1. Explain the main features of ethics of care (maternal ethics) and power-focused (ethics of justice). Next, describe the three feminist positions on the relationship between these two, and a key argument supporting each. Finally, what is your view and why. (See readings on Feminist ethics listed in the Schedule)
2. Explain key features of Natural Law according to Aquinas and show how Martin Luther King Jr. in his Letter from the Birmingham Jail used them to justify breaking some laws while following others. (See readings on Natural Law in Schedule, consult lecture notes, MLK’s letter is pages 626-628 ethics in the Schedule)
3. Offering evidence from the text and lecture, discuss in what ways Marx’s features of capitalism (p 602) and his predictions (p 49) do or do not apply today. Explain and include his concept of alienated labor (p 47-48) in your answer.
4. Briefly define the welfare state and the minimal state, with the values each embrace, and what each would view as distributive injustice. Explain Rawls plans to update the social contract. Also include how he avoids the extremes of collectivism and individualism while integrating what he thinks are the best features of each. This requires treatment of his two principles of justice. (See readings on Rawls, distributive justice, spectrum of views listed in the Schedule)
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Using the prompts below, choose one and write an essay (approximately 1000 words). Read the grading rubric BEFORE writing so that you are sure to address all four elements of the grading rubric. Your essay MUST be submitted in one of the following formats (.doc, .docx, .rtf, .pdf). Failure to do so will count as a NON-SUBMISSION. This also means that you cannot type the essay directly into ecampus. YOU MUST SAVE YOUR ESSAY IN ONE OF THOSE FORMATS AND ATTACH IT TO THE LINK ABOVE (Where the word “Essay” is underlined above.) If you do not know what this means or how to save your work as one of those files, see me or email me immediately. Not knowing how will not be an excuse to allow late work. The essay will go through software that will test for plagiarism. Be sure that when you write your essay you do not use material from other sources without citing them. Doing so is cheating and grounds for a 0.
Write your essay as if you are writing to a friend who missed class on the day this was discussed. There is no bibliography or works cited page required. You may write in first person or even write the essay as if it were a letter to your “friend” from class.
The essay should be double spaced and in a readable font (10pt. and 12pt. are best)
PROMPTS:
Are Sartre and Smullyan right that it is impossible for anything that is self-conscious not to have free will? Explain and evaluate your position.
Is it reasonable to believe something when you do not have sufficient evidence? Explain and evaluate your position.
More Ruberics:
#1: Describe, identify and explain two or more different philosophical positions and the relevant philosophical concepts.
As I grade, I will ask myself, “How well did you describe and explain both positions (either two different positions or an argument and counterargument)? How clear and accurate are your explanations and the use of the relevant philosophical terms/concepts?”
5 Provides clear, accurate and full explanations of each philosophical position.
4 Provides mostly clear, accurate and full explanations of each philosophical position.
3 (a) Provides a clear and accurate explanation of one position and a poor explanation of the second position or (b) provides explanations for both positions that are unclear and/or incomplete and/or inaccurate.
2 (a) Fails to provide an explanation for one of the two theories or (b) provides poor explanations of both positions.
1 (a) Fails to provide an explanation for one of the two theories and (b) provides a poor explanation for the other position.
0 The essay was not on the topic or there was no essay at all
#2: Apply critical thinking skills by analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of philosophical positions or theories and by writing a clear and coherent essay. As I grade, I will ask myself, “Did you explain the issue to be considered? How well do you analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the theories or positions? And how clear and coherent is your overall presentation?”
5 Gives coherent and consistent reasoning throughout the essay and a clear and comprehensive explanation of the issue to be considered. Also provides a coherent analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the positions at issue.
4 Uses generally coherent and consistent reasoning throughout the essay and a clear, but not necessarily comprehensive, explanation of the issue to be considered. Also provides a coherent analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the positions at issue.
3 Uses some coherent and consistent reasoning that either contains clear weakness in reasoning or fails to explain the issue to be considered. Also fails to provide a coherent analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the positions at issue.
2 Uses some coherent and consistent reasoning that contains clear weakness in reasoning and fails to explain the issue to be considered. Also, fails to provide a coherent analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the positions at issue.
1 Uses incoherent and inconsistent reasoning that also fails to explain the issue to be considered. Also fails to provide the strengths and weaknesses of the positions at issue.
0 The essay was not on the topic or there was no essay at all
#3: Create an informed personal response to a philosophical issue by developing and defending a personal opinion to the selected philosophical problem. As I grade, I will ask myself, “Did you develop a personal opinion? How well did you defend why you believe what you believe? Have you explained a rational, but opposing view? Have you explained the assumptions behind your position (and that of the opposing view)? And how your position impacts your life and society?”
