Engaging the Employees in Change Process Write a paper that discusses how to engage employees in the change process and how to benchmark the progress of a change initiative. Include the following in your paper:
Engaging the Employees in Change Process
A clear introduction and conclusion, with headings for each topic below;
An analysis of the factors used to determine if the change is needed in a given organization.
A discussion of how to determine if an organization is structurally ready to support change leading to a culture of continuous learning, improvement, and adaptation.
A critique of several tactics that can be used to engage employees in the change process.
An evaluation of the effects of change on individual, social, financial, and corporate concerns.
Slide1. Title why every teacher is a teacher of send’ slide 2 teachers standards. Slide 3. Hofstede. Slide 4 statistics of disabilities/SEND. Slide 5 Advantages and disadvantages of SEND. Slide 6 conclusion… slides 7 References. More on inclusion Mary Warnock definition of inclusion. Sources www.gov.uk/government/publication/teachers-standards(on teachers’ standards preamble part one teaching 5 ADAPT TEACHING TO RESPOND TO THE STRENGTHS AND NEEDS OF ALL PUPIL.SOURCE 2 SCHOOL INSPECTION HANDBOOK Page 61 and a more inclusive book on special educational needs and disability SEND
Ethical Questions Raised Are all Laws Moral Ethical Questions raised in Chapter 1: Are all laws moral? Are laws always just? Which is more important, morality or justice?
Ethical Questions Raised Are all Laws Moral
Why is there a difference between the treatment of cases brought under civil law and those brought under criminal law? Should there be a difference? CHAPTER OBJECTIVES: • Identify and describe the basic functions of law. • Distinguish between law and justice. Distinguish between law and morals. • Distinguish between (a) substantive and procedural law, (2) public law and private law, and (c) civil law and criminal law. • Identify the sources of law. Explain the principle of “stare decisions.â€
Ethical Questions Raised Are all Laws Moral
Chapter 9 CONTRACTS: Read and review the case Jasdip Properties v. Estate of Richardson on page 172 and answer the Critical Thinking Question at the end. Also, read the Business Law in Action at the bottom of pg 172. What do you think? Key Terms 1. Sale 12. Promisor 2. Goods 13. Promisee 3. Contract 14. Valid contract 4. Breach 15. Void contract 5. Mutual assent 16. Voidable contract 6. Consideration 17. Unenforceable contract 7. Capacity 18. Executed contract 8. Implied in fact contract 19. Executory contract 9. Express contract 20. Promissory estoppel 10. Bilateral contract 21. Quasi-contract 11. Unilateral contract 22. Tort CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Distinguish between contracts covered by the UCC and those covered by common law. (2) List the essential elements of a contract. (3) Distinguish between (a) express and implied contracts, (b) unilateral and bilateral contracts, and (c) valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts, and (d) executed and executory contracts. (4) Explain the doctrine of promissory estoppel. (5) Identify the 3 elements of an enforceable quasi contract.
Chapter 10: Ethical Questions Raised Are all Laws Moral and Mutual Assent
Read and brief the case Thor v. Willspring on page 185-186 and answer the Critical Thinking Question and Ethical Question at the end. Key Terms 1. Objective Standard 12. Revocation 2. Offer 13. Option contract 3. Offeror 14. Firm Offer 4. Offeree 15. Rejection 5. Auction Sale 16. Counteroffer 6. Without reserve 17. Conditional Acceptance 7. Open Terms 18. Acceptance 8. Good Faith 19. Authorized means 9. Commercial Reasonableness 20. Mirror Image Rule 10. Output contract 21. Battle of the Forms 11. Requirements contract CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Identify the three essentials of an offer and explain briefly the requirements associated with each. 2) State the 7 ways an offer may be terminated other than by acceptance. 3) Compare the traditional and modern theories of definiteness of acceptance of an offer, as shown by the common law “mirror image†rule and by the rule of the UCC. 4) Describe the five situations limiting an offeror’s right to revoke her offer. 5) Explain the various rules that determine when an acceptance takes effect.
