Management of Mega and Complex Projects

MBA MEGA projects End of term project – Group Presentation – 30% MBA MEGA projects End of term project – Report – 70%

Refer to the article for the 30% Presentation: Future of Construction_New Karolinska Hospital Case Study and follow the instructions below. For the presentation, I expect each group (to be named afterwards) to build a deck of slides.

Instructions

This presentation is 30% of your total Mark
30mn per group presentation
Groups will be identified upon the start of the class. Once selected, no modifications are allowed.
10 slides max, each student must take part in the presentation in English
Maximum 3 students in each group to mitigate concerns around no individual involvement
Answer all questions below in your analysis
Please come prepared to address questions in class.

Question 1

Discuss the idea of the project and history – 10%
Discuss The challenges of the project beyond what is mentioned in the case based on what you have learnt in class – 10%
Discuss the impact – benefits of the project – 10%
Discuss the barriers to innovation – 10%
Discuss lessons learnt – 10%

Question 2

Critically review and reflect on the outcomes in this situation – 10%
Critically appraise the complexities of management of risk (s) in this situation – 10%
Consider sustainability, corporate social responsibility and ethics across this project lifecycle. 10%
Effectively plan time-efficient and cost-effective strategies to evaluate, select, prioritize and manage the various phases and tasks – 20%

Coursework

Refere to this Article for the 70% Coursework: https://www.raconteur.net/business-innovation/the-great-ocean-clean-up-project

Written report Instructions

After a long selection process, you are hired as a Project Manager for this noble Journey with a worthwhile remuneration and you are to produce a Reflective Report (Case Study) with 4200 words. You decide to plan carefully to expose all uncertain aspects of your project and avoid expensive surprises later on. It is a reflection based on an existing case study.

I need you answer all queries below in details. Everything you write should be linked to the case and how you are planning to accomplish your objectives. Each question below is worth a mark.

SIST is strict when it comes to Plagiarism which is the wrongful stealing and publication of another author’s language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions and the representation of them as your own original work.

All 14 questions should be linked to the Ocean Clean-up project. Please note that Cardiff Met’s programs/modules are peer reviewed evidenced based with in-depth academic content and rigour.

Questions and Marking Scheme:

5% of Total mark

Reasons for the project.

Explain as expressively as possible the ultimate, “big picture” vision and purpose of your completed endeavor.

How will it look, feel, perform, increase productivity, help the end users, or otherwise benefit human kind?

This initial summary of your report is generally considered the most important. Typically 1-2 pages long, It is is often written last, after the entire plan has been finalized, these are the topics that should be addressed in this section:

Project Description
Project Planning
What are you trying to achieve?
Product or service?
Highlights of every section
Financial Highlights
Your recommendations

5% of Total mark

Objectives and constraints of the project –

What are you trying to accomplish? List the project goals and objectives in terms that are clear, concise, achievable, and measurable.

List and discuss in details project objectives.

Please note that they must be measurable and realistic.

You should talk briefly about budget, quality, and time to completion.

5% of Total mark

Who are the main stakeholders and

beneficiaries? Examples of audiences or beneficiaries include: Clients, customers, customers’ customers, local communities, wildlife, students, and specific population segments.

The groups that have a

role and interest in the objectives and implementation of a project; they include target groups, direct beneficiaries, those responsible for ensuring that the results are produced as planned, and those that are accountable for the resources that they provide to that project

5% of Total mark

Will you be creating a product or providing a service?

Results of a project relative to its immediate objectives that are generated by the project outputs.

5% of Total mark

What Methodology will You Use?

Will you start by researching your audiences’ needs? Will you use phases for design, development, implementation, pilot testing, and rollout?

Methodology is expressed as a combination of related practices, methods and processes that determine how best to plan,

develop, control and deliver a project throughout the continuous implementation process until successful completion and termination.

10% of Total mark

Will your project involve an implementation

process that might occur over many months or years? If so, what long-term phases are you anticipating? Are there critical milestones within these phases?

Please create a detailed schedule for near- term tasks you will be performing?

Project identified
Include in master plan process (key)
Determine sponsorship
Develop the concept (key)
Determine who will do the work
Get money
Find your team
Construct…
Control

5% of Total mark

Are there any benefits in teaming up with 3rd

party partners/ consultants who can offer complementary strengths or a long-term track record in an important area.

