Advocacy Group Project Individual

Advocacy Group Project Individual Submission OUR group topic has decided to “FOOD DRIVE”, Your individual submission should be 3-4 pages double spaced, 12-point font and include a cover page and references using APA format (which do not count towards the page limit).

Advocacy Group Project Individual
Advocacy Group Project Individual

Include a minimum of two credible sources beyond those listed on the course Brightspace. A well-developed paper will have an introduction, body with subheadings, and conclusion.

Advocacy Group Project Individual

A clearly identified problem to be addressed (e.g., excessive use of single-use plastics). This should set out the nature of the problem (i.e., why it is a problem, and a general course of action to address, help raise awareness or mitigate the problem with the community).

A clearly defined goal/solution to the problem, based on a defined context/limit for action (e.g., reduce the use of single-use plastics on the Sexton campus by 10% within a certain time frame).

A strategy for intervention, including a timeline that indicates both what you proposed to do, and why you expect it to address the identified problem.

A description of, and critical reflection on, your effort to implement the proposed strategy. The reflection should consider WHAT you were trying to do, WHY your efforts succeeded or failed, and HOW you would either a) do it differently “next time” (if you did not meet your goal), or b) expand on your effort (if you were successful).

Finally, please briefly report (1-2 paragraphs) on the experience of working in a team, and how that experience relates to course content. (I can post all the chatting details that our group discussion into a file for this part)

Management 1302 Assignment #2

Advocacy Project

Engagement with the Community

The purpose of this exercise is to provide participants with a personal context for engaging

with your community. The goal of this assignment is to learn from the experience; while success is desirable, you will be evaluated based on the evidence of learning you provide.

Advocacy Group Project Individual The Task

This assignment will be launched in class on January 30th. In your assigned groups, you will select, design, and execute an advocacy project in your community. The goal is to identify a desirable change in your context or community and develop and implement an intervention that seeks to effect that change. We are asking you to get engaged in an activity that will make a difference to those around you. Simply giving money is not an option. You must engage in a way that is hands-on and contributes something of value.

While success is desirable, the key points for evaluation of the project are based on the critical/reflective components of the exercise. (Note that a bad plan that produces poor results does not provide much fodder for critical reflection.)

Your individual submission should be 3-4 pages double spaced, 12-point font and include a cover page and references using APA format (which do not count towards the page limit). Include a minimum of two credible sources beyond those listed on the course Brightspace. A well-developed paper will have an introduction, body with subheadings, and conclusion.

Key Elements to be Included Are:

A clearly identified problem to be addressed (e.g., excessive use of single-use plastics).

This should set out the nature of the problem (i.e., why it is a problem, and a general the course of action to address, help raise awareness or mitigate the problem with the community).

A clearly defined goal/solution to the problem, based on a defined context/limit for action (e.g., reduce the use of single-use plastics on the Sexton campus by 10% within a certain time frame).

A strategy for intervention, including a timeline, that indicates both what you proposed to do, and why you expect it to address the identified problem.

A description of, and critical reflection on, your effort to implement the proposed strategy. The reflection should consider WHAT you were trying to do, WHY your efforts succeeded or failed, and HOW you would either a) do it differently “next time” (if you did not meet your goal), or b) expand on your effort (if you were successful).

Finally, please briefly report (1-2 paragraphs) on the experience of working in a team, and how that experience relates to course content.

Submission Note – individual reports are to be submitted by each group member. It is expected that the learning will be specific to the individual and hence photocopies of the same report signed by all group members is unacceptable.

Assessment Criteria: Assessment is based on the strength of what the student has learned, not how much success he/she has experienced. There is as much to be learned from a failure, as there is a success (i.e., Lessons Learned). For example, it is more important to know the questions a small business must respond to, rather than knowing the answers.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Productive Counterargument Project Research Paper

Productive Counterargument Project Research Paper Project 3: Productive Counterargument Prompt:

Productive Counterargument Project
Productive Counterargument Project

The Productive Counterargument is your chance to engage in creative, mutually productive civic deliberation that influences your readers to understand your position on an issue. Identify an interesting problem or issue that affects a community that you are a part of and that merits your taking a stand.

Productive Counterargument Project Research Paper

Next, research the positions others have taken on the issue, and identify one published position that differs from your own. Finally, demonstrate why you disagree with that position and put forth your own argument. Do more than just respond to an already existing position, advance a position of your own. To accomplish this, decide (1) what points you are responding to that need to be refuted and (2) where you need to present your own new arguments and information to give a fuller picture of the issue to your audience. Your goal is to actively listen to other positions, civilly engage with a larger conversation, and create understanding and new insights that build community.