Chapter 13: ILLEGAL BARGAINS
Read and BRIEF the following case: Alcoa Concrete v. Stalker Bros. on page 231 and answer the Critical Thinking Question at the end. Key Terms 1. Licensing statute 7. A covenant not to compete for 2. Regulatory license 8. Exculpatory clause 3. Revenue license 9. Unconscionable contracts 4. Wager 10. Procedural unconscionability 5. Usury statute 11. Substantive unconscionability 6. Restraint of Trade CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Identify and explain the types of contracts that may violate a statute and distinguish between the two types of licensing statutes. 2) Describe when a covenant not to compete will be enforced and identify the two situations in which these types of covenants most frequently arise. 3) Explain when exculpatory agreements, agreements involving the commitment of a tort, and agreements involving public officials will be held to be illegal. 4) Distinguish between procedural and substantive unconscionability. 5) Explain the usual effects of illegality and the major exceptions to this rule.
Chapter 14: CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY
Read and BRIEF the following case: a. First State Bank of Sinai v. Hyland. Key Terms 1. Contractual capacity 5. Necessaries 2. Minor 6. Guardianship 3. Disaffirmance 7. Mentally incompetent 4. Ratification CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Explain how and when a minor may ratify a contract. 2) Describe the liability of a minor who (a) disaffirms a contract or (b) misrepresents his age. 3) Define a necessary and explain how it affects the contracts of a minor. 4) Distinguish between the legal capacity of a person under guardianship and a mentally incompetent person who is not under guardianship. 5) Explain the rule governing an intoxicated person’s capacity to enter into a contract and contrast this rule with the law governing minors and incompetent persons.
Chapter 11: CONDUCT INVALIDATING ASSENT
Read and review the following cases: a. Berardi v. Meadowbrook Mall Company. Key Terms 1. Duress 9. Scienter 2. Undue influence 10. Negligent Misrepresentation 3. Fraud in the execution 11. Innocent Misrepresentation 4. Fraud in the inducement 12. Mutual mistake 5. Misrepresentation 13. Unilateral mistake 6. Concealment 14. Unconscionable 7. Fiduciary 15. Procedural Unconscionability 8. Puffing 16. Substantive Unconscionability CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Identify the types of duress and describe the legal effect of each. 2) Define undue influence and identify some of the situations giving rise to a confidential relationship. 3) Identify the types of fraud and the elements that must be shown to establish the existence of each. 4) Define the two types of non-fraudulent misrepresentation. 5) Identify and explain the situations involving voidable mistakes.
Chapter 15: CONTRACTS IN WRITING
Read and review the following cases: a. Mackay v. Four Rivers Packing Co. on page 264 and answer the Critical Thinking Question. b. Ethical Dilemma problem. Key Terms 1. The statute of Frauds 6. The parol evidence rule 2. Suretyship 7. Integrated contract 3. Surety 8. The course of dealing 4. Collateral promise 9. Usage of trade 5. Main purpose doctrine 10. The course of performance CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Identify and explain the five types of contracts covered by the general contract Statute of Frauds and the contracts covered by the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Statute of Frauds provision. 2) Describe the writings that are required to satisfy the general contract and the UCC Statute of Frauds provisions. 3) Identify and describe the other methods of complying with the general contractor and the UCC Statute of Frauds provisions. 4) Explain the Parol Evidence rule and identify the situations to which the rule does not apply. 5) Discuss the rules that aid in the interpretation of a contract.