Do you anticipate joining

forces with other organizations, consultants, or agencies to complete the project? If so, what experience, expertise, credibility,

funding, or other benefits will each party bring to the table?

5% of Total mark

Special Equipment – You may require setting up a technology infrastructure to create or deliver the products or services.

Examples of items in your infrastructure might include: Servers, networks, computers and peripheral devices, and multimedia, sound, or video systems. You

may require using a certain set of software tools or a specific set of templates or techniques. It’s important to specify these at the beginning so that everyone will be clear about what’s required. Example:

e-PMO or remote PMO managed by the e.g., satellite technology for effective execution, control and monitoring of the clean up and further reflection around support technology and stage gated reviews/systems already made available for this mega project

5% of Total mark

Who will review and approve

your Decisions? Will there be a clear process for submitting items for review and approval, and a set timeframe for receiving comments back?

What protocol will you be using?

Type of communication with project sponsor/ owner and team?

10% of Total mark

Tasks – Who Will Be Responsible for What? This aspect is especially important when multiple parties will contribute to the outcome, and even more so when they are dependent on one another.

The tasks that you will allocate, are activities that need to be accomplished within a defined period of time or by a deadline to work towards work-related goals.

A task can be broken down into assignments which should also have a defined start and end date or a deadline for completion.

15% of Total mark

Risks identified and to be managed – Nothing is more difficult that anticipating, flagging, and managing potential risks to a project as a whole, or to the successful completion of your part of it.

There are many types of risks that you should reflect on. Cost risk is a major one which can lead to an escalation

of project costs due to poor cost estimating accuracy and scope creep.

Schedule risk, is when activities will take longer than expected.

You should list all risks and discuss how to mitigate each.

10% of Total mark

General overview of the budget – Financial analysis

An evaluation of

your project’s profitability or cost-effectiveness relative to some alternative project or investment.

5% of Total mark

What open issues remain open? What issues and concerns remain after all topics above have been considered?

You may be keeping a running list of unanswered questions and unknowns. What are these items, and how and when do you think they will be resolved? Do they present risks until they are answered?

10% of Total mark

Your recommendation and conclusion proposal for action to be taken in your specific circumstance, including the parties responsible for that action.

You need to pronounce your strategy and opinion on how this project would progress and conclude.

Total = 100%

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Group Project Deliverable in an MS PowerPoint Presentation

The Group Project Deliverable in an MS PowerPoint Presentation Introduction This is a Group Project. Each student will be assigned to a team to complete the Group Project.

The Group Project deliverable is an MS PowerPoint presentation slide deck that could be used to deliver a professional telecommunications presentation in a commercial business setting. Each team will select one of two mini-scenarios to be the foundation for the presentation. The completed Group Project deliverable is due by 11:59 PM Eastern Time on the due date shown in the Course Schedule. See the Additional Information section of the syllabus for the penalty for late or missed assignments and projects. The Group Project is valued at 15% of the course grade: 10% for the project deliverable and 5% for the Group Project Peer Review.

The Group Project Deliverable in an MS PowerPoint Presentation Scenarios

Scenario 1 Obsidian & Son Lumber Co. has rapidly grown to become a multistate business, and it has recently acquired Crammer’s Lumber, a smaller company with multiple outlets located in the same states. Each of the companies has its own data network. Crammer’s network connects the field offices with the databases at the main office. During its earlier expansion, Obsidian & Son’s implemented a network solution that provides mobile access to the customer database for the employees who respond to customer orders and calls. Obsidian & Son’s employees currently use laptops with wireless access cards with prepaid air time. With the acquisition of Crammer’s, Obsidian & Son’s wants to put all employees on one network and give them wireless access directly into the customer database. They would like to reduce the size of the equipment that employees must carry with them and eliminate the use of air cards. Your team will list and define the requirements, create the project steps that need to be completed, identify the technology that needs to be incorporated, identify issues and security risks, and explain how testing will be done to ensure that requirements are met and the wireless network is secure.

