Problems Associated with Gambling and their Solutions What are the problems associated with gambling, and what are the solutions? Quotations: There should be at least one direct quotation and some paraphrases in your essay.
Problems Associated with Gambling and their Solutions
You must also:
Use an appropriate essay structure.
Don’t use any reference in introduction and conclusion.
Support points with direct quotations, paraphrases and examples.
You should use at least on direct quotations (not more than 30 words).
Use appropriate vocabulary and grammatically accurate expression.
Problems Associated with Gambling and their Solutions Paper Format and Referencing
Use the APA system of referencing with in-text referencing and a separate list of references.
Include a minimum of six (6) different reference sources.
-you should write six paragraphs (1 introduction + 4 bodies paragraph (2 bodies for problems and 2 bodies for solutions)+conclusion)
Assignments Checklist
The Introduction
The essay contains an introduction.
There is a background statement or statements.
The background statement narrows the topic.
There is a clear thesis statement.
The introduction contains subtopics.
Paragraphs
All body paragraphs contain clear topic sentences.
All the sentences in each paragraph relate to the topic sentence.
Paragraphs are logically structured.
Transition/Linking words are used appropriately and correctly.
Paragraphs are not too long.
Ideas
The essay demonstrates that the ideas have been analysed.
It is clear where ideas come from (i.e. your sources).
Various ideas have clearly been combined.
The relationships between ideas have been clearly established.
Arguments/Points
Quotations are used well.
There are clear paraphrases.
There are (far) fewer quotations used than paraphrases or summaries.
There are appropriate examples used.
There are appropriate explanations, comments and elaborations as needed.
The conclusion for Problems Associated with Gambling and their Solutions
There is a conclusion.
It summarizes what the essay says.
The final statement/question ends the essay neatly and powerfully, not abruptly.
Vocabulary and Grammar
The vocabulary is appropriate.
The essay has been checked with a grammar and spelling checker
The essay has also been edited by you and re-edited after spell-checking.
There are no sentence fragments (everything is in complete sentences).
The sentences are all clear and precise.
Tone
Impersonal language is used throughout.
The tone is academic.
Inclusive language (non-discriminatory) is used throughout.
Citations & References
All sources of information are cited in the essay (author, year, page #).
Citation details match the reference list.
Long quotations are single-line spaced.
There is a reference list.
The list is in (surname) a-z order.
The reference list is single line spaced.
There is one space between each entry.
All entries in the reference list have been cited in the text.
Not to use Wikipedia reference and your website
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data Order Instructions: Integrating qualitative and quantitative data In examining the suitability of mixed methods for your research project, consider the type and sources of data that would be needed and the benefits, if any, as well as the expected limitations related mainly to the additional resources, skills and robust data integration that are required.
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data
•Review the Required Learning Resources.
•Providing constructive critique on the scope and significance of mixed methods designs.
•Highlighting possible ethical issues and feasibility constraints with the collection of mixed methods data.
•Explaining the most important barriers to the integration of qualitative and quantitative data.
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data Sample Answer
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data
The mixed method research design has been viewed as the most complicated process when it comes to research analysis. For this reason, different tactics which are essential have been implemented for a sound approach and the implementation of the rules of the data coming together. However, the mixed method research design is of greater significance due to the following reasons.
Triangulation: When a researcher uses different sources to look for data validation of each of the method’s findings, (Fielding, 2012)
Initiation: The results from either method may bring out new research questions which require being analyzed further, initiating the other study project with multiple sources of data, (Bazeley, and Kemp, 2012)
Expansion: The researcher tends to develop one technique by using the find of the other.
Complimenting: The researcher complement findings from a particular source with the utilization of the various source of data.
When conducting research, the moral deliberation should be at the front position as the researchers get on ant capable future research. It is vital for the researcher to be by the ethical requirements. It means that the researcher has to consider the following ethical issues:
Confidentiality: Companies might opt to be anonymous, and it is okay to employ pseudonyms for the firms and the person in a business enterprise studied.
Permission: The researcher should not assume that they can video/sound record or even take photographs. It is necessary to seek for approval before undertaking the process and also request permission when in need to employ direct quotation and secure the image of the quoted author where appropriate, (Bryman, and Bell, 2015)
Communication: The researcher is mandated to officially write to the person to be involved in the research highlighting the agenda to be discussed, (Mertens, 2014)
Budget and time constraints constrain the feasibility of the study. It is vital for the mixed methods to carefully consider the access of different source of data in line with the significance permission as well as the extra time required to gather and analyze various types of evidence, (Bell, J., 2014). It is usually impractical for a comparatively green student researcher to get the appropriate time and more so resources for such a complicated and time-consuming manner.
Significant barrier to the integration of qualitative and quantitative data
The most important barrier as far as the combination of the qualitative and quantitative data is concerned different audiences, (Glogowska, 2015). After the researchers have used both the methodology to come up with complete results, they at times feel that they end up writing their results from the qualitative and quantitative analysis for diverse audiences. That is, either the scenery of the content is attractive a particular audience or the notion of the readers and vice versa.
