Voice against Microaggressions Argumentative Essay

Voice against Microaggressions Argumentative Essay Microaggressions represents to any kind of insult to a definite group through any verbal way or behavior intentionally or unintentionally.

The term “Microaggression” might be new; but it has been prevailing in the society from a long time ago. It is the cause of racism. It was introduced by psychiatrist Chester M. Pierce. Microaggression is a big issue of the world and it should be defined, identified and discussed.

Voice against Microaggressions Argumentative Essay

We face microaggression daily, but we barely notice it. It can be seen by people’s small activities. In an article entitled “Unmasking racial microaggressions,” Tori DeAngelis mentions, “Some racism is so subtle that neither victim nor perpetrator may entirely understand what is going on- which may be especially toxic for people of color”.

Tori DeAngelis’s argument is that Microaggressions takes place daily in our day to day life, but no one really notices it because most of the times it is done intentionally or not directly to the victim and thus, it is unnoticeable.

The very first step to find out if a microaggression is taking place is by identifying the type of microaggression. According to Derald Wing, there are various

Voice against Microaggressions Argumentative Essay

Rayamajhi 2 themes to which microaggression attach. Some of the common themes according to Wing are “Alien in one’s Own Land, Color Blindness, Myth of Meritocracy etc”. In making this comment, Wing urges us to identify the type of microaggression first. There are different ways of being victims of Microaggression. If we can identify the Microaggression, we might be able to discuss it.

The act of microaggression can really affect the victim psychologically. The victim feels unwanted and feeling or fear. In the book, Between the world and me, Coates illustrates, “We were laughing, but I know that we were afraid of those who loved us the most” (17). And Tori DeAngelis also agrees with this when she said “Respondents agreed that these backhanded communications can make them feel as if they don’t belong, that they are abnormal or that they are untrustworthy” in her article. The victim of the microaggression is sometimes mentally harmed a lot. Due to the continuous feeling of being rejected or isolated in many things, they feel unwanted. Due to the feeling of inferiority, they feel unsafe and afraid. They are afraid of losing their loved ones, afraid of the people who make them suffer.

The victim the microaggression should get united and work against it and try to make this invisible thing visible and then only we will be able to get rid of it. In Tori DeAngelis view, “Microaggression holds the power because they are invisible, and therefore they don’t allow us to see that our actions and attitudes may be discriminatory.”

The main reason Microaggression is existing in our society is because no one really cares Rayamajhi 3 about it. The whites think that people are making this topic a big issue since they are not the one suffering from this and therefore, the victims should unite, work for hand in hand to get rid of it.

The whites should be made feel that they are the one causing the microaggression and they should be aware of how badly they are still prevailing racism through microaggression. Tori DeAngelis agrees with this as she mentioned in her article, “It is a monumental task to get white people to realize that they are delivering microaggressions because it’s scary to them”. We should make the white people realize that they are delivering microaggressions to poor colored people. It is a hard task because they will probably not accept it since, this will affect their good, moral white image. If we will be able to make them realize then we can take away microaggression from its roots.

Microaggression is a major invisible problem of our society. Therefore, I would like to conclude by saying that it must be identified and discussed. And thus, we can get rid of microaggression only if the colored people get united and work against the whites and make the white people realize how they are delivering the microaggressions.

Rayamajhi 4

Voice against Microaggressions Argumentative Essay Work cited

Coates, Ta-Nehisi, Between The World and Me. New York: Spiegel & Grau, 2015.

https://www.apa.org/monitor/2009/02/microaggression

https://academicaffairs.ucsc.edu/events/documents/Microaggressions_Examples_Arial_2014_11_12.pdf

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

The Use of Workforce References

The Use of Workforce References The use of workforce references is increasingly viewed as unreliable. Conduct an internet search for information on current hiring practices and answer the following questions:

How can employers legally and ethically obtain information about an applicant’s past performance?

What measures can be taken to verify information contained in a job application or resume?

Want a reference letter sample to view as you craft your own reference letters for current and former employees? This reference letter sample gives you a guide for writing your own employee reference letters. A reference letter is usually requested by an employee who is job searching or who must leave your organization for a reason such as a relocating spouse, returning full time to school, or experiencing serious and time-consuming family issues.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Do Distractions Interfere With Performance

Do Distractions Interfere With Performance Title Page/Introduction

In general, the purpose of your introduction is to explain what other researchers in this area have done and to describe the main point of your study.

Think of yourself as the ‘tour guide’ for your reader – your job is to walk them down the path of your research topic and to point out relevant information so that at the end of the tour they understand why you are asking the question that you are and why it is important.