The Group Project Deliverable in an MS PowerPoint Presentation Requirements

The Deliverable Your team will develop an MS PowerPoint presentation that • explains the business problem, • lists the requirements, • identifies the technology solutions, • lists major project steps, • identifies issues and security risks, and • explains testing to be done to ensure that requirements are met and the network is secure. One or more of the presentation slides should contain a table with requirements and corresponding technology solutions. The presentation should also contain appropriate diagrams and illustrations. It should be designed as a professional presentation with appropriate background, fonts, titles, etc. Separate slides should be included for the cover, the list of topics covered (agenda), the body of the presentation, and the conclusion. Slides should contain the main points in bullet form, with the text of your presentation (what the speaker would say) contained in the Notes section accompanying each slide. The bolded attributes in the Scoring Rubric below must be used as major agenda items in the presentation. To fully demonstrate the effective writing learning objectives, students should use the “6/6 Rule” when writing bullets. This means that there should be no more than six meaningful words in each bullet and no more than six bullets on a slide. Presentations that do not follow this standard may not be successful. Scoring Criteria Individual Participation It is very important that all team members do their fair share of the work to complete the Group Project. At the beginning of the project, each team needs to assign team members to the following roles: • Researcher • Writer • Editor • Illustrator • Other Roles as decided by the team The work should be balanced among the team. At the conclusion of the project, each team member will rate the participation of each of the team members and themselves. These ratings will be entered into the Group Project Peer Review Form and submitted via the assignment folder in LEO. The scoring rubric for individual group participation is contained in the matrix below. Scoring Rubric for Individual Group Participation Description of Participation Score Main participant, without whom the project quality would suffer; major contributor 5 Important participant; major contributions; offered suggestions for improvements to overall project 4 Good participant; assignments completed on time; contributed to discussion of others’ input 3 Average participant; did what was assigned, but little beyond that 2 Minimal participation; little work done 1 No participation 0 Group Project Scoring Rubric The group project will be scored based on the scoring rubric below. (The instructor will determine whether all members of a group will receive the same score, or will have their scores influenced by the group members’ ratings of their individual participation.) Attribute Full points Partial points No points Possible Points Requirements analysis/ technology solution table Requirements analysis/technology solution appropriately addresses the business scenario/problem and demonstrates an understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Requirements analysis/technology solution somewhat addresses the business scenario/problem; it may be lacking in a demonstration of understanding of course concepts, analysis, and/or critical thinking. Requirements analysis/technology solution table is not included or does not identify requirements or solutions appropriate to the scenario.

The Group Project Deliverable in an MS PowerPoint Presentation Major Implementation Steps