Productive Counterargument Project Research Paper

Process: For brainstorming, think about a local issue that is debatable. You are more likely to make a strong, insightful, and fresh argument about issues affecting your hometown, university, or academic organization than about national or global issues like hunger, gun control, or the drinking age. After you have explored various positions about this topic, select one existing argument with which you disagree. This argument provides your exigence: respond directly to it. As part of your proposal, provide a copy (or link) of the existing argument you would like to refute. Explain your exigence and purpose for addressing this topic, and identify an audience you can address, with your common ground.

As you are drafting, consider the character of your audience—friendly? hostile? mixed?—and how best to address them. How might you establish common ground and build consensus with the opposition, even as you refute and rebut to distinguish your own position? Consider what persuasive arguments, examples, reasoning, and rhetorical appeals will best achieve your purpose and avoid fallacies. To support your position, you should have sufficient evidence (from credible sources) that is properly integrated, cited, and developed through your own reasoning. As you revise and edit, consider tone.

Productive Counterargument Project Research Paper

The 1-page cover letter should explain your rhetorical decision-making, and specifically for this paper, it should include: (1) an explanation of your rhetorical purpose, its relation to the issue and your audience, and (2) several examples of rhetorical choices you made to achieve your purpose with an analysis of the outcome.

Format: Your final draft should be 4-5 pages (double-spaced, TNR font, 1” margins). When citing your outside source(s), follow MLA format (see NHG Ch. 19 and/or the PSU Libraries’ Citation Research Guide: http://guides.libraries.psu.edu/mlacitation).

Grading Criteria: Your essay should

(1) define a debatable issue clearly;

(2) address and influence a specific audience;

(3) identify, summarize, and engage with an existing position;

(4) respond to an existing argument with a convincing, rhetorically effective counterargument; (5) support your claims with examples, details, and reasoning;

(6) use research that is credible, appropriate, and properly cited following MLA guidelines;

(7) demonstrate the potential to influence your audience toward your purpose; and

(8) explain and defend these rhetorical choices in a cover letter.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Project Execution Control and Closure Proposal

Project Execution Control and Closure Proposal Assignment 3: Project Execution, Control, & Closure Proposal

Project Execution Control and Closure Proposal Instructions

For this assignment, you will provide a four to six (4-6) page paper, in which you must:

Project Execution Control and Closure Proposal
Project Execution Control and Closure Proposal

Provide a brief summary of your chosen project.

Identify and discuss your projectís greatest challenges (at least three) and provide a recommendation for addressing each of the challenges.

Examine how you manage your project performance via Earned Value Management (EVM). Identify at least three key EVM metrics you will use for your project.

Discuss your plan to properly close your project when it is over.

Use at least three (3) academic resources for this assignment. These resources should be related to your chosen project and the content provided in Assignment 3. Note: Wikipedia and other websites do not qualify as academic resources.

Project Execution Control and Closure Proposal Assignment

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.

Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the studentís name, the professorís name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

Analyze the key concepts, processes, and components of project management.

Develop a process for managing & controlling a project.

Develop a process for measuring the progress of a project in order to determine its effectiveness.

Develop a process for coordinating project closure and determining the projectís effectiveness

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Capstone Project Paper a Forensic Science

Capstone Project Paper a Forensic Science Capstone Project & Paper ñ 100 points – Students will select a forensics topic to study more in-depth throughout the class. Some time will be set aside within the class, but time is required out of class to work on the project and paper. Use this week to begin researching your topic concentrations and project selections.

Capstone Project Paper a Forensic Science
Capstone Project Paper a Forensic Science

Directions – Students choose an area of concentration from Landmark Cases, TV Show Analysis or Career Exploration. Within the concentration, students select their project – 2 cases, 2 shows or 2 forensic careers they are in interested in learning more about. After completing the project (identifying and researching 2 forensics landmark cases, identifying and watching 2 TV shows in their entirety, or identifying and researching 2 forensics careers), students write a paper that provides a description of each of the cases/shows/careers, evidence that is collected/tied into the areas of concentration, how these impact the Criminal Justice System, and why these cases/shows/careers are interesting to them. 2-4 pages, 100 points. Please use appropriate APA/MLA formatting for this paper.

Here is a very useful link on writing. It is the Purdue University writing lab link – it is a wonderful resource containing information on writing and citing/formatting in APA or MLA formats:

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_formatting_and_style_guide.html.