The mixed method’s expectation at times means that whichever set of data draws attention to or employed more or less entirely. The opinion of such expectation of the viewers or readers might cause the researcher to be biased on the keeping out one of the research method or make it of less significance while stressing on the other, (Venkatesh, Brown, and Bala, 2013)
Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data Bibliography
Bazeley, P. and Kemp, L., 2012. Mosaics, triangles, and DNA metaphors for integrated analysis in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(1), pp.55-72.
Bell, J., 2014. Doing Your Research Project: A guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Bryman, A. and Bell, E., 2015. Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.
Fielding, N.G., 2012. Triangulation and mixed methods designs data integration with new research technologies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), pp.124-136.
Glogowska, M., 2015. Paradigms, pragmatism and possibilities: mixed-methods research in speech and language therapy. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, pp.1-10.
Mertens, D.M., 2014. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A. and Bala, H., 2013. Bridging the qualitative-quantitative divide: Guidelines for conducting mixed methods research in information systems. MIS quarterly, 37(1), pp.21-54.
Making Collaboration Forum Work Making it work The discussions that were posted to the Week 5 Collaboration Forum began to examine the process of implementing a major change in the way that an organisation works.
Making Collaboration Forum Work
The Pemancar case study suggested that change agents will inevitably be more concerned with individual and organisational behaviour patterns than with the mobilising of tangible resources. Initial posts to this week’s Key Concept Exercise will have translated this thinking into a range of different environments with which students are already familiar, and thus will have begun the process of applying academic theory to practical workplace situations.
In this week’s Collaboration, your task is to compare the key features of your own organisation’s practice with those described by your classmates in an effort to identify aspects of that practice that could be targeted for improvement.
To prepare for this Collaboration:
•Review the Required Learning Resources from Week 6.
•Review the Collaboration Forum discussion from Week 5.
Making Collaboration Forum Work Sample Answer
Like my organisation’s practice and those described by my classmates, there are a number of key features. For instance, there is an aspect of the bureaucratic standpoint of the executive management, which is visualizing not only a rapid but also a remarkable effect on the firm. For that reason, while it may seem conflicting for those in charge of the firm, strategic leadership is imperative for the senior management in the current environment. This is to say, it requires visionary leadership for workers to meet the set goals. Such goals present open and clear communication regarding the objective of organisational change (Savolainen 2013).
Whereas strategic leadership is important for the attainment of the firm’s mission and vision, Daniel’s goal of implementing change will be crucial in recognising accountability, efficiency and challenges related to equipment. Daniel must be visionary, and acknowledge others, encourage the realization of the company’s goals, confidence, and courage. Building workers’ confidence makes them believe that they are appreciated and part of the company’s future prospects. Apparently, the organisation is in need of revolutionary change. Though it may be conflicting with employees’ interests, it must be executed due to intense competition in the sector.
Another key feature is the disruptive and demotivating environment. In this case, such an environment does not give employees the freedom to be creative (Agbim 2013). In addition, it does not strike a balance between change and continuity. Experts demonstrate change must be viewed as a transition from a given practice or even a reaction to internal factors rather than moving from one point to another (Abdullah & Siti-Nabiha 2012). Again, it is clear that NOVA failed to take into account the environmental factors and simply benchmarked Penmancar with its branches, overlooking the importance of change that gives room for practices. On the other hand, NOVA was keen on searching for a comprehensive strategy to tackle changes at Penmancar while failing to recognise its workplace practices.
In this respect, Daniel should come up with a strategy for defining the organisational goals while aligning them with tasks and expectations during the first stages of change. This is of great importance it terms of enhancing positive attitude as well as behaviour in realizing the organisation’s goals. Nonetheless, job security and social networks at my organisation’s and those described by my classmates are extremely low, and hierarchies are not based on proficiency. Stoltzfus et al. 2011 believe that this is likely to reveal incompatibility and put pressure on the process. However, Daniel will find it challenging to convince the employees to accept the change process. For example, it is may be hard to persuade employees to recognise the importance of change to the firm. Undeniably, for several years Pemancar was making huge profits and realizing its objectives. As such, there is need to ensure that employees understand and accept the change process (Nasim & Sushil 2011).
Furthermore, there is the possibility of abolishing overtime duties, which will enhance the search for extra opportunities. In turn, this will be challenging as the firm will inefficient.
It is also clear that inadequate training as well as competency since there is an issue of incapacity to repair and maintain equipment, which hinders their efficiency. Additionally, the common removal of employees from NOVA can hamper diversity that is regarded as its main tactic of doing things. Without a doubt, there are attempts to implement change as a procedure to meet the organisation’s objectives. Nevertheless, for the company to remain competitive, implementing change is sustainable.
Making Collaboration Forum Work Bibliography
Abdullah, Z. and Siti-Nabiha, A.K., 2012. Leadership and Change Management: A Case Study of Pemancar. Asian Case Research Journal, 16(01), pp.115-132.
Agbim, K.C., 2013. The impact of organizational structure and leadership styles on innovation. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 6 (6), 56, 63.
Nasim, S. and Sushil, 2011. Revisiting organizational change: exploring the paradox of managing continuity and change. Journal of Change Management, 11(2), pp.185-206.
Savolainen, T., 2013. Change Implementation in Intercultural Context: A Case Study of Creating Readiness to Change. Journal of Global Business Issues, 7(2), p.51.
Stoltzfus, K., Stohl, C. and Seibold, D.R., 2011. Managing organizational change: Paradoxical problems, solutions, and consequences. Journal of organizational change management, 24(3), pp.349-367.