2 Major project steps Major project steps to implement the solution are appropriately identified. Major project steps to implement the solution are partially identified and/or are somewhat appropriate. Major project steps are not included. 2 Issues and security risks identified Issues and risks of the proposed solution are appropriately identified; work demonstrates an understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Issues and risks of the proposed solution are partially identified; work may be lacking in demonstration of understanding of course concepts, analysis, and/or critical thinking. Issues and risks are not included, or do not apply to the proposed solution. 1.5 Testing strategy An effective testing strategy that tests capabilities and security is proposed; work demonstrates understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Testing strategy is not well-defined or not appropriate, and/or may be lacking in demonstration of understanding of course concepts, analysis, and/or critical thinking. No testing strategy is included. 1 Diagram Diagram(s) are included, appropriately incorporated, and enhance understanding of the solutions proposed. Diagram(s) are included, but may not be appropriately incorporated, and may not enhance understanding of solutions proposed. No diagrams are included. 1 Presentation content Sufficient narrative is included in the Notes area to fully explain the content of the presentation; work demonstrates understanding of course concepts. Narrative provided partially covers the content; work may be lacking in demonstration of course concepts. No narrative is provided in the Notes area to supplement the content on the slides. 1.5 Presentation format The presentation reflects effective organization, creative design, and correct structure of slides, grammar, and spelling; it is presented in a professional format; and references are appropriately incorporated and cited, using APA style. The presentation is not well-organized, lacks effective design, and/or contains grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or it does not follow APA style for references and citations. The presentation is extremely poorly done and does not convey the information. 1 Total points: 10The Group Project Deliverable in an MS PowerPoint Presentation Introduction This is a Group Project. Each student will be assigned to a team to complete the Group Project. The Group Project deliverable is an MS PowerPoint presentation slide deck that could be used to deliver a professional telecommunications presentation in commercial business setting. Each team will select one of two mini-scenarios to be the foundation for the presentation. The completed Group Project deliverable is due by 11:59 PM Eastern Time on the due date shown in the Course Schedule. See the Additional Information section of the syllabus for the penalty for late or missed assignments and projects. The Group Project is valued at 15% of the course grade: 10% for the project deliverable and 5% for the Group Project Peer Review. Scenarios Scenario 1 Obsidian & Son Lumber Co. has rapidly grown to become a multistate business, and it has recently acquired Crammer’s Lumber, a smaller company with multiple outlets located in the same states. Each of the companies has its own data network. Crammer’s network connects the field offices with the databases at the main office. During its earlier expansion, Obsidian & Son’s implemented a network solution that provides mobile access to the customer database for the employees who respond to customer orders and calls. Obsidian & Son’s employees currently use laptops with wireless access cards with prepaid air time. With the acquisition of Crammer’s, Obsidian & Son’s wants to put all employees on one network and give them wireless access directly into the customer database. They would like to reduce the size of the equipment that employees must carry with them and eliminate the use of air cards. Your team will list and define the requirements, create the project steps that need to be completed, identify the technology that needs to be incorporated, identify issues and security risks, and explain how testing will be done to ensure that requirements are met and the wireless network is secure. The Deliverable Your team will develop an MS PowerPoint presentation that • explains the business problem, • lists the requirements, • identifies the technology solutions, • lists major project steps, • identifies issues and security risks, and • explains testing to be done to ensure that requirements are met and the network is secure. One or more of the presentation slides should contain a table with requirements and corresponding technology solutions. The presentation should also contain appropriate diagrams and illustrations. It should be designed as a professional presentation with appropriate background, fonts, titles, etc. Separate slides should be included for the cover, the list of topics covered (agenda), the body of the presentation, and the conclusion. Slides should contain the main points in bullet form, with the text of your presentation (what the speaker would say) contained in the Notes section accompanying each slide. The bolded attributes in the Scoring Rubric below must be used as major agenda items in the presentation. To fully demonstrate the effective writing learning objectives, students should use the “6/6 Rule” when writing bullets. This means that there should be no more than six meaningful words in each bullet and no more than six bullets on a slide. Presentations that do not follow this standard may not be successful. Scoring Criteria Individual Participation It is very important that all team members do their fair share of the work to complete the Group Project. At the beginning of the project, each team needs to assign team members to the following roles: • Researcher • Writer • Editor • Illustrator • Other Roles as decided by the team The work should be balanced among the team. At the conclusion of the project, each team member will rate the participation of each of the team members and themselves. These ratings will be entered into the Group Project Peer Review Form and submitted via the assignment folder in LEO. The scoring rubric for individual group participation is contained in the matrix below. Scoring Rubric for Individual Group Participation Description of Participation Score Main participant, without whom the project quality would suffer; major contributor 5 Important participant; major contributions; offered suggestions for improvements to overall project 4 Good participant; assignments completed on time; contributed to discussion of others’ input 3 Average participant; did what was assigned, but little beyond that 2 Minimal participation; little work done 1 No participation 0 Group Project Scoring Rubric The group project will be scored based on the scoring rubric below. (The instructor will determine whether all members of a group will receive the same score, or will have their scores influenced by the group members’ ratings of their individual participation.) Attribute Full points Partial points No points Possible Points Requirements analysis/ technology solution table Requirements analysis/technology solution appropriately addresses the business scenario/problem, and demonstrates understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Requirements analysis/technology solution somewhat addresses the business scenario/problem; it may be lacking in demonstration of understanding of course concepts, analysis, and/or critical thinking. Requirements analysis/technology solution table is not included, or does not identify requirements or solutions appropriate to the scenario. 2 Major project steps Major project steps to implement the solution are appropriately identified. Major project steps to implement the solution are partially identified and/or are somewhat appropriate. Major project steps are not included. 2 Issues and security risks identified Issues and risks of the proposed solution are appropriately identified; work demonstrates understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Issues and risks of proposed solution are partially identified; work may be lacking in demonstration of understanding of course concepts, analysis, and/or critical thinking. Issues and risks are not included, or do not apply to the proposed solution. 1.5 Testing strategy An effective testing strategy that tests capabilities and security is proposed; work demonstrates understanding of course concepts, analysis, and critical thinking. Testing strategy is not well-defined or not appropriate, and/or may be lacking in demonstration of understanding of course concepts, analysis, and/or critical thinking. No testing strategy is included. 1 Diagram Diagram(s) are included, appropriately incorporated, and enhance understanding of the solutions proposed. Diagram(s) are included, but may not be appropriately incorporated, and may not enhance understanding of solutions proposed. No diagrams are included. 1 Presentation content Sufficient narrative is included in the Notes area to fully explain the content of the presentation; work demonstrates understanding of course concepts. Narrative provided partially covers the content; work may be lacking in demonstration of course concepts. No narrative is provided in the Notes area to supplement the content on the slides. 1.5 Presentation format The presentation reflects effective organization, creative design, and correct structure of slides, grammar, and spelling; it is presented in a professional format; and references are appropriately incorporated and cited, using APA style. The presentation is not well-organized, lacks effective design, and/or contains grammar and/or spelling errors; and/or it does not follow APA style for references and citations. The presentation is extremely poorly done and does not convey the information. 1 Total points: 10