Capstone Project/Paper ñ 100 points

Capstone Project & Paper ñ 100 points – Students will select a forensics topic to study more in-depth throughout the class. Some time will be set aside within the class, but time is required out of class to work on the project and paper. Use this week to begin researching your topic concentrations and project selections.

Directions – Students choose an area of concentration from Landmark Cases, TV Show Analysis or Career Exploration. Within the concentration, students select their project –  2 cases, 2 shows or 2 forensic careers they are in interested in learning more about. After completing the project (identifying and researching 2 forensics landmark cases, identifying and watching 2 TV shows in their entirety, or identifying and researching 2 forensics careers), students write a paper that provides a description of each of the cases/shows/careers, evidence that is collected/tied into the areas of concentration, how these impact the Criminal Justice System, and why these cases/shows/careers are interesting to them. 2-4 pages, 100 points. Please use appropriate APA/MLA formatting for this paper.

Here is a very useful link on writing. It is the Purdue University writing lab link – it is a wonderful resource containing information on writing and citing/formatting in APA or MLA formats: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_formatting_and_style_guide.html.

Expert Performance Evaluation Rater Biases

Expert Performance Evaluation Rater Biases There are a variety of techniques that can minimize performance rater biases.

Expert Performance Evaluation Rater Biases
Expert Performance Evaluation Rater Biases

In your textbook review “Case Study 6-4: Minimizing Biases in Performance Evaluation at Expert Engineering, Inc.” After reviewing the case and considering the course and textbook content in a 4-5 page paper, not including the cover and reference pages, answering questions 1 & 2.

Be sure to support your statements with logic and argument, citing any sources referenced. Performance appraisals that contain errors or are constructed from a supervisor’s biased viewpoint can affect an employee’s working relationship. Employees whose performance is ranked incorrectly or inaccurately may be on the verge of losing their jobs, or they may become disillusioned and exhibit signs of low morale and poor job satisfaction.

CHAPTER Evaluation and Behavior Change Proposal

CHAPTER Evaluation and Behavior Change Proposal
CHAPTER Evaluation and Behavior Change Proposal

CHAPTER Evaluation and Behavior Change Proposal PROJECT

Important point: 75 points for 750 words: includes both parts: evaluation and proposal. I have added an updated Behavior Change form (see below).

SIMPLIFICATION: Select a chapter in the text which may be of greatest value or interest to you academically, professionally or personally.

The entire project is 750 words (3 pages) for the body. The final part of the project is your learning to use the Operant Behavior Change template so that you can set powerful goals using the reward and consequence method which supports learning and empowers the goals.

Directions: Read the selected chapter and consider taking that Chapter Quiz since you will have studied it.

Cover page using either MLA or APA which is primarily name, course name and number, semester, and I require a word count of the body of the paper only. 5 points

Body: A 750 word minimum is required to earn an A, which is the equivalent of 3 pages, not counting the cover page or Reference information (the text). Points will be deducted for not meeting minimum requirement. Double space only; use margins that are 1 1/2″ from top on first page and 1″ around on other margins. Number pages. No bolding please, use recommended fonts and not to exceed 12 font unless it is smaller, then 14.

Research: To balance a predominately “personal, subjective” evaluation, you are required to use three citations by using data from the text followed by a citation. It can be as simple as (Psychology, p. 323 or Section 1.3), depending on the format of the text. Otherwise, it is considered plagiarism. Each citation is worth 5 points.Please, do not just outline the chapter. My focus in this paper is your personal relationship with the material. The data is a focus for you to share your own examples, experience, or comments. Please discuss how you may have or have not used this knowledge in the past and how you are going to apply it in the present and future, personally, academically and professionally. 35 points

HEART OF THE EVALUATION: Behavior Change Proposal: The conclusion of the body of the paper will include your creating a ‘behavior change proposal’ which you plan to implement but are not required to due to the time constraints for the class. Use this format: Behavior Change Proposal.Preview the document in which you will explain fully how you plan to design this program. Consider whether you thrive more from rewards or consequences from the results of the Sensitivity inventory 30 points
Reference: The only reference required is the e-book, however, or it is considered plagiarism if you use do not give credit to the source. You don’t need a separate reference page if you are using one source since this is a brief paper. 5 points

Note: I am an encourager of student excellence and reward student’s involvement in the material, if so inspired with additional points. I see your discussions and written assignments as an opportunity to provide personalized feedback and interact with you in a more independent study style. My guidelines are the minimum requirements for an A; you may develop this as deeply as you desire; I provide bonus points for deeper involvement.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Textile Survey Project and General Information

Textile Survey Project and General Information The midterm project will assess your comprehension of core concepts from the book (• J. J. Pizzuto’s Fabric Science, 11th Edition; Allen C. Cohen, Ingrid Johnson, Ajoy K. Sarkar;

Textile Survey Project and General Information
Textile Survey Project and General Information

Fairchild Publications, Inc.) Chapters 1, 2, 3, 17 and 4.