A research report begins with a Title Page. Give your report a running head (an abbreviated version of your title) and page number. For example, if your title is “The relationship between introverted personality type and recreational reading in young adults.” the running head could be: Running head: INTROVERSION AND RECREATIONAL READING

Do Distractions Interfere With Performance Research Project

Your title should consist of three lines centered in the center of the page. The first line should be the title of your research project. The second line should be a list of authors. For your group project, list the authors in alphabetical order by last name. The third line should list your department and institution:

Department of Psychology, University of Southern

Indiana

Following the title page is the Introduction. The introduction should consist of three parts: 1) a broad leading that presents the specific problem and describes a research strategy 2) review of the background literature and explanation of the importance of the current topic 3) the hypotheses that your study will evaluate.

In the first part of your report, provide a general overview of your research topic. This is meant to establish why the research is important, why findings could be influential, and a general research strategy.

Do Distractions Interfere With Performance Description

In the second part, describe 5-7 previous studies or experiments whose findings or methodology are relevant to your study. If it is a similar study to yours, then describe their methodology, results, and conclusions. If you are adapting their methods, then describe their experimental procedures along with any limitations. If you will be using specific language (e.g., jargon) in later sections, be sure to define them in the introduction.

Ask yourself the following questions to help with writing the introduction:

Why is the problem important?
How does the study relate to previous work? How does it build on/differ from previous work?
Do your hypotheses test a larger theory?
How does your design test your hypotheses?
What are the implications of your research?

Finally, in the third part of the introduction, describe your hypotheses. Your hypotheses are what will guide the design of your experiment. After your data collection is complete, you will address your hypotheses in the results and discussion sections of your report. In the introduction, you describe what you expect to happen. Then you conduct the experiment and see whether your hypotheses were supported.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Rogerian Argument Outline Research Paper

Rogerian Argument Outline Research Paper Please note: The Rogerian argument and the research paper are two entirely different arguments that you will be writing this semester.

The Rogerian argument presents two sides of an issue and the common ground or compromise between the two sides. You will not take a stand on the issue.

Please review the lecture notes on Rogerian argument before completing this assignment.

For this assignment, you will complete a topic outline (phrases that indicate the main points and supporting points to be used in the research paper). Use Roman numerals for the main point and capital letters for the supporting points. A working thesis needs to be included in the outline.

Rogerian Argument Outline Research Paper Outline

Introduction
A brief background of the topic
Explore the common ground (briefly)
state the issue question and set a neutral tone
Explain key supporting points on the issue

III. Explain key supporting points for the alternate side of the issue

Explain a balanced view of the issue by reviewing valid points from the two sides
Conclusion
Describe a balanced and concise summary of the main points that represent the sides of the issue
Present a middle ground position
Reprise the middle ground position and present a position that will benefit both sides.

Rogerian Argument Outline Research Paper

As you are presenting a Rogerian argument you will need to have a clear thesis placed in the conclusion. Remember, as this is a Rogerian argument, the thesis should not take a stand on the issue. You will need to present both sides of the issue and a section that shows how the two sides do have some common ground. The paper also will need to have a conclusion that wraps everything up for the reader and presents the common ground. Remember, for the actual paper you will need to have more than five paragraphs in the paper.

Rogerian Argument Outline Research Paper Introduction

Lead-in sentences

(“hook” strategies: a scenario or an example, a related current event in the news, a startling statistic, a provocative question or statement)

Rhetorical context/brief synopsis of the discussion surrounding the issue

The issue stated as an issue question to set the neutral tone of inquiry and investigation

BODY

Two or three paragraphs to examine key supporting points that support one prominent position on the issue

Two or three paragraphs to examine supporting points that support an alternative position, opposing the above viewpoint

(The writer’s use of transition/signal sentences, such as On the other hand, critics argue . . . ; or, Despite these compelling arguments for . . . , many persons strongly oppose . . . helps prepare readers for the writer’s switch from examining one position to an opposing viewpoint.)

Rogerian Argument Outline Research Paper Conclusion

The paragraph which presents a balanced and concise summation of the most compelling points representing different sides of the argument

The closing paragraph which presents the writer’s middle-ground position, drawing elements from each position examined earlier

(A common ground value appeal can lay the groundwork for a united front in approaching a resolution to the issue; e.g.,

In the debate over legalization of physician-assisted suicide, we can all agree that we wish to make the process of dying more humane and comfortable for the individual person who is suffering from a terminal illness. Even so

. . . . Also, as illustrated, the writer may choose to use the inclusive first-person, plural point of view, we, to reinforce the collective spirit of his or her proposal.)