Project on Inventing a Quality Of Life Measurement

Project on Inventing a Quality Of Life Measurement Think about the way most countries measure the quality of life. Some countries determine the market value of all final goods and services and divide it by the population.

In other words, most countries use the GDP per capita. Several disadvantages occur when using the GDP per capita. For that reason, some people have tried to think of other ways to measure the quality of life that address these limitations and even include other factors. For this project, invent a measure of well-being that differs from the GDP per capita.
OBJECTIVES
Define quality of life.
Select the factors that describe the quality of life.
Invent a new measurement for well-being.
Materials
For this project, you will need:
Computer and/or paper and pencil
Project
Based on your understanding of the components of GDP per capita and the alternative measurements that include other factors used to describe the quality of life, determine what quality of life means and how to measure it. Remember, the measure of well-being should be different from the GDP per capita.
As you complete each step of this assignment, save your work on your own computer, as you will turn in all of your answers together for the final project.
1. Jot down three to four sentences to define a quality of life, and note one example that supports your definition. Your definition should reflect your personal belief about what quality of life means to you. This will help you develop your personal statement for the project.
2. Research alternative measurements of quality of life. Gather more information about how a country’s quality of life can be measured. Consider how sources affect your personal views. When researching, be sure to follow these guidelines, to ensure your sources are reputable:

The source clearly identifies who the author is.
The source’s author has expertise in the field in which the person is writing. For instance, if you are reading a source on an environmental issue, you would want the author to be someone who has research experience with the topic.
The source is academic, meaning it is published by a respected site or source in the field of studies, such as an official government Web site, a university, academic journals, or reputable news sources.
The source does not state opinions as facts.
The source clearly cites where its information came from.
The source is current and does not include dated information.
Be sure to use at least two sources to support your views. You will need to cite them later, so copy down their information.
3. Once you have completed your research, list three alternative factors you would use to measure the quality of life. After each, explain why this factor is important using the information, you have found from an outside source. For example, suppose you choose education as a factor. Then, your sentence could be about measuring the number of people who finished high school.
Cite your sources for each factor. It is OK if your opinions have changed after completing your research.
4. Now that your opinion is researched, you will discuss your ideas with your peers. Remember the following differences between discussions and debates.
The discussion is collaborative: Multiple sides work toward shared understanding.
The debate is oppositional: Two opposing sides try to prove each other wrong.
In the discussion, one listens to understand, to make meaning, and to find common ground.
In the debate, one listens to find flaws, to spot differences, and to counter arguments.
Discussion enlarges and, possibly, changes a participant’s point of view.
Debate affirms a participant’s point of view.
The discussion reveals assumptions for examination and re-evaluation.
Debate defends assumptions as truth.
Discussion creates an open-minded attitude, an openness to being wrong and an openness to change.
Debate creates a close-minded attitude, a determination to be right.
In the discussion, one submits one’s best thinking, expecting that other people’s reflections will help improve it rather than threaten it.
In the debate, one submits one’s best thinking and defends it against a challenge to show that it is right.
5. After you have discussed your ideas with your peers take a minute to reconsider your own opinions. Ask yourself the following questions.
Did your opinion change?
What factors, such as more reputable sources or convincing discussions, caused your shift in opinion?
In the space below:

Add your original definition of quality of life from step 1.
Add your list of factors to determine quality of life and your sources from step 3.
Reflect on your peer discussion and answer the following questions in complete, complex sentences.
Did your opinions change?
Did your peers’ opinions and sources change your mind about some or all of your factors? Explain why.
If your opinion changed, identify what changed and why. If it did not, explain why.
What would you like to do next?

Project management plan Case Scenario

Can you please describe the key technologies for the project management plan for Campbell soup company?

Share any new ideas, approaches, or tactics from creating your new business proposal and the project management plan to implement the proposal.