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique Order Instructions: APA REFERENCES NOT OLDER THEN 5 YEARS OLD. PLEASE DONT USE WEBSITES AS REFERENCES. MUST BE VALID IN AUSTRALIA.
Student Information Assessment Task 2 (P
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique
art A):
Position Statement Critique
This assessment requires students to demonstrate that they can critique and provide constructive feedback. Students are to provide a structured critique of the provided paper.
Framework (guide only)
1. Is the position statement structured? Does it have an introduction and a conclusion that clearly states the position?
2. Does the position statement relate to the topic?
3. Does the position statement demonstrate adequately the links to the National
Competency Standards for Registered Nurse?
4. Are the references used to support the position statement current and credible (i.e.
evidence), why or why not? (EG. – REF. OLDER THEN 5 YEAR OLD IS NOT RELIABLE )
5. Do you think the author eliminated any important information (i.e. evidence) in
stating their position? If so, please refer to these evidence sources in your critique.
6. Remember when giving feedback it must be constructive regardless of whether it is
positive or negative feedback.
Remember that your critique will be assessed against the criterion-referenced rubric in your unit outline. The above is merely a guide to help you with this assessment task.
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique Sample Answer
Introduction
The introduction of the article expresses concerns related to the fact that there has not been significant funding for research in the last few decades. The introduction begins with an introductory hook that introduces the need for recent data in nursing research. The author, however, laments that such research is not available due to the lack of commitment to support institutions that conduct such research. The article expresses concern over the lack of availability of resources to support research. This concern can be felt greatly by the number of points brought out to justify the need for research yet the funding for such research apparently being unavailable. The paper is very ethical in the presentation of findings as no names, institutions or parties are directly mentioned (Koonrungsesomboon, Laothavorn & Karbwang, 2016).
Analysis of Topic
The topic chosen for the article is inappropriately phrased. The phrasing should be more or less, ‘Resource pulling to fund nursing research in the next five years.’ The conciseness of the topic should enable it to tackle the message without appearing to be a topic sentence. However, the concept of the research is to justify funding for nursing research. The basis of the paper is thus satiable and justifiable.
Main points discussed
The writer brings out the points about 3.1 nurses being encouraged and to some extent are required to conduct further research in their fields. The author also brings out the point on nursing research requiring a lot of population samples to work with. There is also need for permissions to be granted and various permit documents to be acquired. It brings out the need as it exists from the nursing perspective. According to Wertheimer (2015), research ought to be representative of a particular scope or need that addresses a significant societal concern.
About References used
The author is also updated with the references used. The oldest of the references date to 2008 but there are ample references from 2013 and 2015. This makes the work recently researched and very relevant to the current situation on funding for nursing research. The referencing is however short of sufficient evidence from sources. The sources used may be enough for such a short essay but the in-text citing in the paper falls short of research of such a caliber. Chwang (2014) believes that the sources used in a research paper determine the credibility of the research to a great extent.
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique Conclusion
The research will likely draw the attention of the audience and make the final presentation in the concluding note. The conclusion has to be well-placed and with ample hook-notes to capture the reader (Baker, McQuilling & King, 2016). The concluding note of this particular research is the encouragement for society to embrace, support and fund research. The author, however, seems to have eliminated a lot of information concerning research statistics and how they would have changed the scope of the research field of nursing. Credible journals and magazine sources make a research paper more viable than do website sources (Barker, Rattihalli & Field, 2016).
Position Statement and Information Assessment Critique References
Baker, H. B., McQuilling, J. P., & King, N. M. (2016). Ethical considerations in tissue engineering research: Case studies in translation. Methods, 99(Regenerative Medicine), 135-144. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2015.08.010
Barker, L., Rattihalli, R. R., & Field, D. (2016). Symposium: research: How to write a good research grant proposal. Paediatrics And Child Health, 26105-109. doi:10.1016/j.paed.2015.09.004
Chwang, E. (2014). Shared Vulnerabilities in Research. American Journal Of Bioethics, 14(12), 3-11. doi:10.1080/15265161.2014.964872
Koonrungsesomboon, N., Laothavorn, J., & Karbwang, J. (2016). Review Article: Ethical considerations and challenges in first-in-human research. Translational Research, doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2016.05.006
Wertheimer, A. (2015). The Social Value Requirement Reconsidered. Bioethics, 29(5), 301-308. doi:10.1111/bioe.12128
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations Order Instructions: The writer will read this article and constructively offer his criticism of the article.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations
The writer will use pear review article to support his points. The writer should refrain from just indicating ” he is correct or I agree” but offer constructive comments that can also contribute to the article.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations and Guidelines for Creating a Project-Based, Extraordinary Organization
Extraordinary organizations possess certain characteristics in their culture, behaviors, and performance expectations. Ordinary organizations may miss opportunities for learning, may fall in step with the status quo, and stifle innovative thinking. By contrast, in the following paragraph, I will discuss three characteristics that serve as markers for extraordinary organizations: (a) possess a learning orientation, (b) employ systems thinking, and (c) have leaders who embrace killer questions. Using these as guidelines, leaders can create an extraordinary, project-based organization.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations Learning Orientation
Senge (2006) posited that a culture of learning paves the way for an extraordinary organization. Learning can occur both on an individual and team levels. On an individual level, personal mastery is a lifelong commitment to perfecting a craft, skill, or trade, and is the cornerstone of the learning organization (Senge, 2006). Personal mastery applies to both employees and leaders. Therefore, leaders should encourage each employee in the organization to adopt a mindset of continual improvement. Similarly, leaders must also role model this behavior. Paul and Whittam (2015) found that: (a) successful leaders build their tacit knowledge; (b) leadership learning is a continuous process; (c) reflection facilitates leadership learning; (d) leadership learning is a social process; and others. These findings concur with Senge that personal mastery is most effective when leaders demonstrate personal mastery, which sets behavioral expectations and norms for others in the organization to follow.