Textiles are a part of our everyday life and our understanding of them remains intuitive through our life experiences. As we formalize those experiences, we learn to become more informed and knowledgeable in our understanding of textiles.

For this project, you will explore your own wardrobe by selecting one or two garments containing a natural fiber and a manufactured fiber. It can be a combination of both in one garment or it could be two separate garments one containing a natural fiber and one containing a manufactured fiber.

Report on the following for each fiber:

  1. Describe the structure of each fiber (cross-sectional shape, longitudinal appearance)

20 points

  1. State whether each fiber is natural or manufactured fiber 5 points
  2. Describe the performance characteristics of each fiber. Discuss its major favorable and unfavorable properties. Explain how these properties affect fabric aesthetics, performance, and design possibilities. Be detailed.

40 points

  1. Describe how you can identify this fiber in the lab. 10 points
  2. Trademark if any. 5 points
  3. State how the content is listed on the label. 5 points
  4. State the care instructions as listed on the label. 5 points
  5. For each fiber, explain why this is a appropriate for the garment you have examined.

5 points

  1. Attached a picture of each garment and labels. 5points

Requirements: 1000-word essay

GRADE: 100 points

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal For your RIP proposal, write 300-500 words describing your intended project. You don’t need to organize your proposal in the order of these questions and concepts, but make sure they are all addressed in your response.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal
Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal

Message and Purpose: First, what’s your message going to be? What do you want to portray about either your class text or class theme? Think about this specifically and complexly—what are the new insights you can bring to the table?

Genre: What genre do you want your purpose to be conveyed with? The RIP project should involve a text-based genre but is only limited by your imagination. There can be multi-modal components to the project, but there should be a significant amount of text should be the primary component. Research various genres online for what might be most compelling to you—for instance, perhaps you’re interested in a short video, but instead can write a film treatment or script for it. Consider your past RIP exercises as a starting point for your final genre project.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal

Audience: Once you decide your message, who do you want to target? Why? And what are going to be the expectations of this audience? What might be difficult in addressing them? Think specifically about who they are and what they want. How will that affect your appeals to them?

Context: What’s the historical and cultural context of this project? Is this taking place right now? Where and when? How does that influence the project? See the AGWR 39B chapter for more details about exploring context.

PLACE

Rhetoric-In-Practice Prompt

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal Purpose

This project shifts the rhetorical situation from analyzing a message from the position of an audience member (trying to build a deep understanding of the meaning of the text, the context in which the sender created it, and the audiences to which it speaks) to one in which you yourself are a creator, producing a text that is relevant to the rhetoric of freedom and slavery.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal

This project imitates what you’ll be asked to do often in both your college career and afterwards—discern what you want to say, who you want to say it to, and how best to do so. The Rhetoric-in-Practice assignment is intended to give you a deeper appreciation of what it means to make specific rhetorical choices to serve your message and an opportunity to reflect on how those choices affect the message you are sending and the audience that you reach with it.

In this way, the RIP is a culmination of the work you’ve done in this class with respect to your understanding of both genre and rhetoric.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal Assignment

The RIP assignment has two parts: project and essay.

Project: You will craft a text having selected a purpose and audience that addresses the class theme—the rhetoric of freedom and slavery—(or responds to The Underground Railroad). You will then select an appropriate genre for this project, and demonstrate your rhetorical know-how by selecting appropriate rhetorical choices for this situation. In other words, your created text will operate within a clear rhetorical framework—with a clear context, belonging to an identifiable genre, and with a clear purpose and audience. The only limitation on the genre is that it is text-based and it cannot be a short story.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal

Message and Purpose: First, what’s your message going to be? What do you want to portray about either your class text or class theme? Think about this specifically and complexly—what are the new insights you can bring to the table? What are the arguments that you can make?

Audience: Once you decide your message, who do you want to target? Why? And what are going to be the expectations of this audience? What might be difficult in addressing them? Think specifically about who they are and what their expectations will be. How will that affect your appeals to them?