Chapter 16: THIRD PARTIES TO CONTRACTS
Read and review the following cases: a. Speelman v. Pascal. Key Terms 1. Obligor 10. Implied warranty 2. Obligee 11. Express warranty 3. Assignment of Rights 12. Novation 4. Assignor 13. Third-Party beneficiary contract 5. Assignee 14. Intended beneficiary 6. A delegation of duties 15. Incidental beneficiary 7. Delegator 16. Donee beneficiary 8. Delegatee 17. Creditor beneficiary 9. Partial Assignment 18. Vesting of rights CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Distinguish between an assignment of rights and a delegation of duties. 2) Identify (a) the requirements of an assignment of contract rights and (b) those rights that are not assignable. 3) Identify those situations in which a delegation of duties is not permitted. 4) Distinguish between an intended beneficiary and an incidental beneficiary. 5) Explain when the rights of an intended beneficiary vest.
Chapter 17 and 18: CONTRACT REMEDIES/PERFORMANCE, BREACH, AND DISCHARGE
Read and review the following cases: a. Christy v. Pilkinton. Key Terms 1. Condition 11. Material breach 2. Express condition 12. Perfect Tender rule 3. Implied in fact condition 13. Substantial performance 4. Implied in law condition 14. Anticipatory repudiation 5. Condition precedent 15. Material Alteration 6. Condition subsequent 16. Mutual rescission 7. Discharge 17. Substituted contract 8. Performance 18. Accord and Satisfaction 9. Tender 19. The frustration of Purpose 10. Breach 20. Commercial impracticability CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Identify and distinguish among the various types of conditions. 2) Distinguish between full performance and tender of performance. 3) Explain the difference between a material breach and substantial performance. 4) Distinguish among a mutual rescission, substituted contract, and accord and satisfaction. 5) Identify and explain the ways discharge may be brought about by operation of law.
Key Terms 1. Compensatory damages 9. Reliance damages 2. Incidental damages 10. Nominal damages 3. Consequential damages 11. Out-of-Pocket damages 4. The benefit of the bargain damages 12. Reformation 5. Punitive damages 13. Specific performance 6. Liquidated damages 14. Injunction 7. Foreseeable damages 15. Restitution 8. Mitigation of damages CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading this chapter you should be able to: 1) Explain how compensatory damages and reliance damages are computed. 2) Define (a)nominal damages, (b) incidental damages, (c) consequential damages, (d) foreseeability of damages, (e) punitive damages, (f) liquidated damages, (g) mitigation of damages. 3) Define the various types of equitable relief and explain when the courts will grant such relief. 4) Explain how restitution damages are computed and identify the situations in which restitution is available as a contractual remedy.
Chapter 47, 48, 49: NTRO TO PROPERTY, PROPERTY INSURANCE, ETC/ CONCURRENT OWNERSHIP/ TRANSFER AND CONTROL OF REAL PROPERTY
Key Terms – Chap. 47 1. Property 18. Binder 2. Tangible property 19. Insurable interest 3. Intangible property 20. Premiums 4. Real Property 21. Misrepresentation 5. Personal Property 22. Warranty 6. Fixture 23. Concealment 7. Sale 24. Waiver 8. Gift 25. Estoppel 9. Donor 26. Termination 10. Donee 11. Constructive Delivery 12. Accession 13. Confusion 14. Possession 15. Abandoned property 16. Insurance 17. Fire Insurance Key Terms – Chap. 48 1. Co-Tenants 4. Tenancy by the Entireties 2. Tenancy in Common 5. Condominium 3. Joint Tenancy 6. Cooperative Key Terms – Chap. 49 1. Marketable Title 7. Mortgagor 2. Deed 8. Mortgagee 3. Warranty deed 4. Delivery 5. Escrow 6. Mortgage CHAPTER OBJECTIVES – After reading Chapter 47, you should be able to: 1) Define (a) tangible and intangible property, (b) real and personal property, and (c) a fixture. 2) Explain (a) the ways to transfer title to the personal property; (b) the 3 elements of a valid gift; and (c) the treatment of abandoned property under the law. 3) With respect to property insurance, explain (a) types of fires, (b) insurable interest, (c) the defenses of misrepresentation, breach of warranty, waiver, concealment, and estoppel. 4) Describe the essential elements of bailment and describe the rights and duties of the bailor and bailee.