On a team level, Senge (2006) suggested that “teams are the fundamental learning units in modern organizations” (p. 10). There are two reasons why team learning is critical. First, effective teams are able to accomplish more together than an individual could on his or her own (Senge, 2006). Second, Senge stated that individuals of effective teams grow and learn more rapidly within and because of their teams. Peñarroja, Orengo, Zornoza, Sánchez, and Ripoll (2015) concurred and found that through team feedback, teams improve group information sharing and elaboration, which is an antecedent to learning. However, Peñarroja et al. stated that trust was a mediating factor to this outcome. Therefore, leaders need to establish trust among teams first in order to realize the benefits of team learning.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations Systems Thinking
Seiler and Kowalsky (2011) argued that systems thinking is a necessary business strategy and is a way that leaders can achieve gain competitive advantage. Systems thinking is a paradigm shift away from evaluating individual components that comprise the whole (Aronson, 1998). That is, isolating problems into singular or overly simplistic cause and effect relationships. Rather, leaders who utilize systems thinking to evaluate the interactions, coordination, and relationships of components among and in relation to the system of interest (Aronson, 1998). Absent of systems thinking solutions to problems fail to solve problems thoroughly, or have negative unintended consequences (Sherrer, 2010). Aronson (1998) argued that systems thinking perspective enables leaders to address complex issues, recurring problems, and scenarios in which solutions are not obvious, making for a truly extraordinary organization. Therefore, leaders need to be cognizant of the entire ecosystem within an organization, those derived from the process, procedure, but inclusive of the people and the culture involved (Hornstein, 2015).
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations Leaders Who Embrace Killer Questions
McKinney (2012) posited that effective questions lead to innovation because they fundamentally challenge long and previously held assumptions, experiences, and knowledge, which can stifle innovation. One could interpret this to mean that leaders who successfully innovate do so because they are receptive to growth, challenge, and are intolerant of the status quo. Challenging the status quo is simply about not approaching problems in a conventional manner. Instead, effective leaders help build extraordinary organizations by thinking differently about situations and circumstances (Laufer, 2012). Luntz (2011) concurred, and referred to these individuals as paradigm breakers because they refuse to accept the world as it is; they dream and embrace creativity. The business implication of paradigm-breaking is that good questions and the willingness to ask questions serves as the springboard to innovation. By doing so, leaders can think “out of the box” and be strategic about their business decisions or how they approach problem-solving. This is because the questions themselves probe for a deeper understanding of the customer, the product, and the organization.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations Five Actions to Apply
First, look for more opportunities for team learning. Personally, I enjoy learning, but I have found that much of my learning I have done has been an individual activity. This past year I had the opportunity to embark on a research project with colleagues at work. Through the experience in trying to learn about faculty perceptions about research in an institution of higher education, I have learned so much about others’ perspectives. This has been an eye-opening experience and one which I will seek out in the future.
Second, ask better questions, but also seek to understand how and why the status quo “came to be.” This extends from McKinney’s ideas but also has a root-cause analysis flair to it. I recently had the opportunity to explore a corporate expense reimbursement policy as I have been charged to lead a faculty-driven effort to redesign a professional development fund disbursement process. In seeking to better understand why the current policy exists in its current format, helped me better articulate reasons why we should consider an alternative policy. What I took away from the experience is that effective leaders need to stop and seek understanding in order to better dispel and or challenge the status quo.
Third and fourth, be more people-centered and use face-to-face communication. The first idea came from Luntz. I am comforted by Luntz’s explanation that people-centered is not the same as being a people-person. Personally, I lack charisma or a presence which naturally attracts people to me, as some people do. However, I do genuinely care about the opinions and ideas of others, so I will continue to practice this in practical ways. One way is to use Laufer’s suggestion about using face-to-face communication as the primary method of communication. I like emails because communication can occur outside the boundaries of time and space. However, there is something lost in the richness of communication. Therefore, I will make a more concerted effort to be physically present with others.
Fifth, embrace the “living order” concept more fully. Embrace the living order describes the state of ambiguity, dynamic change, and the presence of unpredictable and unforeseen circumstances (Laufer, 2012). Effective project leaders are able to function successfully despite the chaos of living order (Laufer, 2012). One way I like to make this tangible is to acknowledge (verbally or written form) that the external and internal environments, as well as stakeholders, are dynamic and that deviations from the plan are normal and should be expected. This sets the tone whereby stakeholders are not surprised or have other negative emotions about change. Similarly, I like to purposefully build in review periods and opportunities to reflect upon and make changes based on lessons learned.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations References
Aronson, D. (1998). Overview of systems thinking. Retrieved from http://www.thinking.net/Systems_Thinking/OverviewSTarticle.pdf
Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 291-298. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.005
Laufer, A. (2012). Mastering the leadership role in project management: Practices that deliver remarkable results. Upper Saddle River, NJ: FT Press.
