First Amendment to Constitution States

First Amendment to Constitution States
First Amendment to Constitution States

First Amendment to Constitution States

The First Amendment to the Constitution states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” In 2015, Presidential candidate Donald Trump proposed that he would consider shutting down mosques in the United States. Now that Donald Trump is president assume for the purposes of this assignment that he created an executive order mandating the closure of all mosques.

Consider Donald Trump’s statements from a Constitutional perspective. Would Trump’s policies violate the First Amendment? Explain.

Suppose you are the lawyer involved in this case. Which side would you choose to represent, the U.S. Government as the defendant or the congregation of a Muslim mosque as the plaintiffs?

After deciding your position, please make arguments on behalf of your client (either the U.S. Government or the Muslim Congregation). Explain your position using your interpretation of the Constitution and relevant case law.

Your paper must be at least 1000 words.
Please double space your paper and use standard 12 point font.
Make sure to proofread your paper before submitting.
Please follow APA format when referencing information from outside sources.
Make sure to reference at least three (3) outside sources.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Texas Constitution and Safety Resource Portfolio

The Texas Constitution and Safety Resource Portfolio Based on your research and the information you gathered, describe the development, purpose, and attributes of the Texas Constitution, and explain the importance of political history on shaping modern day politics, culture, and government

The Texas Constitution and Safety Resource Portfolio
The Texas Constitution and Safety Resource Portfolio

Prompt: Choose one constitution. Based on your research and the information you gathered, describe the development, purpose, and attributes of the Texas Constitution, and explain the importance of political history on shaping modern day politics, culture, and government

The Texas Constitution and Safety Resource Portfolio

When completing your essay, you must provide in-text citations for any work that is directly quoted or paraphrased. However, you do not need to put the direct citation next to each piece of information that you include in your chart. Bibliographic citations on your bibliography will suffice. When writing your essay, respond to the prompt thoroughly, and completely.

Your response should be your own thoughts and analysis. Citations may be formatted in APA, MLA or Chicago style, as long as they are consistent throughout. Research and resources should be incorporated with the scholarly application. I.e. used as examples or evidence to support your analysis. Make sure to use complete sentences and proper grammar. Your response to the prompt should focus on analyzing the information you gather and use to complete the constitutional chart through the application. Incorporate the information you gathered by using it to provide examples and support for your response to the prompt.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Japanese Constitution Essay Paper

The Japanese Constitution Students are asked to write a 5-page, double-spaced “opinion” analyzing a critical issue in Japanese politics and presenting a particular point of view (similar to an “Op-Ed”* in the New York Times, only longer).

The Japanese Constitution
The Japanese Constitution

Please select one of the topics below. Although this is an opinion piece, you should feel free to use the library and/or the Internet to gather material and the opinions of others on the topic you have chosen. Be sure, however, that you cite your sources and provide proper footnotes. Meiji Constitution, the constitution of Japan from 1889 to 1947. After the Meiji Restoration (1868), Japan’s leaders sought to create a constitution that would define Japan as a capable, modern nation deserving of Western respect while preserving their own power.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Land Use and the Constitutions Case Briefs

Land Use and the Constitutions Case Briefs The brief must have the following seven components:

Land Use and the Constitutions
Land Use and the Constitutions

1) Title and Citation: This is the name of the case and its citation.

Example: Dolan v. The city of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (1994)

2) Facts: This is a short summary of the events that led to the case-identify original plaintiff and defendant and include only the most important details in terms of land use planning.

This should be a few sentences

3) Lower Court History of Procedure: What happened in the lower courts?

How did each court decide on the issue? List each court and its finding. This can be a bullet-point list.

4) Issue(s): This is the legal question (or questions) that the court is trying to answer in this case. Phrase each issue as a question of land-use planning. Make sure there is enough detail beyond “is it constitutional?” Also, make sure that it is a legal issue, rather one.

  1. For example, the following would not be a good statement of the issue: i. “Did the zoning ordinance violate the defendants” constitutional rights under the 5th amendment?
  2. This statements would be better:
  3. “In order to not be a taking, must the condition, for granting a permit for restricted land use, be substantially related to the reason for the land use restriction?”