Chapter 43 and 2: BUSINESS ETHICS/ ACCOUNTANT’S LEGAL LIABILITY
Key Terms – Chap. 43 1. Engagement 6. Fraud 2. Third-party beneficiary 7. Working papers 3. Negligence 8. Accountant-client privilege 4. Privity 9. Due diligence 5. Foreseen users 10. Scienter Key Terms – Chap. 2 1. Ethics 3. Ethical Fundamentalism 2. Business Ethics 4. Utilitarianism CHAPTER 43 OBJECTIVES – After reading Chapter 43, you should be able to: 1) Describe the contract liability of an accountant to her client. 2) Describe for what and to whom an accountant has tort liability. 3) Describe who owns the working papers an accountant generates and whether client information is privileged. 4) Discuss the potential civil and criminal liability of an accountant under the 1933 Securities Act and under the 1933 Securities Act. CHAPTER 2 OBJECTIVES – After reading Chapter 47, you should be able to: 1) Describe the difference between law and ethics and THE SOCIAL CONTRACT.
Practice Profile Story about Nicki Karimipour Workshop Write a profile story about Nicki Karimipour based on watching the interview with her from Module 6:
Practice Profile Story about Nicki Karimipour
“Workshop on Interviewing for the Personal Profile Assignment” – Dr. Julie Dodd & Nikki Karimipour (Links to an external site.) Links to an external site. [33:30]
Be sure to base your profile on the second interview – not the first sample interview on the video. The focus of the profile is on Ms. Karimpour’s experience as editor of the Florida State University newspaper.
The profile story should include quotes, paraphrases, and anecdotes from the interview. Identify the type of soft lead used and nut graph.
Review the rubric before you begin this assignment and again before you submit to make sure you have addressed all the requirements.
Criteria
Soft lead: Soft lead that draws the reader into the story. Soft lead based on the interview and not an essay-type lead or created from the writer’s imagination or speculation. Can include profile subject’s name.
Nut graph Follows lead. Usually the second or third graph. Summarizes the focus of the profile and identifies the person by name (if not done in lead) and includes other relevant information.
Storytelling: The profile focuses on one aspect of the person throughout the article. Includes relevant, specific details. Emphasis on showing not telling. Includes at least two anecdotes. Answers questions readers would have. Avoids vague, generalized or clichéd language. The story comes full circle, if appropriate. Elements of past, present and future are addressed as needed.
Writing Style: Easily understood. Organized and makes good use of transitions. Uses active voice when possible Stays objective. Provides needed context and/or explanation of terms. Uses clear, tight and natural writing. One or two-sentence graphs. Sentences generally no more than 35 words.
Quotes, paraphrases, and attribution: Uses a minimum of five relevant, effective quotes. Also makes good use of paraphrasing. Quotes and paraphrases are appropriately introduced and used in context. The story ends with a kicker quote or paraphrase. Attribution is used regularly and effectively. Attributions repeated during story to indicate the source of information. Attribution typically used at the end of the information. “According to” most often used for citing reports. Said most often used for citing people.
Headline: Includes subject and verb. The brief summary of the story. Not a teaser or question. Should be no more than about 8 to 10 words.
Writing Mechanics and AP Style: Story free of grammar errors, typos, and punctuation errors. AP Style used properly.
Fact Error(s): Story free of inaccurate information and errors or typos in proper nouns, numbers, addresses, dates, and quotes.
Go to this website (Tadawul) this is the Saudi stock market.
Write a report of 3-5 pages. You have also to prepare PowerPoint presentation 8-10 slides. The current technologies are diverse, they are combined easily, transferred quickly from one industry to another. Even if, usually, the technologies are expensive and their creation is gradually becoming a business itself, can not overlook the fact that technology is the most important instrument for sustaining the competitive advantage of the companies with the potential to change the structure of the existing industries and to create new industries.