5 Provides a coherent and well-thought out personal position that is fully defended against a rational, but opposing, position. The assumptions behind your view, and the opposing view, are recognized and analyzed. The impact of your position on your personal life and on your society is explored.
4 Provides a personal position that is coherent and has some support, but needs a little more thought and is mostly defended against a rational, but opposing, position. The assumptions behind your position, and that of the opposing position, are identified but not analyzed. The impact of one’s position on your personal life and on society is explored.
3 Provides a personal position that is coherent but has very little support and needs a lot more depth and is not adequately defended against a rational, but opposing, position. The assumptions behind both views are be identified, but there is no analysis of these assumptions. There is very little attempt to explore the impact of one’s position on one’s life and society.
2 Provides a personal position that is (a) incoherent or has no support and is not defended against a rational, but opposing, position; or (b) does not identify assumptions behind the position or opposing position; or (c) there is no attempt to explore the impact of one’s position on one’s life and society.
1 Provides a personal position that has no support, is not defended against a rational, but opposing view, does not identify the assumptions behind the position, and does not make an attempt to explore the impact of one’s position on one’s own life and society.
0 The essay was not on the topic, there was no personal position or there was no essay at all
#4: Grammar. As I grade, I will ask myself, “How good is the grammar?”
5 Demonstrates graceful use of language by being free from most errors in grammar and mechanics. The essay is well organized and focused. The student uses credible sources to support and inform the content.
4 Demonstrates reasonable facility in the use of language by being free from most errors in grammar and mechanics, however the errors do not impede understanding of the content. The essay is mostly organized and focused. The student uses credible sources to support and inform the content.
3 Demonstrates adequate facility in the use of language by containing some errors in grammar and/or mechanics, some of which may be serious enough to impede meaning. Also the essay is generally organized and focused with some lapses or the student does not use credible sources to support and inform the content.
2 Demonstrates limited facility in the use of language by containing problems with vocabulary and several errors in grammar and mechanics which do impede understanding. The essay is not organized and contains lapses in focus. Additionally, the student did not use credible sources to support and inform the content.
1 Demonstrates little or no facility in the use of language by containing problems with vocabulary and an unacceptable number of errors in grammar and mechanics. The errors are clearly an impediment to understanding the essay This essay is poorly organized and demonstrates little or no focus and does not utilize credible sources to support and inform the content.
0 The essay was not on the topic or there was no essay at all
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Your goal is to construct a critical response to something that we’ve read so far this semester.
To do that, I’d like you to find a claim/theory or argument from one of the texts we’ve read and give reasons for thinking that either the claim/theory is false or that the argument doesn’t work.
The reasons you give should be your own. You should not rely on others’ criticisms.
Relatedly, you should not do outside research for this paper.
You may respond to texts that we haven’t read in class provided that they pertain to phenomenal consciousness and you get them approved by me.
Your paper should consist of several elements, in roughly the following order:
a.Briefly introduce your topic (no more than 100 words)
Say which claim/theory/argument you are going to criticize,
concisely state your main criticism, and iii.give some sense of what your reasoning will be.
b.Explain the target (~250-500 words)
A thorough explanation of the claim/theory/argument you intend to criticize.
Make sure to use concrete examples if you can. iii.Make sure to explain how key terms are being used.
c
Explain your reasoning (~250-500 words)
A thorough explanation of you reasons for thinking the claim/theory is false or that the argument doesn’t work.
d
Consider and respond to one or two objections to your reasoning (~250-500 words)
Thoroughly explainone or two ways in which the proponent of the claim/theory/argument that you’re criticizing will respond to your criticisms.
Try to give some reasons for thinking their criticisms won’t succeed.
e.Summarize your results (~150 words)
Remind your reader of your main claim and your argument for it.
4.You’re aiming for somewhere around 1500 words. a.This is mean as a rough guideline. You can go under or over.
b.But, if you’re going significantly under, there’s a decent chance that your paper won’t be detailed enough.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Write an integrative summary of all the papers and explain how the papers are connected. This means that the papers your select must address the same theme or issues. For example, comparing the Medelin Cartel and the other organized drug dealing cartel for cocaine.
These papers may be from the academic literature or current news on drug controls, the drug war, history of illicit or psychoactive drugs or drug policies from anywhere in the world.
Finally, the documents you cite must include research papers, magazine articles, newspaper article (5 pages long) or government policy documents published during the last 10 years.