5) Holding: This is the answer that the court has given to the issues. It should be one word for each issue: either “yes” or “no.”

6) Reasoning: This is the reasons that the court has given for its opinion. It will often be the lengthiest part of your brief, but it should not exceed a few paragraphs. Answer the question: “Why did the court decide the way it did?”

Don’t use exact quotes in this section: paraphrase and condense into your own words.

7) Planning Essentials: What do you think are the knowledge or skills issues for the planning profession? That is, what is the essential “lesson learned” from this case? This should focus on the applied planning aspects of the lesson.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

US Constitution and Marbury v Madison

US Constitution and Marbury v Madison Read Article III of the US Constitution and Marbury vs Madison.

US Constitution and Marbury v Madison
US Constitution and Marbury v Madison

500+ words Bluebook citation and in-text references Read Article III of the US Constitution and Marbury versus Madison. We will be discussing the role and authority of the judiciary.

Many argue we have problems with judicial activism.

For your initial forum post discuss:

1) What was the ruling in Marbury versus Madison and how did it change the role of the judiciary?

2) What is judicial activism v judicial restraint? Do we have judicial activism in the courts today? If so, is it a problem and how can it be fixed?

Declaration of Constitutional Principles

Declaration of Constitutional Principles The Southern Manifesto (officially known as the Declaration of Constitutional Principles) was a document written in 1956 in direct response to the Brown v. Board of Education decision in the Supreme Court to order the desegregation of public schools.

Declaration of Constitutional Principles
Declaration of Constitutional Principles

It argues that this decision was unconstitutional and was an example of the abuse of judicial power. It was signed by 101 members of Congress from Southern states. This infamous document began the push for Massive Resistance to desegregation.

Read the document below. To expand the selection, click on the “+” on the right. Take your time with this source and read it carefully to be sure you understand it.

The Southern Manifesto

Read the document provided above.

Write a 600-word essay that addresses the following prompt: Describe the main arguments of the Southern Manifesto. What were their stated reasons for opposing the decision, and what were their other motivations? Using recent news articles, describe how the ideas of this document are still a part of American politics today.

You may use your course materials as you research this topic in addition to the outside research you will need to do to find a current event. Be sure to consider the historical and philosophical context of all documents. (Read your current events with an eye toward possible bias.)

Your paper should be formatted using proper MLA citation style and typed in a Microsoft Word document using 12-pt Times New Roman and double-spaced.

All sources should be referenced using the proper MLA format.

Your paper should have a clear structure. Write an introductory paragraph with a strong thesis statement, one or two body paragraphs defending your thesis using examples and evidence, and a concluding paragraph that restates and summarizes your major points.

Proofread your paragraph carefully, making sure you have followed the standard rules for grammar, spelling, punctuation, and capitalization.

Compare Articles of Confederation with US Constitution

Compare Articles of Confederation with US Constitution US History Compare and Contrast the Articles of Confederation with the U.S. Constitution
Compare and contrast the Articles of Confederation with the U.S. Constitution.

Compare Articles of Confederation with US Constitution
Compare Articles of Confederation with US Constitution

Evaluate the extent to which the Articles of Confederation were effective in solving the problems of the new nation.
Why did the articles fail?
How did the Constitution fix those problems?
Specifications:
5 full pages; not including the title or reference pages. The paper must include a thesis statement.
Use specific examples to support your argument and cite all sources carefully.
This is not a summary of the two primary source documents, but an analysis of their similarities, differences, and effectiveness.
Make sure to show thought and analysis throughout the paper in detail.
Must be in APA format with in-text citations from at least 3 credible sources.
Please include the url and/or website address in which you retrieve your information.

US Constitution the Declaration of Independence

US Constitution the Declaration of Independence For this assignment, you will read the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and Thomas Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists in 1802.