Sociology Peer Reviewed Social ScienceJournal You are to review a published article from a peer-reviewed social science journal. Also, you must pay specific attention to two components of the study you choose to review: The Methodology and Results! Talk clearly about the methodology in relation to the chapters in your textbook.
Sociology Peer Reviewed Social Science Journal
The expectation is a 3 – 6-page Article Critique, double-spaced, in 10 or 12 font
You are to review a published article from a peer-reviewed social science journal. This may take time to find the right article. Make sure that the article was published in a reputable professional journal that has a review panel for evaluating content and substance. Make sure that the article you choose was published in the last ten years (2001 – present) and that it has a clear research methodology (either subjective or objective measures). Usually, the best way to tell if the article meets the criteria for having a clear research design is by examining the ‘headings’ of the publication. If it has an Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Results, and Implications/Conclusions, then you can be fairly certain that it meets the criteria. Also, a clear research hypothesis is usually present with research questions. If you are uncertain, attach an article to an e-mail and I will review it to see if it meets the criteria as well. The goal of this assignment is for you to gain a better understanding of how research is conducted and published for scholarly review. Make sure that you pay specific attention to the paragraph by paragraph expectation I have outlined in the syllabus. Also, you must pay specific attention to two components of the study you choose to review: The Methodology and Results! Talk clearly about the methodology in relation to the chapters in your textbook. The expectation is a 3 – 6-page Article Critique, double-spaced, in 10 or 12 font. It will be graded on components outlined in the Syllabus as well as clarity of understanding and communicating the processes of the research design and outcomes. Be sure to focus on the methodology and results with a clear understanding of the information as it relates to your textbook.
Peer-Reviewed Article Critiques Expectations of the 2 (two) Article Critiques (3 to 8 pages each is typical):
The articles that you choose must come from a professional peer-reviewed journal, published after 2005, with a clear research methodology. The flow of your critiques should be as follows:
Paragraph 1 should contain the author(s) names, the date, volume, and a number of the publication, the title of the article, and the title of the journal.
Paragraph 2 and/or 3 should be specifically geared to the goal, purpose, or research question(s), hypothesis, null hypothesis, etc., the author(s) intended to examine. These should be clearly stated.
Paragraph 2, 3, or 4 should be a brief historical Review of the Literature. Please highlight the critical junctions in the historical considerations that led to this current research examination.
Paragraph 5, 6 and 7 should deal specifically with the Research Design and the Methodology used to gather this data. Pay specific attention to research techniques, instruments, or methodology expected to accept or reject the research question(s) or null hypothesis. This is probably the most critical paragraphs as it deals specifically with the techniques to gather data.
Paragraph 7, 8 and 9 should focus on the Results of the current study. What statistics were used, what measurement techniques were utilized, and what analysis yielded the current finding.
Paragraph 10 and 11 should examine the author(s) Recommendation, Implications, Summary, and/or Discussion of the research findings.
Paragraph 12 and /or 13 should be your Critical Analysis of the overall body of work. Examine such issues as the research methodology, the statistics used, the research environment, the sample size, the population for the study, the assumptions made by the author(s), the limitations of the study, the potential for further research in this area, the argument for this data to be replicated, any ethical concerns, and the risk associated with this study.
**In this assignment, the focus is on what the social scientist does with the information that they gather. Is it practical or applicable? Does it fall under the conceptual idea of ‘pure’ science or ‘applied’ science? What research methodology was used and could it have been improved on? The best way to find peer-reviewed professional journal articles is to use “Google Scholar” (simply type that into the Google ‘search” space. It will take you to options where you can select “peer-reviewed.” You simply type in your search terms. Many articles are free to view and download. Typically, those ‘free’ links are to the right side as a hyperlink. Simply go through them and find one that meets the criteria. You may also use databases such as “First Search” accessing the “Wilson Select Plus” database, entering in keyword associations in areas that you may be interested in (i.e., domestic violence, elder abuse, demography, psychological profiles, divorce, etc). Be sure to obtain full-text copies that emphasize a clear methodology (a study that includes a sample size and a manipulation of variables). A librarian will best know how to assist you in finding a peer-reviewed professional social science journal.