What are the key technologies needed for the success of your business opportunity and how will you manage these technologies?
What would you do differently now during the design and development work early in the process?
How will your project management plan prepare you for your professional life and your remaining educational experiences?

In response to your classmates’ posts, compare and contrast your course reflections with their ideas. How are they similar/different?

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Operations Research Project. (Industrial Engineering)

Operations Research Project

Operations Research Project. (Industrial Engineering)

Project Description:

You have recently been hired as an intern by GCM, a prestigious consulting firm. Congratulations! The company now assigned you to work for Steelco Inc., which manufactures I, W, U, H, and L beams. You are required to help Steelco develop an optimized work schedule for the plant over the next 12 months. Last year, under a similar demand and without any optimization tools, the company cleared around $40,000,000 in profits from these five products.
To manufacture beams, Steelco purchases recycled steel for $400/ton and new steel for $600/ton. Due to the quality of the steel, only 80% of the recycled steel can be used to produce the products. Furthermore, at most 6,000 tons of recycled steel can be purchased each month and only 5,000 tons of new steel can be purchased at any month.
Each ton of I, W, U, H, and L beams that is produced is sold by the price described in Table 1. Due to quality requirements, at least 40%, 20%, 60%, 10%, and 25% of I, W, U, H, and L beams, respectively, must be manufactured from new steel.

Each ton of product held over in inventory from one month to the next month costs the company $40/ton. If demand at each month is not met, then there is a penalty cost of $100/ton for I beams, $300/ton for W beams, $250/tons for U beams, $600/ton for H beams, and $1000/ton for L beams. In such a case, the item is placed on back order and the order must be shipped to the customer at some future time. Demand of each product over the next 12 months is shown in Table 2. You must assume that you have nothing in inventory or items that are back ordered, and that you must end at the end of the 12th month with the same condition.

Report:

As a standard policy of GCM, you need to prepare a report to Steelco Inc. Standard format, margins, and appropriate grammar are expected. The format of the report is a one-page executive summary and a technical report (no page limit).
The executive summary is intended for the CEO of Steelco Inc. and is designed to convince him/her that your solution is better than the status quo. That is, the executive summary should include all information you feel is pertinent to your answer and should be written so that an educated (not necessarily technical) person can read, understand, and be convinced to follow your advice. The executive summary should contain proper statement of the problem, main details of the analysis, results, and recommendation(s).

The technical report is intended to someone from either GCM or Steelco who has expertise in industrial engineering and operations research. This person will read the technical report to validate your methodologies and verify the correctness of your decisions. You may want to include the reasons and justification of your decisions. The technical report should include an introduction, description or statement of the problem, assumptions, mathematical model, computer implementation, results, analysis and interpretation of results, recommendation(s), and conclusion. These documents must be well-written and formatted professionally.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Genetically Modify Wine Yeast Hypothesis

Genetically Modify Wine Yeast Hypothesis overexpression of GDP1 gene combined with deletion of ALD6 gene in wine yeast strain can decrease the yield of alcohol production throughout the winemaking process.

Experimental design: by overexpressing GDP1 gene which is primarily responsible for encoding isozymes glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase, the yield of glycerol production will increase significantly and enhanced acetic acid production which results in decreased ethanol yield. However, in order to reverse the negative impact of a high concentration of acetic acid, we will delete the ALD6 gene which encodes for aldehyde dehydrogenase. For mass production of lactic acid, we newly constructed a transgenic wine yeast strain that included six copies of the bovine l-lactate dehydrogenase gene on the genome.

Strategy Implementation for Multinational

Strategy Implementation for Multinational Description
Strategy Implementation for Multinational Companies
(1) watch the conversation with Dr. Kirk Fleming, AVP at ResourcePro (Video Link): https://unl.box.com/s/u08xyv0qdd89xjv6qlxo7acr2vk4z9cn
(2) read Chapter 11 of the text
Select any TWO discussion questions at the end of the chapter (Page 476), and post your answers to the questions as your original post.

Be sure to type the question first before pasting your answer directly below each question.
After watching the video, answer the following question:
If Kirk hired you to train his Chinese employees to become “soft and flexible thinkers,” what content would you cover, and how would you deliver the content? Are there concepts from the chapters you have read in this module that would help?

Project Scheduling and Documentation

Project Scheduling and Documentation One of the most important documents in a project is the kickoff presentation.