Context: What’s the historical and cultural context of this project? Is this taking place right now?

Where and when? How does that influence the project? See the AGWR 39B chapter for more details about exploring context.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal

Genre: After you think through all of these possibilities, now you can start to decide on a genre for your project. The RIP project should involve a text-based genre but is only limited by your imagination.

Part of this project’s goal is for you to explore a genre that you’re not familiar with, so you should pick something that can challenge you in terms of making a complex argument in a different format.

There can be multi-modal components to the project, but there should be a significant amount of text should be the primary component. Research various genres online for what might be most compelling to you—for instance, perhaps you’re interested in a short video, but instead can write a film treatment or pitch document for it. Consider your past RIP exercises as a starting point for your final genre project.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal

Your instructor may suggest specific directions that relate to your class readings and/or theme.

Essay: You will also write a rhetorical analysis of your own work that analyzes the rhetorical choices you made. The essay should build on your work in the RA essay and indicate how you’re applying your rhetorical know-how. You’ll include secondary sources that demonstrate, among other things, your understanding of your chosen genre and your understanding of the texts/ideas you’ve studied throughout the quarter.

Rhetoric in Practice Prompt Proposal Requirements

Multiple drafts, peer review and revision are required elements of the assignment. The RIP project’s length depends on the purpose, audience and genre, but it should be equal to your Rhetorical Analysis in complexity.

  • The RIP essay should be between 500-800 words long.
  • A minimum of three (3) sources must be cited in the essay, though the working bibliography with 3-5 annotations may have 10 or more sources that you read in the process.

OCaml  Wiki Project Paper Available

OCaml  Wiki Project Paper
   OCaml  Wiki Project Paper

OCaml  Wiki Project Paper

the language is “OCaml

OVERVIEW: What kind of language is it? Where and when was it written? Why? What is/was the language primarily used for? What are its most notable features? Did this language mark the first appearance of some language feature? This section is a brief summary providing a high-level summary of the language.

HISTORY: Here you’ll discuss in more detail the origins of the language. What were the primary design features? What were the goals? What was the design process? What need was it intended to address? How does this language differ from what came before it? What changes were made from ancestor languages, if there were any? How widely was it used, and in what areas? Is the language still in use? Why (or why not)? Were parts of it adopted into other languages, or did it become a dead end? Why? Basically, talk about why someone thought this language was needed, what went into it, and how it worked out.

FEATURES: Describe the language in some detail. At the very least, discuss what native data types are available, and what control structures are available. Classify the language based on the various criteria we’ve been discussing (imperative, object-oriented, functional, declarative, etc). Is it strongly or weakly typed? Is typing static or dynamic? How is iteration handled? What about selection? Or are they (some languages don’t have iteration constructs)? What features does it support? Where does the language really shine? What are its biggest drawbacks? For this section, you can assume that your reader is technically literate (e.g. an upper-level computer science undergraduate) who’s not necessarily knowledgeable about this specific language. If the language has some arcane features, explain them, but it’s not necessary to explain what a compiler is.
Evaluate the language on the criteria discussed in chapter 1 and the material from Sebesta: How readable is the language? How writeable? How reliable? Is it highly orthogonal? How expressive? How well does it support abstraction? How does its execution speed compare to other languages of the same era? Support your positions on these issues.

EXAMPLES: Provide a sample of what code in the language looks like, using some simple, well-known algorithm. Adding items in a list, sorting a numeric list, or converting a string to all lower-case would be examples. Provide something big enough to give a taste of what the language is like. (If sorting a list is a one-line function call, you might want to pick something else, or perhaps show how to explicitly/manually sort a list instead.) If a language is strongly associated with a particular IDE or development environment, you may want to include a screenshot or two.

FURTHER READING: Provide a list of resources you used in assembling your report or where the reader could find more information about that language. You should have at least 5 references other than your textbook or other class materials. You may list no more than 1 Wikipedia article in this section.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Project management Element Assignment

Project management Element
                  Project management Element

Project management Element

Marking criteria for portfolio element three
200 words

  • Explanation of costing methods – 4 marks
  • Evidence of understanding of contingency – 4 marks
  • Commentary on your approach to the project (project is on an event to sustain tourism) 4 marks
  • Commentary on your experience in project management (make it up) 2 marks
  • Link or writing to theory 4 marks
  • Referencing 2 marks
  • Altogether 20 marks

Please make sure you follow the word count Of 200 words

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!