The bibliographical selection may address topics from the examples listed below:
Comparative international policies
Historical analysis of policies in different countries
Socio-Economic analysis of drug policies
Social and Psychological Issues of Drug Use and Policies
The Politics and Economics the War on Drugs
International Drug Cartels and their Activities / Violence and Corruption
European colonialism and the drug trade in history
The Professor will look at the following to determine grading:
Issue – Does the student state and explain the issue(s) or problem and explain all of the terms associated with the issue?
Evidence – Is the argument well supported by evidence? Is evidence used effectively – Does the student use examples and quotes from the text?
Context – Does the student explain the set of circumstances that surround the issue?
Student’s Position/Analysis – Does the student analyze the issue? Does the student provide a valid argument supporting their position and counterargument? Does the paper make an original contribution or insight?
Conclusion – The student restates the position they have taken according to the issue being discussed and explains why the audience should care by synthesizing the information already presented.
Organization – Is the paper structured in logical way?
Mechanics and style. Is the paper free of spelling and grammar errors? Is it clearly written?
Finally, he will give additional extra credit for students who produce an outline of your paper by Wednesday.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Compare and contrast Mills and Gerth’s theory of society, theory of social order as a whole, and theory of social agent (chapter 1 and 2 of character and social structure) with Znaniecki’s theory of society (chapter 1 of Modern nationalities; chapter 2 and 3 of The Method of Sociology). Make sure you discuss how Mills and Gerth circumscribe and classify societies and how Znaniecki circumscribes and classifies societies.
Use at least three (3) quality references Note: Wikipedia and other related websites do not qualify as academic resources.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
You must pay particular attention to the identification of the premise and supporting points of the article, a synthesis of the article and the corresponding material in the textbook or a synthesis of the article with your personal experience with the topic, and a critical evaluation of the premise(s) and supporting points of the article.
Journal Article Review 1 must be on the topic of critical incidents or the traumatic stress of law enforcement.
Journal Article Review 2 must be on the topic of psychological theory(ies) of crime.
There are different ways to look at and understand human behavior. In other words, there are different perspectives or schools of thought.
The following is a case study on “Sally.”
Sally was a student I worked with many years ago. She had frequent temper tantrums during class and as the school psychologist, I would be called to the classroom to assist. Below are some of the details about her behavior. After reading textbook on Different Schools of Thought (or Psychology’s Perspective on page 11) and the details of Sally’s behavior pick two different schools of thought (or perspectives) and explain Sally’s behavior. This assignment is to give you a beginning understanding of the different schools of thought.
Sally was having frequent temper tantrums at school. He teacher reported that “for whatever reason” Sally would get mad at another student and threaten to kill the student. Sally’s voice would escalate into screaming, she would throw things around the room, perseverate saying, “it’s not fair, it’s not fair….”, and then expose herself. /since I was the psychologist she was then sent to my office.
Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy Please do not bid unless you have the Textbook: By Corey, Theory, and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy Learning Activity #4: Reality Therapy Discussion Read Chapter 11 of your textbook by Corey, Theory, and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy.
Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy
Prepare to share in discussion the following points. Reality therapy’s emphasis on unsatisfying relationships. The implications of being free to choose and personal responsibility. The five “genetically encoded needs,” how they affect us, and also share your own experiences with some of these needs. Learning Activity #5: Feminist Therapy Discussion Read Chapter 12 of your textbook by Corey, Theory, and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy. Prepare to share in discussion the following points. The emerging of feminist therapy in the 1960s and the immediate perspectives that began to develop as to defining feminist therapy and its perspectives. The “Principles of Feminist Therapy” as found on page 369 of our text and your thoughts pertaining to the same. Describe and analyze two items of “The Therapeutic Process” found on pages 370-373 of our text.
Developing a Research Strategy in Information Literacy Knowing how to thoroughly research a topic is extremely important while achieving your education. You may be asked to support your information with peer-reviewed scholarly resources, but how can you find this type of resource?
Developing a Research Strategy in Information Literacy
The Ashford University Library allows you to search through different avenues to find the requested types of resources. You can narrow your search by the author, year published, title, subject, and by indicating what type of resource you are looking for. You even have access to a librarian if you need some guidance in finding more resources on your topic. In a two- to three-paragraph response with each paragraph consisting of five or more sentences, Describe your experiences using resources, including concerns encountered when conducting academic research through the Ashford University Library. (Areas of concern may include developing a research strategy, using the search function within a database, or evaluating sources.) Explain how using the Ashford University Library has improved your experience in conducting research.