Argumentative Essay on Effects of Universal Basic Income

Argumentative Essay on Effects of Universal Basic Income Compose an argumentative essay that investigates 3 possible effects of Universal Basic Income.

1 of those sources should be from Academic database which means (JSTOR, ProQuest, Academic search premier) Thesis can be this one: “I believe that UBI will boost small business growth and improve mental and physical health, but will increase the national debt”

In each paragraph, every chosen effect should argument. Every paragraph should contain one statistical evidence.

Task and Purpose: Compose an argumentative essay that investigates 3 possible effects of Universal Basic Income.

Audience: Assume your audience is very familiar with Universal Basic Income. Assume that your audience is undecided on the issue of Universal Basic Income.

Format: Use MLA guidelines in formatting your document. Cite and reference a minimum of 4 sources in your essay and Works Cited page. 1 of those sources must be from an Academic Database.

Length: 1.5 – 3 pages (not including Works Cited Page).

Overview: Universal Basic Income, or UBI, is an economic policy that delivers a monthly, unconditional cash payment to any legal residents who opt into the program. The policy is typically discussed in the context of jobs becoming robotized or automated.

Essays should be primarily concerned with the possible negative and/or positive effects of UBI in America. You are not limited to economic effects. Your essay should be entirely original work. Do not use more than two quotes in your essay.

Intro/Thesis: Include a grabber, 1-2 sentences of background/contextual information, and a thesis statement that lists 3 possible effects (Example: “I believe that UBI will boost small business growth and improve mental and physical health, but will increase the national debt”).

Paragraph Development: Each body paragraph should be unified around a single, isolated effect of UBI. Include at least one piece of statistical evidence per body paragraph. Explain how that evidence supports your claim. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of that evidence. Include a transition statement at the end of Body Paragraphs 1 and 2. Provide a conclusion no more than 5 sentences that reviews the main points of your body paragraphs and reveals your opinion on whether or not America should adopt UBI.

Assessment Criteria: Introduction/Thesis (12), Paragraph Development (12), Language Conventions (12), Tone/Language (12), Formatting (12).

Evaluating Arguments Essay Paper

Evaluating Arguments

Below is a series of five fallacious arguments. In one paragraph each, explain why each argument is fallacious and identify the fallacy being committed. In identifying the relevant fallacy, be sure to give an explanation of what that fallacy is. Be comprehensive in your explanations, and cite at least one source to support each explanation (in APA format).

Argument 1
1. My algebra class is a nightmare.
2. Nightmares are bad dreams.
3. Therefore, my algebra class is a bad dream.

Argument 2
We can trust the Andrew’s testimony because Andrew himself said so, and Andrew is a trustworthy person.

Argument 3
If we loosen the office dress code, soon everyone will start showing up naked! Therefore, we shouldn’t loosen the office dress code.

Argument 4
Nobody has disproven that there exists alien life. So, until proven otherwise, it’s reasonable to conclude that alien life does exist.

Argument 5
You shouldn’t vote Republican because Republicans hate the poor, and you shouldn’t vote Democrat because Democrats hate business owners.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Social Media’s impact Argumentative essay

Write an argument in which you make and support a claim about one way we use a specific type of technology in our daily lives, and the significant impact it is having on us (for better or for worse). You are strongly encouraged to look beyond our readings to explore and choose a topic we haven’t talked about. You will want to make sure your argument addresses a larger cultural issue that you feel is important for readers to understand and view differently than they do. (Example: Sherry Turkle argues that the immediate connectability of social media is shaping an entire generation’s ability to navigate relationships in a healthful way.)

1700 words. Double-spaced. MLA format. Works Cited page in the back. Doesn’t have to have exactly 5 sources but somewhere in the ballpark of 4-6.

Paper #2: Taking a Position

We’ve read and discussed arguments about the impact our different daily uses of technology might have on our psychological, mental and emotional health. Together, Sherry Turkle and Jean Twenge have made claims about how our phone technology in particular has shaped the way we communicate with each other, and deal with daily challenges in our own lives.

Now, it’s your turn to pull a chair up to the table and join the discussion:

Write an argument in which you make and support a claim about one way we use a specific type of technology in our daily lives, and the significant impact it is having on us (for better or for worse). You are not limited to the areas we’ve read about and discussed in class; in fact, you are strongly encouraged to look beyond our readings to explore and choose a topic we haven’t talked about. You will want to make sure your argument addresses a larger cultural issue that you feel is important for readers to understand and view differently than they do. (Example: Sherry Turkle argues that the immediate connectability of social media is shaping an entire generation’s ability to navigate relationships in a healthful way.)