Luntz, F. I. (2011). Win: The key principles to take your business from ordinary to extraordinary. New York, NY: Hyperion.
McKinney, P. (2012). Beyond the obvious: Killer questions that spark game-changing innovation. New York, NY: Hyperion.
Paul, S., & Whittam, G. (2015). The show must go on: Leadership learning on Broadway. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 196-203. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.05.005
Peñarroja, V., Orengo, V., Zornoza, A., Sánchez, J., & Ripoll, P. (2015). How team feedback and team trust influence information processing and learning in virtual teams: A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 48(1), 9-16. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.034
Seiler, J. H., & Kowalsky, M. (2011). Systems thinking the evidence from colleges of business and their universities. American Journal of Business Education, 4(3), 55-61. doi:10.19030/ajbe.v4i3.4113
Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations Sample Answer
Comments and Constructive Criticism
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations and Guidelines for Creating a Project-Based, Extraordinary Organization
As detailed in the material, the author subsequently depicts the manner in which extraordinary organizations posse’s particular tenets that relate to their cultures, performance expectations, and behaviors. The element of learning is constituted as an essential in enhancing the process of innovative thinking that aids in undertaking and managing the complexities of an organizations issues that require the inclusion of a systemized approach of thought in problem solving (Sherrer, 2010). It is however significant that the author of this material would have considered giving a brief definition of an extraordinary organization and the manner in which learning impacts its functions.
It is essential to consider that a systematic thinking approach remains fundamental and purely different from other forms of analysis, an aspect that needed to be distinguished in the article (Hornstein, 2015). In traditional analysis, the primary focus is drawn towards the separation of individual pieces on the elements being studied unlike system thinking that focuses on how the elements being studies interact with other components of the system since these elements interact to initiate behavior. In other words, the material needs to initiate the need and use of system thinking within an organization to establish the manner in which behavior is modeled.
The author of the material clearly gives an indication of how team learning is an integral element in accomplishing organizations objectives. This point would have been supported by depicting the role of leadership in initiating such developments within the team and the skills applied in leadership to capture an affective team spirit (Paul, & Whittam, 2015). On the other hand, the author clearly indicates the actions that need to be applied in establishing the process of learning by clearly giving a personalized example on how this is initiated as experienced in an institution. The author therefore needs to consider providing more examples and definitions in order to build this study as a strong thesis.
Ordinary versus Extraordinary Organizations References
Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33, 291-298. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.08.005
Paul, S., & Whittam, G. (2015). The show must go on: Leadership learning on Broadway. Organizational Dynamics, 44, 196-203. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.05.005
Constructive Criticism and Comments Order Instructions: The writer will have to read each of these articles and react to them by commenting, analyzing and supporting with relevant peer review articles. The writer will have to read carefully before giving constructive comments on the article. APA and in-text citation must be used as each respond to the two articles must have in-text citations with a peer review article to support your comments.
Constructive Criticism and Comments
The writer will provide a reference at the end of each comment. They will be a minimum of 1 reference for each respond to the tow articles.
The writer will refrain from simply agreeing but offer constructive and educative feedbacks to the articles. Each article must contain a peer review article to support the statement.
Constructive Criticism and Comments Sample Answer
Comments and Constructive Criticism
Article One
Diversity is a decipherable source of innovation and creativity, which can provide the foundation of competitive advantage in an organization. Diversity is also closely tied to project management since it is the organizational segment that facilitates its growth and expansion in the specified business arena. It can have an impact on project management as identified in the article (Ozgen Nijkamp & Poot, 2013). Nevertheless, the barriers associated with the incorporation of diversity not only affect communication within an organization and project management but also affect the level of confidence in the employed workforce (Bassett-Jones, 2005). There are other potential problems that might rise such as conflict and misunderstanding within the organization, which can result in loss of competitiveness, low morale, absenteeism, and poor quality of projects. From this perspective, it is evident that Ford needs to conduct an analysis of its primary cause of failure in Indonesia and Japan in order to identify the diversity-related solutions while viewing the entire scenario from this perspective in order to compete effectively in the diversified environment.
Article Two
Working in a culturally diverse environment has several potential benefits such as enhancing the competitiveness of an organization. The selection of teams among employees in designing, constructing and supervision facilitates the management of projects since they bring out the perspectives of each culture from their representation in the formulated groups (Hutzschenreuter & Horstkotte, 2013). However, a major challenge might arise due to the selection of teams, which facilitate the diversified growth of an organization by experiencing challenges relating to the selection of the most appropriate human resource management archetypal. Despite the noted effects of culturally diverse teams on performance, Nouri et al. (2013), still insists that cultural diversity may fail to be a factor to be considered in team performance. Therefore, the impact of cultural diversity teams on the performance of the team is relatively uncertain due to the presence of several other factors and conflicting perspectives.