Specific Topic: PARENT VIEWS ON INCLUSION, CULTURE, and DISABILITY
Students write a dissertation plan which will include the following sections;
My Research Topic ñ why I have chosen the topic and what I already know about the topic
My Research Approach – What theories and research paradigm will influence my research My Research?
Questions – What are the specific research questions I want to try to answer My Research Design – What do I plan to do to answer my research questions (setting, sample, data collection methods)
How will I make my research ethical – What ethical procedures must I follow to ensure participants are treated ethically?
PLEASE USE SOME BOOKS FROM THE UPLOADED FILE INCLUDED. ALSO, USE RELEVANT THEORIES FOR BACK UP.
ED5004 Reading List 2017-18
KORTEXT BOOK:
Mukherji, P. and Albon, D. (2015) Research Methods in Early Childhood: An Introductory Guide. London: SAGE
Parent Views on Inclusion Culture and Disability Main Readings
Bell, J. (2010) Doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers in education, health, and social science. 5th edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education (online and library)
Blaxter, L. Loraine, Hughes, C. and Tight, Malcolm (2006) How to research, Milton Keynes: Open University Press (online)
Brodie, K. (2013) Observation, assessment, and planning in the early years. Maidenhead: Open University Press (online and library)
Brotherton, G., Davies, H., and McGillivray, G. (eds.) (2011) Working with children, young people and families. London: Sage (library)
Callan, S. and Reed, M. (2011) Work-based research in the early years. London: Sage.(library)
Clark, A., Kj¯rholt, A. and Moss, P. (2005) beyond listening: children’s perspectives on early childhood services. Bristol: Policy Press. (Library)
Clark, A., Flewitt, R., Hammersley, M. and Robb, M. (2014) Understanding research with children and young people. London: Sage. (Library)
Farrell, A. (ed.) (2005) Ethical research with children. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education. (Online and library)
Farrell, A., Kagan. S.L. and Tisdall, E.K.M. (2016) The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Research, London: SAGE (library)
Frost, N (2016) Researcher Identity: Prospects and Challenges in Practicing Research: Why you are always part of the research process even when you think you’re not, London: Palgrave (library)
Greig, A., Taylor, J., and MacKay, T. (2013) Doing research with children: a practical guide. 3rd edn. London: Sage. (Library)
Groundwater-Smith S, Dockett, S., and Bottrell, D. (2015) Participatory Research with Children and Young People, London: SAGE
Harcourt, D. (ed.) (2011) Researching young children’s perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge. (Library)
Hirst, K. and Nutbrown, C. (eds.) (2005) Perspectives on early childhood education: contemporary research. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books. (library)
Jarvis, P., Newman, S., Holland, W. and George, J. (2014) Research in the Early Years: A Step by Step Guide, London: Routledge (online and library)
Mac Naughton, G. and Hughes, P. (2008) Doing action research in early childhood studies. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education. (online and library)
Mac Naughton, G., Rolfe, S., and Siraj-Blatchford, I. (eds.) (2010) Doing early childhood research: international perspectives on theory & practice. 2nd edn. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education. (library)
OíHara, M., Carter, C., Dewis, P., Kay, J. and Wainwright, J. (2011) Successful Dissertations: The Complete Guide for Education, Childhood and Early Childhood Studies Students. London: Continuum International (online)
Palaiologou, I. (2012) Child observation for the early years (2nd Ed) London: Sage
Papatheodorou, T., Luff, P, and Gill, J. (2013) Child Observation for Learning and Research, London: Routledge (online)
Roberts-Holmes, G. (2014) Doing your early years research project: a step-by-step guide. 3rd edn. London: Sage. (library)
Family Assessment Family Health Assessment Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment.
