Essay Questions
Write an essay on ONE of the following topics.
Your essay must be 4 to 6 pages long not including quotes from other authors.
Use a 12-point font, and double-space the lines except the space between paragraphs.
Be sure to include page references to our text, but you do not require a bibliography unless you use other sources. Use of other sources (including websites) is permitted but must be properly referred to.
Hints: (a) structure your essay into sections (b) explain all quotes (c) explain an idea by using an example of the idea – proves you really understand the idea (d) have a thesis or “pick sides” (e) but always try to explain the reasons behind…everything you say and what the authors say.
Topic Three. What is Personal Identity?
[i] State and explain Locke’s argument that we are not substances or mere souls
[ii] State and explain Locke’s concept of personal identity and its relation to what he calls self, consciousness and punishment.
[iii] State and explain Reid’s criticism of Locke’s theory of personal identity
[iv] Is Reid’s objection a good one? Discuss
Philosophical problems book
Laurence Bonjour and Ann Baker eds. Philosophical Problems; An Annotated Anthology Pearson, Longman 2008 SECOND EDITION. ISBN: 0-321-23659-9 paper
Personal Identity Read: Read: Locke and Reid pp. 215-228 19th Personal Identity Read: Williams, pp. 229-237
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Thomas Nagels Philosophy What Is like to Be Bat Write a review of Thomas Nagel’s “What is like to be bat” by indicating the most important ideas (cite from the text) and conclude by expressing your opinion about his argument.
Thomas Nagels Philosophy What Is like to Be Bat
What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” is the name of a philosophy paper written by Thomas Nagel in 1974. The paper isn’t really about the sensory world of bats; it’s a critique of reductionist theories of the mind. Nagel argues that consciousness has a subjective aspect, and that understanding other mental states is difficult or impossible for those not able to experience those mental states.
Nagel chose bats for a reason. They are mammals, and relatively closely related to humans. We have a great deal in common with bats: we are warm-blooded, care for our young, and have similar basic anatomy. But “anyone who has spent some time in an enclosed space with an excited bat knows what it is to encounter a fundamentally alien form of life,” Nagel writes. He goes on to say that bats experience a range of activity and possess a sensory apparatus so different than ours that imagining what their experiences are like is an exceptionally challenging rhetorical question.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
MAKE SURE TO ANSWER ALL THESE QUESTIONS IN THE PEER REVIEW
Does the thesis include the two specific literary devices and a universal theme?
Could the theme the student identified be more specific? Explain.
Has the student included two quotes from the story?
Has the student explained how each quote supports the thesis statement?
Identify another quote that supports the student’s theme and explain how it does so, OR identify a quote that creates a problem or seems to contradict the student’s thesis statement and explain how it does so.
Discuss the biblical quote the student has chosen and whether you agree or disagree with the student’s analysis of the biblical perspective of the poem.
Thesis: In Zora Neale Hurston’s short story “Sweat” she uses biblical allusions and characterization to show that not all free acts lead to freedom!
From the very beginning, we know that Delia is the breadwinner: She was a wash-woman, and Monday morning meant a great deal to her. She not only is well-organized, but she is strong as she works without complaint to provide for her useless husband. She is meek at first, but by the second page, she has found her voice as she has grown tired of the years of abuse when Skye’s threatens to punch her while she is working. Delia’s habitual meekness seemed to slip from her shoulders like a blown scarf. She seized the iron skillet from the stove and struck a defensive pose, which acts surprised [Sykes] greatly, coming from her. That ole snaggle-toothed black woman you runnin’ with ain’t comin’ heah to pile up on mah sweat and blood. Once he leaves, she realizes that love is lost for her and Sykesí, yet she seems to find comfort in this thought, Oh well, whatever goes over the Devil’s back, is got to come under his belly. Sometime or ruther, Sykes, like everybody else, is gointer reap his sowing.
Sykes is unfaithful, cruel, selfish, childish, and lazy. He is the best description of a modern-day Pharisee as he has no issues pointing out Delia’s every fault yet refuses to acknowledge his own. Yeah you just come from de church house on a Sunday night, but Yeah you gone to work on them clothes.You ain’t nothing but a hypocrite. He is not only physically abusive, but emotionally as well and he never misses a moment to hurt her. Well you better quit gotten me riled up, else they’ll be totin you out sooner than you expect. A’m so tired of you Ah don’t know what to do. Gawd! How Ah hates skinny women! G damn foots over you mmie some kivah heah, a git yo own side! Ah oughter mash you in yo mouf fuh drawing dat skillet on me. He decides to do away with his horrid wife by planting a venomous snake in her home and taking all the light or so he thought. Delia comes home to a dark house and can sense that Skyes has had that woman in her home, she reaches for the matches, but they are all gone except one she strikes the light and sees the snake that he has planted for her death. One match changed Skye’s plan and he reaps the rewards of a life lived without love.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Egalitarian Ethics evaluates communication by the criterion of equality.
The central question is have the conditions produced by the communication enhanced or hindered equal treatment for the individuals who are affected by it?î
Egalitarians discuss their position in contrast to two other kinds of ethics:
Egoistic ethics which asks the question, is the outcome good (or positive, or helpful, or gratifying) for the person doing the evaluating.
