013). Trauma-Informed Approaches to Law: Why Restorative Justice Must Understand Trauma and Psychological Coping. Dalhousie Law Journal. 36(2), 501-533.
Elmar G. M. Weitekamp & Stephan Parmentier (2016) Restorative justice as healing justice: looking back to the future of the concept, Restorative Justice, 4:2, 141-147,
Van Camp, T. (2016) The role of community in restorative justice, Restorative Justice, 4:3, 435-438
Boyes-Watson, C. & Pranis, K. (2012). Science Cannot Fix This: The Limitations of Evidence-Based Practice. Contemporary Justice Review, 15(3), 265-275.
Focus PDCA Cycle PowerPoint Presentation Project Assessment 3 : Final Project
Type of Assessment : Research Project
Assessment tool : Power point presentation
Format : 24 minimum points
Focus PDCA Cycle PowerPoint Presentation Project
Presentation length : 10-15 minute (oral presentation)
This is an individual project. Each learner will
1. Design the quality improvement project. Learners will develop an FOCUS PDCA cycle as an improvement methodology that organisation can use to guide their improvement efforts.
2. Learners need to find opportunity for improvement and apply FOCUS PDCA methodology.
3. Problem can be real-life event or fiction; derived from the imagination or both.
Assessment Text
Assess the quality improvement program in institution of your choice.
1. Identify problem as well as implementation details.
2. Methodically discuss process of problem solving
3. Present data in appropriate format
4. Analyze and interpret data
5. Present conclusions and recommendations
6. Use appropriate references
7. Use APA reference format
8. Prepare power point presentation, for oral presentation
Summary about my field of work and a few pointers.
In my research project, my position in the organization will be of a senior purchasing officer in Supply Chain Management. My topic for this research project “is examining delays in the delivery of items under supply management”.
Complimentary modality and Traditional Intervention Compare and contrast the complimentary modality with traditional interventions for an illness/diagnosis/condition or symptom.
Complimentary modality and Traditional Intervention
Discuss the benefits and risks of both the traditional and the complementary/integrative interventions.
Ascertain how you can combine both traditional and holistic interventions/modalities to achieve optimal client outcomes.
Contact and interview a qualified practitioner of a chosen modality. Experience the modality yourself, if possible.
The paper is to be written in APA format. The length is to be a minimum of 4-5 pages excluding the title page and references. The definition of CAM is somewhat arbitrary. According to the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), CAM refers to healthcare systems, practices, and products that are not considered part of conventional medicine.
Guided Argumentative Research Essay Choose a clear and arguable position. According to Bullock et al. in The Norton Field Guide to Writing with Readings and Handbook, an arguable position means “a position (which) reflect(s) one of at least two points of view, making reasoned argument necessary” (169).
Guided Argumentative Research Essay
Try to choose a substantive issue that intrigues you. Don’t forget to use the rhetorical appeals of ethos, pathos, and logos to reach your audience. Similarly, a “trustworthy tone” is important because it shows readers you are fair-minded and honest (169). Essentially, you are choosing a side on an issue and explaining to the reader WHY you believe your position is correct based upon your evidence.
Persuasive Paper on Guided Argumentative Research Essay
This is a persuasive paper.
Be sure to include the necessary background information (context) so that readers can understand the topic. Provide sound reasons to back up your position. Give “convincing evidence” to back up your reasons, including “facts, statistics, expert testimony, anecdotal evidence, case studies, textual evidence” (169). The evidence you use must include a minimum of four academic sources—dating back to 2000 and no earlier—in a thoughtful way. Your essay must also include one counterargument (the opposite view of your position), as well as your rebuttal (response) to this opposing viewpoint.
Follow MLA formatting standards, including the use of signal phrases to identify new sources, proper in-text citations, and Works Cited pages.
Learning to Think Things through Review Paper Assignment Details
For your unit 4 assignment paper, go to the Library. Download a peer reviewed research related journal article that is of interest to you and your chosen specialization and future profession.
Learning to Think Things through Review Paper
The article must review a specific research study (i.e., with a specific research hypothesis, do not use an article which is a review of the literature).
In completing this assignment, you will be asked to utilize and demonstrate use of all skills gained over Units 1 through 4.
Using the “Critical Writing: Using the Core Process to Write a Paper (pgs 190 – 195) from our textbook “Learning to Think Things Through: A guide to critical thinking across the curriculum” critically work through the six step process on analyzing the article and writing a critical review of the article. Make sure you are incorporating the circle of elements (Chapter 2) SEE-I method (Chapter 1) and the Standards Check (Chapter 4). These steps will be your guide as you read, reflect, evaluate, analyze, apply and write a critical review of your chosen article.
To complete this Assignment, please use the Unit 4 Template. Refer to the Unit 4 assignment grading rubric found in Course Resources to understand how your paper will be graded.
Learning to Think Things through Review Paper Guidelines
Your paper should be 4 – 5 pages (double spaced, 1” margins) in length, not including the title page or reference page. No abstract is required. You should be able to demonstrate graduate school level of writing, with clear, concise scholarly writing, free of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. Your paper should be formatted using APA style (6th edition) with proper page formatting, title page formatting, headings, in text citations, and reference list. You must include at least two scholarly resources, your chosen article and one other resource. You may use one of the course textbooks or other scholarly resource to support your paper.
Analyzing Reasoning on Both sides This final writing assignment allows you to present an analysis of the best reasoning on each side of your issue.
Analyzing Reasoning on Both Sides
In the process, you will get to demonstrate some of the key skills you have learned during this course. In particular, you will demonstrate the ability to create high-quality arguments on both sides of an issue, to support your reasoning with scholarly sources, and to provide a fair analysis of the strength of the reasoning on each side. Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered from, or generated by, observation, experience, reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief and action