Family Assessment Family Health Assessment
Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following:
Describe the SDOH that affect family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.
Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions.
Choose a health model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide a rationale for your reasoning.
Using the model, outline the steps for family-centered health promotion. Include strategies for communication.
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Lopes Write.
Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory
Methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory model
In your own words? Describe each of the below four methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory model
Methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory
– In your own words describe each of the below four methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory model used for final selection decisions. Then, in your own words, describe the pros and cons of each.
– Also, Find and discuss an article that offers current ideas about the topic of our discussion BE SURE TO PROVIDE AN ACTIVE LINK TO YOUR ARTICLE.
Methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory Clinical Prediction
With this approach, the final decision is based on the managers’ expert judgment. With this, the weights arenít always unambiguous. Managers evaluate the candidate based on their experience and if they are good judges of people’s abilities they can easily select efficient candidates with the help of this method. However, usually many managers cannot judge others accurately and this will lead to detrimental results.
Pros:
Cons:
Unit Weighting: This method is simple and straightforward. It involves simply addicting the various weights. Simplicity is the advantage of this method. The disadvantage of this method is that all the predictors may not be equally important.
Pros:
Cons:
Methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory Rational Weighting
In this method, each predictor is given a differential weighting based on its importance. This is much more efficient than the unit weighting method. However, a manager must be capable of clearly identifying which predictor is more important and how much weight to be given to it. Slight errors in giving weights can lead to undesirable results.
Pros:
Cons:
Multiple Regressions: In these methods, weights are based on multiple regression. This method gives higher validity and utility when compared to weighting methods. It is a better choice when the number of predictors is small, the sample size is large and when there is a low correlation among the predictors. However, it is somewhat complex to apply.
Pros:
Cons:
model
In your own words? Describe each of the below four methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory model
– In your own words describe each of the below four methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory model used for final selection decisions. Then, in your own words, describe the pros and cons of each.
– Also, Find and discuss an article that offers current ideas about the topic of our discussion BE SURE TO PROVIDE AN ACTIVE LINK TO YOUR ARTICLE.
Methods or approaches are given in the Compensatory Clinical Prediction
With this approach, the final decision is based on the managers expert judgment. With this, the weights arenít always unambiguous. Managers evaluate the candidate based on their experience and if they are good judges of people’s abilities they can easily select efficient candidates with the help of this method. However, usually many managers cannot judge others accurately and this will lead to detrimental results.
Pros:
Cons:
Unit Weighting: This method is simple and straightforward. It involves simply addicting the various weights. Simplicity is the advantage of this method. The disadvantage of this method is that all the predictors may not be equally important.
Pros:
Cons:
Rational Weighting: In this method, each predictor is given a differential weighting based on its importance. This is much more efficient than the unit weighting method. However, a manager must be capable of clearly identifying which predictor is more important and how much weight to be given to it. Slight errors in giving weights can lead to undesirable results.
Pros:
Cons:
Multiple Regressions: In these methods, weights are based on multiple regression. This method gives higher validity and utility when compared to weighting methods. It is a better choice when the number of predictors is small, the sample size is large and when there is a low correlation among the predictors. However, it is somewhat complex to apply.
Learning Outcome Critique of an Article Critique includes a complete and accurate APA-style reference at the top of page one, prior to the body of critique.
Learning Outcome Critique of an Article
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critique adheres to APA standards, including concise language and appropriate grammar. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critique clearly and concisely states the purpose of the study or review described in the article. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critique includes a thorough yet concise description of methods, including variables and measurements; or supporting arguments of review. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critique includes a thorough yet concise description of results and conclusions; or recommendations or review. This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critique includes potential limitations of study or review.
Critique should be written in complete sentences but must be written in your own words (excluding behavior definitions). Direct quotes from the article are not allowed. There is no pre-specified length for this article critique; think thorough, yet concise (more is not always better).
All critiques should be typed directly into a Word Document.