Altruistic ethics which is the ethic of unselfishness (choice is for the best of the other(s) without considering the needs or wants of the self)
Egalitarians theorize that human affairs are better served by an ethic that prevents the weaker or less protected members of society from being taken advantage of by stronger members.
The Philosophy of Egalitarianism
Egalitarians pose the question, do all have equal access to communication, information, channels, and interpretations that keep society viable?î
John Rawls – contemporary philosopher. In a theory of Justice (1971) he develops metaphorically a criterion called the veil of ignorance which communicator may use to evaluate their social acts.
The Philosophy of Egalitarianism
When considering how to act or speak toward others; Rawls’s theory of justice requires individuals who are self-interested in a particular social outcome to place their acts on one side of a metaphorical curtain and everyone else who could possibly be affected on the other side including themselves), regardless of race, class, gender, power, or other distinctions.
Rawls suggests that ethical communicators who are about to make a decision should remove themselves mentally from their actual circumstances in order to enter a hypothetical reality (behind the veil) from which they are as likely to emerge weak and dependent as powerful and independent.
Decisions made on one side of the veil of ignorance therefore could not take such distinctions or the biases arising from them into account. Subsequent communication decisions would potentially influence all parties equally and fairly, and justice would be the theoretical result.
As a Rawlsian egalitarian, you’d have to place that friendship on the other side of the veil and make the ethical decision on how to communicate without resource to either the fact of the friendship or your egoistic desire to maintain it. The social fact of friendship would have no fundamental relevance to the ethical decision.
The Philosophy of Egalitarianism
The right thing has more to do with maintaining a just or fair social community than it does with maintaining social privileges or special information such as who are friends and who aren’t. Such dimensions should not be critical in ethical decision making in this view.
Although the deontological, teleological and egalitarian theories of ethics are only generalizations that summarize complex systems of philosophical thought in ethics, they provide a background for our survey of ethical systems with more specific application to communication theory.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
A teaching philosophy statement is a 2-3 page, double-spaced document (APA) describing your core approach to teaching in your field. In addition, be sure to include a title page.
WRITING AN EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT
A teaching philosophy statement is a 2-3 page, double-spaced document (APA) describing your core approach to teaching in your field. In addition, be sure to include a title page.
The statement should include:
• a concise, first-person description of your teaching approach. It is important to be aware of your own educational philosophy since it helps you focus on why you may decide to become an educator/teacher.
Questions to consider:
• What is the purpose of education?
• What is your role as an educator?
• What are your beliefs about how children learn?
• How will your beliefs affect your teaching?
• How do you balance the needs of the individual learner with the needs of the classroom
community?
• What are your goals for students?
Your philosophy is a statement of personal beliefs and how these will be put into action in your classroom. It is an action plan for you rather than a theoretical essay on education.
It requires:
• an introduction
• In the body of your essay, emphasize the positive – what you are going to do to make the classroom experience a better one for students.
• a conclusion (The conclusion should be a logical summary of your philosophy.)
A few writing tips:
• Use alternate words for teacher rather than overusing the word.
• Rather than jargon, explain clearly how you are going to impact the students.
• Be specific, as generalizations come across as ‘without substance’.
• Helpful sentence openers would be: “I believe . . .” or “I will . . .” or “Students will
experience . . .” or other similar openers.
WRITING AN EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT
A teaching philosophy statement is a 2-3 page, double-spaced
document (APA) describing your core approach to teaching in your
field. In addition, be sure to include a title page.
The statement should include:
• a concise, first-person description of your teaching approach. It is important to be aware of
your own educational philosophy since it helps you focus on why you may decide to become
an educator/teacher.
Questions to consider:
• What is the purpose of education?
• What is your role as an educator?
• What are your beliefs about how children learn?
• How will your beliefs affect your teaching?
• How do you balance the needs of the individual learner with the needs of the classroom
community?
• What are your goals for students? Your philosophy is a statement of personal beliefs and how these will be put into action in
your classroom. It is an action plan for you rather than a theoretical essay on education.
It requires:
• an introduction
• In the body of your essay, emphasize the positive – what you are going to do to make the classroom experience a better one for students.
• a conclusion (The conclusion should be a logical summary of your philosophy.)
A few writing tips:
• Use alternate words for teacher rather than overusing the word.
• Rather than jargon, explain clearly how you are going to impact the students.
• Be specific, as generalizations come across as ‘without substance’.
• Helpful sentence openers would be: “I believe . . .” or “I will . . .” or “Students will experience . . .” or other similar openers.
Assessment will be based on how well you:
• Convey reflectiveness.
• Communicate that quality teaching is valued.
• Demonstrate that you are attuned to differences in student abilities, background knowledge or levels.
• Write well, clearly and succinctly.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
This assignment is designed to help you reflect on and begin to articulate your professional philosophy for an audience of future employers, parents, and/or colleagues. You will use resources from the course (and perhaps other sources as well if you choose) to justify assertions of your philosophy. Your paper should be 2 pages, double spaced.