US Constitution the Declaration of Independence
US Constitution the Declaration of Independence

Once you have read these founding documents and Jefferson’s letter, you will write a 2–3-page paper (double-spaced, 1-inch margins) adhering to the format specified in the Course Style Guidelines document, comparing each of them. When comparing the U.S. Constitution and Declaration of Independence, pay particular attention to the themes apparent in both documents and comment on which document came first and why that is important.
You must also answer the question, “What do you think the signers of the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution thought about the separation of church and state or about the separation of God from the government?” (Note: these are not the same thing.)
Be sure to incorporate a biblical worldview in your paper. Use the Course Style Guidelines document for the correct formatting.
GRADING RUBRIC
1. Compare/contrast pints are clearly and correctly composed. Biblical concepts are integrated.
2. An understanding of the 2 documents and the interrelationship between the two. Also a good understanding of Jefferson’s Letter to the Danbury Baptists and how it relates to the other two documents.
3. Assignment meets length criteria 2-3 pages. No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.
4. Citations and format are in accordance with the Course Style Guidelines. Cover page, in-text citations, and Bibliography are correctly formatted. Paper is double-spaced with 1-inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.

Applying and Granted Citizenship in United States

Applying and Granted Citizenship in United States Your supervising attorney, Sue Emaul, came to you with a challenge. Some old clients, Mr. and Mrs. Wang, have returned and asked if we could handle a current legal issue for them.

Applying and Granted Citizenship in United States
Applying and Granted Citizenship in United States

The firm handled their prenuptial agreement twelve years ago and now, Mr. Horatio Wang, who is from Canada, would like to become a U.S. Citizen. The Wangs are currently living in Colorado where Mrs. Wang is a Professor of Women’s Studies at a local university and Mr. Wang is a researcher at the university cancer center. The Wangs met at a jazz club when Mr. Wang was a graduate student. He has since completed his PhD and has been credited with advancing treatment for a specialized form of cancer in his current position. He has been lawfully present in the United States from graduate school into his current status on an employment-based visa. Mrs. Elvira Wang, whose maiden name was Smith, is a U.S. citizen. The Wangs have four children, Katie,7; Salena, 5; Dewan, 4; and Devine, 4. All four children were born in Colorado, except Katie who arrived quite early while the Wangs were hiking in

Montana. Both Mr. and Mrs. Wang are active in their community and foster homeless dogs.

The Wangs were one of the first jobs for this firm and despite not handling immigration cases, Attorney Emaul has asked you to explore the requirements for Mr. Wang in seeking U.S. citizenship. Since this is an area of law that the firm is not familiar with, she would also like you to include some background on the process involved in applying for citizenship and the legal grounds under which it can be sought.

Write a 2-3 page interoffice memorandum outlining the process of applying for and being granted citizenship in the United States. Please outline the current law governing these requirements and as well as some further research on the process and what to expect when pursuing this for the client. Finally, compose a list of documents that we will need from the clients. Be sure to cite (using the Bluebook) to at least two primary sources and two secondary sources.

Applying and Granted Citizenship in United States Required Criteria

In addition to fulfilling the specifics of the Assignment, a successful paper must also meet the following criteria:

Length should be 2-3 pages, excluding cover page and references page.

Double-spaced ( and in a 12-point font.

Viewpoint and purpose should be clearly established and sustained.

An assignment should follow the conventions of Standard American English (correct grammar, punctuation, etc.).

Writing should be well ordered, logical and unified, as well as original and insightful, using headings to identify components.

Keep tone professional by avoiding I or Us statements.

Your work should display superior content, organization, style, and mechanics.

Appropriate Bluebook citation style should be followed.

 

The Exclusionary Rule and Constitutional Law IP

The Exclusionary Rule and Constitutional Law IP Find a recent case (2011 to the present) dealing with the exclusionary rule.

The Exclusionary Rule and Constitutional Law IP
The Exclusionary Rule and Constitutional Law IP

Address the following in 300–500 words: The basic facts of the case including the state, city, and whether the original trial court was a state or federal court

The legal issue(s) the court dealt with in the case

The court’s ultimate legal ruling in the case

Do you agree with the court’s ruling? Why or why not?

All sources must be referenced using APA style. The Supreme Court’s interpretations of constitutional guarantees have produced seven “exclusionary rules” which prevent prosecutors from introducing evidence of guilt in criminal trials.