Constructive Criticism and Comments References
Bassett-Jones, N. (2005). The Paradox of Diversity Management, Creativity and Innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management Journal, 12, 2, 169-175. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8691.00337.x/abstract
Hutzschenreuter, T., & Horstkotte, J. (June 01, 2013). Performance effects of top management team demographic faultlines in the process of product diversification.Strategic Management Journal, 34, 6, 704-726. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smj.2035/abstract?userIsAuthenticated=false&deniedAccessCustomisedMessage
Nouri, R., Erez, M., Rockstuhl, T., Ang, S., Leshem-Calif, L., & Rafaeli, A. (2013). Taking the bite out of culture: The impact of task structure and task type on overcoming impediments to cross-cultural team performance. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 34, 739-763. doi:10.1002/job.1871 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/job.1871/abstract
Ozgen, C. Nijkamp, P. & Poot J. (2013). Impact of cultural diversity on firm innovation: evidence from Dutch micro-data. Journal of Migration, 2, 1, 18. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/2193-9039-2-18/fulltext.html
Analytical Essay on Blowback by Chalmers Johnson Guide to Writing an Analytical Essay
Before reading the assignment, you should become familiar with the following questions. The answers to these questions will become the basis of your
analytical essay.
Analytical Essay on Blowback by Chalmers Johnson
1. What information does the author use to support her argument? Does she use the information to convincingly support her argument? Explain.
2. What did you like/dislike about the assigned reading? Explain.
3. While reading the assignment, consider the elements of the style used in the assignment. Consider such style elements as word choice, sentence structure, paragraph development, and overall organization of the reading. How do these style elements affect the clarity of the work and the author’s communicative effort?
4. Concisely state what the author’s claim (thesis) is. Briefly explain why you think it is the central claim and give evidence to support your claim.
5. Are there any flaws in the logic or clarity of the author’s argument?
. Read the book and answer questions:
1. Read the book and answer the above questions.
2. Don’t fall into the trap of thinking that all you need to do is to summarize the book. None of the questions asks for a summary. (This is not to say that
some summarizing may be necessary for supporting your case.)
3. This is an analytical assignment, not simply a descriptive one. However, a small amount of description may be necessary for you to answer your questions.
. Now you are ready to write your essay.
1. Remember the essay should be between 5-8 pages. Five pages are the minimum acceptable; eight pages is the maximum acceptable.
2. Also, remember that violations of the rules of standard written English will cost you points, so proofread carefully for slips in spelling, in punctuation,
and in grammar.
3. And follow the style sheet of your discipline for citing in the paper. Improper citations will also cost you points.
Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action
Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action Sample Answer
Negotiation Process
To negotiate is essentially to confer or communicate with each other in order to reach a settlement of the matter. Through the negotiating process, the parties establish an agreement and they develop a course of action which has to be followed by each party (Fortgang, Lax & Sebenius, 2011). Assuming that I am the lead negotiator of a small firm as described in the scenario, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of the main approaches which my negotiation team will need to employ to research the government negotiators who will attend the negotiation session as well as the overall operations of the federal government. Similar products produced by the competitors are examined and negotiation gambits that would be used in conducting the negotiation session successfully are described. Lastly, this paper examines the common body language traits which my negotiation team will look for throughout the process of negotiation.
Approaches for researching the government negotiators and government’s operations and Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action
The first approach is using insider reports and industry reports – these would provide very important knowledge with regard to the operations of the government. By reading insider reports, my negotiation team will be able to get information regarding what the government may be prepared to pay for my company’s GPS-guided equipment. The second approach entails asking questions – by asking people in the government some questions, the negotiation team would be able to find information about the government negotiators and the operations of the government that cannot be found somewhere else (Mislin, Campagna & Bottom, 2011). Asking relevant people questions especially people in the government could provide my negotiation team with very relevant and specific information that could then be utilized to the company’s advantage.
Internet search – using this approach, the negotiation team will research about the operations of the government and the individual government negotiators. Moreover, this approach will allow the negotiation team to determine the names of the key government negotiators as well as their titles and positions. Searching the individual negotiators on the internet would enable the negotiation team to find out about the neighborhood where these key government negotiators live in, where they go for shopping, the schools their children go to, and even the church which they often attend. All these information could be utilized in creating rapport afterwards when the process of negotiation starts. In essence, tailoring the tactics of negotiation so that they are well-matched to the individual government negotiators would be helpful (Tomlinson & Lewicki, 2015).
Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action and Similar equipment produced by competitors
At the moment, my company is involved in the production of GPS-guided guidance equipment which could be utilized in many different types of vehicles. Similar equipment that competitors currently produce include: (i) Outback Guidance – this product is a sophisticated precision farming system which is quite expensive and not very easy to utilize. The product uses Global Positioning System (GPS) and is designed for farming use (Outback Guidance, 2016). (ii) The Dozer 2000 machine guidance system from Leica Geosystems – The Dozer 2000 GPS machine guidance system consists of a radio data receiver, ruggedized high-precision Global Positioning System receiver, in addition to a touch screen computer. This product, which is mostly used by mining companies, has a GPS antenna mounted on its topside (Leica Geo-systems, 2016). (iii) The Spirit made by Autonomous Tractor Corporation – Autonomous Tractor Company was established by Terry Anderson and The Spirit, the self-driving tractor which he developed, was Terry Anderson’s initial attempt at a totally automated vehicle. This product is square and gold, and runs on tracks. However, this driverless farm equipment does not utilize the Global Positioning System technology. It works with transponders based on the ground, set up around the farmland’s perimeter and it automatically shuts down upon sensing an obstacle such as a tree stump on its path (Hirsch, 2013).