Because this document formally begins, or “kicks off,” project development, it can only be created after the project has been planned, approvals have been obtained, and personnel are in place. A good kickoff presentation communicates succinctly to all attendees what needs to be accomplished to complete the project, in what order, and by whom. It sets expectations and, ideally, energizes project team members. The desired outcome of a project kickoff presentation is for team members to begin tackling the first defined project tasks and know whom to contact if they encounter delays.

Project Scheduling and Documentation Assignment Guidelines

For this assignment, you will create a kickoff presentation in Microsoft® PowerPoint® based on the draft project plan you created in the Week 1 Project Plan Draft individual assignment.
To complete this assignment:
Review the “Kickoff Presentation” section in Ch. 9, “Communication; Project Communication Strategy; from Project Kickoff to Daily Meetings,” of The Complete Software Project Manager: Mastering Technology from Planning to Launch and Beyond.
Create an 8- to 9-slide project kickoff presentation in Microsoft® PowerPoint® similar to this Project Kickoff sample template. The kickoff presentation you create should include details pertaining to the project you defined in the Week 1 Project Plan Draft assignment, including budget details as appropriate. Specifically, your presentation should include:
A high-level project definition
Business case (a description of the business problem/opportunity the plan is designed to solve/exploit)
Project approach
Description of team members and roles
Project scope
Out of scope
Timeline
Budget and budget reporting
Risks, cautions, and disclaimers

Business Case Development for Project Management

Business Case Development for Project Management Using social media as a means of communication strategy to provide solution to the issues that are causing decrease in efficiency and productivity.

use dynamic modeling, diff financial metrics and other soft system approaches to be suggested, use cash flow on excel to compare business as usual, proposed and incremental cash flow to compare at least 3 e.g. twitter, google drive, and SharePoint and recommend SharePoint, there benefits, advantages and disadvantages. More Business Case Development for Project Management details would be attached.

Business Case Development for Project Management Writer Specifications and Guidelines

Writer must be UK based and prince2 certified and also must have written business cases for project managements. Using social media as a means of communication strategy to provide solution to the issues that are causing decrease in efficiency and productivity.
use dynamic modeling, diff financial metrics and other soft system approaches to be suggested, use cash flow on excel to compare business as usual, proposed and incremental cash flow to compare at least 3 e.g. twitter, google drive, and SharePoint and recommend SharePoint, there benefits, advantages and disadvantages. More Business Case Development for Project Management details would be attached.
Writer must be UK based and prince2 certified and also must have written business cases for project managements. Using social media as a means of communication strategy to provide solution to the issues that are causing decrease in efficiency and productivity.
use dynamic modeling, diff financial metrics and other soft system approaches to be suggested, use cash flow on excel to compare business as usual, proposed and incremental cash flow to compare at least 3 e.g. twitter, google drive, and SharePoint and recommend SharePoint, there benefits, advantages and disadvantages. More Business Case Development for Project Management details would be attached.
Writer must be UK based and prince2 certified and also must have written business cases for project managements.

Essay and Poster Research Analysis

Essay and Poster Research Analysis I. Modify essay that will be faxed to you to reflect research results.

Research on facebook use was done via survey monkey looking at how a students year of college affects how often they change their “status” on Facebook through correlation.The sections to be modified are the Hypothesis, Method section, result, procedure, and discussion. Subjects were only from the college of saint elizabeth and the survey was done via the internet on survey monkey students were not gathered in a computer lab to take survey and no water was provided students were only given extra credit if they participated. Subjects were only from the college of saint elizabeth and the survey was done via the internet on survey monkey students were not gathered in a computer lab to take survey and no water was provided students were only given extra credit if they participated. Essay and Poster Research Analysis

Essay and Poster Research Analysis Thesis Statement

The discussion section will contain this statement: Due to an error in the online survey all data was not able to be collected so instead of looking at original hypothesis it as been modified to also look at how the correlation of a student’s year in college affect how often their status on facebook was changed. Essay and Poster Research Analysis For the result section it should reflect that the correlation between the two are moderate R=.47, p<.05(shows moderate correlation) Subjects were only from the college of saint elizabeth and the survey was done via the internet on survey monkey students were not gathered in a computer lab to take survey and no water was provided students were only given extra credit if they participated. Subjects were only from the college of saint elizabeth and the survey was done via the internet on survey monkey students were not gathered in a computer lab to take survey and no water was provided students were only given extra credit if they participated. Essay and Poster Research Analysis