Remember that this is an argument, which means you’ll need to have a defined opinion about your topic/issue, and that opinion will need to be articulated clearly in your thesis up front. As you develop your ideas, think about your audience, and how they will respond to your assertions. Don’t worry about readers that already see the issue your way — think about those that are inclined to view it differently, or at least who don’t see the issue as important enough to care about (yet).

Success in this assignment will depend on:

1. Focus and Cohesion – You must provide a firm, authoritative main claim (thesis statement, defining opinion) up front in this paper, and then continue supporting and developing that claim throughout the argument.

2. Support – Your supporting paragraphs must serve to directly develop and prove your central claim, leaving the reader with no unanswered questions or unsubstantiated points. Your support will come primarily from two different sources: 1) direct observations; and 2) outside research (you are required to integrate two outside sources into this paper). Your support must contribute clearly to your argument. Your two outside sources must be cited and documented per MLA requirements.

3. Structure – Move readers smoothly through your argument with a well-organized sequence of ideas, clear paragraphs, and logical reasoning. We’re looking for an argument that doesn’t go off in unexpected directions, but does develop its relevant points fully.

4. Writing – Read over your work carefully and watch for sentences that seem confusing, awkward or choppy.

As with Paper #1, students failing to submit a hard copy of their rough draft on the day it’s due will be ineligible to turn in a final draft for credit.

You must provide five copies of your rough draft on the due date. Two in-depth workshopping sessions will follow, starting on the next class day. Make sure you arrive on time and prepared for class on workshopping days. If you do not attend, or are late/unprepared on these days, your paper grade will be lowered one full letter grade automatically. Getting feedback for your work is a critical step in revision, and that’s why it’s important for you to be prepared for this phase of the writing process.

Make sure both your rough and final drafts are typed, double-spaced, and appropriately formatted.

Approx. length: 1,700 words
Assignment Value: 70 points
Rough Draft due (five hard copies): Thurs 2/28
WORKSHOP DAYS: Tues 3/5, Thurs 3/7
Final Draft due: Tues 3/12 (hard copy in class, electronic version on
Turnitin.com)

Goodman, John, Kelly McGillis, and Trini Alvarado. 1992. The Babe. Universal City, Ca: Universal Studios.

Gordon, Lawrence, et al. Field of Dreams. Universal City, CA: Universal, 2004. DVD

HBO Real Sports with Bryant Gumbel Episode 114, September 19, 2006. http://www.hbo.com/real-sports-with-bryant-gumbel/episodes/0/114-september-19-2006/synopsis.html

Hanks, Tom, Geena Davis, Lori Petty, and Madonna. 1992. A League of their Own. Hollywood, CA: Columbia Pictures.

Levinson, Barry, Mark Johnson, Robert Redford, Robert Duvall, and Bernard Malamud. The Natural. Burbank, CA: RCA/Columbia Pictures Home Video, 1984. DVD.

Matthau, Walter, Tatum O’Neal, Vic Morrow, and Michael Ritchie. 1976. The Bad News Bears. [Hollywood, Calif.]: Paramount.

Stallone, Sylvester, Talia Shire, Burt Young, Carl Weathers, Tony Burton, Michael Pataki, Brigitte Nielsen, and Dolph Lundgren, Rocky IV. Santa Monica, CA: MGM/UA Home Video, 1985. Videocassette.

Taylor, Lawrence Edmund, Arthur Mann, Alfred E. Green, Jackie Robinson, Ruby Dee, Minor Watson, Louise Beavers, et al. 1950. The Jackie Robinson story. Santa Monica, CA: MGM Home Entertainment.

Ward, David S., Tom Berenger, Charlie Sheen, Rene Russo, and Wesley Snipes. 2017. Major League. Los Angeles, CA: Paramount Pictures.

Unpublished Dissertations

Corzine, Nathan M. “The Last Pure Place: Drugs, Alcohol, and the Paradox of the Modern American Game,” PhD dissertation, Purdue University, 2010.

Mahoney, Michael Paul. “Alcohol Consumption and Drug Use among former Major League Baseball Players,” PhD dissertation, Temple University, 2002.

Website Articles

“Galvin, Pud | Baseball Hall of Fame.” National Baseball Hall of Fame. http://baseballhall.org/hof/galvin-pud.

“NATA Hall of Fame.” National Athletic Trainers Association Hall of Fame, n.d., http://www.nata.org/HallofFame/index.htm#52 (accessed September 25, 2012).

“REAGANFOUNDATION.ORG | NANCY REAGAN – HER CAUSES: JUST SAY NO.” The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Library. http://www.reaganfoundation.org/details_f.aspx?session_args=2A496B23-53C1-4E3C-8892-5B0654701091&p=RR1008NRHC&tx=6&h1=3&h2=7&sw=NANCYHERCAUSES&lm=reagan&args_a=cms&args_b=12&argsb=Y (accessed March 5, 2013).