Organize your paper in the following way:
Brief introduction of yourself and how you came to be interested in studying and becoming a professional in the field of early learning.
Hyeryeong Kwon, Junior, currently in ECFS(early childhood and family studies) major.Interested in the field of early learning and development because…
Three assertions [a confident and forceful statement of fact or belief] as to why the field of early childhood and family studies is important, and cited justification to support your argument for why they are important. Organize each assertion section by first stating your assertion and then elaborating upon it using course readings and content to support this assertion.
– please pick them from the uploaded files.
o Example: Assertion #1: Recent research has provided evidence on the importance of the first 2000 days of life: [next, elaborate on this idea using the readings or course content to support this claim/assertion and cite which sources you are using] State in what way the field of early learning is important in addressing this claim.
You must use at least 3 readings (and cite them as references within and at the end of your paper) from the course as justificationí for your philosophy’s assertions. You may also use information from other sources in the course (PowerPoint, videos from sessions, other documents) but you must choose 3 from the following readings:
Espinosa, L. (2010). The changing face of early childhood in the United States: New promises, new pitfalls. In [author] Getting it RIGHT for young children from diverse backgrounds: Applying research to improve practice (pp. 9-26). Old Tappan, NJ: Pearson.
Consider the examples of leadership demonstrated in this week’s media presentation and the other Learning Resources.
To further your self-knowledge, you are required to complete the Kiersey Temperament as indicated in this week’s Learning Resources. Consider your leadership style, including your strengths for leading others and include your results from Kiersey
Temperament Sorter to describe potential challenges related to your leadership style.
Mentally survey your work environment, or one with which you are familiar, and identify a timely issue/dilemma that requires you to perform the leadership role of moral agent or advocate to improve a situation (e.g., speaking or acting on behalf of a vulnerable patient, the need for appropriate staffing, a colleague being treated unfairly).
What ethical, moral, or legal skills, dispositions, and/or strategies would help you resolve this dilemma? Define the differences between ethical, moral, and legal leadership.
Finally, consider the values and principles that guide the nursing profession; the organization’s mission, vision, and values; the leadership and management competencies addressed in this course; and your own values and reasons for entering the profession. What motivation do you see for taking a stand on an important issue even when it is difficult to do so?
To complete:
Write a 4 to 5 page paper (page count does not include title and reference page) that addresses the following:
Introduce the conceptual frameworks of the ethical constructs of ethics, moral, or legal standards and the purpose of the paper.
Consider an ethical, moral, or legal dilemma that you have encountered in your work environment and describe it.
Analyze the moral, ethical, and legal implications utilized in this situation. Describe your role as a moral agent or advocate for this specific issue.
Consider your leadership styles identified by your self-assessment and determine if they act as a barrier or facilitation during this dilemma.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
To be presented in hard copy on the due date announced. Students are encouraged to report on a major ethical philosopher or development in the history of ethics. The paper should consist of a title page, an eight page body, and a bibliography. Be sure to:
Clearly identify the subject.
spend 3 to 4 pages on the philosopher’s biography of history of the movement.
Clearly identify his contribution to ethics, and which approach to ethics this person is identified with.
Identify opponents or counter-arguments associated with this person.
Be sure that your report includes sound research sources that are cited in the development of the report. Grammar and spelling will affect the grade.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Philosophy Benedict XVI and the Second Vatican Council
Philosophy Benedict XVI and the Second Vatican Council
There is a 600-word essay assignment which involves responding to two primary texts written by Benedict XVI and the Second Vatican Council. The essay assignment is due Tuesday, April 2nd. Essays that are late will be lowered by 5 points. The essay assignment constitutes 20% of the overall grade. Guidelines for the essay assignment are below and on the course website.
Response Essay Assignment (Shared Assignment THE 1000C)
This essay involves responding to the following two primary texts: Benedict XVI on the Identity of Humanity and The Second Vatican Council on Human Nature. These texts are located on the Blackboard website in the folder titled Response Essay Assignment.
Read the two assigned texts. In response, write a 600-word essay in which you do the following:
1) Briefly state the main idea of each reading (What is the author’s argument/main point/thesis?)
2) Briefly describe any points of agreement or disagreement (Do the authors agree or disagree? How so?)
3) Evaluate and take a position on the readings (Do you agree with one author over the other?
Why/why not? What is your own position in relation to the readings?)
PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING:
a) Formatting: When writing the essay, please double-space and use 12-point font with 1 inch margins all around. Formatting essays must follow a recognized standard format (e.g. MLA, APA).
b) Citations: All materials taken from these texts must be properly cited by using footnotes or parenthetical styles. Even when you paraphrase, you must cite sources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Case: John, a 32-year-old man complains of generalized anxiety. He describes growing up with a loving mother who was his biggest support person but she died 5 years ago from cancer. This loss is still hard for him. His father is alive and retired. John says that in his younger years his father was critical, for example when John brought home a 95% on a test, his father’s comment was “you’ll do better next time.” He states he has few friends and his romantic relationships don’t last long.
Describe the functions of the Id, Ego, and Superego in Freud’s structural theory. (1 pt)
Describe how you see these functions at work in this example. (2 pts)
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