(iv) Jaybridge Robotics autonomous vehicles – Jaybridge Robotics is a company that specializes in automating vehicles for driverless operation in industrial domains such as mining and agriculture. The company does this through the use of its software and commercial, off-the-shelf parts. The management of Jaybridge Robotics Company believe that the biggest obstacle in making vehicular robotics dependable and cost-effective is actually software. This firm has worked with Kinze Manufacturing in automating Kinze Manufacturing’s line of agricultural equipment (Brown, 2013).
To overcome any objections on quality or price of my company’s product, 2 possible selling points which my team would utilize are as follows. First is that our product is the least expensive compared to the products offered by the competitors, hence they are affordable and cost-effective for the government and the federal government would save money by purchasing our product. Secondly, our product is the easiest to use among all the other products.
Steps in opening the negotiation session
In the process of negotiation, the first stage of the process is the opening session, which is typified by the first meeting or a set of meetings. To open the negotiation session with the negotiators representing the federal government, the important steps which my negotiating team would utilize include the following: step 1: all parties to introduce themselves. At the start of the negotiation session, every party will introduce themselves hence my negotiation team should also do the same (Lewicki, Saunders & Barry, 2015). Step 2: secondly, the negotiation team should seek to understand, then to be understood – the team should ask questions to make sure that the team members actually understand the position and issues of the government negotiators. The team will seek information in order to build their case. Step 3: exchange statements with the government negotiators that show readiness to share ideas, listen, demonstrate openness to reason, and show willingness to bargain in good faith. It is in this step where the negotiation team should describe its product including the price and features of the product and the benefits of using it. Step 4: articulate expectations for the contract negotiation (Fortgang, Lax & Sebenius, 2011).
Negotiating gambits to use
The gambits for negotiation that would be used to carry out a successful process of negotiation include the following: (i) never saying yes to the initial offer. If the negotiation team says yes to the first offer, this would trigger 2 thoughts in the minds of the government negotiators, that something must be wrong or that they could have done better (Lewicki, Saunders & Barry, 2015). (ii) Nibbling – using this gambit, the negotiating team can in fact get slightly more even after they have agreed with the government negotiators on everything. (iii) The negotiating team should ask for more than they are expecting to get – it is worth mentioning that the negotiating team could get away with an opening position that sounds really outrageous if they imply some flexibility. (iv) Being ready to walk away – using this gambit, the negotiating team projects to the government negotiators that they would leave the negotiations if they cannot get what they want (Tomlinson & Lewicki, 2015).
Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action and the Importance of writing a contract which represents my company’s interests
Interests generally lie behind the negotiators’ positions in the negotiation process. In essence, interests are why the negotiator wants the position that they are taking. Understanding interests helps to understand win/win negotiations (Mislin, Campagna & Bottom, 2011). It is important for the negotiator to write the contract which represents the interests of the negotiator’s company because this will allow the negotiator to protect his/her company’s interests in the negotiation and avoid lose of interest. In addition, when the negotiator writes the contract which represents the interests of his/her company, the negotiator would be able to write a contract that (i) maximizes the chances of getting to an agreement that satisfies the interests of the negotiator – that is, the negotiator’s desires and needs; (ii) reaches a contractual agreement that would accomplish its purpose; (iii) reaches an agreement that would last; and (iv) reaches an agreement which would pave the way for other agreements later on in the future (Tomlinson & Lewicki, 2015).
In essence, I would not want to let members of the industry to write the contract primarily because these individuals would want to take advantage of my company. Members of the industry may write a contract which does not maximize the chances of getting to an agreement that satisfies the interests of my company – the negotiator’s company. Secondly, the contract they write might not reach an agreement that would last because my company may not commit to it if a contract is written which shows that my company is a loser in the negotiation. In this case, it would be important for my company to search for a way out of that contract.
Body language attributes to look for in Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action
The common attributes of body language which my negotiation team will be looking for throughout the process of negotiation include Maintaining Friendly Eye Contact: eye contact is a very powerful communication tool between 2 persons since it helps to convey trust, honesty and openness. Nodding the head during the conversation – this helps to defuse tension and build alignment. Other body language attributes include remembering to smile, relaxing one’s body, and keeping an open posture (Mislin, Campagna & Bottom, 2011). These attributes will help my negotiation team to overcome any possible objections or hindrances which may arise in that maintaining a friendly eye contact during the process of negotiation would help to develop a good rapport. It would give the government negotiators the feeling that my negotiators are being honest and clear, both of which make the process of negotiation easy. The negotiators should keep moderately consistent eye contact, although they can look away when processing or thinking since this is natural given that too much eye contact could really be threatening and considered intimidating or aggressive (Tomlinson & Lewicki, 2015). Nodding the head will be helpful in overcoming any potential hindrances or objections since this helps to calm tension during the negotiations and establish alignment. In addition, negotiations could become very intense. As such, assuming a relaxed body posture can really be helpful in easing the tension. On the whole, it is important to ensure that the negotiation process does not become very intense. To reach a successful deal or agreement that would result in a long-term relationship, remembering to smile could help to make the environment friendly for both sides (Tomlinson & Lewicki, 2015).
Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action Conclusion
In conclusion, a negotiation is understood as a process that involves 2 or more persons who try to come to an agreement which satisfies the interests of every party in the negotiation. To research government negotiators and operations of the government, the approaches that would be employed include researching on the internet, asking people questions, and reading insider reports. There are several similar products from the competitors, for instance the Dozer 2000 machine guidance system from Leica Geosystems. Some of the negotiation gambits that would be used include nibbling and never saying yes to the initial offer. The body language attributes to look for include smiling, nodding the head, and maintaining eye contact.
Negotiation Process and Agreeable Course of Action References
Mislin, A. A., Campagna, R. L., & Bottom, W. P. (2011). After the deal: Talk, trust building and the implementation of negotiated agreements. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115: 55–68.
Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2015). Negotiation. New York: McGraw Hill.
Basically, you will need to read 10-12 pages and answer the questions below in an essay form please.
1- Statement of the issue – one or two sentences.
2- Review of the authors arguments – one or two paragraphs stating at least three major points made by each author.
3- Comparison of arguments – at least one paragraph contrasting what each author had to say.
4 – Your opinion – at least one paragraph explaining either
a) why you agree with one of another, or
b)why you disagree with all the authors.
5- Discussion Question – an open ended question that you derive from the readings.
This is the textbook name just in case you need to know or if you want to quote anything. “The Enduring Debate (Norton, 2014)
SAMPLE ANSWER
Statement of the Issue
According to the authors in these literatures, the central theme that stands out is the evolution of the media industry. The authors therefore address some of the areas that have been impacted by the advent of internet.
Review of the Authors Arguments
The first author takes a look at the element of future political journalism in which he describes the manner in which people primarily depended in the newspapers and the broadcast television networks as their sources of information(Norton, 2014). Cable news therefore emerged in providing an alternative to the already existing forms of media. However, the rise of the internet in the 1990s resulted in a dramatic change in communication technology, a factor that has seen the social media networks receive much attention in the presentation of opinions. The changes in communication and technology have therefore wrought different changes in political practices and the manner in which people learn about the government.
Paul Star in the next article articulates the manner in which newspapers are taken for granted. The newspapers according to him remain the center of American politics, culture and business. This author therefore denotes that through newspapers, people are in a position to determine the welfare of the state and determine several elements within the civil society(Norton, 2014). However, the advent of the internet has changed the manner in which information is dispensed within the society. This therefore points out to the fact that there has been a decline on the newspapers that has been superseded by the growth of the internet as a source of information with this impacting how people receive information.
On the other hand, James Fellow through his literature points out on the effective approaches directed towards saving the news. It is essential to note that this author alleges that the news business is being killed considering the fact that Google is fighting to bring this back to life(Norton, 2014). Googles power in this case is viewed as the creator or the destroyer of the newspaper industry. One of the things that stand out for this author is in the number of newspaper subscriptions that are made in each and every household that is quickly falling, a factor that is ascribed to the founding of different communication technologies.
Comparison of Arguments
It is essential to consider the fact that all of these authors argue their cases out on the power on the communication technology within the society. The first author considers the manner in which the society entirely depended on newspapers and cabled news in providing information and news about the factors that revolved around the society(Norton, 2014). The author depicts the manner in which the old forms of media that included pamphlets, newspapers, and the radio and the television dominated the era of ascendency. However, the author depicts the fact that the advent of the interned turned around this factors.
Paul Star on the other hand depicts the manner in which newspapers are today taken for granted. He gives a historical background stating how the newspapers remained an important tool in the American society that would inform the community on several elements. The author therefore laments that the advent of the internet has changed this factors into a new regime that discredits the old forms of communication.
James Fellow also ascertains the effective approaches directed towards saving the news. According to him, the advent of information technology has killed the news business with google trying to fight this back. However, the author alleges that Google may turn out to be the destroyer or the creator of the newspaper industry.
In my opinion, these authors therefore depict the manner I which information and technology has eroded the older forms of information and technology. They therefore give their opinions on the old forms of communication approaches and their advantages during the period. However, they fail to understand that the globalization of the world has changed the manner in which communication is dispensed today. It is in my view essential to consider that the changes in technology are to the advantage of the society since this has made work easier and information so first to get. The society would wait for some time to read the newspaper and grasp information about an issue. However, in this dispensation, there is access to information at the click of a button, a factor that has broadened the manner in which the society views things.
References
Norton, (2014).The Enduring Debate. An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 45-84.
We can write this or a similar paper for you! Simply fill the order form!
Argumentative Essay on Are Organizations Rational In answering this question, please note that you are expected to draw on material from across all the topics on the course so far.
Argumentative Essay on Are Organizations Rational
All essays should contain
a full list of works referred to.
A good essay has the following characteristics:
*It demonstrably makes use of readings (not just the textbook) and course material and references them: an essay is not just your opinion but should be based
on the existing studies of the topic
*It makes an argument, rather than just being a list of points, and that argument can include, but should not be limited to, your own opinion.
*It is structured rather than being a string of haphazard ideas
*It makes the best use of the words available: as you write and re-read what you have written, ask yourself whether every word is relevant to the question