Arcidiacono, David. “The Curious Case of Tommy Barlow.” Elysian Field Quarterly – The Baseball Review, Winter 2004, accessed October 1, 2018, http://www.efqreview.com/NewFiles/v21n1/onhistoricalground.html.

Baseball Almanac. “Famous First Salary Levels.” Hosting for Less (hosted), Available from World Wide Web: http://www.baseball-almanac.com/firsts/first9.shtml (accessed November 1, 2009.)

Doherty, Allen. “Baseball Commissioner Peter Ueberroth and Steroids.” Steroidsinbaseball.net, accessed May 5, 2009, http://www.steroidsinbaseball.net/commish/ueberroth.html.

Ilel, Neille and Donnell Alexander. “An LSD No-No.” Weekend America, March 29, 2008, accessed October 1, 2018, http://weekendamerica.publicradio.org/display/web/2008/03/28/pitch/.

Major League Baseball. “Drug Policy in Baseball: Event Timeline.” Drug Policy Coverage, 2018, accessed May 5, 2018, http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/news/drug_policy.jsp?content=timeline.

_____. “The Commissionership: A Historical Perspective.” The Commissionership: A Historical Perspective, 2018, accessed October 1, 2018, http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/history/mlb_history_people.jsp?story=com.

Major League Baseball Players Association. “History of the Major League Baseball Players Association.” The Major League Baseball Players Association, 2018, accessed October 1, 2018, http://www.mlbplayers.com/ViewArticle.dbml?ATCLID=211042995&DB_OEM_ID=34000.

Woolley, John T. and Gerhard Peters. “The American Presidency Project.” Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, 1999, accessed October 18, 2018, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=2767.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Aspects of Marriage or Sex and Love Argumentative Paper

Aspects of Marriage or Sex and Love Argumentative Paper Topics (chose one):

-Sex, love, compassion, altruism.

–Interpersonal relationships (conflict, resolution, marriage, friendship, etc)

-Improving the quality of your life (money, work, values, and vocation).

-Death and dying (as a context for a more fulfilling life), Illness.

The paper should be an argumentative paper, that is, you should expand on a topic, point, or thesis, and convey your best supportive arguments for it. An “argumentative” paper does not mean you are going to “argue”, An argumentative paper is a paper in which you advance a thesis framed in form of a question; that distinguishes it from a purely “descriptive paper”.you should have an introduction, a main body of the paper (separated in sections as needed) and a conclusion. The paper should also have a short Abstract and a Bibliography (Minimum 5 citations) and should be free of misspellings errors. The length of the paper should be at least 2500 words.

The paper should be written using APA format ONLY, and it should be minimum -2,500words long not counting title page and bibliography. The paper has to have a title page, followed by an Abstract in which summarizes the main idea of your paper. Then you should have an introduction followed by the main body of your paper. Finally a Conclusion and a Bibliography. Therefore your paper outline should be as follows:

Title Page

Abstract

Introduction

The main body of your paper

Conclusion

Argumentative Essay on Parenting

Argumentative Essay on Parenting and the best way to parent kids only using this article
“How Not To Talk To Your Kids”
Format is
1. Anecdotal introduction w/thesis
2. First body paragraph with 1st claim and two pieces of evidence from the text
3. Counter claim paragraph also with 2 pieces of evidence from text
4. Second body concluding why the counter claim is false also with two pieces of evidence from the text
5. Conclusion

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!

Black People Stereotype and Analyzes

Black People Stereotype and Analyzes the Rhetorical Techniques Write a rhetorical analysis essay that examines and analyzes the rhetorical techniques such as ethos, pathos.

logos, figurative language as well as any logical fallacies the author uses to argue his/her claim. use the source that I gave you at the bottom of this page to support your analysis of your essay as it relates to your topic.

must have a background giving lead-in to provide context.
have a thesis sentence that provides context.
provides at least one direct quotation per example. This includes Ethos, pathos, Logos, Figurative Language, and Opposition
Accurately and specifically identifies the rhetorical technique does(often in one sentence).

5. Do not double dip with the quotes (do not just provide two examples of repetition, alliteration, connotative diction, etc. but gives some variation of technique and explains how both work together to achieve an effect on the reader)

6 Do not begin or end with quotes.

7 Clearly summarizes the thesis including the rhetorical techniques and their respective effects

The topic to write on is – black people stereotype

Choose an article that will support your rhetorical analysis essay (only one article).